
Iranian authorities make sweeping arrests in wake of war with Israel
Advertisement
Rights groups have condemned the moves, with Amnesty International warning against arbitrary executions and expedited trials. The arrests have also raised fears inside Iran that a new wave of repression is coming, as the government seeks to root out spy networks and clamp down on any dissent among the wider population.
Advertisement
Iranian security forces have beaten, arrested, tortured, and executed thousands since the Islamic Republic was founded in 1979. More recently, the regime cracked down on nationwide protests that erupted when a woman died while in the custody of Iran's guidance patrol — or morality police — in September 2022.
In the months leading up to Israel's offensive, the government appeared to ease some social restrictions, while others were tightened. The enforcement of strict female dress codes appeared to taper off in some cities, but the government increased its monitoring of discourse online.
At the same time, Iranian prisons stepped up executions. At least 975 people were executed in Iran last year, according to the United Nations, which said it was the highest number recorded in nearly a decade.
So when the Israeli strikes started, 26-year-old Iman, an engineer from Tehran, said he immediately began to worry about a potential crackdown.
'As long as this government exists, I am concerned about the chances of increased repression, but during times when there's an 'external threat,' the repression gets much worse as they have more excuse to see us as enemies,' he said of Iranian authorities. Iman, like some others in this story, spoke on the condition that he be identified only by his first name for fear of reprisal by security forces.
Over the past week, he said, he has changed the way he dresses in public, wearing less colorful clothing out of fear he could become a target. New checkpoints in Tehran, where plainclothes officers stop cars and question drivers, have contributed to an intimidating atmosphere in the sprawling capital, residents said.
Advertisement
Zahra, 41, an activist from Tehran, she said she has heard that at least four fellow activists were rounded up during the conflict. She fears more widespread arrests are on the horizon, she said.
'The Iranians probably don't even know the full extent of the infiltration yet,' said a Western official who was briefed on the security situation and spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss the sensitive matter. 'So, they are out there hunting,' the official said. 'Suspicions are heightened.'
Perhaps most troubling, rights groups say, is the effort by parliament to make espionage a capital crime. Iran is already one of the world's top executioners, hanging people for offenses ranging from murder and rape to drug smuggling and corruption. The law would give the judiciary much broader authority to impose the death penalty, rights activists say.
And while Israel pummeled Iranian military targets throughout the conflict, including weapons, infrastructure, and senior commanders, the tools Iran uses to crack down domestically are largely intact, according to Afshon Ostovar, an Iran expert and professor of national security affairs at the Naval Postgraduate School in California.
'What Israel has done is really weaken the military as an external actor, but it hasn't done much to weaken it as an internal actor. And it takes a lot less to wage violence inside a country than outside of it,' Ostovar said.
To crack down domestically, Iranian forces 'don't need missiles and drones and jets and helicopters. They just need rifles and big vehicles, and those still exist,' he said. 'The state hasn't lost its ability to monopolize violence.'
But Ostovar doubts Iran's leaders will reflect on some of the more uncomfortable questions about their deep unpopularity and the value of some security practices such as a mass surveillance.
Advertisement
'If they were reflective, they'd realize that the reason why they were so bad picking up the Israelis is because they're focused on every single person in the crowd,' he said. He referred to surveillance programs that cast wide nets, monitoring social media discourse or how Iranian women cover their hair in public.
'They have no way to discriminate who's an actual spy and who's not, because everybody with a bad hijab or tweeting the wrong thing is seen as equal to an actual foreign operative,' Ostovar said.
The Iranian judiciary announced last week that it was expanding its monitoring of electronic communications. Jahangir, the judiciary spokesman, said Sunday that it would also pursue online accounts 'that were cooperating with the enemy.'
Jahangir also praised Iranian citizens, who he said 'immediately provided a lot of information' that led to quick identifications and arrests.
In recent days, top Iranian officials have emphasized the country's 'unity' in the face of Israel's attacks, which killed more than 900 people, according to the government. In his first public remarks since the cease-fire, Iran's supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, said the country 'showed that when it's necessary, a unified voice will be heard from this nation, and praise God, this is what happened.'
President Masoud Pezeshkian echoed those comments. Iranians learned 'not to submit to humiliation and not to bow our heads before oppression,' he said in a statement on X.
Regardless of the messaging, however, Iran has emerged from the conflict 'in a greatly weakened position,' said Gregory Brew, an Iran analyst with the Eurasia Group, a New York political risk consultancy.
Advertisement
'There will be questions about the strategic failures of not only the last two weeks, but of the last two years,' he said, referring to the collapse of Iran's allies in Gaza, Lebanon, and Syria following the Hamas attacks on Israel on Oct. 7, 2023. That kind of accounting could lead to shuffles within the country's leadership.
'So not regime change,' Brew said. 'But changes within the regime should be expected in the months and years ahead.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hill
26 minutes ago
- The Hill
Trump's hidden goal in Alaska was to break the China-Russia axis
The Alaska summit between President Trump and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, was more than a high-stakes encounter over the Ukraine war. It signaled America's recognition that its own missteps have helped drive Russia closer to China, fueling a de facto alliance that poses the gravest threat to U.S. global preeminence since the Cold War. Washington's miscalculations helped build the China-Russia partnership it now fears most. In a world where the U.S., China and Russia are the three leading powers, the Alaska summit underscored Trump's bid to redraw the great-power triangle before it hardens against America. The president's Alaska reset seeks to undo a policy that turned two natural rivals into close strategic collaborators, by prioritizing improved U.S.-Russia ties. Trump's signaling was unmistakable. In a Fox News interview immediately after the summit, he blasted his predecessor. 'He [Biden] did something that was unthinkable,' Trump said. 'He drove China and Russia together. That's not good. If you are just a minor student of history, it's the one thing you didn't want to do.' The remark captured the essence of America's dilemma. Two powers that are historic rivals — one vast in land and resources, the other populous and expansionist — have been pushed into each other's arms by Washington's own punitive strategies. For decades, the bedrock of U.S. grand strategy was to keep Moscow and Beijing apart. President Richard Nixon's 1972 opening to Beijing was not about cozying up to Mao Zedong's brutal regime, but about exploiting the Sino-Soviet split by coopting China in an informal alliance geared toward containing and rolling back Soviet influence and power. That strategy helped the West win the Cold War, not militarily but geopolitically. Since 2022, however, Washington has inverted that logic. In response to Putin's invasion of Ukraine, the U.S. unleashed unprecedented sanctions designed to cripple Russia economically. Instead, the sanctions drove the Kremlin toward Beijing while tightening Putin's grip on power. What had been an uneasy partnership has become strategic collaboration against a common adversary — the U.S. Rather than playing one against the other, America finds itself confronting a two-against-one dynamic, with China as the primary gainer. Western sanctions have effectively handed resource-rich Russia to resource-hungry China. Beijing has also chipped away at Russian influence in Central Asia, bringing former Soviet republics into its orbit. Meanwhile, despite the grinding war in Ukraine, Russia remains a formidable power. Its global reach, military capacity and resilience under sanctions have belied Western hopes that it could be isolated into irrelevance. On the battlefield, Russia holds the strategic initiative, strengthening Putin's bargaining hand and reducing his incentive to accept any ceasefire not largely on his own terms. The uncomfortable truth for Washington is that it risks losing a proxy war into which it has poured vast resources. The legacy-conscious Trump recognizes this. His push for a negotiated end to the war is not a retreat but an attempt to cut losses and refocus U.S. strategy on the larger contest with China that will shape the emerging new global order. Among the great powers, only China has both the ambition and material base to supplant the U.S. Its economy, military spending and technological capabilities dwarf that of Russia. Yet Beijing remains the main beneficiary of America's hard line against Moscow. In fact, sanctions and Western weaponization of international finance have turned China into Russia's financial lifeline. Russia's export earnings are now largely parked in Chinese banks, in effect giving Beijing a share of the returns. China has also locked in discounted, long-term energy supplies from Russia. These secure overland flows, which cannot be interdicted by hostile forces, bolster China's energy security in ways maritime trade never could — a crucial hedge as it eyes Taiwan. Far from weakening Beijing, U.S. policy has made it stronger. A formal China-Russia alliance would unite Eurasia's vast resources and power — America's ultimate nightmare, as it would accelerate its relative decline. The Ukraine war has drained U.S. focus even as China expands influence in the Indo-Pacific, the true theater of 21st-century geopolitics. This is why the Alaska summit mattered. Trump and Putin seemed to recognize that improved ties could reshape the global balance of power. For Trump, the goal is clear: Reverse America's blunder, separate Moscow from Beijing and refocus power on the systemic challenge posed by China. Critics call this appeasement, but it echoes Nixon's outreach to Mao: exploiting geopolitical rivalries to keep the U.S. globally preeminent. Washington needs similar clarity today, not doubling down on a failing proxy war, but easing tensions with Russia while strengthening deterrence in the Indo-Pacific, where the stakes are truly global. Trump's tariff-first approach, evident in his punitive approach toward India, has already hurt important partnerships. Yet his instinct on the U.S.-China-Russia triangle could be transformative. If he can begin to pry Moscow away from Beijing — or even sow just enough mistrust to prevent a durable Sino-Russian alliance — he will have altered the trajectory of world politics. America need not befriend Russia — it need only prevent Russia from becoming China's junior partner in an anti-U.S. coalition. That requires ending the Ukraine war and creating space for a geopolitical reset. The Alaska summit was only a first step. But it acknowledged what U.S. policymakers resist admitting: continuing the current course will further strengthen China and entrench America's disadvantages. A shift in strategy is not weakness. It is the essence of grand strategy — recognizing when old approaches have outlived their usefulness. If Trump can reengineer the strategic geometry of the great-power triangle, he will have preserved America's place at the apex of the global order.


Axios
26 minutes ago
- Axios
Conservationists bring public lands podcast tour to Utah
A coalition of environmental organizations is calling attention to what it describes as attacks on public lands, with a tour through the West that arrives in Utah this week. Why it matters: From wildfires to proposed land sales, Utah's wild places have faced new threats this year amid cuts by the Trump administration and a Republican-led Congress. Driving the news: The Center for Western Priorities is taping a podcast live at Fisher Brewing Company, from 6-9pm Thursday, to discuss the fallout from staff and funding cuts to land management agencies. The big picture: Public lands advocates are celebrating the rejection of Sen. Mike Lee's (R-Utah) controversial proposal to sell off up to 3.3 million acres of public land in Western states. Catch up quick: The National Park Service has lost nearly a quarter of its permanent employees since January, according to a July analysis by the National Parks Conservation Association. Glen Canyon National Recreation Area lost conservation specialists and Arches National Park suspended access to one of its most popular hikes in the aftermath of staffing turmoil this spring. At Zion, the Washington Post reported some bathrooms have been replaced with portable toilets and a ranger said some repairs and improvements were being delayed. Zoom out: In Yosemite, scientists were reassigned to bathroom detail and campgrounds were closed in Colorado's Curecanti National Recreation Area. Meanwhile, Congressional Republicans have proposed defunding the management of about half of Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument. The NPS did not immediately respond to Axios' query Tuesday afternoon. Follow the money: Small businesses in Utah's outdoor industry areas also are strained by President Trump's tariffs and guides are wary of upgrading gear amid projected international tourism losses, Utah Business reported last week.

Miami Herald
26 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
Trump criticizes Smithsonian portrayal of slavery amid call for review
Aug. 19 (UPI) -- President Donald Trump stepped up his criticisms of the Smithsonian on Tuesday, deriding the museums for its negative portrayal of slavery in American history. Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform that he would direct his attorneys to "review" the Smithsonian in the same way his administration has sought to reshape colleges and universities. The post comes a week after the White House announced it was subjecting the influential museum consortium to an unprecedented examination of its materials, signaling it had become a focal point in Trump's efforts to transform cultural institutions. In his post, Trump wrote that museums all over the country are the "last remaining segment of 'woke.'" "The Smithsonian is OUT OF CONTROL, where everything discussed is how horrible our Country is, how bad Slavery was and how unaccomplished the downtrodden have been -- Nothing about Success, nothing about Brightness, nothing about the Future," Trump wrote. Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., reacted with a post on X, writing that if "Trump thinks slavery wasn't bad, he clearly needs to spend more time in a museum." Roughly 17 million people visited one of the Smithsonian's 21 museums and galleries last year. Smithsonian Institution Secretary Lonnie Bunch III, who is the first African American to lead the institution and has held the position since 2019, has previously commented on the importance of acknowledging slavery's impact on American history. "I believe strongly that you cannot understand America without understanding slavery, that our notions of freedom, our notions of liberty are juxtaposed with our notions of enslavement," he said in an interview on Face the Nation in 2021. "And so I think that it's not about pointing blame, it's not about remembering difficult moments just to hurt." Last week, three White House aides wrote to Bunch in a letter notifying him the museum would be subject to a review to "ensure alignment with the President's directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions." The reshaping of the Smithsonian and its galleries and museums has been part the Trump administration's goal to remove left-leaning ideology from the federal government and cultural institutions. In March, Trump signed an executive order directing the Smithsonian to eliminate "divisive" and "anti-American ideology" from its museums, pointing to exhibits that "promoted narratives that portray American and Western values as inherently harmful and oppressive." He also named himself chairman of the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts, seemingly in opposition to its having hosted performances he disagreed with for promoting so-called woke ideology. The move prompted many performances and performers to cancel shows. Copyright 2025 UPI News Corporation. All Rights Reserved.