
University of Mumbai opens CDOE applications for MMS and MCA entrance exams 2025; check details and direct link here
MUMBAI: The University of Mumbai's Centre for Distance and Online Education (CDOE) has opened the online application window for its postgraduate entrance examinations in Master of Management Studies (MMS) and Master of Computer Applications (MCA).
Applications, which began on June 28, will be accepted until July 17, 2025, via the official portal:
forms.epravesh.com/MumbaiUniversity
. The entrance exam will be held online on July 20, 2025.
The MMS and MCA programmes are both two-year postgraduate degrees offered in online mode through CDOE and are recognised by the University Grants Commission (UGC) and the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). This ensures the courses meet national standards of academic and professional relevance.
MMS equivalent to MBA with three specialisation options
The MMS programme, which was approved for online delivery by the AICTE and UGC from the academic year 2021–22, is officially recognised as equivalent to an MBA. Students enrolled in the MMS course may choose from three areas of specialisation: Human Resources, Finance, or Marketing. The programme has a total intake capacity of 720 students, offering working professionals and graduates a flexible route into advanced business education.
MCA programme redesigned for industry needs
The MCA programme has been revised into a two-year structure, aligning with the latest industry demands in computing, software development, and IT systems. With an intake capacity of 2,000 students, the programme is designed to accommodate a wide pool of applicants from across the country. Both courses offer learners the opportunity to upskill through a recognised institution while balancing work or other commitments.
Details available on university's official website
Prospective candidates are encouraged to visit the official CDOE section on the University of Mumbai website at
mu.ac.in/distance-open-learning
for detailed information on eligibility requirements, fee structure, syllabus, and examination guidelines.
Professor Shivaji Sargar, Director of CDOE, has urged eligible candidates to complete their applications well before the deadline to avoid last-minute issues. 'We encourage all aspirants to review the programme details carefully and complete the online form before the deadline,' said Prof. Sargar.
The initiative reflects the University of Mumbai's continued efforts to expand access to high-quality, flexible postgraduate education across India through its distance and online learning infrastructure.
Is your child ready for the careers of tomorrow? Enroll now and take advantage of our early bird offer! Spaces are limited.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
2 hours ago
- Time of India
Drones are key to winning wars now. The U.S. makes hardly any.
FAIRBANKS, Alaska -- On a patch of dirt in the vast wilderness in Alaska, a long-range drone roared like a lawn mower as it shot into the sky. It scanned the ground for a target it had been programmed to recognise, and then dived, attempting to destroy it by crashing into it. But it missed, landing about 80 feet away. On another attempt, a drone nose-dived at launch. On a subsequent try, a drone crashed into a mountain. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category others Product Management Others healthcare Degree Finance Digital Marketing Technology Public Policy Operations Management Project Management MCA MBA Leadership Artificial Intelligence Design Thinking Healthcare Cybersecurity Data Analytics PGDM Data Science Management Data Science CXO Skills you'll gain: Duration: 16 Weeks Indian School of Business CERT - ISB Cybersecurity for Leaders Program India Starts on undefined Get Details These drones weren't flown by amateur hobbyists. They were launched by drone manufacturers paid by a special unit of the Department of Defense as part of an urgent effort to update U.S. capabilities. For four days last month, they tested prototypes of one-way drones by trying to crash them into programmed targets, while soldiers tried to stop the drones with special electronic equipment. The exercise aimed to help U.S. defense contractors and soldiers get better at drone warfare. But it illustrated some of the ways in which the U.S. military could be unprepared for such a conflict. The nation lags behind Russia and China in manufacturing drones, training soldiers to use them and defending against them, according to interviews with more than a dozen U.S. military officials and drone industry experts. "We all know the same thing. We aren't giving the American war fighter what they need to survive warfare today," said Trent Emeneker, project manager of the Autonomy Portfolio at the military's Defense Innovation Unit, which organised the exercise in Alaska and paid for the development of the drone prototypes that flew there. "If we had to go to war tomorrow, do we have what we need? No. What we are trying to do is fix that." Live Events Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth has acknowledged that the country has fallen behind, and he announced a series of new policies and investments in drones that he vowed would close the gap. In a video released Thursday, he cited outdated rules and procurement processes as making it too difficult for commanding officers to buy drones and train their soldiers to use them. NYT News Service Soren Monroe-Anderson, center, chief executive and co-founder of Neros, a startup based in El Segundo, Calif., during a military exercise in the Yukon Training Area in Alaska, June 25, 2025. A four-day test in the Alaska wilderness shows how far the U.S. military and American drone companies lag behind China in the technology. "While our adversaries have produced millions of cheap drones," he said, "we were mired in bureaucratic red tape." The video came on the heels of an executive order signed by President Donald Trump last month called "Unleashing American Drone Dominance," which directs federal agencies to fast-track approvals for American drone manufacturers and protect the U.S. drone supply chain from "undue foreign influence." But it will take time and money to grow a domestic industry capable of producing enough drones to meet the needs of the U.S. military. Although the United States has excelled in developing large, complex unmanned aircraft such as the Predator and Reaper drones, which cost tens of millions of dollars apiece, today's conflicts have been dominated by swarms of smaller, inexpensive drones that are largely produced with components from China. The Defense Department did not respond to requests for comment. Drones have become a weapon of choice on modern battlefields. In the early days of the war in Ukraine, soldiers beat back the Russian invasion by adding deadly modifications to the Mavic, a drone sold to hobbyists by DJI, a Chinese company that is the world's largest drone manufacturer. Versions of the Mavic cost between $300 and $5,000, according to online retailers. DJI, of Shenzhen, China, accounts for about 70% of all commercial drones sold globally for hobby and industrial use, such as aerial photography, package delivery and weather research. The privately held company sells its equipment to customers in the United States -- there's even an authorised store on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan -- but U.S. law bars the military from buying Chinese drones. The company declined to share market data, but industry experts estimate that DJI's output far exceeds that of any other drone manufacturer. "No one even comes close," said Bobby Sakaki, chief executive of UAS NEXUS, a drone industry consultant. "DJI can make millions of drones per year. That is a hundred times more than anybody in the United States can make." Although DJI is not a military company and said it cuts off customers who use its drones for armed conflict, its near-total dominance of the market for drones and drone components has caused alarm in Washington, where some lawmakers want to ban its products so that a domestic industry can flourish. But it will take time and money to grow a domestic industry capable of producing enough drones to meet the needs of the U.S. military. NYT News Service Joey Killeen of the startup Neros, a startup based in El Segundo, Calif., prepares a drone to launch during a military exercise in the Yukon Training Area in Alaska on June 25, 2025. Enter Silicon Valley investors who have been pouring money into American drone companies, anticipating that the Defense Department will place a large order for American-made drones. Peter Thiel's Founders Fund has invested more than $1 billion in Anduril Industries, an American defense technology company that specialises in advanced autonomous systems. Trump's son Donald Trump Jr. joined the board of Unusual Machines, another U.S. drone maker, last year. About 500 companies manufacture drones in the United States, producing fewer than 100,000 a year, according to Ryan Carver, communications manager for the Association for Uncrewed Vehicle Systems International, a nonprofit organisation of industry professionals. But many are startups without a track record of production or sales. Founders jockey for the chance to show off their wares to military units that are beginning to work with drones. The changes Hegseth announced Thursday, which make it easier for commanders to buy drones, will intensify that competition. "Everyone wants to win the Army's big drone contract, get their billion-dollar check and go retire on an island somewhere," said Nathan Ecelbarger, chair of the U.S. National Drone Association, which promotes the rapid advancement of drone and counter-drone technologies. But the exercise in Alaska showed how hard it can be to develop homegrown drone capabilities. The first two days of testing were full of setbacks. Two companies were testing prototypes of a long-range unmanned craft that could fly for hours, navigate without GPS or a human operator, and crash into a target that it had been trained to recognise. They were among four finalists -- out of more than 100 applicants -- to get the money from the Defense Innovation Unit to develop the systems. Two other companies were set to test their prototypes in Ukraine. The craft made by Dragoon, a startup in Tucson, Arizona, experienced engine trouble and then issues with navigation. It failed to hit a target. But on the final day, it recognized a target -- an M113 armored personnel carrier -- and swooped down to crash into it. The hit was considered a success, even though the target had not been the one intended. "We have got a lot of work to do to make it operational, for sure," said Jason Douglas, one of three co-founders of Dragoon. "But those were huge steps." AeroVironment fared worse. At first, its drone failed to launch. Then one crashed into a mountain after its navigation system was blocked, narrowly missing a group of soldiers who stood with their jamming equipment. Although one of its drones flew long distances, and successfully crashed into a target with the help of GPS, the prototype never hit a target once its GPS was blocked. Paul Frommelt, a spokesperson for the company, noted that the exercise was a chance to collect data on "an experimental variant of one of our products." While many small drones are controlled by human operators, the Defense Innovation Unit has been trying to develop semiautonomous systems that can be trained by artificial intelligence to recognise targets -- enemy tanks, for instance -- and attack them even if communication with the human operator is cut. "Do we need a capability like this? Yes. I think that is very clear in the modern battlefield," said Emeneker, who is a civilian contractor for the DIU. But he acknowledged that the project might not succeed. "Things haven't gone as smoothly as I wanted. It's clear that there are some still really hard technological challenges to overcome." NYT News Service Ukrainian soldiers at an air defense position, where they monitor for, and shoot down armed Russian drones, in the Kharkiv region of Ukraine, May 13, 2025. The soldiers who participated in the exercise, most of them from the Electromagnetic Warfare Platoon of the Army's 11th Airborne Division, experienced their own problems. On a mountaintop, they set up six tall electronic jammers, which looked like slender microphones attached to black tripods. They emitted radio signals that were supposed to overpower the signals sent by the drone operators. But those jammers -- some of which were designed more than a decade ago to fight the war on terror -- had hardly any effect. Neither did the backpacks containing newer drone-disarming equipment that some soldiers wore. The team had a drone-buster, too -- a huge gunlike device that looked like something from the movie "Ghostbusters." But no one bothered to try it. "That thing never worked," one man said. Over time, the soldiers improved. By the fourth day of the exercise, they had figured out how to use their jamming equipment more effectively. A black suitcase-sized box called a Magpie worked particularly well, they said. But Lt. Col. Scott Smith, director for the nonlethal effects section of the 11th Airborne Division, said the exercise highlighted how much more work Americans needed to do to prepare for a conflict involving drones. "Their equipment just doesn't have the desired effect against the latest technology," he said. Chris Bonzagni, a drone industry consultant with Contact Front Technologies who helped put on the Alaska test, said many of the American drones that were initially delivered to Ukraine failed on the battlefield because they were outdated or easily jammed by the Russians. "In Ukraine, the companies delivering tech to the war fighters are with them all the time, observing firsthand what is working and what is not," he said. Ukraine has also become a drone-making hub because its soldiers and engineers are forced to master drone technology to survive, something Americans have not experienced yet. The event was held at the Yukon Training Area, a military site about an hour south of Fairbanks, because it was the only place where organisers could get permission to fly the drones while soldiers tried to try to jam them, Emeneker said. The electronic signals used to disrupt drones can wreak havoc with civilian aircraft, radios and cellphones, making it difficult to get clearance to conduct such exercises in populated areas. Some U.S. drone companies do their testing and development in Ukraine. That may be why one drone stood out in Alaska: a small, short-range quadcopter created by Neros, a startup in El Segundo, California, with an office in Ukraine, which was testing a radio. That drone, called the Archer, managed to hover about 10 feet over the soldiers' heads, despite their jamming equipment. Its radio toggled between multiple frequencies, switching every time soldiers tried to jam it. It carried a jar of strawberry jam, a joke from Soren Monroe-Anderson, the 22-year-old CEO and co-founder who piloted it with what looked like a video game controller. Neros, which is providing about 6,000 drones to Ukraine this year and produced the drone that appeared in Hegseth's video, has been described by some U.S. military leaders as their best alternative to China's DJI. The Archer sells for about $2,000 each, making it one of the most affordable models. But Neros produces only about 1,500 Archers per month in a factory where 15 workers assemble them by hand. Monroe-Anderson, a former drone racer, said he was ramping up production and wanted to build a factory capable of making 1 million drones a year. He aspires to compete with DJI, but acknowledged the daunting odds. "It is so much better than really any other company in the world," he said of DJI. "That's the reason why it is important to do what we are doing."


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Yes Bank shares in focus after Q1 PAT zooms 59% YoY
Shares of Yes Bank are likely to be in focus on Monday, July 21, following the announcement of its strong Q1FY26 results. The private lender reported a 59% year-on-year (YoY) jump in standalone profit after tax (PAT), which stood at Rs 801 crore, compared to Rs 502 crore in the same quarter of the previous financial year. The significant rise in net profit was driven by a combination of higher non-interest income and an improvement in net interest income (NII). Yes Bank reported a 5.7% YoY increase in NII, which came in at Rs 2,371 crore for Q1FY26, aided by a reduction in the cost of funds. On a sequential basis, NII grew by 4.2%. Explore courses from Top Institutes in Select a Course Category MBA Product Management Operations Management Data Analytics Artificial Intelligence Technology healthcare Project Management Design Thinking Others Leadership Data Science others Degree Finance Cybersecurity Healthcare Public Policy MCA Digital Marketing Data Science Management PGDM CXO Skills you'll gain: Financial Management Team Leadership & Collaboration Financial Reporting & Analysis Advocacy Strategies for Leadership Duration: 18 Months UMass Global Master of Business Administration (MBA) Starts on May 13, 2024 Get Details Skills you'll gain: Analytical Skills Financial Literacy Leadership and Management Skills Strategic Thinking Duration: 24 Months Vellore Institute of Technology VIT Online MBA Starts on Aug 14, 2024 Get Details by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like If you have a mouse, play this game for 1 minute Navy Quest Undo Meanwhile, the bank's non-interest income rose sharply by 46.1% YoY to Rs 1,752 crore, boosted by improved treasury income. Sequentially, non-interest income saw marginal growth of 0.7%. Also read: Is RIL's strong profit growth sustainable amid rising capital expenditure? Yes Bank's net interest margin (NIM) for Q1FY26 stood at 2.5%, reflecting an upward trend on a year-on-year (YoY) basis. The improvement was driven by reductions in deposits related to the priority sector lending (PSL) shortfall and savings account (SA) rate cuts, partially offset by repricing impacts. Live Events Total interest income for the quarter stood at Rs 7,596 crore, down 1.6% from Rs 7,719 crore reported in the same quarter of the previous year. Interest expenses also declined by 4.6% YoY to Rs 5,224.41 crore, compared to Rs 5,475 crore a year ago. Yes Bank's asset quality remained stable, with improvements seen in both gross non-performing assets (GNPA) and net non-performing assets (NNPA) ratios on a YoY basis. On Friday, shares of Yes Bank closed flat at Rs 20.17 on BSE. ( Disclaimer : Recommendations, suggestions, views, and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of The Economic Times)


Time of India
4 hours ago
- Time of India
Govt to notify revamped model concession agreement for BOT (Toll) projects in a month, says road secretary Umashankar, ETInfra
Advt Advt By & , ETInfra NEW DELHI: The Ministry of Road Transport and Highways will notify a revamped Model Concession Agreement ( MCA ) for Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) toll road projects that seeks to moderate the traffic risk faced by private investors, a top official has overhauled MCA will drop the concept of competing roads and introduce a so-called buy-out principle by linking all parameters to traffic, V. Umashankar , Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Highways, said while addressing the ET Infra Roads and Highways Summit held in Delhi on July 18.'We are doing away with the concept of competing roads and additional toll ways and relating everything to traffic, which means that the need for disputes that are likely to arise will not now arise because these factors have been built in a different way,' Umashankar stated, noting that defining a competing road in India is 'very difficult'.According to the road ministry, 'competing road' means a road connecting the two end points of a highway and serving as an alternative route.'I have come across a case where in an arbitration somebody made a claim that a Pradhan Mantri Gram Sadak Yojana road was also a competing road for a BOT concessionaire,' he said, describing how a 'loose definition' of competing facility prescribed in the MCA creates a dispute at a later stage.'That aspect we are tightening out and the single parameter would be traffic. If the traffic is not up to the threshold or it drops compared to previous years, then a mechanism automatically should kick in. Along with that, when a highway reaches the targeted traffic, then there will be a buyout principle. We can buy out so that we are not locked in and the expansion of the highway does not happen,' the Secretary changes are aimed at removing the 'uncertainty' and to make the MCA and the construction part 'more predictable' so that financing and construction becomes 'easier', thereby helping the highway authority to impose 'quality conditions' upon it.'We are rewriting the model concession agreement where we are moderating the traffic risk that is faced by a BOT concessionaire. There will be built-in mechanisms for extension or compensation in case traffic falls below the threshold and there will be a (revenue) sharing mechanism where the traffic goes beyond that threshold,' said Umshankar.'We are at the final stage of the MCA clearance and, hopefully, in a month's time we should be notifying it,' Umashankar revamping of the MCA comes close on the heels of the government's decision to revert to the BOT (Toll) model for developing highways after a gap of close to a a BOT Model, a private developer is responsible for financing, building and operating a highway project in which he is allowed to recover the investment by way of user charges or tolls for a specified BOT (Toll) Model is one of the key instruments adopted by the government for development of large-scale highway projects, but over the years it had fallen out of favour as developers faced challenges such as delay in land acquisitions, environmental clearance and fluctuation in traffic impacting toll revenues, among the revamped model concession agreement, it is expected that the government will enable provisions wherein changes to concession modalities will come about if the projected traffic undergoes variation by more than 5 per cent, than the earlier 20 per cent threshold, Minister of State for Road Transport and Highways Harsh Malhotra , had said in an interaction with ET Infra revamped model concession agreement related to BOT (Toll) Model is also expected to include significant changes related to land acquisition norms, forest clearances and other aspects related to pre-construction activities.'There were issues with the BOT concept. So, the first part of ensuring that we have a good BOT system in place is if we take care of the pre-construction issues -- land acquisition, forest clearances and others. On this again, we have issued a schedule saying at what time the project will be bid, at what time the project will be received based upon pre-construction activities,' said Umshankar.'Today, we will not even initiate the bidding process unless a wildlife clearance is received because that has an impact on cost. We won't receive the bids unless forest clearances are received,' he the existing norms, developers were exposed to operational risk at various stages of construction and were mandated to commence the work on the project after minimum acquisition of 80 per cent of the land required for the project.'What we (now) do is that we spend a little time on the appraisal, approval process and then the construction time gets spread out. We are planning to do it the other way, spend a little more time doing the pre-construction part and then get into the award so that the construction proceeds ahead smoothly. So, if you do that then you take the project construction risk significantly out of the game,' said government's endeavour to revive the BOT (Toll) Model has come at a time when budgetary allocation has reached a peak, with capital expenditure for 2025-26 at ₹11.11 lakh crore, a marginal increase from the previous year. The ministry and the National Highways Authority of India (NHAI) is now looking more at monetisation of brownfield highways and expressways rather than funding via debt and relying on budgetary that there has been a 'slight dip' in the highway award process, the Secretary said that 'it is also because this is the time to re-calibrate, re-consider and re-think because what we do now is going to stay with us for the next 50 years and that will be it'.The MCA for Hybrid Annuity Model (HAM) road projects will also be revised, Umashankar added.