Slate Auto ditches 'under $20,000' price tag for its pickup EV after Trump's 'Big Beautiful Bill' passes
The Jeff Bezos-backed EV startup previously said its modular Slate truck was expected to start at under $20,000 after federal incentives, but has now changed its website to say the electric truck will be priced in the "mid-twenties."
Slate's website featured the "under $20,000" expected price as recently as Wednesday, according to Internet Archive screenshots viewed by Business Insider. TechCrunch first reported the change.
It comes as the US House of Representatives passed a final version of President Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill," which is expected to kill the $7,500 tax credit for new US-built electric cars from September.
When it unveiled the utilitarian truck in April, Slate said it would cost $25,000. However, the company had been banking on federal incentives, such as the $7,500 discount, to push the price of its first EV under the $20,000 mark.
The company did not respond to a request for comment from BI, sent outside normal working hours.
A lack of affordable options has hampered EV adoption in the US, and Slate Auto's CEO previously told BI the company aimed to help fill that gap.
The startup made a big splash with its first vehicle, with the back-to-basics pickup truck amassing 100,000 refundable reservations in its first three weeks on sale.
Although the base version of the truck, which is set to be built in Indiana with deliveries beginning in 2026, will lack frills such as screens, radios, or power windows, Slate says it will be heavily customizable.
Buyers will be able to buy over 100 accessories, ranging from personalized wraps to an "SUV kit" that transforms the Slate truck into a five-person people carrier.
The average price of an EV in the US is already almost $10,000 more expensive than its combustion-engine equivalent, and experts have warned that the scrapping of the $7,500 tax credit will make electric cars even more unaffordable.
A report by Harvard University's Salata Institute in March found that removing the tax credit would result in a 15% hit to expected EV sales by 2030, and 20 million metric tons extra of CO2 emissions over the same time period.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Insider
an hour ago
- Business Insider
We asked 3 autonomous driving experts to comment on Tesla's robotaxi launch and break down videos of some of its errors
Tesla's robotaxis are finally on the road — and on camera. The lucky few who got to ride Tesla robotaxis after last month's launch posted videos of their rides online, and it didn't take long for viewers to identify possible errors by the driverless vehicles. Business Insider asked autonomous driving experts to review those videos and share their thoughts on what they saw, and what might need to be changed before Tesla scales up its long-awaited product. Tesla's robotaxis launched on Sunday, June 22, in a limited area in Austin. Its "early access rides" were only available to a group of Tesla influencers and investors, who have been live-streaming and posting about their rides. Most of the rides appear to have gone smoothly, but there have been some hiccups. According to the posted videos, the list of robotaxi issues includes speeding more than 10 miles above the limit, driving into the wrong lane, incidents of random braking, issues with the pullover button, and at least two interventions from the safety monitor due to parking issues. The three autonomous driving experts told Business Insider about how they think the launch went, and what may have prompted robotaxi issues caught on camera. BI called the influencers and investors to ask about their rides, but did not hear back. Tesla did not respond to a detailed request for comment from Business Insider. The vision-only robotaxi design Robotaxi uses an advanced version of Tesla's Full Self‑Driving (FSD) software as its central system, complete with eight cameras installed around the vehicle to capture 360° visual data. The vehicles do not use any radar or lidar, unlike competitor Waymo, whose cars rely on multiple ways to sense the environment. Lidar uses laser light pulses to scan the environment, while radar detects objects with radio waves. Raj Rajkumar, professor of engineering at Carnegie Mellon University, told BI that while issues with pullover and even driving into the wrong lane could likely be fixed through more training data, incidents of what he described as "phantom braking" may have exposed a flaw in the robotaxi design. In one video he saw, YouTuber Kim Java was on a robotaxi ride when, according to the video, it braked with nothing obstructing it, causing her belongings to fall to the floor. Java, a YouTuber specializing in tech and clean energy with more than 250 thousand subscribers, can be seen in the video saying, "That's something that people have talked about being one of the limitations of Full Self-Driving with robotaxi," immediately after the braking incident. "To process camera data, one has to use AI and machine learning," Rajkumar said. "But hallucinations are an integral part of how AI operates, and once you hallucinate, phantom braking ends up happening, so a camera-only solution will not be sufficient for a very long time." "Imagine being on the freeway at 65 mph and the car suddenly brakes for a phantom object, and there is an 18-wheeler semi truck behind you, and they cannot stop," Rajkumar added. "It could be extremely dangerous, depending on what's happening around you." Steven Shladover, lead researcher at the Partners for Advanced Transportation Technology program at the University of California, Berkeley, told BI he is concerned that Tesla's camera-only approach without lidar or radar will eventually lead to passenger injuries without intervention. Shladover reviewed a range of different Tesla robotaxi mishaps, including an apparent incident of speeding and veering into the wrong lane, in addition to the sudden braking. "Automated driving needs a combination of sensor data from cameras, radars, and lidars, as well as precise localization relative to a high-accuracy digital map of the roadway environment and other data such as the local rules of the road and speed limits," said Shladover. "Phantom braking" is a known phenomenon in some Tesla software systems. Tesla is facing a class-action lawsuit over alleged phantom braking in its Autopilot system, which is "an advanced driver assistance system" that is different from the supervised version of Full Self-Driving. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration also launched an investigation into Tesla Model 3 and Model Y vehicles in 2022 after more than 750 drivers complained to the agency that their Teslas suddenly slammed on the brakes at high speeds while on Autopilot. The investigation and evaluation are still ongoing. In the same year, a Tesla driver who told police they were using the supervised Full Self-Driving was caught in an eight-car pileup due to sudden and unexpected braking. CNN first reported this incident in December 2022, and Tesla did not respond to their requests for comments. Tesla CEO Elon Musk addressed phantom braking complaints in 2020 on what was then Twitter, but he has not commented further since then. "Is the issue of phantom braking fixed in this release?" user EV-HQ asked in October 2020. "Has been a number of people talking about this recently." "It should be," Musk replied, following up with, "Meant to say that it should be fixed in the latest wide release. Won't need to wait for FSD." Tesla's robotaxis need more training Autonomous driving experts are saying "not so fast" when it comes to replacing human drivers entirely, especially for Tesla's robotaxis. Tesla CEO Elon Musk said prior to the launch that a human safety monitor would accompany each robotaxi in the passenger seat out of an abundance of caution. From what can be seen in the videos, the human monitor can halt the vehicle by pressing an "In Lane Stop" button on the touchscreen. This feature can be seen used in a video where a safety monitor stopped a robotaxi from colliding with a reversing UPS truck as the vehicle attempted to park itself. The video in question is posted by Dave Lee, an early Tesla investor and a YouTuber with more than 230,000 subscribers. "There are real robotaxis on American roads, but none is a Tesla," Bryant Walker Smith, a professor in engineering and law at the University of South Carolina, told BI. "Tesla is still relying on safety drivers for its Austin demo — and rightly so, because its technology is immature." "There is a huge difference between launching without safety drivers and testing or demoing with them, akin to climbing up a giant cliff with or without a harness and rope," Smith added. It is common for autonomous vehicles to launch with a safety driver first. Waymo's early vehicles, including those in its public pilot programs, initially included a safety driver in the driver's seat. The Wayve self-driving car, which recently launched in London, also comes with a safety driver. It is also common for robotaxis to experience incidents, even years after initial launch. In 2024, Waymo recalled its vehicles twice, once for a fleet of 670 cars after an unoccupied robotaxi hit a telephone pole in Phoenix. Cruise's robotaxis repeatedly caused jams on city roads after launching in San Francisco in 2022. In 2023, a Cruise vehicle dragged a pedestrian initially hit by a human driver for an additional 20 feet instead of stopping, which led to the company's robotaxi business folding. Rajkumar said that Tesla robotaxi is "extremely geofenced" to a region of Austin that, based on screenshots, seems to span 5.5 to 6 miles east to west and 3.5 to 4 miles north to south. Waymo, too, has limits on where it can go, and it is unable to drive freeways in most of the cities it operates in. Rajkumar called the launch "a good start," but said there is still a way to go before the Tesla robotaxi could handle unfamiliar situations on its own, completely free of human intervention. "There is a very long list of things that happen in real life that we do not anticipate when we drive," Rajkumar said. "But we are very intelligent creatures, we know how the world operates and we can decide to take action on it on the fly, even if it's something that we have never ever seen before."
CNBC
an hour ago
- CNBC
Trump says tariff letters to 12 countries signed, going out Monday
U.S. President Donald Trump said he had signed letters to 12 countries outlining the various tariff levels they would face on goods they export to the United States, with the "take it or leave it" offers to be sent out on Monday. Trump, speaking to reporters aboard Air Force One as he traveled to New Jersey, declined to name the countries involved, saying that would be made public on Monday. Trump had earlier on Thursday told reporters that he expected a first batch of letters to go out on Friday, a national holiday in the United States, though the date has now shifted. In a global trade war that has upended financial markets and set off a scramble among policymakers to guard their economies, Trump in April announced a 10% base tariff rate and additional amounts for most countries, some ranging as high as 50%. However, all but the 10% base rate were subsequently suspended for 90 days to allow more time for negotiations to secure deals. That period ends on July 9, although Trump early on Friday said the tariffs could be even higher — ranging up to 70% — with most set to go into effect August 1. "I signed some letters and they'll go out on Monday, probably twelve," Trump said, when asked about his plans on the tariff front. "Different amounts of money, different amounts of tariffs." Trump and his top aides initially said they would launch negotiations with scores of countries on tariff rates, but the U.S. president has soured on that process after repeated setbacks with major trading partners, including Japan and the European Union. He touched on that briefly late on Friday, telling reporters: "The letters are better ... much easier to send a letter." He did not address his prediction that some broader trade agreements could be reached before the July 9 deadline. The shift in the White House's strategy reflects the challenges of completing trade agreements on everything from tariffs to non-tariff barriers such as bans on agricultural imports, and especially on an accelerated timeline. Most past trade agreements have taken years of negotiations to complete. The only trade agreements reached to date are with Britain, which reached a deal in May to keep a 10% rate and won preferential treatment for some sectors including autos and aircraft engines, and with Vietnam, cutting tariffs on many Vietnamese goods to 20% from his previously threatened 46%. Many U.S. products would be allowed to enter Vietnam duty free. A deal expected with India has failed to materialize, and EU diplomats on Friday said they have failed to achieve a breakthrough in trade negotiations with the Trump administration, and may now seek to extend the status quo to avoid tariff hikes.
Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Republicans Issued Warning on 2026 Midterms
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Republicans have been warned that the party's recent passage of the One Big Beautiful Bill Act could have dramatic repercussions in the 2026 midterm elections. Karl Rove, a longtime GOP strategist, said on Fox News's America's Newsroom: "I think it'll have a huge impact on 2026, because, remember, as these changes, particularly the Medicaid changes come into effect, they're going to have, people are going to be losing their coverage." Why It Matters President Donald Trump's Big Beautiful Bill, a taxation and spending package, narrowly passed the House of Representatives on Thursday by 218 votes against 214, having been approved by the Senate earlier in the week thanks to vice president JD Vance's tiebreaking vote. Trump signed the bill into law on Friday. The flagship legislation contains an array of tax and spending measures. Tax cuts Trump introduced in 2017 would be made permanent, while state and local tax deductions would increase from $10,000 to $40,000—primarily benefiting those living in high-tax states. The bill also includes additional funding for border security and the military and cuts to Medicaid and food stamps. It also raises the national debt ceiling and the Congressional Budget Office projects it will add $2.4 trillion to the U.S. federal debt. What To Know Republicans advanced sweeping policy changes with the bill, imposing 80-hour-per-month work requirements on able-bodied Medicaid recipients and introducing stricter eligibility checks. The legislation will reduce federal funding for Medicaid and food assistance, which is likely to result in millions losing coverage. Overall, Rove backed the legislation, commenting: "The able-bodied—think about it, there was an interesting study done of able-bodied people on Medicaid, and … you know what their No. 1 activity was if they weren't working? It was watching television. And No. 2 was playing online games." The GOP strategist praised work requirements but cautioned Republican leaders that "the work is just beginning," urging continued advocacy to justify these changes to voters. Rove said: "Medicaid was meant for poor seniors, for children in poor families, and for the disabled, and we should not be paying for health care for people who are able-bodied, and can work, and are refusing to work. This is why they got to go on the offense. But yeah, it's going to be a big impact." Meanwhile, Democrats and critics warn the cuts could energize opposition and threaten Republican lawmakers' control of Congress in closely divided districts. What People Are Saying Speaking to Newsweek Gianno Caldwell, a conservative commentator and Fox News contributor, said: "BBB [Big Beautiful Bill] is what the American people have been demanding for decades. Putting the American People First, less taxes, support of the working and middle classes and cutting taxes for every American. Trump kept his promise and the American people won." Mark Shanahan, an American politics expert who teaches at the University of Surrey in the U.K., told Newsweek: "The cuts to America's safety net may bite hardest. While the tightening of the rules around SNAP won't come into play until 2028, Democrats have the chance to weaponize the changes in Medicaid around work requirements, six-month reenrolments, and, especially, the cut in provider tax. "At an individual level, millions of poorer Americans—many firmly in the MAGA camp—will see their benefits cut, while, at community level, we're likely to see a slew of rural hospital closures. There are many more Americans on Medicaid than there are billionaires, and this bill skews heavily against the poor. The White House may have calculated that these people don't vote anyway, but history says Americans vote on how healthy their wallet feels. By November 2026, for many, their wallets may be on life support." File photo: President Donald Trump speaks to journalists aboard Air Force One on July 4, 2025. File photo: President Donald Trump speaks to journalists aboard Air Force One on July 4, 2025. BRENDAN SMIALOWSKI/AFP/GETTY Dafydd Townley, a U.S. focused political scientist at the University of Portsmouth in southern England, told Newsweek: "The Big Beautiful Bill could prove costly to the Republican Party if the promised tax cut benefits are not felt universally. Concerns over Medicaid and the closure of rural hospitals are also unlikely to be welcomed but Republicans in close-fought districts. While there is likely to be some pushback against the incumbent party, the Republicans have a tiny majority in the House and will be determined to minimize this. If the House does flip to the Democrats in 2028, there will undoubtedly be two years of political stalemate as it's unlikely there will be any bipartisan collaboration, much like the last two years of the first Trump administration." Matt Terrill, a managing partner at consultancy firm Firehouse Strategies, told Newsweek: "This will be an asset to President Donald Trump and Republicans given this is the president delivering on the promises he made on the campaign trail—from tax cuts, to border security, etc., and those who voted for the president and congressional Republicans expected them to deliver on these core campaign promises. "In addition, this bill, particularly the tax cuts component, was crucial with respect to providing the president the ability to execute his economic agenda. Without this bill, he would not have been able to do so, and the upcoming midterm elections will primarily be about the economy. "However, for this to be a sustained win for the White House and for the GOP, particularly heading into the midterm elections, it comes down to where the economy will be over the next few months. Heading into the midterms, if the economy is strong, this bill will not just be a micro win but a macro win as well." What Happens Next The next midterm elections are scheduled to take place on Tuesday, November 3, 2026. Currently, the Republicans have a narrow majority in both the Senate and House and losing either would make it significantly more difficult to pass President Donald Trump's policy agenda.
