logo
Stone Age humans extracted animal teeth with flames, blades, and fleshy stews

Stone Age humans extracted animal teeth with flames, blades, and fleshy stews

Yahoo25-06-2025
In prehistoric communities across what is now northeastern Europe, decorative ornaments with animal teeth were a regular cultural practice. These decorative ornaments that have been dug up in gravesites of Stone Age hunter gatherers offer some insight into the daily lives of our ancestors.
How the people in these settlements best removed the teeth from animal skulls has been a mystery. To figure out the potential answer, a team of archaeologists tested seven different teeth extraction methods. The findings are detailed in a study published June 20 in the journal Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences and reveal the two most effective methods. It also demonstrates that daily survival, individuality, and symbolism were quite intertwined in ancient societies.
[ Related: Butchered skulls point to Europe's Ice Age cannibals. ]
The study centers on the Zvejnieki cemetery site in northern Latvia. Dating back to about 7500 to 2500 BCE, more than 2,000 animal teeth have been excavated from the various graves. Earlier studies focused on the symbolic and decorative roles of these ornaments in burial rituals. Depending on the environment, the teeth of different carnivores and mammals, including bison, elk, reindeer, wild boar, wild horse, and even humans, have been used in these ornaments in northern Europe and beyond.
To determine how the people living here extracted the teeth, the team on this study used experimental archaeology to test seven different extraction methods:
Cutting– using blades can be used to cut teeth from the animal's jaw bones
Percussion–crushing the jaw bones using cobbles and wooden tools to loosen the teeth
Scavenging/air-drying–leaving the jaw bone outdoors for an extended period of time to soften the bone and decompose the soft tissues to extract the teeth by hand
Soaking–soaking a jaw bone for several weeks to soften the bone and decompose the soft tissues so that the teeth can be extracted by hand
Direct heat/fire–exposing the jaw to direct heat from an open fire to dry out the bone and extract the teeth
Wet cooking–simmering the jaw in a ceramic pot to allow the tissues to detach and extract the teeth by hand
Pit steaming–placing the entire head in a cooking pit to detach the soft tissues
They found that wet cooking and pit steaming were the most effective techniques. Both allowed for high extraction rates, without damaging the teeth. Using wet cooking and pit steaming also ensured that the meat was edible and the bones could be used to make tools–ensuring that nothing on the animal was wasted.
'Our experiments show that tooth extraction was a deliberate, time-sensitive process embedded in daily life, especially cooking practices,' Aija Macāne, a study co-author and zooarchaeologist at the University of Helsinki in Finland, said in a statement. 'This challenges the assumption that teeth used for ornaments were simply scavenged or easily available.'
According to the team, these findings indicate that tooth extraction was not merely a functional task, but served an integral role in broader cultural practices. Extracting these animal teeth intertwined food prep, making personal items to wear, and burial and death rituals. The study also calls for a reevaluation of what archeologists call the chaîne opératoire—or the sequence of actions that are involved in artifact production. A reassessment looking particularly at both ornament making and human–animal relationships could yield more insight into these millennia-old practices
The team hopes that this work inspires further studies into the early stages of ornament production, including comparing prehistoric butchery practices and the extraction of both human and carnivore teeth.
'By better understanding the extraction process, we gain deeper insight into the life histories of tooth pendants—from animal capture and processing, to ornament crafting, use, and final deposition,' said Macāne.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stone Age humans were picky about which rocks they used for making tools, study finds
Stone Age humans were picky about which rocks they used for making tools, study finds

Yahoo

time10 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Stone Age humans were picky about which rocks they used for making tools, study finds

Ancient Humans-Stone Tools WASHINGTON (AP) — Early human ancestors during the Old Stone Age were more picky about the rocks they used for making tools than previously known, according to research published Friday. Not only did these early people make tools, they had a mental picture of where suitable raw materials were located and planned ahead to use them, traveling long distances. By around 2.6 million years ago, early humans had developed a method of pounding rocks together to chip off sharp flakes that could be used as blades for butchering meat. This allowed them to feast on large animals like hippos that gathered near a freshwater spring at the Nyayanga archaeological site in Kenya. 'But hippo skin is really tough" — and not all rocks were suitable for creating blades sharp enough to pierce hippo skin, said co-author Thomas Plummer, a paleoanthropologist at Queens College of the City University of New York. Co-author Emma Finestone of the Cleveland Museum of Natural History added: 'When we think about stone tools, not every rock is equal in terms of the quality of tools.' At the Nyayanga site, researchers found durable blades made of quartzite, a rock material that they traced to streambeds and other locations around 8 miles (13 kilometers) away. The new research appears in the journal Science Advances. 'This suggests they've got a mental map of where different resources are distributed across the landscape,' said co-author Rick Potts of the Smithsonian's Human Origins Program. Previously, researchers had assumed the stones may have been found within just a mile or so of the freshwater spring site. The new study shows that 'these early humans were thinking ahead. This is probably the earliest time we have in the archaeological record an indication of that behavior,' said Eric Delson, a paleoanthropologist at the American Museum of Natural History, who was not involved in the research. The oldest previously known example of early human ancestors transporting raw materials for tool-making was about 600,000 years later than the Nyayanga site. Researchers said it's unclear who these early toolmakers were — whether members of the Homo genus or a related but extinct branch of the family tree, such as Paranthropus. Homo sapiens did not arise until much later, around 300,000 years ago. But the knack for seeking out the best raw materials to make simple technology dates back nearly 3 million years. 'We today are a species that's still technology-dependent — using tools to spread around the world and adapt to different environments,' said Finestone. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content. Solve the daily Crossword

Stone Age humans were picky about which rocks they used for making tools, study finds
Stone Age humans were picky about which rocks they used for making tools, study finds

Associated Press

time11 hours ago

  • Associated Press

Stone Age humans were picky about which rocks they used for making tools, study finds

WASHINGTON (AP) — Early human ancestors during the Old Stone Age were more picky about the rocks they used for making tools than previously known, according to research published Friday. Not only did these early people make tools, they had a mental picture of where suitable raw materials were located and planned ahead to use them, traveling long distances. By around 2.6 million years ago, early humans had developed a method of pounding rocks together to chip off sharp flakes that could be used as blades for butchering meat. This allowed them to feast on large animals like hippos that gathered near a freshwater spring at the Nyayanga archaeological site in Kenya. 'But hippo skin is really tough' — and not all rocks were suitable for creating blades sharp enough to pierce hippo skin, said co-author Thomas Plummer, a paleoanthropologist at Queens College of the City University of New York. Co-author Emma Finestone of the Cleveland Museum of Natural History added: 'When we think about stone tools, not every rock is equal in terms of the quality of tools.' At the Nyayanga site, researchers found durable blades made of quartzite, a rock material that they traced to streambeds and other locations around 8 miles (13 kilometers) away. The new research appears in the journal Science Advances. 'This suggests they've got a mental map of where different resources are distributed across the landscape,' said co-author Rick Potts of the Smithsonian's Human Origins Program. Previously, researchers had assumed the stones may have been found within just a mile or so of the freshwater spring site. The new study shows that 'these early humans were thinking ahead. This is probably the earliest time we have in the archaeological record an indication of that behavior,' said Eric Delson, a paleoanthropologist at the American Museum of Natural History, who was not involved in the research. The oldest previously known example of early human ancestors transporting raw materials for tool-making was about 600,000 years later than the Nyayanga site. Researchers said it's unclear who these early toolmakers were — whether members of the Homo genus or a related but extinct branch of the family tree, such as Paranthropus. Homo sapiens did not arise until much later, around 300,000 years ago. But the knack for seeking out the best raw materials to make simple technology dates back nearly 3 million years. 'We today are a species that's still technology-dependent — using tools to spread around the world and adapt to different environments,' said Finestone. ___ The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute's Department of Science Education and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store