logo
A million more Afghans could be sent back from Iran, Red Cross warns

A million more Afghans could be sent back from Iran, Red Cross warns

Straits Times08-07-2025
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox
GENEVA - The Red Cross said on Tuesday it is bracing for another 1 million people to be sent back from Iran to Afghanistan amid mass deportations that humanitarians say are placing a heavy strain on the aid system.
Over 1.2 million people have been returned to Afghanistan from Iran since the start of this year, according to data from the U.N. refugee agency, with the number of returns surging since Iran and Israel launched strikes on each other last month.
Sami Fakhouri, Head of Delegation for Afghanistan at the International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies, said he witnessed bus loads of people returning to a border crossing at the Islam Qala border in Herat province in recent days.
"(We) are anticipating that an additional one million people, possibly more, may return from Iran to Afghanistan by the end of this year," he told reporters at a Geneva press briefing, voicing concern about their futures with many having left their home country years ago and were now homeless.
"The majority didn't have a say in coming back. They were put on buses and driven to the border," he said.
Afghanistan is already battling a humanitarian crisis and aid groups worry that the new arrivals from Iran - on top of hundreds of thousands pressured to return from Pakistan - risks further destabilising the country.
Fakhouri said the IFRC appeal for 25 million Swiss francs ($31.40 million) to help returning Afghans at the border and in transit camps is only 10% funded, voicing concerns about whether it could maintain support for people.
Babar Baloch, a spokesperson at the U.N. refugee agency, said tens of thousands were arriving from Iran daily with over 50,000 crossing on July 4.
He also voiced concerns about family separations.
"The psychological scars are going to stay with Afghans who have been made to come back to the country in this way,' he said at the same press briefing. REUTERS
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wreck of WWII Imperial Japanese Navy destroyer Teruzuki found 83 years after sinking
Wreck of WWII Imperial Japanese Navy destroyer Teruzuki found 83 years after sinking

Straits Times

time2 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Wreck of WWII Imperial Japanese Navy destroyer Teruzuki found 83 years after sinking

Find out what's new on ST website and app. The Teruzuki sank in December 1942 while transporting supplies to Japanese soldiers on Guadalcanal, the largest island of the Solomon Islands. TOKYO - A shipwreck thought to be the Teruzuki, an Imperial Japanese Navy destroyer, was recently found on the seabed off Guadalcanal, Solomon Islands, according to a US marine survey team. The survey team, which includes Japanese researchers, conducted the search off the South Pacific Ocean island, where one of the deadliest battles in the Pacific War took place. The Teruzuki sank in December 1942 while transporting supplies to Japanese soldiers on Guadalcanal, the largest island of the Solomon Islands. During the War, the Japanese and US militaries fought fiercely for the airfields and other military facilities on the island. On the Japanese side, more than 20,000 soldiers died on the island, and many of them starved to death. In addition to starvation, many died of malaria and other diseases. In Japan, Guadalcanal has been called 'Gato' (island of starvation). 'Seeing the warship helps us understand the hopeless situation faced at that time,' said one of the Japanese researchers. The 134m long Teruzuki was built in August 1942 and was the Imperial Japanese Navy's second Akizuki-class destroyer. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Priority for singles, higher quota for second-timer families to kick in from HDB's July BTO exercise Singapore Witness stand not arena for humiliation in sex offence cases, judge reminds lawyers Asia Japan's Ishiba vows to stay on despite historic election setback Business Bigger, quieter, greener: High-volume low-speed fans see rising demand in warming Singapore Singapore New home owners in Singapore find kampung spirit on BTO Telegram groups Singapore What would it take for S'pore to shed the dirty image of its blue recycling bins? Business DBS hits record high above $47; CDL up after director Philip Yeo announces resignation World Gaza civil defence says Israeli fire kills 93 aid seekers In December that year, the ship was hit and immobilised by US torpedoes while escorting warships carrying food and other supplies to the island. It was the Teruzuki's own crew that ultimately sank the ship, and about 10 crew members who were unable to escape died. According to the Ocean Exploration Trust (OET), the US marine research organization which conducted the survey, the shipwreck believed to be the Teruzuki was found in a sea area known as the Iron Bottom Sound, an area where many warships sank. The OET conducted the search with an unmanned underwater vehicle on July 11, ahead of the 80th anniversary of the end of World War II, with assistance from the US National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. The main part of the shipwreck was found on the seabed 800m under water, and the broken stern of the ship's body was found at another location about 200m away. The damage on the ship matches testimonies of former crew members who survived the sinking, and the numbers and positions of gun turrets are the same as on the Teruzuki. Two Akizuki-class destroyers, including the Teruzuki, sank in sea areas off the Solomon Islands, according to war records. As the other destroyer has already been found, the researchers concluded that the shipwreck was the Teruzuki. At the time of the sinking, Japan had lost air superiority over the Pacific Ocean, so supplies to Guadalcanal were cut off. The Imperial Japanese Navy began transportation missions using destroyers, a highly maneuverable type of ship capable of sailing at fast speeds, to transport supplies in place of transport ships, which sail at lower speeds. However, most of the operations failed. 'The Teruzuki symbolizes the Japanese military's hardships in overcoming the desperate supply problem,' said Hiroshi Ishii, a program-specific researcher of Kyoto University's Centre for Southeast Asian Studies who participated in the marine survey. The OET had another success in 2023 when it took photos of wrecks of the Akagi, an aircraft carrier that was sunk in the Battle of Midway in 1942. 'People can understand the reality of war by seeing photos of sunken ships and other evidence, and (finds like this) can help console the souls of soldiers who died,' said Professor Kotaro Yamafune, a visiting professor of Kyoto Tachibana University who studies shipwreck archaeology. Mr Kazushige Todaka, director of the Yamato Museum in Kure, Hiroshima Prefecture, said: 'The Teruzuki was one of the rare destroyers that were designed for anti-aircraft warfare. 'The original shape is still in excellent condition, and considering the appearance of the gun turrets, there's no doubt it's the Teruzuki.' JAPAN NEWS/ASIA NEWS NETWORK

Headstart On Record Podcast: Fending off procrastination: How to get started
Headstart On Record Podcast: Fending off procrastination: How to get started

Straits Times

time4 hours ago

  • Straits Times

Headstart On Record Podcast: Fending off procrastination: How to get started

Find out what's new on ST website and app. We put off work because work, for some reason, puts us off. Synopsis: Every first and third Monday of the month, get a headstart in your personal finance and career with The Straits Times. Procrastination: The frustratingly human tendency to postpone work we can and should get started on earlier. It may seem tempting to berate ourselves for being lazy, unmotivated or disorganised. Instead, procrastination is actually our brains trying to shield us from uncomfortable feelings, putting a hidden toll on ourselves. Our guest today is an expert on the psychology of people who work together in groups. She shares with us what research tells us about procrastination and other quirks of our mind that permeate our work and daily life. She also goes into the 'dark things' she relishes researching, such as why people are cynical at work, and the fallout from narcissist leaders. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Priority for singles, higher quota for second-timer families to kick in from HDB's July BTO exercise Singapore Both Bukit Panjang LRT disruptions in July linked to newly installed power system: SMRT Singapore 1 in 3 vapes here laced with etomidate; MOH working with MHA to list it as illegal drug: Ong Ye Kung Asia Johor Bahru collision claims lives of e-hailing driver and Singapore passenger Sport Arsenal arrive in Singapore for pre-season matches with AC Milan and Newcastle Business Crypto exchange Tokenize to shut down Singapore operations Singapore More initiatives and support for migrant community announced at Racial Harmony Day event Singapore ComfortDelGro to discipline driver who flung relative's wheelchair out of taxi The guest was: Dr Ruchi Sinha, organisational psychologist and associate professor (practice) at Nanyang Business School, Nanyang Technological University Highlights (click/tap above): 2:00 What is procrastination and what type of procrastinator are you? 11:06 What are some strategies to help you manage procrastination? 14:07 Procrastination is about misplaced priorities too 16:22 Is it any easier for Dr Sinha to beat procrastination, as an expert? 17:05 The 'pretty dark stuff' Dr Sinha studies, such as narcissism at workplaces 23:04 How does Dr Sinha translate research in her field to real life? Read more about procrastination here: Read Tay Hong Yi's articles: Follow Tay Hong Yi on LinkedIn: Host: Tay Hong Yi ( hytay@ ) Produced & edited by: Amirul Karim Executive producers: Ernest Luis, Lynda Hong & Joanna Seow Follow Headstart On Record Podcast channel here: Channel: Apple Podcasts: Spotify: Feedback to: podcast@ SPH Awedio app: Get business/career tips in ST's Headstart newsletter: --- Follow more ST podcast channels: All-in-one ST Podcasts channel: Get more updates: The Usual Place Podcast YouTube: --- Get The Straits Times app, which has a dedicated podcast player section: The App Store:

What would it take for S'pore to shed the dirty image of its blue recycling bins?
What would it take for S'pore to shed the dirty image of its blue recycling bins?

Straits Times

time5 hours ago

  • Straits Times

What would it take for S'pore to shed the dirty image of its blue recycling bins?

Find out what's new on ST website and app. Recycling efforts in Singapore have been stymied by residents who treat the blue bins under the national recycling programme as rubbish bins, sullying batches of recyclables. SINGAPORE – These days, Singapore is armed with more recycling bins than it has ever had. Yet, households here are recycling less of their waste than they did over a decade ago. Domestic recycling rates were at an all-time low of 12 per cent in 2022 and 2023, a far cry from the target of 30 per cent set by the Government for 2030. The waste statistics for 2024 have yet to be released. The low recycling rate is not because people here are not recycling. A 2023 survey by the National Environment Agency (NEA) found that 72 per cent of households here recycled, up from 64 per cent in 2021. Instead, recycling efforts have been stymied by those who treat the commingled blue bins under the national recycling programme as rubbish bins, sullying batches of recyclables. For example, a survey of the overflowing recycling bins near my home revealed contaminants like soiled tissue, a disposable plastic packet with traces of milk tea and an oil stained wrapper in the big blue bins. The contamination means that about 40 per cent of what goes into these blue bins cannot be recycled . Against this gloomy backdrop, some organisations are taking matters into their own hands. The Straits Times reported last week that a public waste collector and an environmental group here have initiated segregated recycling points that aim to counter the ills of commingled blue bins. These efforts lowered contamination rates to as low as less than 5 per cent, according to early findings by non-governmental organisation Zero Waste SG. Segregated recycling infrastructure is also a tried-and-tested solution practised by places famed for their recycling etiquette, like Taiwan, Germany and South Korea. But will this be suitable for an island that is already saturated with hundreds of recycling points in residential estates and public spaces? Infrastructure aside, people here will also need a refreshed attitude towards waste management if Singapore is to meet its recycling goals . Singapore's Semakau Landfill is expected to run out of room by 2035, a decade earlier than estimated. This highlights the urgency in developing a culture of recycling to lighten the load on the city-state's sole landfill. Singapore's recycling blues At the heart of poor recycling habits in Singapore is a disconnect between top-down recycling policies and waste disposal habits on the ground, argued researchers from NUS' Asia Research Institute and the French National Centre for Scientific Research in a 2024 study. Through interviews with 114 residents here, the researchers found that most of them were reluctant to recycle because these bins were so badly contaminated with non-recyclables and organic waste . The lack of a system that rewards good recycling practices and punishes bad ones has resulted in people recycling based on their convenience, the researchers noted. Singapore has for decades struggled with apathy from its people towards recycling, and parliamentary discussions on the issue go back to the 1990s. Multiple factors could be at play , found two studies by Zero Waste SG in 2024. These include the greater convenience brought about by rubbish chutes, the extra effort needed to clean recyclables, and a lack of confidence in the efficacy of the recycling process. The ease of disposing of waste means that rubbish could be chucked without much thought or effort. Once out of sight, the waste is seamlessly processed by Singapore's three public waste collectors. Most end up incinerated and dumped on offshore island Semakau . Efforts to make it more convenient for people to recycle have not shown noticeable success. The Government has mandated recycling chutes at new Housing Board blocks since 2014, followed by certain private residential developments. But the yearly recycling statistics have shown that domestic recycling rates did not improve. Waste management experts have long recommended that Singapore learn from the policies implemented by economies with sophisticated recycling cultures such as South Korea, Taiwan and Japan. Users there are charged based on how much waste they throw away, while recycling is generally free. Taiwan is notable for shedding its image as a 'garbage island' in less than two decades through a concerted combination of strict policies, incentives and public education programmes. Taiwanese residents, manufacturers and importers are made to pay for waste disposal. Those who do not comply face fines, while whistle-blowers receive financial rewards. To prevent residents from dumping their household waste in public bins, the Taiwanese government took away most of these bins. Through these efforts, recycling has become a routine that starts with a dedicated truck that alerts residents to bring down their sorted waste by broadcasting classical music. While there is no solution that fits every country, the example of Taiwan shows that a tough stance on recycling backed by political will can transform habits. A fine nation There are just five years left for Singapore to meet its 2030 recycling targets. Moreover, the drop in overall recycling rate from 62 per cent in 2013 to 52 per cent in 2023, as well as consistently poor domestic recycling rates, should prompt soul-searching about whether the Republic's current approach to recycling waste is working. It would certainly be ideal if residents can simply make the practice part of their lives, like the Japanese do with the concept of 'mottainai', which translates as not wasting anything worthy. But efforts to encourage Singapore residents to recycle have been ongoing since 2001. Ultimately, the fate of Singapore's recycling habits and infrastructure will rest on how seriously the authorities think recycling is for the nation's future. In Singapore, imposing fines has shown more success in changing behaviours compared with public outreach campaigns. In 2021, after years of reminding people to return their trays at hawker centres and coffee shops, NEA made not doing so a fineable offence. Since then, it has been rare to find a tray lingering on a hawker centre table.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store