Teenagers behind rise in racist attacks in Ireland, special rapporteur says
Dr Ebun Joseph, chief executive of the Institute of Antiracism and Black Studies, who is also the special rapporteur for the National Plan Against Racism, said that a rise in incidents of crime involving members of minority communities is becoming a national crisis.
Advertisement
Recent attacks on members of the Indian community have been widely condemned.
People take part in a silent assembly for migrant workers and their families outside the Department of the Taoiseach in Dublin (Niall Carson/PA)
The Ireland India Council believes there is an organised social media campaign against the Indian community in Ireland and the number of violent attacks has intensified since January this year.
A large crowd gathered outside the Department of the Taoiseach on Wednesday for a silent assembly in support of migrant workers.
Dr Joseph said that racism and racial crime is not a 'new thing' in Ireland.
Advertisement
'It's been there. The black community, the Roma community, the new Traveller community have experienced racism in Ireland for years,' she said.
'This is not a new fight but in the last few months it has intensified. What is scary is that right now we have teenagers actually perpetrating these acts.
'Young people are being made to think that violence against another person because of the colour of their skin or where they are from or their accent, that to feel that is right to do is a major problem. This is national crisis.'
A protester taking part in a silent assembly for migrant workers and their families outside the Department of the Taoiseach in Dublin (Niall Carson/PA)
Shashank Chakerwarti, of Desi Community Against Racism, said the protest also honours the dignity of victims of racist attacks.
Advertisement
'Another person was severely lacerated on his eyebrow just yesterday. His brow was cut into two pieces. Images of that sends chills down your body.
'We want to send a clear message to the Taoiseach (Micheal Martin) that you need to control this teenage violence and criminal activity that is going on in Dublin.
'There's been a lot of content directly taken from the UK narrative, of migrants coming to Ireland via boats, but that is not the case.
'The far right are using that narrative and are applying it here which is completely incorrect.
Advertisement
'There is a severe frustration that some individuals are feeling, especially in deprived communities and areas where you don't see a lot of investment and local services.
'They feel that third country people are taking their jobs and houses, but that is not the case at all.'
He also called for the Government to introduce a campaign to encourage people to report hate crimes.
'We need to (educate) people on how to report racist crime, but there is no direct engagement with communities about this,' he added.
Advertisement
People Before Profit TD Paul Murphy was among those to take part in the protest.
He said it is important to take a stand against racist violence.
'What we have seen on our streets over the past number of weeks is Indian people and others targeted with violent attacks because of the colour of their skin and where they are perceived to come from,' he said.
People take part in a silent assembly for migrant workers and their families outside the Department of the Taoiseach in Dublin (Niall Carson/PA)
'We need to push back against those who are pushing the racist lies and propaganda which is creating an environment where these attacks are taking place.'
Social Democrats TD Jennifer Whitmore said that racism has 'crept' into Irish society.
'We are at the point now where it is quite normalised for people to be racist in what they say on social media,' the Wicklow TD added.
Ireland
Finance Minister O'Dowd condemns 'racist' gangs pa...
Read More
'It is important we have events and days like these where we stand and say this is not okay, it is not acceptable for racist attacks.
'There are racist elements who are allowed to say what they want without any come back.
'Our health system would collapse without many migrant communities and having that conversation of the value of migrants and also reflect on Irish people who have been migrants, it's something Irish people are very familiar with.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
15 minutes ago
- Reuters
Zelenskiy to meet Starmer in Downing Street ahead of Trump-Putin summit, Sky News reports
Aug 14 (Reuters) - Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy will meet with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer in Downing Street on Thursday, Sky News reported citing the British government.
The Independent
44 minutes ago
- The Independent
Starmer to welcome Zelensky to No 10 ahead of Trump meeting with Putin
Sir Keir Starmer will be joined by the Ukrainian president at Downing Street on Thursday morning, as Europe braces for the outcome of Donald Trump's face-to-face discussions with his Russian counterpart later this week. The Prime Minister's meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky comes after he said Britain stands ready to 'increase pressure' on Russia if necessary. Meanwhile, Mr Trump threatened Russia with 'severe consequences' if a ceasefire was rejected by its leader. During a call with the US president and European allies on Wednesday, Sir Keir praised Mr Trump for his work to bring forward a 'viable' chance of an end to the war. But concerns have been raised over Mr Zelensky's exclusion from the meeting between the Mr Trump and Mr Putin, which is set to take place in Alaska on Friday. Speaking on Wednesday, Sir Keir said: 'This meeting on Friday that President Trump is attending is hugely important. 'As I've said personally to President Trump for the three-and-a-bit years this conflict has been going on, we haven't got anywhere near a prospect of actually a viable solution, a viable way of bringing it to a ceasefire. 'And now we do have that chance, because of the work of that the president has put in.' Further sanctions could be imposed on Russia should the Kremlin fail to engage, and the UK is already working on its next package of measures targeting Moscow, he said. 'We're ready to support this, including from the plans we've already drawn up to deploy a reassurance force once hostilities have ceased,' he told allies. 'It is important to remind colleagues that we do stand ready also to increase pressure on Russia, particularly the economy, with sanctions and wider measures as may be necessary.' Sir Keir and European leaders have repeatedly said discussions about Ukraine should not happen without it, amid concerns the country is being sidelined in negotiations about its own future. Asked if it was his decision to not invite Mr Zelensky to the meeting, Mr Trump said 'no just the opposite', before adding that a second meeting with the Ukrainian president could take place afterwards. 'We had a very good call, he was on the call, President Zelensky was on the call. I would rate it a 10, you know, very, very friendly,' he told reporters in Washington. He added: 'There's a very good chance that we're going to have a second meeting which will be more productive than the first, because the first is I'm going to find out where we are and what we're doing.' The US president has previously suggested a truce could involve some 'swapping' of land. It is believed one of the Russian leader's demands is for Ukraine to cede parts of the Donbas region which it still controls. But Mr Zelensky has already rejected any proposal that would compromise Ukraine's territorial integrity, something that is forbidden by the country's constitution. A joint statement from the Coalition of the Willing, which is co-chaired by Sir Keir, French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, said 'international borders must not be changed by force'. It added: 'Sanctions and wider economic measures to put pressure on Russia's war economy should be strengthened if Russia does not agree to a ceasefire in Alaska.' The Coalition of the Willing is a European-led effort to send a peacekeeping force to Ukraine in the event of truce.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Nicola Sturgeon's immense political talent is undeniable. The nationalism was the problem
Nicola Sturgeon was – and still is – important, talented, personable and, to many, inspirational. She was also extremely lucky and often wrong, sometimes seriously so. There are examples of all these qualities in her newly published memoir, Frankly. Sturgeosceptics should concede at once that it contains much that is fascinating, especially about her relations with her charismatic mentor turned vengeful enemy Alex Salmond. Starry-eyed Sturgies should equally admit she made several deep and lasting errors that have left behind a divided nationalist party and movement. The book is more open and touching about private issues than most political memoirs, although Sturgeon deploys these qualities selectively. Many of the intimate reflections are about being a woman in politics. Other memoirs by female politicians – including those of Margaret Thatcher, Hillary Clinton and Angela Merkel – leave such subjects alone. Sturgeon does not. She writes about her relationships, her miscarriage, her sexuality and her menopause. Yet to me, the single most affecting sentence in the book comes near the end, when she describes her resignation in 2023. 'In short,' she writes, in words that should be pondered by male and female rulers alike, 'I was exhausted.' After Sturgeon's years of power, who would not have been? From the moment she joined the Scottish National party as a teenager, Sturgeon built a career at the most demanding and, for nationalists, the headiest time in modern Scottish history. She was a parliamentarian, a minister, deputy leader and then leader of her party, and finally Scotland's first minister from 2014 to 2023. Roy Jenkins wrote long ago that eight years at the top is as much as anyone should be permitted in the full-on world that is modern politics, and Sturgeon's career proves him right. You can quibble, as some people have, about whether being Scotland's first minister is really as important and demanding as being a US president or a UK prime minister. Clearly it is not. However, after what the self-confessed workaholic Sturgeon had already crammed in, she was surely right to get out two years ago and prepare for the rest of her life. She is still only 55, and she is entitled to use this book as a pivot from the old to the new, whatever that may be. Just don't idealise her, that's all. The most important thing about Sturgeon's political career is not whether she was relatable, good on television or better than the men. Pretty obviously, she was all three. It is whether she was right to be a nationalist. In my book, she was wrong. From her teenage years, Sturgeon's overriding political goal has been to break up the United Kingdom. It still is. Many of her admirers, especially in England, ignore this fact. But it cannot be ignored, in part because everything else that she did in politics was always ultimately subordinate to it, and in part because, even now, her cause may yet win in the years ahead if British parties and governments allow it to happen. Sturgeon's great political talent was her ability to ride the waves of change. Talent was part of that. But good luck also played a huge role. The first major example of this came in 2004, when she over-ambitiously threw her hat into the ring to become SNP leader in a contest most observers thought she would lose. Who knows where the story would have ended if she had fought on? Over a private dinner in Linlithgow, however, Salmond told Sturgeon that he was planning to enter the contest, and proposed a pact in which she would run as deputy and eventually succeed him. Labour was already haemorrhaging votes as a result of the Iraq war. In 2007 the duo took the SNP to power at Holyrood. Sturgeon quickly became the most popular politician in Scotland. In 2011, the SNP won an unprecedented overall majority. Her second big stroke of luck, nevertheless, was the defeat of the 2014 independence referendum. Salmond resigned in the aftermath, leaving Sturgeon as his unchallengeable successor. SNP membership soared. What could have been a hospital pass was instead a coronation. A few months later, it got even better. At the 2015 general election, the SNP captured all but three of Scotland's Westminster seats. Then came Brexit, opposed by the majority of voters in Scotland. This presented the nationalists with a perfect platform to claim that the union was denying Scotland its will. While the Tories became obsessed with Brexit, and Labour turned in on itself, Sturgeon was able to pitch Scotland as a nation that marched to a different and more progressive drum, and to follow the pro-European path. But the SNP did not have things all its own way. True, the party remained dominant. Electorally speaking, Sturgeon could have titled her book Undefeated. True also, Sturgeon managed to keep the prospect of a second referendum simmering without boiling over. But in other respects the Scottish political and economic landscape was getting far tougher for the SNP. There were rows about Lockerbie, on which Sturgeon's book is informative, and about Hebridean ferry contracts and overruns and Scotland's drug problems – topics on which she has next to nothing to say. Sturgeon's unequivocal pledge in 2016 to eliminate the educational attainment gap between children from rich and poor neighbourhoods in the next decade is skated over too. Her account of the court case against Salmond is nothing if not bitter. Her gender recognition reforms were dogmatic and divisive. Her legacy in many respects is division, and perhaps fiscal unsustainability. The reminder in Wednesday's Government Expenditure and Revenue Scotland report that Scotland's public spending deficit has widened even further than in the UK as a whole is a timely counterpoint to Sturgeon's version of history. But the greatest gift that the gods ever presented to Sturgeon and the SNP came in 2019: Boris Johnson's accession to the UK prime ministership. Sturgeon did not have to make an argument against Johnson. She could merely let people observe the contrast between his sloppiness and her precision, and let them judge for themselves. It would have been the same with Liz Truss, if she had lasted. Sturgeon used every lever to imply that Scotland was handling the pandemic better than the wider UK. To many in Scotland and in England, the contrast marked Sturgeon's apotheosis. In England, some yearned to have Sturgeon in charge south of the border too, and had done so during the Cameron and May years as well. Yet this was to fundamentally misread Sturgeon. It was a misreading that she was smart enough to encourage. Hers is an interesting account. But it is not the full story. She was not seeking to be the negation of Johnson or Truss. Her aim was to be the negation of the union. It is on this that she should be judged, by nationalists and anti-nationalists alike. By that yardstick her career has – frankly – been a failure. So far, at least. Martin Kettle is a Guardian columnist
