&w=3840&q=100)
Explained: Can you break your SCSS deposit early, and what would it cost?
The Senior Citizen Savings Scheme (SCSS) has become one of the go-to investment options for senior citizens in India, offering a stable and secure way to grow their savings. With its high interest rates, government backing, and quarterly payouts, it's no wonder that SCSS is favored by retirees looking for predictable returns. However, life is unpredictable, and sometimes, unforeseen financial needs arise that require you to access your funds earlier than planned. So, what happens if you need to break your SCSS deposit early? Is it possible, and what are the consequences?
What is the SCSS scheme?
The Senior Citizen Savings Scheme (SCSS) is a government-backed savings scheme designed to provide a regular income stream for senior citizens. It offers a fixed interest rate and allows for both individual and joint accounts, primarily benefiting those 60 years and older. The scheme is a safe investment option, backed by the Indian government, and offers tax benefits.
The Senior Citizen Savings Scheme was introduced in 2004 as a part of post office savings scheme, to provide financial security to senior citizens who are in need of a steady income post retirement. Residents aged more than 60 years, can individually or jointly open SCSS account.
It can either be opened in a post office branch or an authorized bank. It offers an interest rate of 8.2% for the current quarter. This scheme supports a maximum deposit of Rs.30 lakhs, with a tenure of 5 years which can be further extended to 3 years. Deductions under section 80C of Income Tax Act is allowed for this scheme. However, interest on deposits are fully taxable.
The current interest rate applicable to SCSS is 8.2% p.a. This interest rate is applicable for first quarter of financial year 2025-26. At 8.2% p.a. interest rate and an investment amount of Rs.30 lakh, the monthly income is stated to be Rs.20,500 per month for each investor.
The maturity period of SCSS is 5 years. However, individuals can extend the maturity period for 3 more years by submitting an application. The application for an extension of maturity should be within one year from the date of maturity.
Withdrawals from Senior Citizens Savings Scheme accounts will be exempt from tax starting August 29, 2024. Senior citizens are predominantly benefitted from this amendment.
TDS (Tax Deducted at Source) is applicable on the interest earned if it exceeds ₹50,000 in a financial year (for senior citizens).
Investments up to Rs 1.5 lakh in SCSS qualify for tax deductions under Section 80C of the Income Tax Act.
Premature withdrawal before maturity: Yes, but with a cost
SCSS has a default lock-in period of five years. However, the government does allow early closure—with penalties based on how long you've been invested.
Value Research breaks this down:
If withdrawn before 1 year: No interest is payable. Any interest already credited will be recovered from your principal.
If withdrawn after 1 year but before 2 years: A penalty of 1.5 per cent of the deposit amount is deducted.
If withdrawn after 2 years but before 5 years: A penalty of 1 per cent of the deposit amount is deducted
ClearTax does a further deep dive:
Within 1 Year of Deposit:
If you wish to withdraw the SCSS deposit before the first year, the interest earned will be penalized.
A penalty of 1.5% will be charged on the deposit amount, which means you will lose some interest earned on the deposit.
After 1 Year but Before 2 Years:
If the deposit is withdrawn after one year but before two years, the penalty reduces to 1%.
After 2 Years:
If you withdraw the deposit after two years but before the completion of the full five-year tenure, the penalty continues to be 1% of the deposit amount.
It's important to note that if you break your SCSS account before maturity, you won't get the full interest rate and could face some loss of earnings.
Conditions:
One exception to the premature withdrawal penalty is in the unfortunate event of the account holder's death. If the account holder passes away, the SCSS deposit can be withdrawn without incurring any penalty on the interest. In this case, the nominee or legal heir will be entitled to the principal and the interest earned, without the penalty charges that would normally apply to premature withdrawals.
Tax Implications of Premature Withdrawal
When you break your SCSS deposit early, the tax treatment on the interest earned remains the same. Interest earned on SCSS is subject to taxation, and the amount is taxed according to your income tax bracket. However, the early withdrawal may affect how much you ultimately pay in taxes due to the reduced interest earnings after the penalty is applied.
Additionally, Tax Deducted at Source (TDS) will be applicable if the interest earned exceeds ₹50,000 in a financial year (for senior citizens). The TDS will be deducted regardless of whether the deposit is withdrawn prematurely or not.
What about maturity? You now have more flexibility
"Previously, SCSS allowed only a one-time extension of three years. But rules have changed. Now, you can extend your SCSS deposit indefinitely in blocks of three years each. This is great news for retirees who don't want to reinvest elsewhere and prefer to continue earning a fixed return in a secure scheme. The extension must be requested within one year of maturity. The interest rate applicable will be the one prevailing at the time of extension," explained Value Research in a note.
Can You Withdraw During the Extension Period of SCSS?
Yes, you can withdraw from your SCSS account during the extension period. After the initial 5-year term, the SCSS account can be extended for an additional 3 years. The best part? Once you have completed one year of this extended block, there is no penalty for premature withdrawal. This offers senior citizens more flexibility, as they can still access their funds without being penalized.
Why is This Advantageous?
This is a key benefit of the SCSS extension feature. If your circumstances change or if an unexpected financial need arises, you don't have to be permanently locked into the scheme. The ability to withdraw funds after a year during the extension period means that, while you continue to earn interest, you are not stuck if you need liquidity. This flexibility makes SCSS a relatively adaptable investment for seniors who may need to adjust their financial plans over time.
How to Exit the SCSS Scheme (During or After Extension Period)
To exit the scheme, whether during the original five-year term or during an extended period, you need to follow a simple process:
Visit the Bank or Post Office: Go to the bank or post office where you hold your SCSS account.
Submit Form 2: Fill out and submit Form 2, which is the form used for premature closure of your SCSS account.
Provide Necessary Documentation: You may also need to submit some documents, such as your account details, proof of identity, and any other documents required by the institution.
Once your request is processed, you will receive the principal amount and the interest earned, minus any penalties if applicable (which is not the case during the extension period after one year). This flexibility provides senior citizens with peace of mind, knowing that their funds are not entirely locked in if they need them earlier than planned.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Licences of 24 fertilizer dealers suspended after raids in Gujarat
Gandhinagar: The state agriculture department conducted surprise raids at dealerships selling chemical fertilizers on Saturday to prevent misuse. In the state-wide raids conducted across 16 districts, the licences of 24 dealers were suspended, the govt said on Sunday. The govt stated that the inspections were carried out to ensure that sufficient fertilizer stocks are available to farmers for the kharif season. An official statement mentioned that the inspections were conducted by 32 teams of the agriculture department on Saturday in 16 districts. The inspections involved checking the physical stock of fertilisers, the stock in POS machines and verifying records of govt-approved dealers of chemical fertilizers. "In total, 57 dealers across 16 districts were inspected, and show-cause notices were issued to dealers for various reasons. The licences of 24 dealers were suspended due to irregularities found in the fertilizer stocks at 24 locations," the statement said. An estimated 1,090.64 metric tonnes of fertilizers worth 1.78 crore were prevented from being sold, and further legal action was taken. During the inspection, sale of fertilizer stocks was verified with 101 farmers," the statement added. Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo In the first raid conducted by the agriculture department, discrepancies were found at 17 locations, and an estimated stock of 718.47 metric tonnes worth approximately 1.14 crore was prevented from being sold. The statement added that a total of 31 show-cause notices were issued for various reasons, and the licences of 17 dealers were suspended. In the second round of inspection, another 31 dealers were also subjected to raids. A total of 372.17 metric tonnes of unauthorized stock worth Rs 63.65 lakh was prevented from being sold. Show-cause notices were issued to the dealers for various reasons, and the licences of seven dealers were suspended.


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Tata-govt body bank guarantee case: HC refuses to intervene
Raipur: The Chhattisgarh High Court has disposed of a writ petition filed by Tata Projects Limited, which sought restoration of status quo, directing the company to seek remedy before the commercial court. The petition concerned the encashment of a performance bank guarantee of Rs 167.46 crore by the Chhattisgarh Infotech Promotion Society (CHiPS), the nodal agency for driving IT growth and implementing IT and e-Governance initiatives in the state. A division bench of Justice Narendra Kumar Vyas and Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad heard the petition filed by Tata Projects. The company sought restoration of the status quo ante, asking for the return of the Rs 167.46 crore to State Bank of India and the issuance of an identical bank guarantee. Alternatively, Tata Projects requested CHiPS to deposit the amount in an interest-bearing account until the dispute's resolution. According to court records, CHiPS had issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for the selection of a Master System Integrator (MSI) for the BharatNet Phase-II Project in Chhattisgarh. A dispute arose between Tata Projects and CHiPS during the commercial contract. Previously, Tata Projects had filed writ petition, in which a single bench of the high court on 2 July 2024, granted interim protection, restraining respondents from encashing the performance bank guarantee. This writ petition was later disposed of on 30 April 2025, with the court re-delegating the parties to approach the commercial court. Subsequently, Tata Projects filed an application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The commercial court, on 3 May 2025, ordered an interim status quo regarding the invocation of the bank guarantee. However, after the respondents filed their reply, the commercial court disposed of the application on 6 May 2025, vacating the status quo order. The initiation of the bank guarantee encashment process led Tata Projects to approach the high court. Senior counsel Kishore Bhaduri, appearing for Tata Projects, argued that CHiPS's conduct was fraudulent and high-handed, misleading the court and misusing its power by attempting to invoke the bank guarantee. Counsel for the respondents and the state argued that the writ petition was not maintainable, as Tata Projects had remedies available under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, or under the Chhattisgarh Madhyashtham Adhikaran Act, 1983. The high court observed that an arbitration clause existed in the agreement and that Tata Projects had already approached the commercial court. The court ruled that the writ petition was not maintainable at this juncture. However, it granted Tata Projects the liberty to pursue statutory remedies before the commercial court. The court also clarified that the respondents were free to raise objections regarding the maintainability of any application. The High Court directed the commercial court to consider and decide any interim application or application under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the petitioner expeditiously and in accordance with the law. The high court also made it clear that it had not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case, leaving it to the commercial court to decide independently.


Time of India
35 minutes ago
- Time of India
Insurance firm directed to pay 11L for unfair trade practice in settling claim
Raipur: The Chhattisgarh state consumer disputes redressal commission directed an insurance firm backed by a public-sector bank to pay Rs 11,16,801 to a Raipur-based firm for deficiency in service and unfair trade practice in settling a vehicle insurance claim. The commission also awarded Rs 50,000 for mental agony and Rs 5,000 towards litigation costs. The order, passed by President Justice Gautam Chourdiya and Member Pramod Kumar Varma, set aside an earlier ruling by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Raipur, which dismissed the complaint as premature. The commission noted that keeping the claim pending for an extended period, especially after the damaged vehicle was handed over as per the insurer's instructions, amounted to deficiency in service and unfair trade practice. "After accepting the surveyor's assessment, instructing disposal of the damaged vehicle, and its actual disposal, it was improper for the insurer to raise further objections. Keeping the claim pending despite receiving the wreck value amounts to deficiency in service and unfair trade practice. The insurer is liable to pay the remaining Rs 11,16,801, along with compensation for mental agony and litigation costs. The district commission erred in holding the claim premature, making its order unsustainable and liable to be set aside," remarked the consumer commission on the case. The firm's car, insured with the insurance firm, met with an accident on Nov 8, 2019. The insurance company assessed the loss at Rs 11,16,801 and instructed the complainant to hand over the damaged vehicle to a salvage buyer, who paid Rs 13,30,000. The firm alleged that despite these actions and assurances of payment, the remaining amount of Rs 11,16,801 was not disbursed. A complaint was filed before the district commission seeking the balance amount and compensation. The insurance firm, in its defence, said that the claim was pending as the complainant did not provide clarifications and relevant documents regarding the incident. The state commission, however, observed that the insurer already acted upon the surveyor's settlement recommendation and instructed the disposal of the vehicle's wreckage. The commission noted that after proceeding towards settlement and the disposal of the wreckage, it was improper for the insurer to raise further objections. The insurance company has been directed to pay the remaining assessed loss of Rs 11,16,801 with 6% annual simple interest from the date of filing the complaint until realisation, along with the compensation and litigation costs.