Six jailed for 'out of control gangsterism' in Edinburgh and Lothians
Judge Lord Mulholland, said the men had been found guilty of "out of control gangsterism".They were found guilty of numerous offences including attempted murder, wilful fire-raising and attempting to pervert the course of justice at the High Court in Glasgow last month.
Hand 'almost severed'
The group's first victim was attacked in Bilston, Midlothian in December 2022 when the gang attacked his car and smashed it up with bladed weapons.He told a 999 call they had tried to "chop him up".Another man was targeted by a machete-wielding assailant near his home in Edinburgh's Pilton on 5 January, 2023.The man had attempted to fend off the attacker after he pulled up in a car and began striking him with the weapon.His hand was almost completely severed in the attack, after which he was rushed to hospital and spent 12 hours in surgery.The man said he thought he was "dying on the doorstep".
Another man was targeted in a "high speed chase" between Edinburgh and Dalkeith.He was forced off the road and his car smashed into a wall. The man was left with a "large gaping wound" to his arm after he was struck with machetes.After several operations, he was left scarred for life and remains physically affected by the incident.On 7 January, 2023, six cars belonging to staff at HMP Addiewell in West Lothian were set on fire late at night.Later that month, another of the gang's victims was ambushed by masked attackers in the Ferniehill area of Edinburgh.His injuries were so severe he ended up in intensive care and a coma.More to follow.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
a minute ago
- Telegraph
HMRC sacks dozens of staff for snooping on taxpayers
Have you worked or do you work at HMRC? Tell us about a data breach in confidence at: money@ Information that needs a higher level of security can be submitted here. Please see our Privacy Notice. HM Revenue and Customs sacked 50 workers last year for breaking data privacy rules and snooping on taxpayers' records. In total, 354 tax employees have been disciplined for data security breaches since 2022, of whom 186 have been fired, The Telegraph can reveal. The tax office admitted that some were dismissed for looking up taxpayers' confidential information. HMRC holds a vast amount of sensitive data such as addresses, salaries and National Insurance numbers. Staff are forbidden from looking up these details unless they have a genuine business reason. Despite the warnings, a number of employees have been caught accessing unauthorised accounts using HMRC's IT systems. In 2024-25, 96 staff were disciplined for data security breaches, of whom 50 were later dismissed, according to data obtained by The Telegraph via a Freedom of Information request. HMRC said this represented less than 0.1pc of its nearly 68,000 staff. The numbers have fallen since last year when 138 employees were disciplined, and 68 were given the sack. The figures covered all data security breaches and not just staff searching for taxpayers' records. Other examples of data breaches include making changes to records without authorisation, losing sensitive documents or failing to securely dispose of inadequately protected devices. In one incident in 2023, an employee was sacked from HMRC after sending the data of 100 individuals to his personal email address. According to court documents, the staff member was visiting a business as part of a compliance check when he emailed himself a PDF containing a list of staff members' details – including their salaries and National Insurance numbers – and printed it off for the meeting using his home computer. The incident was flagged to his line manager by the analytics team responsible for identifying data breaches and he was dismissed for gross misconduct following an investigation. The worker took HMRC to an employment tribunal, arguing he had not been thinking straight at the time due to anxiety. However, the tribunal dismissed his claim for wrongful dismissal. Data breaches like this have been on the rise since the pandemic because of remote working, according to one HMRC manager cited in the tribunal. In an email reminding staff never to send personal data outside the tax office's systems, the line manager of the claimant wrote: 'There have been more incidents of this recently as we are working from home a lot more since Covid, but never send anything to your own private email address to print off that contains any personal or business data.' Former HMRC inspectors said the importance of data security was drilled into employees from day one. Ronnie Pannu, of advice firm Pannu Tanu, said: 'When I was in HMRC, there was always a strong message from above that viewing a taxpayer's records where this was not necessary for a particular purpose was a serious issue which could have serious consequences for the individual concerned.' John Hood, of accountants firm Moore Kingston Smith, said: 'Any HMRC employee foolish enough to look up personal information that is not part of their usual responsibilities faces a ticking time bomb as most searches are tracked. 'As an additional security, some parts of the system are restricted so that only specifically authorised personnel can access them, such as the departments dealing with MPs and civil servants.' All staff receive mandatory training on data security, and HMRC restricts access so workers can only look up customer records if this is needed for their specific role. In addition, the tax office tracks staff activity on its systems to deter misuse and record breaches. Employees who break the rules are investigated and will face penalties, with each incident considered on a case-by-case basis. Ellen Milner, of the trade body the Chartered Institute of Taxation, said: 'Taxpayers have to be able to trust that the private information they provide to HMRC will not be leaked, supplied to criminals or used for any purpose other than that for which it was provided, and in accordance with the law. 'That is why HMRC treats unauthorised access to records and data so seriously, and it is good to see that where breaches happen, HMRC will act.' On the social network, Reddit, users who claim to work at the Civil Service say they have seen new recruits at HMRC and the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) fired after looking up their own records or those of friends and celebrities out of curiosity. In 2021, an administrative officer was sacked from DWP after looking up her neighbour's address using Searchlight, a database containing information about almost everyone in the country. According to the court documents, DWP workers are explicitly told not to look up themselves, families or celebrities. A DWP employee present at the tribunal described it as 'the number one rule' impressed upon everyone who joined the department. Serious data breaches must be reported to the Information Commissioner's Office. HMRC's annual report shows that there were six incidents last year of employees changing customer records without permission, and two of staff losing inadequately protected devices. HMRC is under growing pressure to strengthen its data security as criminal attacks grow more sophisticated and as it shifts towards becoming a digital-first organisation. It recently emerged that 100,000 taxpayers had been affected by phishing attacks in the past year. Criminals used stolen credentials to access taxpayers' accounts and claim significant sums in rebates. There was no loss to the individuals, who have since been contacted, and a number of arrests were made – but the cost to the taxpayer was £47m. A spokesman for HMRC said: 'Instances of improper access are extremely rare, and we take firm action when it does happen, helping prevent a recurrence. 'We take the security of customers' data extremely seriously and we have robust systems to ensure staff only access records when there is a legitimate business need.'
Daily Mail
a minute ago
- Daily Mail
‘I would gamble my wages away as soon as I got them': How I lost £50,000 – and my marriage, family and home – to an online gambling addiction
When Tracy Page's gambling addiction became too much to bear, she decided to take her own life. Relations with her children were broken, her marriage was over, her beautiful home was gone; expensive cars and Caribbean holidays were a thing of the past and her debts were mounting. There was nowhere further to fall. 'I was exhausted – that's the only way I can describe it,' she says. 'And not just physically; I was mentally exhausted. I just felt I couldn't take any more. I'd been going to the doctor in the run-up and had built up a lot of medication because I knew what I was going to do. I took a serious overdose.'
Telegraph
a minute ago
- Telegraph
Nearly nine in ten voters support deporting foreign sex offenders
Almost nine in 10 voters think foreign sex offenders should be deported, a new poll has revealed. A huge majority of Britons across all ages and political parties agree that migrants who commit a sexual offence should be kicked out. It comes amid a wider debate about the impacts of mass migration and controversy over alleged crimes perpetrated by asylum seekers. The survey, by Find Out Now, also found that almost four in 10 people favour restricting immigration from countries with poor women's rights. Yvette Cooper, the Home Secretary, has vowed to increase the rate of deportations and limit the avenues foreign criminals have to appeal against their removal. Earlier this year, she announced that any migrant placed on the sex offender register would be automatically prevented from claiming asylum in the UK. The pollsters asked more than 2,000 voters whether they supported the deportation of non-UK citizens who have been convicted of sex crimes. More than 87 per cent said they either 'strongly' or 'somewhat' supported removal, compared to just three per cent who said they opposed it. In total, 85 per cent of Labour voters, 96 per cent of Conservative supporters and 97 per cent of Reform backers said they favoured deportation of this kind. Find Out Now also asked the public whether they would support restricting immigration from countries 'where women have few legal rights and protections'. Just under 39 per cent of all voters said they would back such restrictions, compared with a little over a quarter who said they would oppose them. Support for tougher measures was voiced by 30 per cent of Labour voters, 52 per cent of Conservative backers and 74 per cent of Reform supporters. A total of 38 per cent of Labour supporters said they would oppose such measures. Finally, the pollsters also asked Britons whether they 'believe that immigration levels impact women's safety in your area'. Overall, 47 per cent said they believed that was the case, versus 23 per cent who did not. In total, 29 per cent of Labour voters, 58 per cent of Conservative supporters and 84 per cent of Reform backers said they felt less safe. Additionally, 43 per cent of Labour supporters said they believed their area was less safe as a result of migration. The poll was commissioned by the Women's Safety Initiative, a group set up 'to expose the dangers of uncontrolled immigration'. The group says it provides 'a space for women to voice concerns about safety, culture, and national identity without fear of censorship or judgment'. Anna McGovern, the deputy director, said: 'This data confirms what women across the country have been telling us for years – they feel less safe and they want action. I've spoken to so many women who have shared their experiences of feeling unsafe, and I include myself in that. 'Our leaders cannot continue to ignore these concerns or dismiss them as unfounded. Women's safety must be prioritised above political convenience, and this is the moment to start taking decisive steps to protect women everywhere.'
