CG Power closes QIP at Rs 660 per share, raising funds from institutional buyers
CG Power and Industrial Solutions Limited announced the successful closure of its qualified institutions placement (QIP) of equity shares on July 3, 2025. The company's Securities Issue Committee approved the issue price of ₹660.00 per equity share, including a premium of ₹658.00, after applying a 2.81% discount to the floor price of ₹679.08 per share as per SEBI regulations.
In a regulatory filing, CG Power said the committee, which met on July 3, finalised the allocation of equity shares to eligible qualified institutional buyers (QIBs). The placement document was also approved, and the confirmation of allocation notes were sent to the investors.
The QIP was conducted under the provisions of Chapter VI of SEBI (Issue of Capital and Disclosure Requirements) Regulations, 2018, and Sections 42 and 62(1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013. Funds from QIBs have already been credited to the escrow account in accordance with the terms of the issue.
The Securities Issue Committee meeting commenced at 9:45 p.m. and concluded at 10:05 p.m., approving all the key resolutions for the completion of the QIP.
This move is expected to strengthen the company's capital base and support its growth initiatives.
Ahmedabad Plane Crash
Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Upturn
7 hours ago
- Business Upturn
ICICI Bank account holders will now have to keep Rs 50,000 as minimum balance vs Rs 10,000 earlier
By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on August 9, 2025, 09:33 IST ICICI Bank has announced a sharp increase in the minimum average monthly balance (MAB) requirement for its savings account holders in metro and urban locations. Effective October 1, 2025, customers in these areas will need to maintain a minimum balance of Rs 50,000, compared to the current requirement of Rs 10,000. The move marks a fivefold jump in the balance requirement, aimed at revising the bank's account maintenance norms in line with market conditions. According to the bank's updated schedule of charges, non-maintenance of the minimum balance will attract penalties as per the revised slab rates, which will also come into effect from October 1. The revision applies only to customers with savings accounts in metro and urban branches, while semi-urban and rural account holders will continue with the existing minimum balance requirements. ICICI Bank has advised customers to review their account balances ahead of the change to avoid non-maintenance charges. The update is part of a broader industry trend where banks are reviewing account-related fees and conditions to align with evolving cost structures and deposit mobilization strategies. Ahmedabad Plane Crash Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
Judge vacates debit fee regulations
This story was originally published on Payments Dive. To receive daily news and insights, subscribe to our free daily Payments Dive newsletter. U.S. District Judge Daniel Traynor ruled Wednesday that the Federal Reserve exceeded its authority more than a decade ago when it put regulations in place on fees bank card issuers can charge retailers and other merchants when consumers swipe debit cards. 'Accordingly, the Court will vacate Regulation II, 76 Fed. Reg. 43,394 (July 20, 2011), because it is contrary to law and was promulgated in excess of the Board's authority,' the U.S. District Court for North Dakota said in a judgement issued Thursday. The case filed initially by the North Dakota Retail Association and the North Dakota Petroleum Marketers Association against the Federal Reserve in April 2021 is part of a long-standing fee battle between banks and card networks on one side, and retailers and other merchants on the other side. While financial institutions that issue the cards, and their card network partners, have pressed for higher fees, merchants have pushed to lower them. The judge stayed the decision to give the Fed time to appeal the ruling 'to prevent interchange transaction fees from becoming a completely unregulated market,' the court order said. A spokesperson for the Fed declined to comment on the court ruling. While the litigation has been playing out in court, the central bank in 2023 for the first time said it would update the rates for debit card fees allowed under the Durbin Amendment. The fee rates for routing debit card transactions were initially set in 2011, after the amendment became law as part of the 2010 Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and haven't been changed since then. The Federal Reserve Board voted in October 2023 in favor of reducing the cap on the debit card interchange fee to reflect current costs for the transactions. The proposal would lower the base debit fee rate by about 30% to 14.4 cents from 21 cents, according to a proposal memo produced by the Fed's staff. The proposed changes to Regulation II would also adjust the amounts that banks subject to the rule can charge to cover fraud costs and to counter fraud losses. Only financial institutions with $10 billion or more in deposits are covered by the rules, know as Reg II. While that Fed proposal has been pending, the Supreme Court injected its voice into the debate in July 2024, ruling that plaintiffs in the North Dakota case, including a Watford City, North Dakota truck stop and convenience store called Corner Post, could continue to challenge the Fed's existing debit card interchange rate despite an appellate court ruling that the complaint was barred by a six-year statute of limitations. Corner Post, which became the main plaintiff in the case, is represented by Stephanie Martz, who is also general counsel and chief administrative officer for the National Retail Federation. Martz lauded the latest ruling by Traynor, saying in an interview that it supported everything her camp has been arguing for years. While she acknowledged that the Fed is likely to appeal the decision, she said she hoped it wouldn't. She said the central bank should scrap its plan to update the fee rules, and just craft new regulations. The Fed 'could just go ahead and promulgate a rule that comports with the Durbin Amendment,' she said. 'The rationale of the revised rule, even though we certainly were encouraged by it because it lowered the cap by quite a bit, it's now invalid under this court ruling,' Martz said. 'So, we strongly urge the Fed to move ahead with a rule that only considers enumerated [authorization, clearing, and settlement] costs and that sets rates based on individualized transaction costs.' Bank trade groups reacted negatively to the ruling. The Clearing House, which is owned by major banks, and the Bank Policy Institute issued a joint statement by email disagreeing with the court decision. 'We are severely disappointed in the Court's interpretation of the Durbin Amendment,' the two groups said in an emailed statement. 'The payment system is secure, convenient and reliable because of significant investment by banks, and today's decision, if affirmed, would undermine that system.' Mark Horwedel, an industry consultant who was formerly a payments executive retail behemoth Walmart, said he believes the ruling is long overdue. "They basically ignored what the law said at a cost of billions to merchants over 14 years," Horwedel said in an interview. The Fed misinterpreted the Durbin Amendment by taking factors like fraud prevention into consideration in determining the fee rates, argued Horwedel, who was also formerly CEO of an industry trade organization called the Merchant Advisory Group. Patrick Cooley contributed to this story. Recommended Reading Merchants, banks spar over Fed's debit card fee proposal Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Business Upturn
a day ago
- Business Upturn
Cabinet approves Rs 30,000 crore compensation for PSU oil companies' LPG losses
By Aditya Bhagchandani Published on August 8, 2025, 16:36 IST The Union Cabinet, chaired by Prime Minister Narendra Modi, has approved Rs 30,000 crore in compensation to three public sector oil marketing companies — Indian Oil Corporation (IOCL), Bharat Petroleum Corporation (BPCL) and Hindustan Petroleum Corporation (HPCL) — for losses incurred on domestic LPG sales. The amount will be distributed by the Ministry of Petroleum and Natural Gas in twelve tranches. Domestic LPG cylinders are supplied at regulated prices by these OMCs. With international LPG prices remaining elevated through 2024-25, the companies absorbed the cost increase without passing it on to consumers, resulting in substantial under-recoveries. Despite these losses, supply of domestic LPG was maintained across the country. The approved compensation will help the OMCs meet key needs, including crude and LPG procurement, debt servicing and capital expenditure, ensuring uninterrupted LPG availability. The move also reinforces the government's commitment to protect consumers from global price volatility and maintain access to clean cooking fuel under schemes such as the Pradhan Mantri Ujjwala Yojana. Ahmedabad Plane Crash Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.
