Yamuna pollution, smog biggest environmental issues in Delhi: SC Judge Sanjay Karol
New Delhi: Supreme Court judge Justice Sanjay Karol on Thursday said smog and Yamuna River pollution were the biggest environmental issues in the national capital. The judge was speaking at the Society of Indian Law Firms (SILF) Climate Change Conference and Awards 2025 when he emphasised on environmental protection. Each citizen, he said, was responsible to protect the environment and the onus wasn't just on the judiciary, the executive and the legislature. 'We have to make sure that the environment, be it in any form, has to be protected. I would also say this, that over the years we have developed certain principles, and the public trust doctrine is one such doctrine which we must always keep in mind,' Justice Karol said. He continued, 'But I would say this, if you were to see our report card in the last 75 years, or since the 1980s, what have we done? Have we done enough to protect the environment? My view is that a lot needs to be done, at all levels. And I would borrow an expression, that the solution to the problem now is grassroots solutions to an international problem.
The way forward, according to me, is that we as individuals have to take up the causes pertaining to the environment.'
Environmental issues could not be left to the courts for passing of verdicts, the legislature for making relevant laws or the executive for implementing them,
he added. 'Each one of us, as responsible citizens, has to understand, become aware of, and ensure that we protect the environment for posterity.' He highlighted the two major issues -- air pollution and a polluted Yamuna -- Delhi has been grappling with required attention. 'I don't know how many of you have travelled in the Metro, or how many of you have gone beyond the Lutyens.
But if you go to Noida or Trans-Yamuna, you would see what Yamuna really is. These are the two biggest challenges,' Justice Karol said. He outlined judiciary's 'zealous' role in protecting the environment. 'The reason is very clear. And it is that Mother Earth is not ours. We are there for her and we are there not only for her but also for posterity, for future generations, not only in India, but the world over,' the judge said.
Justice Karol, as a result, urged each citizen to take up the cause of protecting the environment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
2 hours ago
- The Hindu
High Court reiterates creation of ‘leaders parks' for installation of statues instead of public places
The Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has reiterated the creation of 'leaders parks' across Tamil Nadu for installation of new statues and relocation of existing statues for which permission was already granted. A Division Bench of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and A.D. Maria Clete observed that instead of installing statues of leaders in public places, the court had elaborately considered the issue and directed the government to identify lands for creation of the required number of 'leaders parks' across the State. Accordingly, permissions have already been granted and statues are to be relocated in the 'leaders parks'. The formation of 'leaders parks' would be of much benefit to youth as they can learn about the ideas and ideologies of the leaders. Instead of making concrete efforts for the formation of 'leaders parks', the government cannot issue orders granting permission to install statues in public places, the court observed. On account of heavy traffic congestion and other mitigating factors, the general public are put to hardship in the event of granting such permission to install statues in public places. The rights of citizens in all respects guaranteed under the Constitution are to be protected by the State, the court observed. The Supreme Court had passed an order directing no further installation of statue or construction of any structure on public roads, pavements, sideways and other public utility places are to be permitted. A Division Bench of Madras High Court also passed orders. When the Supreme Court passed an order not to grant permission to install statues in public places, the State government cannot pass orders granting such permission, the court observed. The court was hearing a petition filed by Palsamy of Tirunelveli district who had sought a direction to restrain the authorities from installing a bronze statue and name board of the former Chief Minister M. Karunanidhi near the entrance of Valliyoor daily vegetable market in Valliyoor in Tirunelveli district. The State submitted that instruction had been issued to the Collector not to install the statue of the former Chief Minister and action will be taken to withdraw the G.O. issued. The court posted the matter for reporting compliance on July 16.
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
Trapped In Cash Row, Here's Justice Yashwant Varma's Only Way Out To Avoid Impeachment
Last Updated: Resignation is the only option before Justice Yashwant Varma to avoid impeachment by Parliament as the government pushes for bringing a motion to remove the Allahabad HC judge. Cash At Home Row: The Union government is likely to bring in Parliament an impeachment motion against Justice Yashwant Varma of Allahabad High Court, who was indicted by a Supreme Court-appointed probe panel after the discovery of a huge amount of burnt cash from his official residence in the national capital. Government sources told CNN-News18 that Parliamentary Affairs Minister Kiren Rijiju has begun speaking with all the opposition parties, to take them all in confidence ahead of initiating any action against Justice Varma. What's The Option? According to the officials as quoted by news agency PTI, resignation is the only option before him to avoid removal by the parliament. Officials aware of the procedure to appoint and remove Supreme Court and high court judges pointed out that while defending his case before lawmakers in any of the House, Justice Varma can announce that he is quitting and his verbal statement will be considered as his resignation. Should he decide to resign, he will get pension and other benefits entitled to a retired HC judge. But if he is removed by Parliament, he will be deprived of pension and other benefits. How Can A Judge Resign? According to Article 217 of the Constitution, a High Court judge 'may, by writing under his hand addressed to the President, resign his office." A judge's resignation does not require any approval. A simple resignation letter is sufficient. What Is Impeachment? If pursued, this motion will initiate a rare and highly structured removal process under the Constitution of India and the Judges Inquiry Act. According to Article 217, read with Article 124(4), a high court judge can be removed only by the President after both Houses of Parliament pass a motion with a special majority on grounds of proven misbehaviour or incapacity. The Judges Inquiry Act mandates that the process begin with a notice of motion signed by 100 MPs in the Lok Sabha or 50 MPs in the Rajya Sabha. If the Speaker or Chairman admits the motion, a three-member committee — comprising an SC judge, HC Chief Justice, and a distinguished jurist — is formed to probe the charges. The judge has the right to a fair hearing, including responding to charges and cross-examining witnesses. If the committee finds the judge guilty, the matter is returned to Parliament for a final vote. Justice Varma's removal proceedings will be taken up in the upcoming Monsoon session of Parliament. This will be the first ever impeachment proceeding to be taken up in the new Parliament building. Supreme Court judge V Ramaswami and Calcutta High Court judge Soumitra Sen had earlier faced impeachment proceedings but they resigned. What's The Row? Justice Varma is facing allegations of corruption after the cash discovery in March, when he was a judge at the Delhi High Court. However, he has claimed ignorance about the cash. After the controversy, Justice Varma was transferred to the Allahabad High Court, his parent High Court. After the cash discovery incident, the Supreme Court had set up a three-member committee of Justice Sheel Nagu, Chief Justice of the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Justice GS Sandhawalia, Chief Justice of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh and Justice Anu Sivaraman, Judge of the High Court of Karnataka, to look into the allegations against Justice Varma. While the preliminary report of the Delhi High Court Chief Justice and the response of Justice Varma, along with the photos and videos taken by the Delhi Police, were publicised by uploading them on the Supreme Court's website, the final iquiry report, submitted to the Chief Justice of India on May 4, has not been officially disclosed yet. Then Chief Justice of India Sanjiv Khanna had written to the president and the prime minister to remove Justice Varma, mired in the cash discovery row. Justice Khanna had prodded Varma to resign but he had refused, sources had earlier said. (With inputs from PTI) About the Author Shobhit Gupta Shobhit Gupta is a sub-editor at and covers India and International news. He is interested in day to day political affairs in India and geopolitics. He earned his BA Journalism (Hons) degree from More Get breaking news, in-depth analysis, and expert perspectives on everything from politics to crime and society. Stay informed with the latest India news only on News18. Download the News18 App to stay updated! Location : New Delhi, India, India First Published: June 08, 2025, 19:49 IST News india Trapped In Cash Row, Here's Justice Yashwant Varma's Only Way Out To Avoid Impeachment
Mint
3 hours ago
- Mint
Israel is putting more women on the front line to help fix its manpower problem
GOLAN HEIGHTS—Days ago, an Israeli search-and-rescue team in Gaza spent hours drilling through concrete and plying aside rebar to recover the body of a fallen soldier buried under rubble in Khan Younis. The combat unit had been following a commando brigade in Gaza, recovering the bodies of dead soldiers on the battlefield. It is a routine task in the Israeli military, but it was unique that this team was made up mostly of women. 'A year and a half ago, I would never have dreamed of leading a combat team within Lebanon or Gaza," said a petite 25-year-old major. 'I think the war proved to all of us how much we are capable of." She is among a growing number of women serving on the front lines of Israel's military. Before the Hamas-led Oct. 7, 2023, attack that spurred the war, women were trained for combat, but left mostly to guard within Israel's borders or run checkpoints in the West Bank, considered less dangerous tasks. Now, they are entering the battlefield in Gaza, Lebanon and Syria in ways many previously thought impossible. Today, one in five combat soldiers is a woman, a ratio higher than many other modern Western militaries, experts say, and one which helps relieve Israel's acute manpower shortage after 20 months of war. Israel's military is made up largely of volunteer reservists, placing the burden of the war on regular working people, often with young families. Still, full equality in the military remains a challenge. The military last week cut short a pilot program to integrate women into Israel's main infantry units for 'expected low effectiveness," after finding that the 23 female trainees were suffering injuries and were 'not expected to meet the required standards of combat and physical fitness." The Israeli military has been pushing to recruit ultra-Orthodox Jewish men into its ranks as a solution to the manpower problem. The military and most of the country supports drafting ultra-Orthodox men, who are largely refusing to comply with a recent Supreme Court ruling that overturned their longstanding draft exemption. In light of this, integrating women eases pressure to free up men for other fighting roles. But with many of the military's core combat positions still closed to women or dominated by men, integrating women means it is only a partial solution to the manpower problem. Israel has for decades had one of the highest female representations among modern militaries, standing at about one-third overall, according to the military's most recently available data. It quickly drew on women ahead of its 1948 founding war out of a mix of socialist ideology, nationalism and necessity, experts say. Israel later scaled back women's roles until the 1990s, when Border Guard units opened their ranks to female fighters and a Supreme Court case forced the air force to recruit female pilots. Today, just over half of the military's combat roles are open to women, and 90% of overall roles. This high ratio of women in combat-designated roles is unusual for modern militaries. The U.S., although it has opened most military roles to women, still has a lower overall percentage of female forces at 18%, and therefore at the front lines. Israel is also one of the few countries that subjects women to a broad-based draft at age 18, just like men. Today, women represent 21% of Israel's combat-classed forces, jumping from 14% right ahead of the war and up from 7% a decade earlier, according to Israeli military data. The military said that it has about 4,500 female recruits in combat roles, driven by both an expansion in offerings to women and increased female demand to go into combat professions. 'There are three reasons militaries look to put women in combat roles: ideology, equality and necessity," said Jacob Stoil, chair of applied history at the Modern War Institute at the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, who emphasized he was speaking from his personal research and not on behalf of the Army. 'You'll see women serving in combat roles when one of those three are the case," he said, adding that in Israel all three apply. The search-and-rescue unit that the young major belongs to is a mixed-gender fighting force specialized in excavating collapsed structures and evacuating the wounded. Ahead of the war, the unit was mostly relegated to West Bank security-keeping roles, also considered a less dangerous task. After Oct. 7, the unit was sent to the front lines in Gaza and embedded with commando units. When the war expanded to Lebanon, women were sent on front-line missions there too. The military plans to expand the unit by opening a new company in August. Since first being admitted in 2008, women have grown to fill about 70% of its combat roles, officers in the unit said. Women's conscription into combat units has long been a subject of debate in Israel. Some believe that the risk of torture or rape if captured puts women in a uniquely dangerous position. Others argue it hurts male morale, and that it creates additional challenges for some religious men who don't want to be in the same unit as a woman. Perceptions began to change after the Oct. 7 attack, when three all-female tank crews in the Caracal Battalion, meant to patrol Israel's border with Egypt but not enter enemy territory, raced through the desert to fight off Palestinian militants in and around Israeli communities under siege. Israel's military said that it has about 4,500 female recruits in combat roles. The Israeli military's then-chief-of-staff Herzi Halevi took notice at the time, saying that their 'action and fighting" against Hamas on Oct. 7 answers critics of women's integration into fighting forces. The search-and-rescue unit's base in Zikim also came under attack, and seven soldiers died fending off militants. Among the rescuers sent to recapture and secure the base was a 21-year-old lieutenant. She and other relief forces held off militants for two days before tanks arrived to back them up, she said. Shortly thereafter, she was attached to Israel's equivalent to the Navy SEALs as part of the initial phase of Israel's ground invasion, helping them hunt for underground tunnels in Gaza. She doesn't think she would ever have been given such an opportunity before Oct. 7. 'I think that they just realized how powerful we are," she said. 'They realized we can actually do it."
