logo
Ukraine talks without Russia are a 'road to nowhere'

Ukraine talks without Russia are a 'road to nowhere'

Perth Nowa day ago
Russia has warned the West that attempts to resolve security issues for Ukraine;s future without Moscow's participation are a "road to nowhere."
Russia's Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov particularly criticised the role of European leaders who met US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy at the White House on Monday to discuss security guarantees for Ukraine that could help end the three-and-a-half-year-old war.
"We cannot agree with the fact that now it is proposed to resolve questions of security, collective security, without the Russian Federation. This will not work," Lavrov told a joint press conference after meeting Jordan's foreign minister.
US and European military planners have begun exploring post-conflict security guarantees for Ukraine. Lavrov said such discussions without Russia were pointless.
"I am sure that in the West and above all in the United States they understand perfectly well that seriously discussing security issues without the Russian Federation is a utopia, it's a road to nowhere."
NATO military leaders holding a video conference on Wednesday had a "great, candid discussion" on the results of recent talks on Ukraine, the chair of the alliance's military committee said.
"Priority continues to be a just, credible and durable peace," Admiral Giuseppe Cavo Dragone wrote in a post on X.
Meanwhile after an object likely to be a Russian drone crashed in a cornfield in eastern Poland overnight, Poland accused Russia of provoking NATO countries just as efforts to find an end to the war were intensifying.
"Once again, we are dealing with a provocation by the Russian Federation, with a Russian drone. We are dealing in a crucial moment, when discussions about peace (in Ukraine) are under way," Defence Minister Wladyslaw Kosiniak-Kamysz said.
Moscow this week also restated its rejection of "any scenarios involving the deployment of NATO troops in Ukraine."
Lavrov accused the European leaders who met Trump and Zelenskiy of carrying out "a fairly aggressive escalation of the situation, rather clumsy and, in general, unethical attempts to change the position of the Trump administration and the president of the United States personally ... We did not hear any constructive ideas from the Europeans there."
Trump said on Monday the United States would help guarantee Ukraine's security in any deal to end Russia's war there. He subsequently said he had ruled out putting US troops in Ukraine, but the US might provide air support as part of a deal to end the hostilities.
Zelenskiy's chief of staff, speaking after a meeting of national security advisers from Western countries and NATO, said work was proceeding on the military component of the guarantees.
"Our teams, above all the military, have already begun active work on the military component of security guarantees," chief of staff Andriy Yermak wrote on social media.
Yermak said Ukraine was also working on a plan with its allies on how to proceed "in case the Russian side continues to prolong the war and disrupt agreements on bilateral and trilateral formats of leaders' meetings."
Lavrov said Russia was in favour of "truly reliable" guarantees for Ukraine and suggested these could be modelled on a draft accord that was discussed between the warring parties in Istanbul in 2022, in the early weeks of the war.
Under the draft discussed then, Ukraine would have received security guarantees from a group of countries including the five permanent members of the UN Security Council - China, Russia, the United States, Britain, and France.
At the time, Kyiv rejected that proposal on the grounds that Moscow would have held effective veto power over any military response to come to its aid.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Donald Trump's massive $778 million civil fraud fine in AG Letitia James' case thrown out by New York appeals court
Donald Trump's massive $778 million civil fraud fine in AG Letitia James' case thrown out by New York appeals court

Sky News AU

time29 minutes ago

  • Sky News AU

Donald Trump's massive $778 million civil fraud fine in AG Letitia James' case thrown out by New York appeals court

President Trump won a huge, symbolic victory Thursday when a New York appeals court threw out the more than $500 million ($778 million AUD) fine he owed in Attorney General Letitia James' business fraud case. The Appellate Division, First Department, overturned the whopping $464 million judgment against Trump, 79, but upheld a finding that the real estate tycoon-turned-president engaged in fraud by exaggerating his net worth for decades. 'I had a victory today. You know, they stole $550 million from me with a fake case, and it was overturned,' Trump told dozens of law enforcement officers later Thursday during a visit related to his crime crackdown in Washington, DC. But the case, stemming from a civil suit brought by James' office, still remains in place and will now go to New York's highest court as the legal battle between the state's top lawyer and the commander in chief continues. The 323-page decision included three separate opinions, but three of the five judges agreed the fine against Trump — which had grown to $515 million including interest — was 'excessive.' 'While the injunctive relief ordered by the court is well crafted to curb defendants' business culture, the court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,' the main opinion by Judges Dianne T. Renwick and Peter H. Moulton read. Still, the five-judge panel kept in place a ban on Trump and his two eldest sons, Donald Trump Jr. and Eric Trump, from running a company in New York for several years. And the ruling kept in place an order for an outside monitor to oversee and file reports on the Trump Organization's business dealings for three years. Those parts of the ruling had been on hold while the appeal was decided. And Trump posted a $175 million bond in place of paying the entire judgment during the appeal process. The interest and fines against everyone in the case — including Don Jr. and Eric, and other Trump Org. execs — have ballooned to over $527 million since the February 2024 ruling from Manhattan Supreme Court Justice Arthur Engoron. Thursday's decision was a blow to James — whose office prosecuted Trump — and to Engoron, as at least two appellate judges found Engoron made 'errors' in his rulings on the case. James accused Trump and others of carrying out a 'staggering fraud' by inflating his net worth by billions of dollars over a decade to get better loan and insurance terms. But the Republican commander-in-chief maintained his innocence, claiming that he was a target of the AG's politically motivated prosecution. Trump lauded the ruling in two lengthy posts on Truth Social, repeating claims that the case was a 'political witch hunt.' 'TOTAL VICTORY in the FAKE New York State Attorney General Letitia James Case!,' Trump posted. 'I greatly respect the fact that the Court had the Courage to throw out this unlawful and disgraceful Decision that was hurting Business all throughout New York State.' James, in her own statement, glossed over the fact that the judgment was vacated, also playing the decision off as a victory. 'The First Department today affirmed the well-supported finding of the trial court; Donald Trump, his company, and two of his children are liable for fraud.' James said her office would appeal. The five-judge panel was starkly divided on various issues. Two of the judges found James' suit was valid and that she proved Trump committed fraud but felt the fine against him was too harsh. One judge said Engoron made a mistake by ruling that Trump was liable for fraud before the bench trial. Another judge, Justice David Friedman, said James didn't have the authority to bring the case against Trump in the first place, noting the institutions that lent money to the president could have sued him if they felt aggrieved. Friedman — who issued the most scathing opinion among the three against James and Engoron — said the trial judge wrongly sided with the AG on a range of issues, including by crediting the testimony of ex-con Michael Cohen and when he doled out sanctions against Trump's lawyers for 'playing the role they are supposed to.' The fact Engoron hit Trump's team with sanctions, 'raises serious doubts about the trial court's objectivity and impartiality in presiding over and adjudicating this action,' Friedman wrote in his dissent. As for James, Friedman blasted: 'Plainly, her ultimate goal was not 'market hygiene' … but political hygiene, ending with the derailment of President Trump's political career and the destruction of his real estate business. 'The voters have obviously rendered a verdict on his political career. This bench today unanimously derails the effort to destroy his business.' Since there wasn't a majority reached in Thursday's decision, the case can automatically qualify to be heard in the Empire State's top court — the New York Court of Appeals. Trump's side can seek to put the non-monetary punitive measures, like the ban on him running the business, on hold again during further appeal, the panel said. The appeal court's decision came after a theatrical, 11-week trial that threatened to derail Trump's image as a real estate tycoon — and brand him as a fraudster — as he campaigned to regain the White House. Trial evidence revealed that Trump secured cushy interest rates between 2011 and 2021 after goosing up the value of assets like his Big Apple penthouse and Mar-a-Lago estate on financial papers. Trump's business falsely claimed that his Trump Tower triplex was 30,000 square feet — rather than its true size of 11,000 square feet — and used the phony figures to pump up the pad's value to $327 million in 2015 after claiming it was worth $80 million just four years earlier, evidence showed. Trump also valued Mar-a-Lago at $517 million on a financial filing despite his own tax broker admitting to listing the palatial estate's 'market value' at just $27 million in 2020, a witness revealed. 'The frauds found here leap off the page and shock the conscience,' Engoron wrote in his ruling. The case roiled the soon-to-be 47th president, who chose to leave the campaign trail for several days to attend the trial, calling the proceedings a 'political witch hunt' and insisting that he did 'nothing wrong.' Engoron and James are both elected Democrats, and the AG campaigned on a promise to investigate Trump, calling the then-president a 'con man' and ″carnival barker.' Trump's lawyers argued that the case had no 'victims' and that 'sophisticated' companies like Deutsche Bank did their own research before entering into the deals, and were all paid back in full. But James' office argued that Trump's fudged financial filings were nonetheless harmful to the marketplace as a whole — and Engoron agreed. 'The next group of lenders to receive bogus statements might not be so lucky,' he wrote in his ruling. Ed Martin, Trump's political weaponization czar, called for James to step down as the Empire State's top lawyer after he launched a probe into allegations that she committed mortgage fraud on a Brooklyn townhouse and a Virginia home. Martin, the director of the Justice Department's Weaponization Working Group, even showed up outside James' multi-family residential property in Brooklyn last week. 'I'm just happy to be on a block looking at houses,' Martin told a Post reporter at the time. 'I'm just looking at houses, interesting houses. It's an important house.' Trump faced four criminal cases, but appears to have gotten off unscathed in all of them, primarily because he landed back in the White House for another term and benefits again from presidential immunity. Two federal cases, for his alleged role in the Jan. 6 Capitol Riot and for allegedly hoarding confidential documents at Mar-a-Lago, were both dropped by the Justice Department soon after he took office in January. 'I'm just happy to be on a block looking at houses,' Martin told a Post reporter at the time. 'I'm just looking at houses, interesting houses. It's an important house.' Trump faced four criminal cases, but appears to have gotten off unscathed in all of them, primarily because he landed back in the White House for another term and benefits again from presidential immunity. Two federal cases, for his alleged role in the Jan. 6 Capitol Riot and for allegedly hoarding confidential documents at Mar-a-Lago, were both dropped by the Justice Department soon after he took office in January. Trump was convicted in a 'hush money' case in New York State court but he only received a slap on the wrist. He's appealing that case. And a Georgia election fraud case against him was derailed after Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis was exposed for having an affair with the lead prosecutor she appointed to prosecute him. Willis was removed from the case and it's been in limbo since. The president is still fighting two civil jury verdicts in the lawsuits brought by writer E. Jean Carroll, accusing Trump of sexually abusing her one time in the 1990s and then defaming her repeatedly by denying her claims and calling her a liar. He is seeking to overturn an $83.3 million verdict in Carroll's defamation suit. And he lost his bid to vacate a $5 million verdict in Carroll's sexual abuse suit. He could still seek to have the US Supreme Court hear his appeal in the latter case. Originally published as Donald Trump's massive $778 million civil fraud fine in AG Letitia James' case thrown out by New York appeals court

‘Excessive': Trump rejoices as $700m New York fraud fine tossed out
‘Excessive': Trump rejoices as $700m New York fraud fine tossed out

Sydney Morning Herald

timean hour ago

  • Sydney Morning Herald

‘Excessive': Trump rejoices as $700m New York fraud fine tossed out

New York: A Manhattan appeals court struck down a roughly $US500 million ($780 million) fraud penalty against US President Donald Trump and his company, even as it upheld the finding that he broke the law by inflating the value of assets such as Mar-a-Lago. A five-judge panel on Thursday, New York time, agreed with Trump that the size of the fine was unconstitutionally 'excessive'. The long-awaited ruling by New York's intermediate appeals court is a major victory for Trump over New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose office brought the case, though other aspects of the April 2024 judgment remain intact. On top of the financial penalty, Trump and his sons faced a temporary ban on serving as corporate officers in New York. The company was also ordered to submit its financial records for review by an independent monitor. Those sanctions stand, though they remain on hold for possible further appeal by Trump. In a statement, James said her office would challenge the ruling at the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court. She also stressed that 'yet another court has ruled that the president violated the law'. Still, the massive fine had been the heart of Justice Arthur Engoron's judgment. The judge had ordered Trump last year to pay $US355 million in penalties after finding that he flagrantly padded financial statements provided to lenders and insurers. With interest, the sum has topped $US515 million. Additional penalties for executives at his company, the Trump Organisation, including sons Eric and Donald Trump jnr, have brought the total to $US527 million with interest. The elimination of the fine adds to the list of Trump's legal woes that have essentially melted away since he won re-election as president. The Justice Department dropped two federal criminal cases agaist him, citing a longstanding policy against prosecuting a sitting president. Though he was convicted of falsifying business records to conceal hush-money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels, he was sentenced to no jail time.

‘Excessive': Trump rejoices as $700m New York fraud fine tossed out
‘Excessive': Trump rejoices as $700m New York fraud fine tossed out

The Age

timean hour ago

  • The Age

‘Excessive': Trump rejoices as $700m New York fraud fine tossed out

New York: A Manhattan appeals court struck down a roughly $US500 million ($780 million) fraud penalty against US President Donald Trump and his company, even as it upheld the finding that he broke the law by inflating the value of assets such as Mar-a-Lago. A five-judge panel on Thursday, New York time, agreed with Trump that the size of the fine was unconstitutionally 'excessive'. The long-awaited ruling by New York's intermediate appeals court is a major victory for Trump over New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose office brought the case, though other aspects of the April 2024 judgment remain intact. On top of the financial penalty, Trump and his sons faced a temporary ban on serving as corporate officers in New York. The company was also ordered to submit its financial records for review by an independent monitor. Those sanctions stand, though they remain on hold for possible further appeal by Trump. In a statement, James said her office would challenge the ruling at the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court. She also stressed that 'yet another court has ruled that the president violated the law'. Still, the massive fine had been the heart of Justice Arthur Engoron's judgment. The judge had ordered Trump last year to pay $US355 million in penalties after finding that he flagrantly padded financial statements provided to lenders and insurers. With interest, the sum has topped $US515 million. Additional penalties for executives at his company, the Trump Organisation, including sons Eric and Donald Trump jnr, have brought the total to $US527 million with interest. The elimination of the fine adds to the list of Trump's legal woes that have essentially melted away since he won re-election as president. The Justice Department dropped two federal criminal cases agaist him, citing a longstanding policy against prosecuting a sitting president. Though he was convicted of falsifying business records to conceal hush-money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels, he was sentenced to no jail time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store