logo
How Trump's aid cuts are inflicting double the pain on LGBT+ people

How Trump's aid cuts are inflicting double the pain on LGBT+ people

Yahoo17-05-2025
At a drop-in centre on Uganda's border with Kenya, along a busy trucking route, groups of people gather to play Ludo and pick up their HIV medication. It's a safe space for people from LGBT+ communities who have been turned away or harassed at other facilities.
But the centre is now quiet – three-quarters of its staff have had to be laid off after cuts to US aid. Stocks of drugs are running low and most of its regular clients have stopped showing up. Since January, when Donald Trump came into office for the second time, the centre has lost its funding.
'I have a friend who is taking antiretrovirals [ARVs]. He has now gone a week without,' explains Shafiq, 24, who relies on the centre, putting him at risk of getting sick or infecting others. 'It really tortures us so much'.
This comes in the wake of The Independent revealing that the US cuts have derailed the projected end of the Aids pandemic, which could lead to 4 million extra deaths by 2030.
Uganda has faced international criticism for harsh anti-homosexuality laws passed in 2023 – punishing consensual same-sex relationships with penalties of up to life in prison. As a result, specialist services that help LGBT+ people access HIV care are generally run by charities and community organisations outside of the public health system.
The centre in the town of Busia, which is run by the Amalgamated Transport General Workers Union (ATGWU), started life when its founder observed how truckers would spend time there, creating a market for sex workers – and a hotspot for HIV transmission. Now it serves as a clinic and meeting place for LGBT+ people too. While it remains open at the grace of volunteers, supplies of pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) – to reduce the risk of contracting HIV – condoms and ARVs for treatment have been dwindling. Staff pay and stipends for volunteers came from US funding – now all gone.
The hostile law makes it hard enough to reach these groups with prevention services, while also deterring people from seeking support and medication. Trump's cuts are only making things worse. The Uganda Key Populations Consortium (UKPC), an NGO supporting vulnerable communities, confirmed to The Independent that it has recorded incidents of people being denied medical care in public hospitals because of their identities since the US cuts were announced in January.
Shafiq's story is illustrative of this discrimination. He says he found his way to the drop-in centre in Busia, having been denied antibiotics for a sexually-transmitted infection (STI) at a public hospital. He found a friendly place and started working there, helping others to access free medicines, testing and counselling. 'It gives me a chance to talk about what I'm really going through,' Shafiq adds.
It allowed him to get supplies of PrEP to protect him from contracting HIV. But owing to the aid cuts, Shafiq took his last dose of PrEP five days ago, when stocks ran out.
He worries that without it, his next partner could infect him with the virus. More than one in 10 gay men in Uganda are estimated to be living with HIV.
HIV testing and medication are supposed to be available to everyone in public hospitals and clinics. 'The treatment is there, but they cannot give it to us just because they know what we are doing is illegal,' Shafiq says, speaking about being turned away for treatment when hospital staff found out he was gay.
'You are discriminated [against]. You are isolated and you feel like shying away. You also feel like you are unwanted within the community,' Shafiq adds.
In hospital facilities, he says: 'They ask you so many questions. After asking you so many questions, they start judging you.'
'Most of our peers were suffering from such incidents,' he adds, referencing harassment while waiting in line at public hospitals or at times outright denial of services.
Richard Lusimbo runs the UKPC, a leading organisation in the country supporting groups euphemistically referred to as 'key populations'. This vague language is designed to ward off the hostility that can come with openly advertising that you are helping LGBT+ people (and other vulnerable groups like sex workers).
Lusimbo has begun to hear reports from contacts around the country of trans people being turned away at hospitals.
'We saw some cases of increasing stigma and discrimination in health facilities.
'In eastern Uganda there's a facility where a trans person was turned away by a security guard saying Trump does not support you people, so leave.'
The Ugandan Ministry of Health said the allegations raised in this were 'untrue'.
A spokesperson said: 'As a government, we uphold a non-discriminatory policy in service delivery, ensuring equal access to healthcare for all. Despite the funding cut, we're reorganising our system to maintain continuity ... Our clinics remain open to all patients, providing care without discrimination.'
But for Lusimbo, the US cuts have helped 'send people back to spaces where they've been discriminated against, they've been castigated, again making them more vulnerable'.
Withdrawal of health resources has a 'serious and disproportionate impact on groups of people that are highly vulnerable to HIV,' the UN Aids agency (UNAIDS) deputy director, Angeli Achrekar, says.
Not only does this first and foremost harm those vulnerable communities, it creates the risk that 'the progress made in the fight against HIV will go into reverse', says Achrekar.
'That would be a tragedy for global health,' she adds.
This article was produced as part of The Independent's Rethinking Global Aid project
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

An appeals court lets the Trump administration suspend or end billions in foreign aid
An appeals court lets the Trump administration suspend or end billions in foreign aid

Los Angeles Times

time7 hours ago

  • Los Angeles Times

An appeals court lets the Trump administration suspend or end billions in foreign aid

WASHINGTON — A divided panel of appeals court judges ruled Wednesday that the Trump administration can suspend or terminate billions of dollars of congressionally appropriated funding for foreign aid. Two of three judges from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit concluded that grant recipients challenging the freeze did not meet the requirements for a preliminary injunction restoring the flow of money. In January, on the first day of his second term in the White House, Republican President Trump issued an executive order directing the State Department and the U.S. Agency for International Development to freeze spending on foreign aid. After groups of grant recipients sued to challenge that order, U.S. District Judge Amir Ali ordered the administration to release the full amount of foreign assistance that Congress had appropriated for the 2024 budget year. The appeal court's majority partially vacated Ali's order. Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson and Gregory Katsas concluded that the plaintiffs did not have a valid legal basis for the court to hear their claims. The ruling was not on the merits of whether the government unconstitutionally infringed on Congress' spending powers. 'The parties also dispute the scope of the district court's remedy but we need not resolve it ... because the grantees have failed to satisfy the requirements for a preliminary injunction in any event,' Henderson wrote. Judge Florence Pan, who dissented, said the Supreme Court has held 'in no uncertain terms' that the president does not have the authority to disobey laws for policy reasons. 'Yet that is what the majority enables today,' Pan wrote. 'The majority opinion thus misconstrues the separation-of-powers claim brought by the grantees, misapplies precedent, and allows Executive Branch officials to evade judicial review of constitutionally impermissible actions.' The money at issue includes nearly $4 billion for USAID to spend on global health programs and more than $6 billion for HIV and AIDS programs. Trump has portrayed the foreign aid as wasteful spending that does not align with his foreign policy goals. Henderson was nominated to the court by Republican President George H.W. Bush. Katsas was nominated by Trump. Pan was nominated by Democratic President Joe Biden. Kunzelman writes for the Associated Press.

A court victory for Trump's foreign aid cuts, briefly explained
A court victory for Trump's foreign aid cuts, briefly explained

Vox

time9 hours ago

  • Vox

A court victory for Trump's foreign aid cuts, briefly explained

President Donald Trump in the State Dining Room of the White House on August 8, 2025. Nathan Howard/Bloomberg via Getty Images This story appeared in The Logoff, a daily newsletter that helps you stay informed about the Trump administration without letting political news take over your life. Subscribe here. Welcome to The Logoff: The Trump administration's decision to cancel billions in foreign aid can stand, a federal appeals court said today, in a major blow to global humanitarian aid. What did the court actually decide? A three-judge panel on the DC Circuit Court of Appeals ruled 2-1 that the plaintiffs in the case weren't eligible to bring the suit in the first place. The majority found that only the Government Accountability Office can challenge the administration's decision to withhold congressionally appropriated funds under a specific process laid out in the Impoundment Control Act of 1974. What's the context for this decision? Donald Trump and Elon Musk made US foreign aid programs one of their first targets upon taking power in January. Musk boasted about feeding the US Agency for International Development 'into the wood chipper,' and Trump withheld billions in spending already authorized by Congress. A number of humanitarian nonprofits sued to restore the withheld funds, alleging it was an unconstitutional violation of the separation of powers — but today's ruling punts on that question altogether, instead focusing on procedure. What will the impact of this freeze be? To put it simply, US foreign aid saves lives, and cutting it will cost them. Among the money the Trump administration will now be allowed to withhold is billions of dollars in funding for HIV/AIDS prevention and other global health programs. As the New York Times calculated earlier this year, the potential death toll for slashing US aid is more than 1.5 million people in 2025 alone; many, including young children, have already died. The Logoff The email you need to stay informed about Trump — without letting the news take over your life. Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply. What else should I know? Separate from the human impact, this is a significant decision for the Trump administration's efforts to impound congressionally appropriated funds, for foreign aid and other purposes. Unless or until the GAO sues over impoundment, the administration can keep at it and keep chipping away at the separation of powers in the process. And with that, it's time to log off… You know what The Logoff hasn't featured in a while? That's right — an animal livestream. Today I'm spotlighting one of my favorites from Brooks Falls in Katmai National Park, Alaska.

Appeals court lets the White House suspend or end billions in foreign aid
Appeals court lets the White House suspend or end billions in foreign aid

Boston Globe

time12 hours ago

  • Boston Globe

Appeals court lets the White House suspend or end billions in foreign aid

After groups of grant recipients sued to challenge that order, U.S. District Judge Amir Ali ordered the administration to release the full amount of foreign assistance that Congress had appropriated for the 2024 budget year. Advertisement The appeal court's majority partially vacated Ali's order. Judges Karen LeCraft Henderson and Gregory Katsas concluded that the plaintiffs did not have a valid legal basis for the court to hear their claims. The ruling was not on the merits of whether the government unconstitutionally infringed on Congress' spending powers. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up 'The parties also dispute the scope of the district court's remedy but we need not resolve it ... because the grantees have failed to satisfy the requirements for a preliminary injunction in any event,' Henderson wrote. Judge Florence Pan, who dissented, said the Supreme Court has held 'in no uncertain terms' that the president does not have the authority to disobey laws for policy reasons. 'Yet that is what the majority enables today,' Pan wrote. 'The majority opinion thus misconstrues the separation-of-powers claim brought by the grantees, misapplies precedent, and allows Executive Branch officials to evade judicial review of constitutionally impermissible actions.' Advertisement The money at issue includes nearly $4 billion for USAID to spend on global health programs and more than $6 billion for HIV and AIDS programs. Trump has portrayed the foreign aid as wasteful spending that does not align with his foreign policy goals. Henderson was nominated to the court by Republican President George H.W. Bush. Katsas was nominated by Trump. Pan was nominated by Democratic President Joe Biden.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store