Royal Family Makes Major Health Announcement Amid King Charles' Cancer Battle
The British royal family made a major health announcement amid III's cancer battle with news featuring .
On Friday, May 23, the official royal family Instagram account shared photos from a ribbon cutting of a new transplant center at Queen Elizabeth Hospital in Birmingham, U.K.
🎬 SIGN UP for Parade's Daily newsletter to get the latest pop culture news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox 🎬
Birgitte, 78, is married to King Charles' first cousin, Prince Richard, Duke of Gloucester, 80.
In the update, Buckingham Palace revealed, "Birgitte, Duchess of Gloucester has officially opened Edmonds Transplant Centre Birmingham at Queen Elizabeth Hospital. 🏥."
It explained, "The new centre provides all the services that patients would need in their transplant journey, with the Birmingham-based hospital being the most active transplant centre in Europe."
Among the major organ transplants carried out at hospital are heart, lung, liver and kidney,
"The new centre will enable the hospital to continue to provide life-changing care to their patients," the post concluded.
The news of the organ transplant center opening came amid King Charles' cancer journey. In February 2024, the monarch announced his diagnosis with an unspecified form of cancer.
"His Majesty has today commenced a schedule of regular treatments, during which time he has been advised by doctors to postpone public-facing duties," the royal family shared in a statement. "Throughout this period, His Majesty will continue to undertake State business and official paperwork as usual."
Since then, King Charles, 76, has continued treatment and resumed royal duties—but with plenty of help from other members of the royal family.
Next:
Royal Family Makes Major Health Announcement Amid King Charles' Cancer Battle first appeared on Parade on May 23, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tim McGraw Makes Bold Promise to Fans at First Show Since Major Health Scare
Tim McGraw Makes Bold Promise to Fans at First Show Since Major Health Scare originally appeared on Parade. shared a video from his first show since a major health scare—and in it, he made a bold promise to fans. On Saturday, May 31, the country icon, 58, headlined the Music City Rodeo at Bridgestone Arena in Nashville. It was McGraw's debut concert since canceling his Standing Only Room Tour in June 2024. 🎬 SIGN UP for Parade's Daily newsletter to get the latest pop culture news & celebrity interviews delivered right to your inbox 🎬 In the wake of his milestone performance, the "Live Like You Were Dying" crooner took to Instagram with a video of highlights from the show. "NASHVILLE!! I love this town!!!" McGraw declared in his update. "Thank you for such a warm welcome for the inaugural year of @musiccityrodeo!" The montage featured behind-the-scenes shots as well as clips of McGraw singing and the enthusiastic crowd cheering as the fan-favorite track "I Like It, I Love It" played. At the end of the video, the country crooner made a bold promise to the Music City Rodeo crowd, revealing, "We're going to be here every single year, so I want y'all to keep coming out!" View this post on Instagram A post shared by Tim McGraw (@thetimmcgraw) In the comments, McGraw's Instagram followers rejoiced over his big return. One fan wrote, "Oh my dear Mr. McGraw. You are such a wonderful entertainer…your voice, songs and personality are a pleasure to experience. And you are so easy on the 👀." Another shared, "We are glad you're back and healthy. We love you." Someone else echoed, "Welcome back to the stage, Sir! You have been missed! Can't wait til the next time," as a different Instagram user agreed, writing, "Doesn't get more epic T!" Meanwhile, yet another follower begged, "Tim back on tour 2026 🤠." Ahead of his May 31 concert, McGraw opened up about the seriousness of his health issues. "I'm getting there," McGraw said of his recovery on The Bobby Bones Show. The "Humble and Kind" singer explained he underwent three back surgeries and double knee replacements in the past "six or eight months." Next: Tim McGraw Makes Bold Promise to Fans at First Show Since Major Health Scare first appeared on Parade on Jun 3, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jun 3, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Mt. Everest's Xenon-Gas Controversy Will Last Forever
It was a travesty—two travesties, actually, separate but inextricably linked. In May 1953, Edmund Hillary and Tenzing Norgay became the first people to reach the summit of Mount Everest, a challenge that had killed more than a dozen people in the preceding decades and that scientists had once declared impossible. The catch: They breathed canisters of pure oxygen, an aid that the Everest pioneer George Mallory—one of those who died on the mountain—had once dismissed as 'a damnable heresy.' A month later, a young British medical trainee named Roger Bannister just missed running the first sub-four-minute mile, another long-standing barrier sometimes dubbed 'Everest on the track.' But he did it in a race where his training partner let himself be lapped in order to pace Bannister all the way to the finish line, violating rules about fair play due to the advantages of pacing. Bannister's American rival, Wes Santee, was unimpressed. 'Maybe I could run a four-minute mile behind one of my father's ranch horses,' he said, 'if that's what you want.' Funny how history repeats itself. Fast-forward to a couple of weeks ago: A controversy erupted in the world of mountaineering, when four British climbers summited Everest just five days after jetting to Nepal from the United Kingdom. To skip the usual weeks or months spent gradually adjusting to high altitude, they paid a reported $153,000 each for a bespoke protocol that included inhaling xenon gas to help them adjust more rapidly. Meanwhile, on the track, Kenya's three-time Olympic champion, Faith Kipyegon, is preparing for a carefully choreographed, Nike-sponsored attempt to become the first woman to run a mile in under four minutes. It's slated for June 26 in Paris and will almost certainly violate the same pacing rules that Bannister's run did. Both initiatives are, by any measure, remarkable feats of human ingenuity and endurance. They're also making people very angry. The xenon-fueled expedition was organized by an Austrian guide named Lukas Furtenbach, who is known for his tech-focused approach to expeditions. He has previously had clients sleep in altitude tents at home for weeks to pre-acclimatize them to the thin mountain air. What made the new ascent different is that, in addition to sleeping in altitude tents, the four British climbers visited a clinic in Germany where they inhaled xenon gas, whose oxygen-boosting potential has been rumored for years. The World Anti-Doping Agency banned xenon in 2014 after allegations that Russian athletes used it for that year's Winter Olympics. But subsequent studies on its athletic effects have produced mixed results. Other research in animals has hinted at the possibility that it could offer protection from potentially fatal forms of altitude illness, which can occur when climbers ascend too rapidly. For now, the strongest evidence that it helps high-altitude mountaineers comes from Furtenbach's own self-experimentation over the past few years. When news of Furtenbach's plans emerged earlier this year, the International Climbing and Mountaineering Federation's medical commission put out a statement arguing that xenon probably doesn't work and could be dangerous because of its sedative effects. Other critics have pointed out that shorter expeditions mean less paying work for the Sherpa guides in the region. But these criticisms can feel like post hoc justifications for the fact that many mountaineers simply have a gut-level aversion to what seems like a shortcut to the summit. Their objection isn't to xenon itself but to the idea of making Everest easier. That's the same problem many runners have with Kipyegon's sub-four-minute-mile attempt. Women have made extraordinary progress in the event since Diane Leather notched the first sub-five in 1954, but under conventional racing conditions, no one expects a sub-four anytime soon. Kipyegon is the fastest female miler in history: Her current world record, set in 2023, is 4:07.64, which leaves her more than 50 yards behind four-minute pace—an enormous deficit to overcome in a sport where, at the professional level, progress is measured in fractions of a second. Nike has promised 'a holistic system of support that optimizes every aspect of her attempt,' including 'footwear, apparel, aerodynamics, physiology and mind science,' but hasn't revealed any details of what that support might look like. That means critics—and there are many—don't yet have any specific innovation to object to; they just have the tautological sense that any intervention capable of instantly making a miler 7.7 seconds faster must by definition be unfair. (I reached out to Nike for further specifics about the attempt, but the company declined to comment.) It's a safe bet that new shoes will be involved. Kipyegon's effort, dubbed Breaking4 by Nike, is a sequel to the company's Breaking2 marathon in 2017, in which Kipyegon's fellow Kenyan Eliud Kipchoge came within 25 seconds of breaking two hours at a time when the official world record was 2:02:57. Kipchoge's feat was made possible in part by a new type of running shoe featuring a stiff carbon-fiber plate embedded in a thick and bouncy foam midsole, an innovation that has since revolutionized the sport. But the reason his time didn't count as a world record was that, like Bannister, he had a squad of pacers who rotated in and out to block the wind for him all the way to the finish line. That's also likely to be a key for Kipyegon. In fact, scientists published an analysis earlier this year suggesting that a similar drafting approach would be enough to take Kipyegon all the way from 4:07 to 3:59 without any other aids. Bannister's paced-time trial in 1953 was ruled ineligible for records because, per the British Amateur Athletic Board, it wasn't 'a bona fide competition according to the rules.' Still, the effort had served its purpose. 'Only two painful seconds now separated me from the four-minute mile,' Bannister later wrote, 'and I was certain that I could cut down the time.' Sure enough, less than a year later, Bannister entered the history books with a record-legal 3:59.4. Similarly, Kipchoge went on to break two hours in another exhibition race in 2019, and Nike's official line is that it hopes that feat will pave the way for a record-legal sub-two in the future. (It's certainly getting closer: The world record now stands at 2:00:35.) In 1978, a quarter century after Hillary and Norgay's historic ascent, Reinhold Messner and Peter Habeler climbed Everest without supplemental oxygen. One view of innovation in sports, advanced by the bioethicist Thomas Murray, is that people's perceptions are shaped by how new ideas and techniques are introduced. The status quo always seems reasonable: Of course we play tennis with graphite rackets rather than wooden ones, use the head-first Fosbury flop to clear high-jump bars, and climb mountains with the slightly stretchable kernmantle ropes developed in the 1950s. But many of these same innovations seem more troublesome during the transition periods, especially if only some people have access to them. When Bannister finally broke the four-minute barrier, he was once again paced by his training partners, but only for about the first three-quarters of the race. This form of pacing remained highly controversial, but because none of the pacemakers had deliberately allowed himself to be lapped, the record was allowed to stand. These days, such pacing is so routine that there are runners who make a living doing nothing but pacing races for others, always dropping out before the finish. The full-race pacing that Kipyegon will likely use in Breaking4 remains verboten; the slightly different pacing that leads runners almost all the way through the race but forces them to run the last lap alone is simply business as usual. Oxygen in a can is good; xenon in a can is bad. These are subtle distinctions. Sports are, in at least some respects, a zero-sum game: When one person wins a race or sets a record, it unavoidably means that someone else doesn't. Even at the recreational level, if everyone decides to run marathons in carbon-plated shoes that make them five minutes faster, the standards needed to qualify for the Boston Marathon get five minutes faster. 'Once an effective technology gets adopted in a sport, it becomes tyrannical,' Murray told me several years ago, when I was writing about athletes experimenting with electric brain stimulation. 'You have to use it.' In the '50s, a version of that rationale seemed to help the British expedition that included Hillary and Norgay overcome the long-standing objections of British climbers to using oxygen—the French had an Everest expedition planned for 1954 and the Swiss for 1955, and both were expected to use oxygen. Less clear, though, is why this rationale should apply to the modern world of recreational mountaineering in which Furtenbach operates. What does anyone—other than perhaps the climbers themselves, if you think journeys trump destinations—lose when people huff xenon in order to check Everest off their list with maximal efficiency? Maybe they're making the mountain more crowded, but you could also argue that they're making it less crowded by getting up and down more quickly. And it's hard to imagine that Furtenbach's critics are truly lying awake at night worrying about the long-term health of his clients. Something else is going on here, and I'd venture that it has to do with human psychology. A Dutch economist named Adriaan Kalwij has a theory that much of modern life is shaped by people's somewhat pathological tendency to view everything as a competition. 'Both by nature and through institutional design, competitions are an integral part of human lives,' Kalwij writes, 'from college entrance exams and scholarship applications to jobs, promotions, contracts, and awards.' The same ethos seems to color the way we see dating, leisure travel, hobbies, and so on: There's no escape from the zero-sum dichotomy of winners and losers. Kalwij's smoking gun is a phenomenon that sociologists call the 'SES-health gradient,' which refers to the disparities in health between people of high and low socioeconomic status. Despite the rise of welfare supports such as pensions and health care, the SES-health gradient has been widening around the world—even, Kalwij has found, among Olympic athletes. There used to be no difference in longevity among Dutch Olympians based on their occupation. But among the most recent cohort, born between 1920 and 1947, athletes in high-SES jobs, such as lawyers, tend to outlive athletes in low-SES jobs by an average of 11 years. As Kalwij interprets it, making an Olympic team is a life-defining win, but getting stuck in a poorly paying dead-end job is a loss that begets an endless series of other losses: driving a beater, living in a lousy apartment, flying economy. These losses have cumulative psychological and physiological consequences. Some things in life really are competitions, of course. Track and field is one of them, and so we should police attempts to bend its rules with vigilance. Other things, such as being guided up Everest, are not—or at least they shouldn't be. The people who seem most upset about the idea of rich bros crushing Everest in a week are those who have climbed it in six or eight or 12 weeks, whose place in the cosmic pecking order has been downgraded by an infinitesimal notch. But I, too, was annoyed when I read about it, despite the fact that I've never strapped on a crampon. Their win, in some convoluted way, felt like my loss. Another detail in Kalwij's research sticks in my mind. Among American Olympians, silver medalists tend to die a few years earlier than either gold or bronze medalists. Kalwij theorizes that these results, too, are related to people's outlook. Gold medalists are thrilled to win, and bronze medalists are thrilled to make the podium; silver medalists see themselves as 'the No. 1 loser,' as Jerry Seinfeld once put it. With that in mind, I've tried to reframe my attitude about the xenon controversy. Let the annual Everest frenzy continue, with or without xenon, and let its allure continue to draw the most hard-edged and deep-pocketed summit baggers. Meanwhile, leave the other, lesser-known mountains for the rest of us to enjoy in tranquility. I'd call that a win. Article originally published at The Atlantic
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Child Psychologists Are Begging Parents and Grandparents to Never Turn a Blind Eye to These 10 Habits
Child Psychologists Are Begging Parents and Grandparents to Never Turn a Blind Eye to These 10 Habits originally appeared on Parade. Childhood and adolescence are times of learning and growing. However, child psychologists share that certain habits go beyond "kids being kids" and serve as red flags. While it sounds scary, experts explain that noticing these habits as potential warning signs allows parents and grandparents to operate from a place of empowerment and seek help for the child in their lives."The sooner you can detect behavioral issues such as aggression, irritability, hitting others [and] language delays, the sooner you can address [them]," explains , a licensed clinical psychologist specializing in work with children, teens and parents. "These emotional and behavioral concerns need to be addressed as soon as possible so they don't intensify throughout the years."She, along with other experts, shares 10 habits not to ignore in children and adolescents, as well as how to find help if you're Yes, every child is different. However, sometimes, the whole idea that "kids do XYZ when they are ready" can go too far. ., a division chief of psychology at Phoenix Children's, stresses that caregivers know their child best and encourages them to bring up concerns about consistent developmental delays, stagnation or regression in skills or abilities with a pediatrician. She says the CDC and are excellent resources for noting developmental milestones. Related: Today's kids have access to far more of the world than many parents and grandparents did at their age, thanks to the internet, and it can be trickier to navigate than riding a bike on a bumpy sidewalk."Children can unknowingly become prey to those who seek to take advantage of their naïveté and lack of experience," explains ., a psychologist and mental health director at Hackensack University Medical Center. "It is important that caregivers are able to monitor internet use."He stresses the importance of creating boundaries for kids, including surfing the web in a common area and using open communication."If you recognize a child you care for attempts to or insists on exploring the internet unsupervised and/or in private, it is time that you engage in greater exploration of the foundation for their desire," he says. "It is important to explain to children the reality that, while a great tool, the internet exposes us all to great vulnerabilities." Besides the internet, significant increases in screen time, more broadly, can also signal trouble. Dr. Allan shares it's linked to sleep problems, social-emotional issues and obesity."While screens are a part of modern life, a harm-reduction approach is important, especially for preschoolers," she says. "Limiting screen use during key times, such as meals, play and bedtime, is essential."Related: Psychologists say that appetite changes may signal issues beyond eating."If your child is experiencing drastic appetite changes, like overeating or not eating enough, it can indicate problems such as distress, anxiety or an eating disorder like anorexia or bulimia," says , a psychologist with Thriveworks. Dr. Biller agrees, saying that children often don't understand how food habits can affect their eating. He recommends caregivers try to get to the root of the issue and seek help from a licensed mental health professional if they're concerned. Dr. Muradian says hitting, biting, throwing objects and long tantrums in which a child struggles to soothe are all emotional red flags. "These negative behaviors, if not addressed, can bleed into their elementary and middle school years," she explains. "It's crucial to redirect and gain a better understanding of the aggression through seeking support and guidance for your child." We all tell a lie now and then, but chronically not telling the truth is an issue, shares, a senior psychologist with the ADHD & Behavior Disorders Center at the Child Mind Institute. "A big tip for prevention of more serious lies? Helping the truth be less scary to tell," she says. "You want to set limits and have consequences for behaviors, but you want to let your child have an incentive for truth-telling."Dr. Litvinov advises parents to avoid interrogation if they already know the truth."Let them know you know and not argue about it," she suggests. "If the teacher says a child missed a class, don't ask if they missed it—just tell them the teacher told you they missed it, and you want to know why and what you will need to do to make it up. Give them a chance to do the right thing. Some kids need a moment to tell the truth, so you might need to give them that moment."Related: Dr. Litvinov says that parents are often surprised to hear kids using inappropriate language or even cursing with their parents or their friends—and not just the spoken word."An issue that we have been seeing more recently has been when parents look at the texts sent among teens," she explains. "There is much more Inappropriate language, including more ableist, racially insensitive and sexually charged comments. Talking to your children openly and in a non-shaming way will be very important."Also? "Parents will also want to model respectful language," she stresses. Sleep is vital for people of all ages, especially kids with developing minds."Sleep is essential for a healthy childhood, yet many kids occasionally struggle to fall or stay asleep," Dr. Allan says. "Consistent bedtimes and wake times, a sleep-friendly environment and avoiding screens in the bedroom can help minimize disruptions."Related: "Nail-biters" during close sports games are one thing. However, Dr. Biller says it's important to pay attention to kids who constantly bite their nails. "Children also lack the understanding of the physical harm that they can cause by biting their nails, even when doing so results in bleeding or pain," he explains. "As with many habits, nail biting typically has an emotional foundation. It is not uncommon that nail biting is a reflection of a behavioral response to anxiety." This one is heavy but vital to note."Many kids, especially teens, may question whether life is worth living—but most go on to lead healthy, meaningful lives," Dr. Allan says. "If you're concerned your child may be thinking about suicide, ask directly. Asking someone if they've had suicidal thoughts will not plant an idea in their head or lead them to harm themselves."Related: She suggests listening without judgment but also taking steps to ensure safety."Increase supervision during stressful times and ensure firearms and medications are securely stored," Dr. Allan says. "If the risk is immediate, call 9-1-1 or go to the nearest emergency room. Otherwise, seek therapy as quickly as possible."Related: Noticing habitual behavioral issues in kids is stressful. However, Dr. Muradian emphasizes it's important to stay calm and consistent."Kids learn from our behaviors," she says. "They look at us how we react to certain situations and will emulate it."Related: Books aren't just for schools. Dr. Muradian says books create conversations around behaviors. Three of her favorites are: Hands are Not for Hitting by Martine Agassi Teeth are Not for Biting by Elizabeth Verdick The Color Monster: A Pop-Up Book of Feelings by Ana Llenas Noticing multiple problematic habits in kids is extra stressful. Dr. Vaughan emphasizes that you're not going to fix everything in one giant swing, though."Focus on one habit at a time to not overwhelm your child if there are multiple bad habits," she says. "Discuss clear expectations and consequences for continued unhealthy behaviors to help teach boundaries for acceptable behaviors. Also, motivate positive behaviors by utilizing positive reinforcements, such as praise/affirmations." There's no shame in seeking help."Some habits and situations require more professional help, such as a mental health provider," Dr. Vaughan says. "Providers specializing in working with children and teens can help the kids and parents work through these habits in talk therapy. Other types of therapy, such as art and play therapy, can be helpful tools for children who struggle to express themselves in traditional talk therapy." Up Next:Dr. Regine Muradian, Psy.D., a licensed clinical psychologist specializing in work with children, teens and parents Dr. Carla C. Allan, Ph.D., a division chief of psychology at Phoenix Children's Developmental milestones. CDC. Milestones matter. Dr. Brett Biller, Ph.D., a psychologist and mental health director at Hackensack University Medical Center Media and young minds. AAP. Dr. Denitrea Vaughan, Psy.D., LPC-S, a psychologist with Thriveworks Dr. Lara Litvinov, Ph.D., a senior psychologist with the ADHD & Behavior Disorders Center at the Child Mind Institute. Child Psychologists Are Begging Parents and Grandparents to Never Turn a Blind Eye to These 10 Habits first appeared on Parade on Jun 3, 2025 This story was originally reported by Parade on Jun 3, 2025, where it first appeared.
