‘Napalm Girl' may be work of different photographer, awards body says
The authorship of one of the world's most famous press photographs has been called into question by the organisation that honoured it with 'photo of the year' 50 years ago.
Nick Ut won the World Press Photo award for the photograph known colloquially as 'Napalm Girl', but officially titled The Terror Of War, in 1973.
The striking image of a naked and terrified Kim Phuc running away from a napalm attack became a symbol of the war's tragedy, and remains one of the most iconic photographs from America's war in Vietnam.
World Press Photo announced on Friday, however, that it has 'suspended its attribution' to Ut because of doubts over who actually took it.
The body's report adds to the muddle over an issue that has split the photographic community since The Stringer, a movie released earlier this year, questioned Mr Ut's authorship.
World Press Photo said its probe found that two other photographers – Nguyen Thanh Nghe, the subject of the film, and Huynh Cong Phuc – 'may have been better positioned' to take the shot.
'We conclude that the level of doubt is too significant to maintain the existing attribution,' said Joumana El Zein Khoury, executive director of World Press Photo.
'At the same time, lacking conclusive evidence pointing definitively to another photographer, we cannot reassign authorship, either.'
World Press Photo, an organisation whose awards are considered influential in photography, won't attempt to recover the cash award given to Mr Ut, a spokeswoman said.
Mr Ut's lawyer, James Hornstein, said his client hadn't spoken to World Press Photo after some initial contact before The Stringer was released. 'It seems they had already made up their mind to punish Nick Ut from the start,' he said.
Gary Knight, a producer of The Stringer, is a four-time judge of the World Press Photo awards and a consultant to the World Press Photo Foundation.
After two investigations, Associated Press (AP) – who Mr Ut worked for at the time – said it found no definitive evidence to warrant stripping Mr Ut's photo credit.
'Impossible to prove'
The AP said it was possible Mr Ut took the picture, but the passage of time made it impossible to fully prove, and could find no evidence to prove anyone else did.
On Friday, it said that its standards 'require proof and certainty to remove a credit and we have found that it is impossible to prove exactly what happened that day on the road or in the (AP) bureau over 50 years ago.'
'We understand World Press Photo has taken different action based on the same available information, and that is their prerogative,' the statement said. 'There is no question over AP's ownership of the photo.'
Meanwhile, the Pulitzer Prize that Mr Ut was awarded for the photo appears to be safe.
The Pulitzers depend on news agencies who enter the awards to determine authorship and Marjorie Miller, an administrator – and a former AP senior editor – pointed to the AP's study showing insufficient proof to withdraw credit.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
‘A reflection of who she was': major Diane Arbus exhibition hits New York
Constellation, the enormous new show of photographer Diane Arbus's life work, aims to present the artist as no one has seen her before. Embracing randomness, this exhibition of a full set of 454 master prints from Arbus's only authorized printmaker, Neil Selkirk, tries its best to give audiences a completely unstructured presentation of the photos. 'I wanted to make sure that it was as mixed up as possible,' the show's curator, Matthieu Humery, told me. 'I didn't want to make any specific connections between images. I tried to keep out any kind of narratives so that visitors create their own narratives. There is this magic madness.' Constellation grew out of a 2011 acquisition made by the Luma Foundation of Arbus's prints, many of them unpublished and rarely viewed. With prices for individual Arbus prints ranging into the six figures, it was a blockbuster, and expensive, deal – such an acquisition demanded a bold show. While mulling the potential exhibition, Humery's thoughts went to the Met's major 2005 Arbus retrospective, Revelation, and he recognized that he didn't want to work the same ground. 'The question was how to present this group of images without doing a classic retrospective, since it had already happened,' he said. 'I thought it would be great to show everything at once. I was in the New York subway, looking at the map of the subway, and I saw that grid and thought, 'Maybe we could have this sort of grid and present all the images that way.'' The result of Humery's inspiration is a remarkable, scaffolding-like series of structures that allows him to hang the hundreds of photographs while removing any walls from the exhibition space. Audiences at once become both viewers of the art and voyeurs of each another – it is impossible to see the exhibition without also making observations of fellow show-goers. Seeing any sizable body of work in this way can be overwhelming, and even more so with Arbus. Her portraits seek out the ways in which humanity can be perplexing, illegible or even incongruous to our notions of human experience. Viewing an Arbus photo can evoke genuine feelings of dislocation and distress, at the same time also bringing forth empathy and connection. The opportunity to experience this without traditional handholds, such as chronology, context or interpretation, is to be doubly thrown into a body of work that has not lost its capacity to haunt our psyches, even after half a century. For his own part, Humery found it challenging to let go of all the typical accoutrements that would come along with a major show of a world-class photographer. His solution was to immerse himself within the photographs to incarnate his vision. 'It was kind of difficult in the beginning, just to have something in my mind, and to translate that into reality,' he said. 'I really wanted to do it myself and to experiment with the display myself, so it took me like two weeks. I was locked in there for two weeks.' If there is a concession to order that Humery made, it is in Arbus's portrait of artistic mentor and lifelong love interest Marvin Israel. The photo – a rather somber, full-body shot of Israel in a sweater and slacks, hands in pockets, looking lonely in the distance – is given pride of place, situated above all other shots. 'The way I placed him, he's the highest figure in the show, dominating everything,' Humery said. 'He was the one really who pushed Arbus a lot to give her the strength to do the pictures the way she wanted to do it. He was also the one who initiated the retrospective at the Moma when she died.' Humery's other concession to order was to create a 'secret room' within the show to exhibit Arbus's so-called box of 10. A project that Arbus worked on in the last years of her life, the box of 10 collects some of her most enduring photos – including her shot of identical twins made in Roselle, New Jersey, and a young man wearing curlers, shot in his home in New York City – into a plexiglass container, originally priced at $1,000. The box of 10 was a transformational piece, helping confer on Arbus the honor of being the first photographer to be featured in the influential art magazine Artforum, and it has come to be seen as part of a larger turning point when photography was at last taken seriously as art. Arbus only completed eight out of a projected run of 50 boxes, selling just four before her death – among the purchasers were photographer Richard Avedon and artist Jasper Johns. 'It's kind of like a secret room within Constellation,' Humery said. 'The box of 10 was really something very unique at the time, the idea of Arbus looking back at her own work and making a selection of 10 photographs to put into this plexiglass box. That's when things turn for her, because of this box of 10. All of these images together, they're so strong together, so that's the only moment in the show when I didn't want to spread it out.' During the show's run in in Arles, France, Constellation attracted the attention of German film-maker Wim Wenders, who was bemused at how the format let him take in people's reactions to Arbus's photos. 'Wim Wenders looked at the show, and he said, 'You know what's very beautiful is to see people looking at pictures,'' Humery said. 'Most of the time in a museum show you see people from behind, but in this case you see people from every angle, and it's kind of beautiful to see people looking at the pictures. Wenders said that he would love to come back and take pictures of people looking at the pictures.' Humery sees his show, the most comprehensive exhibition of Arbus's photographs that has ever been staged, as both a tribute to Arbus herself and a way to better understand one of the medium's greatest practitioners. 'I wanted to create a show that was at her level, that's a reflection of who she was,' he said. 'For me, all these portraits together comprise the portrait of Diane Arbus. It's like her looking at herself in a mirror. It's like a way to make a portrait of her that you discover for yourself.' Diane Arbus: Constellation is on show at the Park Avenue Armory in New York from 5 June to 17 August
Daily Mail
2 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Doctor issues warning over spicy food after influencer dies of stomach cancer
A doctor has issued a warning about eating too much spicy food after a young woman died of stomach cancer. Chinese content creator Qianqian, 25, died from the disease last month and listed her love of chili as a potential reason for developing the deadly cancer. Talking to local media on what may have triggered her diagnosis, she said: 'I don't like to eat breakfast for a long time. I eat irregularly. I like spicy food.' Qianqian's online title was 'I love crab pot,' referencing her love of a Chinese seafood hot pot dish containing large quantities of dried chilies and Sichuan pepper. Now, Taiwanese oncologist and haematologist Dr Li Sijin said it was possible the influencer's love of spicy food could have increased her cancer risk. She explained excessive consumption of chili peppers could aggravate the stimulation of the gastric mucosa-the innermost lining of the stomach. Dr Li, who works at Dalin Tzu Chi Hospital, said this irritation could potentially trigger changes in the cells of the stomach which may develop into cancer. She advised that although chilies can form part of a balanced diet, they must be eaten in moderation. However, there is no conclusive evidence that eating spicy food increases the risk of stomach cancer, with studies exploring the topic delivering mixed results. Dr Li added that an irregular eating schedule wouldn't carry the same level of risk to the stomach. Qianqian previously explained that before her diagnosis in 2024 she had been suffering from stomach pains for more than six months. However, she dismissed these potential early warning signs as a consequence of her poor and inconsistent dietary habits. When her cancer was eventually uncovered medics performed a total gastrectomy, where the entire stomach is surgically removed in a bid to save her life. However, the disease was found to have returned just a month later, having spread to other tissues in her body. In her final days she shared a post with her followers: 'Still alive, lingering, vomiting all the time, the tumour in my stomach is getting bigger and bigger, the time I am awake is getting less and less. 'I don't want to pick up my phone, the hospital is very noisy and I'm in a bad mood.' While the evidence that spicy food can contribute to cancer risk is inconclusive some foods are known to increase the chances of developing the disease. Charity, Cancer Research UK (CRUK) cites evidence that people who eat high levels of pickled foods have between a 28 to 56 per cent higher chance of developing stomach cancer compared to those who eat the fewest. People with high salt intake in their diet are also at increased risk of stomach cancer with a 68 per cent higher chance of developing the disease, according to CRUK. While these increases risk sound dramatic the odds that a person will develop stomach cancer is quite low. CRUK estimates that one in every 92 men and one in 170 women in Britain will develop stomach cancer in their lifetime. And there is also some evidence that spicy food can in fact be good for your health. A 2024 study by the British Journal of Nutrition suggested that eating a spicy dish once a week reduced the risk of stroke by 13 percent. Additionally, in 2020, the American Heart Association found people who ate moderate quantities of chili were 26 percent less likely to die from heart disease than those who never eat them. Though it does not mention chili specifically the NHS warns that stomach cancers can be linked to lifestyle factors. The health service advises eating at least five portions of fruit and vegetables every day and cut down on salt and alcohol to reduce the risk of the disease. About 6,500 patients in Britain and 30,000 in the US are diagnosed with stomach cancer each year. The disease kills about 4,000 Britons and 11,000 Americans per annum. If caught in its earliest stages, the majority of stomach cancer patients (65 per cent) will survive a decade after their diagnosis according to charity Cancer Research UK. However, for stage four patients, 10-year survival drops to just one in five. The main symptoms of stomach cancer include heartburn or acid reflux, physical problems swallowing, nausea, indigestion-like burping a lot-and feeling very full after eating. Anyone with these symptoms for three weeks or more, or who find they suddenly get worse, should contact their GP.
The Review Geek
2 hours ago
- The Review Geek
Second Shot at Love – K-drama Episode 7 Recap & Review
Episode 7 Episode 7 of Second Shot at Love begins with Gwang-ok's friend calling to apologise. She accidentally went to the wedding, thinking Geum-ju was the bride, and found out about Ju-yeop's shotgun wedding. She, of course, told Gwang-ok which led to her drinking. The whole family is upset while Geum-ju is awkward. Gwang-ok apologises for her nagging and Jeong-su blames himself. After comforting them, Geum-ju runs to Ui-joon and cries. She never told anyone as she didn't want pity. But she is glad that Ui-joon knows. Meanwhile, Seon-hwa tries to set up Seon-wook with a woman. She is excited on learning he has a crush and even overhears him trying to patch up with Hyeon-ju. However, Seon-hwa misunderstands and thinks he wants Hyeon-ju on the taekwondo team. As for the stranger mystery, the cops reveal that the truck was stolen. CCTVs also show a man breaking into Ui-joon's house and he is sure it is his father. Things seem to be looking up as Geum-ju's company wants her back. Gwang-ok now trusts her and constantly tears up when reminded of her distrust. Seon-wook notices Ui-joon sulking over Geum-ju's departure and they spar together. They bond over how complicated life is. Elsewhere, the ladies gossip how Ui-joon likes Geum-ju but is way beyond her league. Unable to take it, Gwang-ok finally tells them about Ju-yeop. Geum-ju pops up and Gwang-ok is apologetic. But Geum-ju is relieved that she doesn't need to lie anymore. As expected, the news spreads like wildfire and everyone is upset. Seon-wook feels bad for nagging Geum-ju and even goes to a fortune teller for a good luck talisman. Geum-ju is packing up when her family returns the money she used to send them. She is touched as they promise to support her. Even the boys show up and they all hold a farewell party for Geum-ju. There is more good news as a realtor finds a new tenant for Geum-ju's apartment. To celebrate, Gwang-ok permits one drink but Geum-ju refuses. Everyone is proud of her. Suddenly, there is a commotion. The villagers arrive with pitchforks, ready to beat up Ju-yeop. As the Hans try to stop them, Geum-ju is amused. She realises that she has people by her side and she need not endure alone. A flashback shows that the new tenant is Ui-joon. Alone, she tells him not to sign the lease. She finally confesses that she did like him. It is why she was embarrassed by his pity. She jokingly tells him to stop going out of his way for her. She returns to work and Chief Kim is surprisingly apologetic. He looks out for her and hypes her up. When the team pitches a welcome dinner, he scolds them for being inconsiderate about her recovery. As a compromise, those who drink will head out. It is everyone except Geum-ju. As she is left alone, Kim smirks. A friendly co-worker warns her that Kim holds grudges. Ui-joon itches to check up on her but stops himself. Nurse Baek encourages him to follow his happiness. However, he cannot forget his father's threat. A flashback shows Mr. Seo causing a scene at Ui-joon's hospital. While trying to stop him, a nurse falls and hits her head. Back in the village, Jeong-su runs into Seon-hwa. He talks about what a good friend Seon-wook is to Geum-ju. She thinks her brother likes Geum-ju. At the same time, Hyeon-ju tells Seon-wook they cannot be more than mutual acquaintances. He tells her how he didn't believe in love because of his family. But he changed his mind after he fell for her. He plays with her kids and she sees him in a new light. Ui-joon goes home and finds that his love note for Geum-ju is crumpled. A flashback shows his father seeing the love note and threatening to hurt Geum-ju unless Ui-joon gives him money. At present, Ui-joon realises she is in danger. Geum-ju is headed home when the truck driver shows up and hits her car. However, Ui-joon arrives in time and takes him down. At the police station, they see that the driver is a former patient. He is a violent alcoholic who refused treatment. His family left him and he blames Ui-joon. Once that is resolved, Ui-joon finds Geum-ju missing. He panics before he finds her heading towards the police station for him. He frets over her and she tells him to stop. She keeps mistaking his pity for feelings. He finally confesses that he loves her and they kiss. In the Second Shot at Love Episode 7 epilogue, Geum-ju asks the fortune teller about Ui-joon. The fortune teller comments that they kissed 10 years ago and Geum-ju thinks she is a quack. The Episode Review Second Shot at Love Episode 7 is quite wholesome as Geum-ju realises that she need not endure her sufferings alone. All the characters who have been nagging her redeem themselves by coming to her aid once they learn the truth about her ex. Geum-ju grows as well, seeing the support for what it is instead of pity. And there is finally some progress in the romance department with Geum-ju and Ui-joon dating while Hyeon-ju starts considering Seon-wook's feelings. With the Hans' alcoholism being demoted in terms of conflict, the show sets up multiple mini-conflicts to fill the second half of the show. We are pretty sure that there may be a relapse plot twist before the finale but till then, Chief Kim and Ui-joon's father are bound to keep things interesting. Previous Episode Next Episode Expect A Full Season Write-Up When This Season Concludes!
