Constellation Brands: Fiscal Q1 Earnings Snapshot
The Rochester, New York-based company said it had net income of $2.90 per share. Earnings, adjusted for non-recurring costs, came to $3.22 per share.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
23 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Stock market today: Dow, S&P 500, Nasdaq futures rise as Trump's tax bill heads to House
US stock futures rose as President Trump's sweeping spending bill headed to the House after narrowly passing the Senate. Futures attached to the Dow Jones Industrial Average (YM=F) ticked up 0.2%. Futures attached to the benchmark S&P 500 (ES=F) and the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100 (NQ=F) rose 0.3%. On Tuesday, stocks were mixed as Trump's "One Big Beautiful Bill" cleared the Senate, with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote. The bill now heads to the House, where Speaker Mike Johnson aims to pass the legislation by Thursday, July 4. Economists estimate the bill's final price tag could top $4 trillion. Meanwhile, Trump's pause on his "reciprocal" tariffs is set to expire on July 9, and the president has said he isn't considering an extension. The administration is now reportedly trying to close smaller trade deals before the deadline, after which the president has said he will send letters to countries assigning tariff rates. "I'll be writing letters to a lot of countries," Trump said on Tuesday. Read more: The latest on Trump's tariffs Finally, Wall Street is looking forward to the release of the June jobs report on Thursday as investors bet a rate cut from the Federal Reserve could land sooner rather than later. Any labor market weakness will be closely watched as it could strengthen the case for a cut. Markets across the Asia-Pacific region saw mixed trading early morning on Wednesday, with investors eyeing the potential of US interest rate cuts and the fast-approaching July 9 tariff deadline for deals to be struck between the US and major trading partners worldwide. Singapore's benchmark, the Straits Times Index (^STI), gained 0.5% to hit a record high of 4009.15 points as of 00:20 (UTC-4). The move saw the index crossing past the 4000 threshold for the second time on record. Australia and Hong Kong led gains as Australia's S&P/ASX 200 (^AXJO) rose 0.4% and the Hang Seng Index (^HSI) popped 0.7%. Japan saw loss in the country's major gauge as the benchmark Nikkei 225 (^N225) slipped 0.7%. Korea's Kospi (^KS11) cratered 1.2% as Trump ratcheted up pressure on the country to finalize a trade deal. Mainland China's CSI 300 ( hovered near the baseline. Reuters reports: Markets across the Asia-Pacific region saw mixed trading early morning on Wednesday, with investors eyeing the potential of US interest rate cuts and the fast-approaching July 9 tariff deadline for deals to be struck between the US and major trading partners worldwide. Singapore's benchmark, the Straits Times Index (^STI), gained 0.5% to hit a record high of 4009.15 points as of 00:20 (UTC-4). The move saw the index crossing past the 4000 threshold for the second time on record. Australia and Hong Kong led gains as Australia's S&P/ASX 200 (^AXJO) rose 0.4% and the Hang Seng Index (^HSI) popped 0.7%. Japan saw loss in the country's major gauge as the benchmark Nikkei 225 (^N225) slipped 0.7%. Korea's Kospi (^KS11) cratered 1.2% as Trump ratcheted up pressure on the country to finalize a trade deal. Mainland China's CSI 300 ( hovered near the baseline. Reuters reports: Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
32 minutes ago
- Yahoo
How NIL Spending Is Reshaping College Football's Competitive Landscape
How NIL Spending Is Reshaping College Football's Competitive Landscape originally appeared on Athlon Sports. In 2021, Cincinnati made history by becoming the first Group of Five program to reach the College Football Playoff. For many, it was proof that the so-called gap between the Power Five and G5 wasn't insurmountable. Advertisement But in 2025, that proof feels distant. Not because the quality of G5 football has declined, but because the financial structure of the sport has changed entirely. As college athletics enters the first full cycle of NCAA-sanctioned revenue sharing and matured NIL collectives, the economic realities facing Group of Five programs have become unavoidable. And nowhere is that shift more visible than in the SEC. While the Big Ten, ACC, and Big 12 are also adapting to this new era, the SEC stands as the clearest representation of what the modern Power conference looks like. For the sake of this comparison, it serves as a fair and conservative barometer for the Power Four as a whole. Florida Gators quarterback DJ Lagway (2) shakes hands while entering the locker Pendleton-Imagn Images NIL Spending and Revenue Structures in 2025 Starting in 2025, every school within the Power Four is permitted to distribute up to $20.5 million to athletes through the NCAA's new revenue-sharing model. According to projections from SEC schools are expected to meet that cap across the board. On top of that, the average SEC collective will provide another $13.95 million in NIL compensation. Advertisement That puts the total average for SEC athlete compensation at roughly $34.5 million per school. In contrast, Group of Five programs are projected to operate on significantly smaller margins. Here's how the averages stack up: Conference Revenue Share (Avg.) NIL Collective (Avg.) Total Compensation SEC (P4 Proxy) $20.5M $13.95M $34.45M American $2.99M $1.6M $4.6M Mountain West $4.37M $1.7M $6.0M Sun Belt $2.02M $1.0M $3.0M MAC $1.90M $800K $2.7M Conference USA $1.63M $600K $2.2M These figures reflect projected funding availability, not guaranteed athlete payouts, as collective disbursements vary based on structure, fundraising stability, and timing. Even within the Power Four, there are schools operating more conservatively than others. But as a whole, the SEC provides a useful benchmark for how far the top tier of college football has moved from the rest of the landscape. Advertisement How NIL Impacts G5 Player Retention in College Football For years, the most difficult challenge for G5 programs was attracting high-end talent. Now, it's keeping it. Player development has long been a hallmark of successful mid-major programs. But the same qualities that make G5 players appealing, such as early playing time, system fit, and on-field production, also make them targets in the transfer portal. One G5 staffer described his situation plainly. 'We can't offer more. We can only offer first,' he said. 'And most of the time, that's not enough anymore.' When a starting wide receiver in the American makes $15,000 and hears from a Power Four program offering $75,000, the leverage disappears quickly. And with NIL deals now embedded in roster planning, that gap becomes less about poaching and more about structure. Texas Longhorns quarterback Arch J. Rebilas-Imagn Images The SEC's NIL Spending as a Model for Power Four Programs Programs like Texas and LSU are projected to spend over $40 million on athlete compensation in 2025. Some, like Texas Tech, are experimenting with consolidated booster-collective models that push total payrolls past $50 million. Advertisement This is not just a reaction to NIL. It is the beginning of a structured financial era. Some Power Four programs are segmenting their NIL spend by position group. Others are introducing multi-year deals and retention bonuses that incentivize players to stay through graduation. Meanwhile, many G5 schools are still assembling short-term packages through local sponsors, donor drives, and limited institutional support. The systems are fundamentally different in scale, planning, and stability. NIL Disparity and the Future of G5 Competitiveness These numbers don't disqualify G5 programs from being competitive. But they do redefine what that competitiveness looks like. Advertisement A 12-0 G5 season that earns a Playoff bid remains possible. Building it into a sustained era of success, however, now requires navigating an environment where roster stability is directly tied to financial infrastructure. In a model where one tier of programs is investing in multi-year continuity and another is forced to rebuild annually, the pressure is no longer just on recruiting. It's on retention, investment alignment, and consistent access to capital. South Carolina Gamecocks quarterback LaNorris Sellers could be the 2026 number 1 draft pick.© Jeremy Reper-Imagn Images Closing: A Financial Divide That's Redefining College Football College football has never been a level playing field. But as athlete compensation becomes a core function of program operations, the separation between tiers of the sport is becoming formalized. Advertisement Programs at the top are managing rosters with continuity in mind. Programs at the bottom are often just trying to hold theirs together long enough to stay relevant. Related: Will NIL Dreams Crush Team Chemistry in College Sports? The sport may still be governed by one rulebook, but the terms of competition are no longer the same. The playoff is expanding. The revenue models are not. The question now is not whether a G5 team can make a run. It's whether any program without long-term financial planning can remain in the conversation for more than a year at a time. This story was originally reported by Athlon Sports on Jul 2, 2025, where it first appeared.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Nictus Full Year 2025 Earnings: EPS: R0.38 (vs R0.20 in FY 2024)
Revenue: R58.9m (up 18% from FY 2024). Net income: R20.3m (up 85% from FY 2024). Profit margin: 34% (up from 22% in FY 2024). EPS: R0.38 (up from R0.20 in FY 2024). This technology could replace computers: discover the 20 stocks are working to make quantum computing a reality. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Nictus shares are down 6.4% from a week ago. It's necessary to consider the ever-present spectre of investment risk. We've identified 3 warning signs with Nictus (at least 2 which are significant), and understanding them should be part of your investment process. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Sign in to access your portfolio
