Indiana's Camp Atterbury to be used to house detained migrants
Hegseth announced the decision in a June 15 letter to Rep. Herb Conway (D-N.J.), the House Committee on Armed Services and other members of Congress outlining that both locations would be for 'temporary use by the Department of Homeland Security to house illegal aliens.'
The news surfaced widely on Friday as Democrats publicly criticized the move.
Hegseth in the letter also stated that this will not affect military activities in the camps.
'The Secretary approved a Department of Homeland Security request for assistance to use real property at Camp Atterbury, Indiana and Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst, New Jersey to establish temporary soft-sided holding facilities,' an official from the Department of Defense (DOD) told The Hill in a statement.
The letter did not provide any indication on how many migrants could be detained there, nor on when the camp would be open.
'The timeline for these facilities will depend on operational requirements and coordination with DHS,' wrote the DOD.
'Soft-sided holding facilities' mean that these camps will resemble Alligator Alcatraz, a detention facility the Trump administration has opened in the Florida Everglades, with tent-like walls and fencing inside to surround the beds.
Earlier on Friday, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem suggested that Alligator Alcatraz would be a blue-print for future facilities.
Governors of South Carolina, Mississippi and Texas told NewsNation that they would be ready to host these temporary facilities in their states.
'Texas will continue to assist the Trump administration in arresting, detaining, and deporting illegal immigrants,' said Andrew Mahaleris, a spokesman for Gov. Greg Abbott (R).
Camp Atterbury is 40 miles out of Indianapolis, is operated by the National Guard and is more than 34,000 acres, according to their website. Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst is near Trenton, New Jersey and about 42,000 acres.
Indiana Rep. Andre Carson (D) wrote in a statement, 'I remain concerned on this use of Camp Atterbury given the deplorable and inhumane conditions at other ICE detention facilities nationwide. The number of ICE detainees – and the number of deaths in detention – have grown at alarmingly high rates since the start of President Trump's term, which in unacceptable. Also unacceptable is the apprehension and detention of US citizens. The Hoosier state should not facilitate these unlawful actions.'
A group of New Jersey Democrats also condemned the DOD's plan.
'This is an inappropriate use of our national defense system and militarizes a radical immigration policy that has resulted in inhumane treatment of undocumented immigrants and unlawful deportations of U.S. citizens, including children, across the country,' they said.
This move by the administration continues mass deportation efforts. This week, Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) announced that they would have access to Medicaid data from 79 million people, including addresses and dates of birth, to facilitate finding undocumented migrants.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNBC
a minute ago
- CNBC
Lutnick: U.S. to release result of probe into chip imports in two weeks
The Trump administration will announce the results of a national security probe into imports of semiconductors in two weeks, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said on Sunday, as President Donald Trump suggested higher tariffs were on the horizon. Lutnick told reporters after a meeting between Trump and European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen that the investigation was one of the "key reasons" the European Union sought to negotiate a broader trade agreement that would "resolve all things at one time." Trump said many companies would be investing in semiconductor manufacturing in the United States, including some from Taiwan and other places, to avoid getting hit by new tariffs. He said von der Leyen had avoided the pending chips tariffs "in a much better way." Trump and von der Leyen announced a new framework trade agreement that includes across-the-board 15% tariffs on EU imports entering the United States. Trump said the agreement included autos, which face a higher 25% tariff under a separate sectoral tariff action. In April, the Trump administration announced that it was investigating whether the extensive reliance on foreign imports of pharmaceuticals and semiconductors posed a national security threat. The probe, being conducted under Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, could lay the groundwork for new tariffs on imports in both sectors. The Trump administration has begun separate investigations under the same law into imports of copper and lumber. Earlier probes completed during Trump's first term formed the basis for 25% tariffs rolled out since his return to the White House in January on steel and aluminum and on the auto industry. Trump has upended global trade with a series of aggressive levies against trading partners, including a 10% tariff that took effect in April, with that rate set to increase sharply for most larger trading partners from August 1. The U.S. relies heavily on chips imported from Taiwan, a fact that Democratic former President Joe Biden sought to address during his term by awarding billions of dollars in Chips Act funds to lure chipmakers to expand production in the United States.
Bloomberg
a minute ago
- Bloomberg
US and EU Leaders Shake Hands Following Trade Deal
President Trump shakes hands with EU Commission President Ursula von der Leyen following trade deal. The deal will see the bloc face 15% tariffs on most of its exports, including automobiles, staving off a trade war that could have delivered a hammer blow to the global economy. (Source: Bloomberg)
Fox News
a minute ago
- Fox News
RILEY GAINES: Trump did right thing with DOE cuts, now Congress needs to get in the game
Earlier this month, the Supreme Court gave the green light for his administration to slash nearly a third of the Department of Education's workforce. It's a big (and long overdue) step toward reining in decades of federal overreach that's taken power away from parents and local communities. Here's what happened: The Court lifted a lower court's block on Trump's executive order, which directed Secretary of Education Linda McMahon to start shutting the department down and returning control of education to the states. Essential services would stay intact. But the bloated bureaucracy? That's on the chopping block. And it should be. For years, the Department of Education has acted less like a support system and more like a control center. With around 4,000 employees, its main tasks have included writing regulations, managing student loans, and overseeing grants. Even its PR office has 89 staffers and costs taxpayers over $10 million a year. A quick number crunch shows a pretty glamorous salary for a not-so-glamorous job. That money's not going to raise reading scores or teach kids about the Constitution, that's for sure. That's why this restructuring matters. Student loan management is being handed over to the Treasury Department, where it belongs. A simplified repayment and collection system is already in motion. Meanwhile, other functions of the DOE are being reassigned to smaller, more efficient agencies. The goal? Streamline the system and put decision-making power back where it belongs: with parents and local authorities. Abolish the Department of Education entirely. But this is about more than just bureaucracy. It's about values. For years, bureaucrats in D.C. have decided what our kids learn, what values they're taught, and who's allowed to speak up in the classroom. That chapter is closing. Now it's time to restore education to the people it actually affects: families, teachers, and local leaders. For years, the DOE has pushed a radical agenda on schools across the country. In 2016, it sent a "Dear Colleague" letter to school districts, threatening to pull funding unless they allowed boys into girls' locker rooms, bathrooms, and sports teams. This wasn't about safety or fairness; it was about forcing schools to comply with a social ideology most parents never agreed to. Go back even further. This radicalization started under the Obama administration. In 2011, the DOE rewrote Title IX rules to lower due process standards in campus sexual harassment cases, leading to lawsuits and unjust expulsions. In 2014, it teamed up with the DOJ to pressure schools into enforcing racial discipline quotas regardless of whether actual discrimination existed. Teachers were forced to ignore disruptive behavior to avoid triggering federal investigations. And under Biden, it got worse. The DOE tried to expand Title IX to include "gender identity" and disregard "sex," pressuring schools to rewrite policies on housing, sports, and facilities until courts stepped in and said enough. None of these decisions came from Congress. They were mandates from unelected bureaucrats, better known as people you didn't vote for and can't hold accountable. That's not how a constitutional republic is supposed to work. Now, thanks to the Supreme Court, the door is open to real reform. Congress has the power to finish the job and eliminate the DOE for good. These layoffs are just the first move toward dismantling a department that has prioritized politics over education for far too long. For years, bureaucrats in D.C. have decided what our kids learn, what values they're taught, and who's allowed to speak up in the classroom. That chapter is closing. Now it's time to restore education to the people it actually affects: families, teachers, and local leaders. Local control means more freedom, better accountability, and real opportunities for students to succeed. It means pulling education out of Washington's grip and giving it back to the people who know their kids best. The Supreme Court did its part. Now it's Congress's turn. Let's finish what Trump started. Eliminate the Department of Education and build a system based on merit, fairness, and freedom. Our kids and, in turn, the future of America deserve nothing less. Editor's note: This column was first published on Outkick.
