Dem governor expected to defend state's controversial sanctuary policies during GOP-led hearing
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker will be among several Democratic governors who are expected to face a grilling before GOP lawmakers during a Thursday hearing on their states' controversial sanctuary status.
According to prepared remarks obtained by Fox News Digital, Pritzker will defend his state's policies, saying his administration was left to fill the void in the absence of help from the federal government in dealing with the border crisis.
He will accuse certain border state governors and mayors of having abandoned the nation's highest ideals by having spent millions of taxpayer dollars treating immigrants as "pawns" rather than doing "everything possible to make the promise of America the practice of America."
He will take aim at Republican Govs. Greg Abbott of Texas and Ron DeSantis of Florida for having bused illegal immigrants to predominantly liberal cities and states in the north – actions, he will argue, were political stunts that only exacerbated the problem.
Pritzker will say that Illinois' resources were strained because of a lack of federal support – from both Republicans and Democrats – during the crisis.
The Democratic governor is expected to highlight his state's efforts to address the influx of immigrants into the "Land of Lincoln" by processing new arrivals, supporting temporary shelter and permanent housing, and enabling them to live independently and contribute to the economy.
Pritzker will note that even though state resources were strained during this period, it did not stop his administration from focusing on public safety by investing in state and local law enforcement, including the Illinois State Police (ISP) troopers. He will highlight statistics showing that violent crime has gone down under his stewardship.
Pritzker will reaffirm his intolerance for violent criminals – whether documented or undocumented – and note that Illinois law enables government employees to cooperate with federal immigration officers executing criminal warrants.
He is expected to say that federal officials are welcome to operate in Illinois but will make clear that Illinois will not divert limited resources when it is not in the best interest of the state. He will say that he wants residents to feel comfortable turning to local law enforcement for help.
Pritzker is also expected to invoke his own family's history, having fled to the U.S. to escape the Russian massacre of Jews in Ukraine.
He is expected to implore Congress to fix the nation's broken immigration system so that law-abiding immigrant families can have the same opportunity his family did. The governor will close his remarks by arguing that reforming the system does not have to come at the expense of securing the border.
Pritzker will be joined by fellow Democratic Govs. Tim Walz of Minnesota and Kathy Hochul of New York. "A Hearing with Sanctuary State Governors" begins will at 10 a.m. EST before the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Forbes
an hour ago
- Forbes
Appeals Court Pauses Ruling Against Trump's National Guard Deployment In LA
An appellate court on Thursday temporarily blocked a federal judge's order directing President Donald Trump to return control of the California National Guard troops deployed in Los Angeles back to the state's Governor Gavin Newsom, pausing the ruling against Trump's controversial decision to deploy active duty military personnel to quell protests against his immigration crackdown. National Guard troops were deployed to Los Angeles this week. (Photo by) On Thursday, U.S. District Judge Charles Breyer said in a filing Trump must 'return control of the California National Guard to the Governor of the State of California forthwith.' The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals blocked the ruling late on Thursday after an appeal by the Trump administration. In his ruling Breyer said Trump's deployment of the National Guard, which was done without Newsom's approval, was illegal, 'exceeding the scope of his statutory authority and violating the Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.' Newsom called Breyer's ruling a win for the U.S., saying it is 'a check on a man whose authoritarian tendencies are increasing by the day,' and demanded that Trump comply with Breyer's order. Breyer's order was set to go into effect at 3 p.m. EDT on Friday, but the appellate court's decision means the troops in Los Angeles will remain under the president's control. Breyer's now paused order, however, only applied to California National Guard forces and not the group U.S. Marines, who have also been sent to Los Angeles by the Trump administration. Get Forbes Breaking News Text Alerts: We're launching text message alerts so you'll always know the biggest stories shaping the day's headlines. Text 'Alerts' to (201) 335-0739 or sign up here. Earlier on Thursday, Breyer said it did not appear Trump issued his National Guard order through Newsom, which is a requirement when the president seeks to deploy the troops in a given state. The judge also said he was trying to understand 'how something is 'through' somebody if in fact you didn't give it to him,' adding, 'It would be the first time I've ever seen something going 'through' somebody if it never went to them directly,' Politico reported. Breyer also scrutinized Trump's justification that the protests posed a danger of rebellion, deploying troops through a law that gives the president the power to do so in instances of 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion.' The judge disagreed with Trump's defense that a claim of potential rebellion is not reviewable by courts, according to Politico, adding, 'That's the difference between a Constitutional government and King George. It's not that a leader can simply say something and it becomes it.' Immigration protests in Los Angeles began last week in response to Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids conducted at retail spaces, graduations and courthouses in the city, as well as Trump's larger immigration policies. The same night protests began, the Trump administration began weighing the deployment of the National Guard to Los Angeles. Protests continued into the week and federal troops were deployed, eventually reaching a point where National Guard members were briefly detaining protesters before handing them off to local law enforcement for arrest. Newsom has sharply blasted the use of the National Guard, accusing Trump of 'putting fuel on the fire' and taking the president to court over the decision. The governor has claimed his authority was infringed upon with the deployment of the National Guard and the Marines, though the latter force has yet to participate in operations within Los Angeles. Los Angeles Protests: National Guard Has Detained Some Protesters (Forbes) Sen. Alex Padilla Forcibly Removed From Kristi Noem's Press Conference In Los Angeles (Forbes)
Fox News
an hour ago
- Fox News
Protesters hauled away as anti-ICE protests continue in Los Angeles despite mayor's curfew order
Anti-ICE protests in Los Angeles continued even after LA Mayor Karen Bass issued a curfew from 8 p.m. Thursday to 6 a.m. Friday, as Immigration and Customs Enforcement operations continue in Southern California. Late Thursday evening, the LAPD took a bus load of more than 20 protesters away as they continued to chant "peaceful protest." The protests in LA exploded over the weekend, causing the Los Angeles Police Department to declare an "unlawful assembly" Sunday night. "Agitators have splintered into and through out the Downtown Area," the LAPD's Central Division wrote on X. "Residents, businesses and visitors to the Downtown Area should be alert and report any criminal activity. Officers are responding to several different locations to disperse crowds." Bass announced she would be extending the curfew on Thursday during a news conference and stated that it seemed to be helping to lessen confrontations between law enforcement and protesters. "We have had to have a curfew in the city because we want to make sure that the downtown neighborhood and all the other neighborhoods are safe," she said. "But let me be very clear, we want peace to come to our city. The peace that we need to have happen needs to begin in Washington, and we need to stop the raids." Over the last couple of days what started out as a peaceful protest has continued to escalate with rioters burning flags in the streets, defacing police vehicles and destroying property. "An UNLAWFUL ASSEMBLY has been declared for the Downtown Los Angeles area," LAPD stated. Since then, more than 2,000 National Guardsmen have been stationed in L.A., to combat protests that are expected to continue through the weekend. Los Angeles residents may also begin to see Marines in the area as soon, with protection operations in coordination with the National Guard set to begin Friday.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Spokane Mayor Lisa Brown defends difficult decision to deploy police during Wednesday protests in order to avoid National Guard response
Jun. 12—As immigration protests broke out downtown Wednesday night, Spokane Mayor Lisa Brown had to strike a balance, not wanting to appear to be assisting or condoning the actions of federal immigration agents while fearful President Donald Trump could use a weak police response to justify the deployment of the national guard, as he did recently in California. "I think we're all aware of the situation that unfolded in Los Angeles and the deployment of the National Guard troops and U.S. Marines to that city," Brown said Wednesday night as the curfew she ordered took effect. "It was fairly clear to me that if there was no Spokane Police presence, that that could be used as a justification for the National Guard or other national agents to come in and take control of the situation." Her first response earlier in the afternoon had been to call Washington state Attorney General Nick Brown to see if there were any legal steps that could be taken to assist 21-year-old Cesar Alexander Alvarez Perez, who is seeking asylum from Venezuela, and Joswar Slater Rodriguez Torres, a Columbian national , and to connect the attorney general with former City Council President Ben Stuckart, who spurred the initial protest. She insisted that Spokane police were not deployed to "assist" Immigration and Customs Enforcement in their detention and transport of the two men. Once protesters surrounded the Cataldo Avenue ICE office and blocked the exits, and unknown activists spray-painted an ICE vehicle's windshield and slashed another's tire, they were violating city law, requiring local police response, she argued. City spokeswoman Erin Hut noted that some protesters began to remove park benches to use them to add to the barricade, which "could be seen as an escalation." The mayor had reiterated throughout the evening, including to Stuckart, that the city would keep the peace while abiding by the Keep Washington Working Act. Often referred to as Washington's "sanctuary state" law, the 2019 state law prohibits local law enforcement from collaborating with federal immigration agencies, including by sharing nonpublic information, holding people on ICE's request or arresting someone solely for a civil immigration offense, among other prohibitions. Facing criticism from some activists for ultimately creating the space for ICE officials to leave the facility with the two detainees, transporting them to the state's central ICE holding facility in Tacoma, Brown argued her office was duty-bound to respond to the obstruction of any facility's public access and that it was unrealistic to imagine the situation would end any other way. "I think it's pretty clear from the observations I had of what was occurring there, and frankly from my communication throughout the afternoon with some of the protesters, that they did not expect that they would be successful in stopping ICE, a federal agency, from completing their mission," Brown said Wednesday night. "I think anybody who's observed that agency and its actions and the actions of this (federal) administration could reach the same conclusion." Stuckart and the initial protesters, before they were joined by hundreds from a separately, previously scheduled anti-ICE protest, had expressed clearly that they expected to be arrested, she added. Once Spokane police did arrive en masse and protesters refused to disperse from the immediate area surrounding the ICE offices, continuing to attempt to blockade the entrances, the use of limited crowd dispersal munitions such as smoke grenades and pepper balls became necessary, as did the eventual curfew order, she argued. Notably, the curfew was announced shortly before 8:30 p.m. and wouldn't take effect for nearly an hour, giving protesters time to disperse, and it was not aggressively enforced when it began at 9:30. The area where the curfew took effect was limited, as well — so much so that a small group of protesters gathered outside the doors of City Hall just a few blocks away, visible and audible from a 10 p.m. news conference Brown held to debrief the events of the evening. Broadly, Brown has stood behind the police department's response, but has also stated her office would review the incident to determine whether any mistakes were made and planned to be open about their assessment.
