Mine Collapse Traps 3 Workers in British Columbia
The ground in the Red Chris mine collapsed on Tuesday morning near an underground area where three miners were working, Newmont Corp., the mine operator, said in a statement on Wednesday. The miners were able to move to a sealed area underground before a second collapse that blocked access to the underground area, according to Newmont.
Contact with the miners has been restricted since the second collapse, Newmont said, adding that operations have been suspended at the mine to focus resources on the rescue effort.
Premier David Eby of British Columbia said on Wednesday that two of the miners are from his province, and the third is from Ontario. He said that it appears that the workers are uninjured.
Newmont and rescue teams were 'working overtime to bring these miners home to their families,' he added.
'All appropriate emergency response protocols were activated immediately. Newmont is actively assessing all methods and technologies available to restore communication and safely bring our team members to surface,' Newmont said in a statement.
The Red Chris open-pit mine was constructed in 2014 and was approved to produce gold and copper until 2038, according to British Columbia's mining database.
Earlier this year, a Newmont subsidiary applied for a change to its environmental assessment certificate, which would allow it to shift the Red Chris project from open-pit mining to underground mining, using a method called block-caving that collapses large ore deposits to allow them to be mined.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Associated Press
2 hours ago
- Associated Press
From Benjamin Franklin to Pony Express to anthrax: How the US Postal Service shaped a nation
The one government agency that still reaches nearly every American daily — undeterred by rain, sleet, snow or even gloom of night — turns 250 on Saturday. Established in 1775, when the Second Continental Congress appointed Benjamin Franklin as postmaster general, the postal service predates the United States itself. It was launched nearly a year before the colonies declared their break from British rule. 'The country may not even have come into existence but for the Postal Service,' said Stephen Allen Kochersperger, the postal service historian and a former local postmaster. Now grappling with concerns over its financial viability, the independent agency has had a long and colorful history. It has grown from serving the 13 colonies to delivering more mail than any other postal system in the world, reaching nearly 169 million addresses and employing more than 635,000 people. America's first postmaster When the Continental Congress met in 1775, it had two main priorities: appoint a commander to lead the war against Britain and appoint a postmaster to oversee communication among the colonies. Franklin was chosen because he had served in the British postal service for North America. He'd been dismissed in 1774, in part for his radical views. The early American postal service linked colonial leaders and the Continental Army. It also helped unify the diverse, fragmented colonies by spreading ideas of liberty and independence through letters, newspapers and pamphlets. 'People were reading, getting ideas of what it would be like to be an independent country,' Kochersperger said. Settlers, migration and roads: A nation connected When the U.S. Constitution was ratified, Congress was granted power to establish post offices and mail routes — many along existing Native American trails. These post roads, first used by mail carriers on horseback, were upgraded for stagecoaches. Some evolved into highways still used today. Historians have said this aided settler expansion into Native lands and was intertwined with the displacement of tribes. As western migration accelerated, mail was sent by ship from New York to Central America and on to California. Delivery typically took two to three months. A new business model: Putting a stamp on it Before the advent of stamps, postage was generally collected in cash from the recipient. 'By the mid 19th century, the problem is developing that the post office is carrying a lot of letters for which it's never actually getting paid,' said Daniel Piazza, chief curator of philately at the Smithsonian National Postal Museum. With no home delivery, recipients either didn't want the letters or were unaware of them. Postmasters paid to publish in newspapers lists of people with mail piling up. In 1847, the first U.S. postage stamps were issued. Making postage prepaid saved the post office the trouble of chasing down its money. 'That's a business model that's pioneered in 1847 that is still the basic business model of the postal service today,' Piazza said. A postal precursor: The Pony Express comes ... and goes While the Pony Express is legendary, it only lasted about 18 months. Operated by private carriers from April 3, 1860, to Oct. 26, 1861, a relay system of riders on horseback carried mail, often from San Francisco or Sacramento, California, to St. Joseph, Missouri, the furthest westward railroad stop. The 1,800-mile (2,900-kilometer) journey took 10 days. As a West Coast stock market emerged, most mail was financial, Piazza said. Businesses needed to send stock quotes and commodity prices across the country. 'And so they're willing to pay exorbitant amounts of money to do that,' Piazza said. 'The Pony Express was very, very expensive.' While U.S. postage to send a letter was 10 cents in 1860, it initially cost an additional $5 to send mail by Pony Express — close to $200 today. Piazza said the service was scuttled by the Civil War and made obsolete with the advent of the telegraph. Later, the transcontinental railroad reduced mail delivery from months to days. A war and sad tidings streamlined home mail delivery After early experimentation, free mail delivery to homes began in earnest in the nation's largest cities in 1863. During the Civil War, the only communication from a father, brother, husband or son usually came through letter-writing. The postal service let soldiers send mail for free and vote by mail — an early forerunner of mail-in ballots. Women lined up daily at post offices, awaiting word. Sometimes they got their own letters back, with a note saying their loved one had been killed. 'And that was a terrible scene at the post office that played out almost every day,' Kochersperger said. Postal officials in Cleveland decided to take mail to people's homes out of compassion, he said. The idea spread quickly. City home delivery proved popular, but nearly two-thirds of Americans still lived in rural areas by the end of the 19th century. Demand was so great that rural free delivery, or RFD, began expanding rapidly around 1900. Postal innovations: Using Army planes and pilots While authorized air mail flights began in 1911, the nation's first regularly scheduled air mail service began on May 15, 1918. The initial routes were between Washington, D.C., Philadelphia and New York, using Army pilots and planes. The post office soon took over air mail, running operations for nine years until turning to fledgling private airline companies, some of which remain major airlines. In the early days, flights were so dangerous that some pilots dubbed themselves the Suicide Club. Thirty-two pilots were killed, including four whose planes caught fire in flight, according to the National Postal Museum. There were no commercial aviation systems, navigational tools or radios, and pilots relied on landmarks to find their way. 'These pilots were flying in open cockpits and all kinds of weather. It was very risky,' Kochersperger said. FDR's New Deal brings the nation new post offices Part of President Franklin Delano Roosevelt's New Deal plan to address the Great Depression was to put people to work on federal construction projects. That included roughly 2,000 new post offices. A portion of each building's budget was reserved for artwork, such as murals. Hundreds of post offices still house original art from the era. During World War II, the 6888th Central Postal Battalion, or the Six Triple Eight, an all-Black and all-female unit of the Women's Army Corps, went overseas to tackle a massive backlog of undelivered mail for troops in Europe, many of whom had been reassigned. The unit's motto was, 'No mail, low morale.' It cleared the backlog in three months. A population boom and five digits transform mail service After World War II, the economy boomed — and so did the population. The post office needed a faster way to sort massive amounts of mail. It could no longer do so by hand. On July 1, 1963, each post office was given a five-digit ZIP code. 'Previously, clerks had to memorize thousands of points of address information so they could sort the mail,' Kochersperger said. 'With the ZIP code, you didn't have to memorize anything.' The public was skeptical at first, balking at more numbers. So, the post office came up with a friendly cartoon character named Mr. ZIP, who helped convince people their mail would arrive faster. It took some getting used to, but it worked. 'Today, can you imagine life without a ZIP code?' Kochersperger asked. A mail workers' strike led to restructuring and bargaining rightsIn 1970, a strike was called over low wages by leaders of the National Association of Letter Carriers union in New York and quickly broadened in scope. After about 200,000 workers joined the first U.S. postal strike, President Richard Nixon called up the National Guard to help sort mail. But it was a 'disaster' after two days, Kochersperger said. The strike led to the Postal Reorganization Act of 1970, which authorized collective bargaining rights for postal workers. It also transformed the taxpayer-supported Post Office Department into the United States Postal Service, a financially self-sustaining and independent agency within the executive branch. The postmaster general would work for a board of governors instead of reporting to the president. The U.S. Postal Service would set its own rates, control its finances and decide post office locations. How anthrax attacks reshaped the postal service Weeks after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks, four threatening letters contaminated with anthrax were sent through the mail, including to two U.S. senators. Two workers at a mail distribution center in Washington, D.C., died after breathing in the spores. Three other people were killed, and more than a dozen were sickened. Following a nine-year investigation, authorities concluded the person who mailed the anthrax had taken his own life in 2008 and the case was closed, but new precautions were added to protect workers. 'It changed the whole way that we sorted mail at that time,' Kochersperger said. Years later, postal workers would be designated essential workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and don protective gear again. What's next for the USPS? The advent of the internet and private companies like Amazon has taken a bite out of mail volume, threatening the postal service's financial viability. A 10-year modernization effort was launched to keep up with the times. Reaction has been mixed, but David Steiner, the agency's newly appointed postmaster general, says some improvements have been made. Steiner, a former FedEx board member, wants to help keep the service self-sustaining. He has said he opposes privatization, an idea raised by President Donald Trump and billionaire Elon Musk, and believes the agency has a bright future as an independent entity. 'There is much to build upon in the years ahead,' he said. ___ Haigh reported from Hartford, Conn.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dear Abby: My son-in-law is awful to me
DEAR ABBY: My daughter has been married to her high school sweetheart for 15 years. Their marriage has been rocky from the start due to her husband's 'God' complex. He's a spoiled brat and a compulsive liar. He has not only caused mayhem in his own family but has nearly destroyed ours. He was extremely disrespectful to his late parents, and shortly after their deaths his bullying began being directed at us. Unfortunately, I have been the primary target. As a career businesswoman, I've always been able to respectfully stand my ground. Because he cannot control me like he does everyone else, he degrades, ridicules and belittles me, hurling nasty language and offensive behavior at me at every opportunity. I have tried everything humanly possible to get along with him. I've been a kind, loving mother-in-law and grandmother to his children. My daughter can't protect me, nor can my husband. I'm at the point of being willing to sacrifice my relationship with my daughter and grandchildren to get away from this monster. Counseling has given me tools to protect myself emotionally, but in the real-time situation they are not helpful. Any thoughts, Abby? — BROKEN-HEARTED IN NEW ENGLAND DEAR BROKEN-HEARTED: Your son-in-law is an elder abuser and probably a misogynist. The example he sets for your grandchildren is abominable, and they shouldn't grow up thinking it is normal behavior. Perhaps it's time you model the behavior your daughter should follow and separate yourself entirely from her husband. See her one-on-one, if at all. If you would like a relationship with your grandchildren, leave it up to her to make sure it happens. In the meantime, if you have a will, talk to a lawyer about changing it to ensure her husband cannot gain control of your assets. DEAR ABBY: My daughter-in-law is scheduled for surgery in a few weeks. She will need to take a leave of absence from her teaching job. When she put in her request to the principal, he wanted to know what kind of surgery she was having. At first, she told him it was personal and she would prefer not to say, but he continued to harass her until she told him. She was embarrassed because it's a female-related procedure. I told her what he did was unprofessional and it's possibly illegal (HIPAA) for him to ask such a question. In her contract, she's allowed to take an LOA for personal reasons. How do you think she should have handled this situation? — LEAVE OF ABSENCE IN THE EAST DEAR LOA: I think your daughter-in-law handled the grilling as best she could. But understand that the principal had no right to pry into her medical needs. What he did was ethically and morally wrong. If he wanted a note from her doctor explaining her need for time off for surgery, he could have requested it. The details of the procedure were none of his business. If she is suffering emotional distress because of his harassment, she should consult a lawyer. Dear Abby is written by Abigail Van Buren, also known as Jeanne Phillips, and was founded by her mother, Pauline Phillips. Contact Dear Abby at or P.O. Box 69440, Los Angeles, CA 90069. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Monogamy vs. monogamish? 7% of Americans are in monogamish relationships
Monogamy vs. monogamish? 7% of Americans are in monogamish relationships Summer is heating up, and love—or at least lust—is in the air. However, love is no longer the 'until death do us part' variety, according to a recent Hims survey. A majority of men (64%) and women (57%) in America say monogamy is outdated, unrealistic, or downright impossible. Others say they just want to keep their options open. When asked about their feelings towards monogamy, America tipped non-monogamous, with 39% of respondents saying monogamy is the only type of relationship they'd consider, and the other 61% saying otherwise. Specifically, 9% say it's aspirational but not realistic; 9% say it's old fashioned and outdated; 7% say they don't believe it's possible; and 6% saying it's possible for women but not men (hmm). Another 7% say they are keeping their options open, and 11% say it just depends—the more sexual options people have, the less monogamous they are likely to be (see Monogamy By the Numbers). 12% say the jury's out—they just aren't sure what they think about monogamy one way or the other. Q: Which describes your feelings toward monogamy? 39% It's the only type of relationship I'd consider 11% It depends on how many sexual options a person has—the more options people have, the less monogamous they are likely to be 9% It's aspirational but unrealistic 9% It's old-fashioned and outdated 7% I don't believe people can be monogamous 7% I just don't want to be in a monogamous relationship 6% It's possible for women but not for men 12% I'm not sure America is Open to Open Relationships Backing up the finding that monogamy is falling out of favor, or at least not as expected as it used to be, America was split on whether they preferred marriage or something other than tying the knot. 54% of respondents said old-fashioned courtship and marriage was their preferred path, with a close 46% saying they are looking for something else. Furthermore, 7% of respondents are currently in an open relationship, including 15% of Gen Z respondents (see below), about the same percentage of respondents who report not being married, but in a monogamous relationship (8%). Sexual experimentation also tied with sexual comfort as America's preferred way to express their romantic relationships (49% vs. 51%, respectively) and one-third of respondents (32%) value 'a little mystery' over a serious commitment, with women and men being about equally as likely to want some wiggle room in their relationship (29% of women want to keep things open vs. 34% of men). Gen Z is the least monogamous generation to date—but they're still looking for love, IRL As a generation that has consistently bucked the trends, it's not surprising that Gen Z is the least likely to say monogamy is their preferred relationship style. 68% of Gen Zs, including 65% of Gen Z women and 71% of Gen Z men, say they'd consider non-monogamous relationships. This compares to 64% of Millennials, 50% of Gen Xers, and 43% of Baby Boomers, showing a clear trend between monogamy and generation. Also, it is unsurprising that only 44% of Gen Zs are looking for old-fashioned romance compared to 54% of total respondents. Gen Zs are also 2X more likely to be in an open relationship than respondents overall (15% vs. 7%), and 5X more likely than their Gen X parents to be in an open relationship (15% vs. 3%). However, as noted in Gen Z is Finding Love the Old Fashioned Way, next-generation relationships don't necessarily mean virtual ones. 74% of Gen Zs and 77% of respondents prefer IRL relationships to digital courtship. In other words, Gen Zs don't want to digitize their romantic partnerships; they just want to diversify them. What else do Gen Zs want in a romantic partner? Ambition. Gen Zs were more likely than other generations to say they prefer ambition to romance, with 38% of Gen Zs picking a partner who is ambitious to one who is romantic, compared to 36.5% of Millennials, 32% of Gen Xers, and 27% of Baby Boomers who feel the same way. In bed, women call the shots as much as men In another departure from tradition, women report calling the shots in bed as much as their male partners. 50% of women and an equal 50% of men say, when it comes to who takes the lead in bed, 'it's a 50/50 split.' And what do women want from their partners? Experimentation. Women were nearly as likely as men to say they want sexual experimentation over sexual comfort (48% of women want experimentation vs. 50% of men). Gen Z women were more likely than their Gen Z male counterparts to want to experiment: 55% of Gen Z women want sexual experimentation over sexual comfort compared to 52% of Gen Z men. This study is based on a 7,100-person online survey, which included (1) 5,000 18-to-65-year-old respondents in the top 50 metropolitan areas (100 respondents per city); (2) 5,000 18-65-year-old respondents in each of the 50 states (100 respondents per state); and (3) a nationally representative sample of 500 18-to-65-year-old respondents to contextualize results. These three categories are not mutually exclusive; some respondents fall within multiple categories. The study was fielded in January 2025. Findings were analyzed by 190 demographic and psychographic cuts, including city, region, gender (when Hims refer to 'women' and 'men,' it includes all people who self-identify as such), age, race and ethnicity, relationship status, parenting status, sexual orientation (heterosexual, bisexual, gay, lesbian, pansexual, asexual, queer, etc.), fandoms (music, sports, etc.), and fitness and diet preferences, among other areas of interest. All data in this study are from this source, unless otherwise noted. Independent research firm, Culture Co-op, conducted and analyzed research and findings. This story was produced by Hims and reviewed and distributed by Stacker. Solve the daily Crossword
