logo
US justice department asks to unseal grand jury transcripts in Epstein case

US justice department asks to unseal grand jury transcripts in Epstein case

The Guardiana day ago
The US Department of Justice asked a federal court on Friday to unseal grand jury transcripts in Jeffrey Epstein's case at the direction of Donald Trump amid a firestorm over the administration's handling of records related to the wealthy financier.
The move – coming a day after a Wall Street Journal story put a spotlight on Trump's relationship with Epstein – seeks to contain a growing controversy that has engulfed the administration since it announced that it would not be releasing more government files from Epstein's sex trafficking case.
Todd Blanche, the US deputy attorney general, filed motions urging the court to unseal the Epstein transcripts as well as those in the case against British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted of luring teenage girls to be sexually abused by Epstein. Epstein killed himself in 2019 shortly after his arrest while awaiting trial.
The justice department's announcement that it would not be making public any more Epstein files enraged parts of Trump's base in part because members of his own administration had hyped the expected release and stoked conspiracies around the well-connected financier.
Trump's demand to release the grand jury transcripts came after the Wall Street Journal reported Thursday on a sexually suggestive letter that the newspaper says bore Trump's name and was included in a 2003 album for Epstein's 50th birthday.
The letter bearing Trump's name includes text framed by the outline of what appears to be a hand-drawn naked woman and ends with, 'Happy Birthday – and may every day be another wonderful secret,' according to the newspaper. The outlet described the contents of the letter but did not publish a photo showing it entirely.
Trump denied writing the letter, calling it 'false, malicious, and defamatory' and promised to sue. Trump said he spoke to both to the paper's owner, Rupert Murdoch, and its top editor, Emma Tucker, and told them the letter was 'fake'.
'These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don't draw pictures,' the president wrote on social media.
The justice department said in the court filings that it will work with with prosecutors in New York to make appropriate redactions of victim-related information and other personally identifying information before transcripts are released.
'Transparency in this process will not be at the expense of our obligation under the law to protect victims,' Blanche wrote.
But despite the new push to release the grand jury transcripts, the administration has not announced plans to reverse course and release other evidence in its possession. Pam Bondi, the US attorney general, had hyped the release of more materials after the first Epstein files disclosure in February sparked outrage because it contained no new revelations.
A judge would have to approve the release of the grand jury transcripts, and it's likely to be a lengthy process to decide what can become public and to make redactions to protect sensitive witness and victim information.
The records would show testimony of witnesses and other evidence that was presented by prosecutions during the secret grand jury proceedings, when a panel decides whether there is enough evidence to bring an indictment, or a formal criminal charge.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Visa integrity fee: The new $250 charge visitors to US must pay under Trump scheme
Visa integrity fee: The new $250 charge visitors to US must pay under Trump scheme

The Independent

time16 minutes ago

  • The Independent

Visa integrity fee: The new $250 charge visitors to US must pay under Trump scheme

Travellers visiting the US will have to pay a 'visa integrity fee' under Donald Trump 's new ' One Big Beautiful Bill Act '. The fee, $250 (£186) for the 2025 fiscal year, applies to all visitors travelling to the US on a non-immigrant visa (but not those who travel with a visa waiver). It's due to affect millions of tourists, international students and workers after the Trump administration's 'One Big Beautiful Bill' was signed into law on 4 July 2025. The fee will be charged on top of existing visa application costs – including a newly increased 'Form 1-94 fee', now $24 (£18). According to section 10007 of the Act: 'In addition to any other fee authorized by law, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall require the payment of a fee, equal to the amount specified in this subsection, by any alien issued a nonimmigrant visa at the time of such issuance.' It also states that the $250 charge cannot be waived or reduced. However, travellers on a non-immigrant visa may be able to have the fee reimbursed if they comply with all visa conditions, including not accepting unauthorised employment, while in the US. Those who depart the US no later than five days after their visa expires or gain 'lawful permanent resident' status will also be eligible for a reimbursement. The charge is not yet set up to be collected but will be effective during the US fiscal year, which runs from 1 October 2024 to 30 September 2025. The law doesn't specify exactly when or how the fee will be paid or reimbursements will be issued. A Department of Homeland Security spokesperson told CBNC: 'The visa integrity fee requires cross-agency coordination before implementation.' It added: 'President Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill provides the necessary policies and resources to restore integrity in our nation's immigration system.' The visa integrity fee can be changed by the Secretary of Homeland Security and will be adjusted annually, per inflation. A ' Report of the Visa Office' found that almost 11 million nonimmigrant visas were issued in 2024 alone. Many UK travellers, as well as those from more than 40 countries such as Australia, Japan and Singapore, do not need visas to enter the US for less than 90 days under the Visa Waiver Programme. These tourists will be exempt from the charge. Most visit on an Electronic System for Travel Authorization (Esta), which is also due to increase in price – almost doubling from the current $21 (£16) fee to $40 (£30).

UK may back down on demand for backdoor access to Apple users' encrypted data
UK may back down on demand for backdoor access to Apple users' encrypted data

The Guardian

time17 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

UK may back down on demand for backdoor access to Apple users' encrypted data

Pressure from Washington could lead the UK government to climb down on its demand that Apple provide British law enforcement agencies with backdoor access to encrypted customer data, it has been reported. In January, the UK Home Office formally asked Apple to provide law enforcement agencies access to heavily encrypted data held on behalf of its customers. But the US company resisted and withdrew its advanced data protection service from the UK market. It argues privacy is one of its 'core values'. The Financial Times reports that UK government sources believe pressure from Washington, including the US vice-president, JD Vance, means the Home Office is facing a climbdown. Vance has previously criticised as 'crazy' the idea of 'creating a backdoor in our own technology networks' that enemies could exploit, even when they were established for domestic security purposes. The FT quoted one Whitehall source saying 'the Home Office is basically going to have to back down' and another stating 'they are working on a way around it now'. The Home Office did not immediately comment. The Home Office had issued a 'technical capability notice' to Apple under the Investigatory Powers Act. But in February, Apple responded by withdrawing its advanced data protection (ADP) service in the UK and said: 'We have never built a backdoor or master key to any of our products or services, and we never will.' ADP is available everywhere else in the world and offers end-to-end encryption for iCloud drive and backup, notes, wallet passes, reminders and other services. Apple has launched a legal challenge in the investigatory powers tribunal over the Home Office's powers to demand backdoor access. The Home Office demanded this challenge be kept secret by the courts but judges ordered details of the case be made public. Sign up to Headlines UK Get the day's headlines and highlights emailed direct to you every morning after newsletter promotion The government is trying to position the UK as an appealing place for US tech companies to invest. Some ministers have argued that encryption technology prevents law enforcement agencies from tackling criminals, including child abusers. But there are concerns that the demand for a backdoor could imperil technology agreements with the US, which could be an important part of Labour's trade strategy.

Leftists are determined to date each other - and not settle for liberals: ‘Politics are the new religion'
Leftists are determined to date each other - and not settle for liberals: ‘Politics are the new religion'

The Guardian

time17 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

Leftists are determined to date each other - and not settle for liberals: ‘Politics are the new religion'

Zohran Mamdani gave Hinge an unofficial boost last month when the New York mayoral candidate revealed that he met his wife, Rama Duwaji, through swiping. 'There is still hope on those dating apps,' he said on the Bulwark podcast a week before his stunning victory in the Democratic primary. The tidbit spread over social media, cementing the 33-year-old democratic socialist's status as a millennial everyman. A subsequent Cosmopolitan headline read: 'Zohran Mamdani could make history (as the first NYC mayor to meet his wife on Hinge).' Representatives for Hinge would not comment, but plenty of eligible New Yorkers did, claiming they would redownload the app due to Mamdani's success, in spite of their dating fatigue. 'Now I'm clocking in like it's a full-time job,' one user posted on TikTok. 'If he can find love on that app maybe I can,' another wrote in a caption. However, they could run into an ideological hurdle while filling out their profiles. Alongside answering basic questions – 'Do you smoke, drink or do drugs? Where did you go to college?' – Hinge ask singles to choose their political affiliation: liberal, conservative, moderate, not political, or the mysterious 'other'. Some people to the left say the label 'liberal' does not encapsulate their socialist views. They associate it with establishment figures such as Joe Biden, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama – or Mamdani's rival, former governor Andrew Cuomo. Many liberals deem proposals by Hinge's golden boy (freezing rent, taxing the super-rich, making buses free) too radical. A socialist might want to distance themselves from such center-leaning liberalism and instead embrace the 'hot commie summer' that hedge fund manager Daniel Loeb warned his fellow billionaires of. 'There's a real appetite to date leftists now,' said Abby Beauregard, fundraising chair for Democratic Socialists of America's New York chapter. She said that Mamdani's victory reinvigorated the dating scene in in the city, 'but it's really hard to find explicitly leftist dating spaces. Most dating apps have a liberal option, but no leftist option, and it's not a turn-on to see 'other', because that could mean anything.' (For instance, far-right or communist.) So lefty singles are finding more explicit ways to signal their politics to like-minded love matches, on Hinge and beyond. Some have turned their dating profiles into mini-manifestos, writing out their entire belief system as answers to the apps' prompts. It's common to see watermelon emojis as euphemisms for solidarity with the Palestinian people. Some users will warn that they'll swipe left on Terfs (the acronym for trans-exclusionary radical feminists), cops or Donald Trump supporters. 'It's important for me to see those signifiers,' said Caroline, a 38-year-old florist who lives in Queens. (She other sources are going by their first name for privacy reasons.) 'There's a nice feeling on the apps right now with people being proud to be communists or leftists, and they're saying that.' But she's wary of anyone who comes off as too lefty. 'That seems kind of tryhard,' she said. 'It can read as too performative, that you're fishing for alt-girls or you're a centrist who just wants someone freaky from Bushwick.' Tinder, OK Cupid and the kink-friendly app Feeld allow users to write their own bios, unlike Hinge, and they can choose within those bios whether they reveal their political affiliations. In the lead-up to the 2024 election, Tinder also launched profile 'stickers' so users could signal the issues they felt strongly about, such as 'voting for reproductive rights'. For her part, Caroline, who uses Feeld, wrote in her profile that she's 'far left' and 'COVID-cautious'. That feels like enough for her. 'Saying 'I love vaccines!', 'free Palestine!' or 'fuck Trump!' would be trite. It's all implied.' Dennis Mulvena describes himself as 'very left-leaning'. He used to keep his affiliations private on Hinge because he believed there was room for nuance in discussing politics, but recently listed himself as liberal. 'With the return of Trump in the last two years, it's important to have that out there,' said Mulvena, 30, who works in customer service for a car manufacturer. 'Admittedly gay people who live in Brooklyn tend to lean left, but I have had the experience of going on a date with someone who then revealed he was part of his college's Young Republicans club.' That was the last time he assumed that everyone he matched with would share the same views as him. According to an NBC News poll from April, the partisan gap between gen Z women, who are more likely to say they are Democrat, and gen Z men, who have shifted right, is the widest of all generations. And, increasingly, a person's politics have an impact on their perceived desirability. While past generations may have thought nothing about a conservative and liberal romantic pairing ('don't talk about politics or religion at the dinner table'), 60% of 18- to 24-year-olds think it's important to date or marry someone who shares their political beliefs. 'Politics is the new religion,' said Dr Jess Carbino, a former sociologist for Bumble and Tinder who studies dating apps. 'It's become the way that people choose to frame how they look at the world and their values.' Lily, a 23 year-old socialist who was recently laid off, is wary of seeing someone identify as 'not political' on Hinge. 'I'm immediately scared of what that means,' they said. 'As a queer person living through everything that's happening in this country, I need to know someone has a baseline care for people and their community.' In New York, more voters between the ages of 25 and 34 – a mix of gen Z and younger millennials – turned out to vote in the Democratic primary than any other age cohort, indicating a vigor for leftist politics. Recently, Lily has seen young people write on Hinge that they'd only go out with someone who voted for Mamdani or that they'd never go out with a Cuomo supporter. They have seen multiple people answer the Hinge prompt 'when was the last time you cried?' with: 'when Zohran won'. (They presume these were happy tears.) This is not to say New York is a young Bolshevik paradise: conservatives in the city are also trying to find each other. Some have gone into voluntary exile from mainstream dating apps, creating their own options. 'Our dating apps have gone woke,' reads the description for Date Right Stuff, one such app backed by Peter Thiel. 'Connect with people who aren't offended by everything.' In March, Date Right Stuff hosted a singles event at New York's Trump Tower called 'make America hot again'. It was a coming-out night for what the app's former chief marketing officer Raquel Debono called 'city conservatives', or Republicans who prefer urban life to small towns and tradwifedom. They are not the only ones going off-app: the Mamdani effect on New York's lefties could not be contained to Hinge. In early July, young people gathered inside a cocktail bar on the Lower East Side for a 'sexy socialist singles' event hosted by New York's DSA. Those looking for something casual – or, as the host put it, 'if you just want fast and free, like Zohran's buses' – were sent to one part of the bar, while those who wanted 'a slow burn, like taxing the fucking rich' went to another. At one point, organizers directed polyamorous attendees to a room upstairs, where they could mingle with other non-monogamous individuals. Upstairs, Sven, 25, an economics master's student who lives in Bushwick, said that young people view the DSA as a social club just as much as a platform for socialist candidates. 'I saw a post on Reddit talking about how all Zohran's canvassers are hot, and we have soccer leagues and book clubs,' they said. 'It's a great way to make friends.' Downstairs, back in monogamyville, Lauren, a video editor who lives in Astoria (the Queens neighborhood Mamdani represents as a New York assemblymember), waited for a friend who was off flirting. 'There's definitely an energy when I wear my Zohran T-shirt out,' she said. 'People are revved up. They'll call you from across the street saying, 'What's up?' or 'I love that guy.' It's a real conversation starter.' New York's DSA will continue its sexy socialist mixers in youth hubs Bushwick and Williamsburg, and in the Upper West Side for those over 30. In the meantime, singles will have to keep parsing political signifiers on dating apps.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store