
'Toba Tek Singh' remains a chilling reminder of the tragedy of 1947
In 'Toba Tek Singh', Manto exposes the lingering scars of 1947 on collective memory and national identity.
Out beyond the shifting boundaries of sanity, madness and one's search for identity, Saadat Hasan Manto's words truly hold a mirror to the troubled fate of two countries, which have yet to achieve true liberation in thought and conscience.
What remains daunting about Manto's stories is the uncanny resemblance between the past and the present, revealing how little things have actually changed. The craft of revealing the truth—a genre crafted and skillfully mastered by the resilient voice of Manto:
"Hindustan had become free. Pakistan had become independent soon after its inception but man was still slave in both these countries — slave of prejudice — slave of religious fanaticism — slave of barbarity and inhumanity."
Manto, in his notable short story Toba Tek Singh, delves into the interplay of memory, trauma and displacement across the timeline of 1947 Partition.
The motif of madness plays as a guiding metaphor in Manto's narrative to deconstruct the absurd narrative of Partition, hinting towards the signs of madness projected by the two countries, and in turn, set the tragedy in the lives of the people, residing on both sides of the border.
Amidst years of collective grief and generational trauma, the 1947 Partition becomes, perhaps, an unsettling memory.
Along similar lines, Ritika Singh notes,'Trauma lies not in the shock of the occurrence of the event but in its reception.'
Manto's works explore the nature of trauma within the people of 1947. The unresolved nature of trauma and denied grief persist in the years-long endurance to seek meaning and redemption in their lives.
Caught in a recurring cycle, it is the constant shift between the past and the present that aggravates the tragedy of man in Manto's Toba Tek Singh.
In Toba Tek Singh, Manto pens the dilemma of the protagonist Bishan Singh, an inmate of this asylum, whose internal conflict centers around his search for home following the Partition.
Manto satirically comments on the aftermath of Partition through the narrative of mental asylums, followed by an exchange of psychiatric patients between Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims across the two countries, India and Pakistan.
Such was the gravity of the situation that even individuals in mental asylums were being relocated or one could say, partitioned between the two nations, reflecting the absurdity of it all.
Manto, in the satirical piece, constantly touches upon the paradigm of sanity and insanity for today's readers. Manto reimagines the perspective of borders as a weakening factor which divided the people of India and tore the two countries apart.
He redefines 'borders' as not arbitrary lines drawn to solidify the national identity of the countries. If truth be told, these borders unveil the grave intentions behind the British divide-and-rule policy, one of the pivotal instruments of colonial rule, which thrived on partitioning the subcontinent into two separate countries.
Manto goes on to question the 'mad' and the 'partially mad' and signifies the inability of both to comprehend the partitioned identity of Pakistan and India.
He frames the consciousness of the characters in such a poignant manner; their stories mirror the personal dilemma of Manto who could never come to terms with the occurrence of Partition. Manto employs the character of Bishan Singh to voice the stories of those who almost died, without losing their lives during the turmoil.
"As to where Pakistan was located, the inmates knew nothing. That was why both the mad and the partially mad were unable to decide whether they were now in India or in Pakistan. If they were in India, where on earth was Pakistan? And if they were in Pakistan, then how come that until only the other day it was India?"
Manto projects the identity crisis of Bishan Singh's character whose sense of self shatters completely; he loses himself in an unsettling state of chaos and utter confusion when he begins to think of home, where he truly belongs.
The protagonist's home is located in Toba Tek Singh, which now resides in Pakistan. Tracing his character arc, Manto's reader resonates with the underlying feelings of displacement, carefully examining the relationship between an individual's home and his identity.
It is not merely Bishan Singh's home that seems to be displaced, but his identity too, the fragments of which lie in the heart of India and Pakistan.
Bishan Singh's life story, much like those of countless others, stands as a moving testament to collective memory, trauma, and identity crisis buried within the overarching narrative of Partition. Manto builds on the nuanced relationship between a person's home and personal identity, by a conscious attempt to confuse his reader between the identity of Bishan Singh and the identity of the place, Toba Tek Singh.
Throughout the narrative, the writer decides to use the two names interchangeably to draw upon a familial connection between a person's home and their identity.
The internal rhyme embedded within the two names 'Toba Tek Singh' and 'Bishan Singh' mirrors the protagonist's disoriented state of mind which alters his reality. Through the absurd landscape of the asylum, Manto exemplifies his deep resentment towards the incompetency of national politics and the political nature of Partition.
He recounts the madness, the uncertainty, the mass migrations, and his people reluctantly abandoning their homes, their loved ones and hurriedly boarding trains for survival.
Leaving a life, they lived and loved, Manto knows nothing but the tragedy of his people.
Reaching the final lines of Toba Tek Singh, Manto reveals the wretched fate of his loved character, Bishan Singh and his beloved home 'Toba Tek Singh':
"There behind barbed wire, one side lay India and behind more barbed wire lay Pakistan. In between, on a bit of earth which had no name, lay Toba Tek Singh."
The recurring motif of the barbed wire symbolically conveys the dilemma of a 'no man's land' grounded in the physical and ideological division between the separated countries. Manto's search for a no man's land manifests the tragedy of Bishan Singh who ultimately takes his last breath on the border, one that unites and divides India and Pakistan.
Carrying the conversation on Partition Literature forward, Faiz Ahmed Faiz and Manto employ the poetics of resistance to demonstrate how unresolved grief and intergenerational trauma collectively stem from the absence of closure attached to people of the past; many of whom continue to grapple with sentiments of loss, dislocation and fragmented identity, still strongly felt among us today.
Remembering Faiz, his poetry reverberates with anguish for the unfulfilled promises of freedom that birthed with the 1947 Partition of India. His widely celebrated poem 'Subh-e-Azadi' – Dawn of Independence draws parallels to Manto's Toba Tek Singh, weaving the intricate themes of nostalgia, hopelessness and disillusionment together.
The living memory of Partition seems to be almost rooted in the words of both writers, a tragedy which disintegrated all hope in people for a land that is their own to a no man's land.
Yeh daagh daagh ujaala yeh shab-gazida seher
Woh intezaar tha jiska, yeh woh seher to nahin
Yeh woh seher to nahin, jis ki aarzoo le kar
Chale the yaar ki mil jaayegi kahin na kahin
In the writings of Faiz Ahmed Faiz and Saadat Hasan Manto, the common man of 1947 seems almost broken, stranded within the confines of a no man's land, searching for the Dawn of Independence once promised.
The tragedy of Partition lies in knowing that the sense of longing is here to stay and this Dawn of Independence was never meant to set, in the eyes of the people who lived and almost survived Partition in its entirety.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Express Tribune
22-05-2025
- Express Tribune
Ben Affleck, Islamophobia and global stakes of speaking up
Listen to article In an era when celebrity commentary often seems either performative or superficial, a rare moment of sincerity can stand out — especially when it affirms dignity over division. That's exactly what happened last month when I had a brief but meaningful encounter with Ben Affleck. While walking together, my wife spotted Affleck in the distance. To her horror, I walked straight up to him before she could stop me. "Hey Ben," I said. He looked up, clearly caught off guard — likely expecting a selfie request or a comment about The Accountant 2. But instead, I told him, "You probably don't remember, but I want to thank you for standing up for Muslims and calling out Islamophobia years ago on " Before I could finish, he smiled and said, "On Bill Maher show?" I nodded. Without missing a beat, he replied: "It should be obvious. There's no place for hate." My wife had caught up by then and instinctively recorded the tail end of our chat — a brief handshake, but a powerful moment of moral clarity. A moment that reminded me — and clearly millions of others, given how widely the story resonated online — that Hollywood, at its best, can push back against harmful narratives. That exchange brought me back to 2014, when Affleck famously challenged Bill Maher and Sam Harris on HBO's Real Time. Harris, a neuroscientist and prominent atheist, had declared that "Islam is the mother lode of bad ideas" and argued that liberals fail to confront theocratic extremism. Maher backed him, claiming that Muslim societies broadly lack liberal values. Affleck didn't let it slide. "It's gross. It's racist," he said, comparing the generalisations to saying, "Oh, you shifty Jew." He reminded the panel — and the audience — that there are more than a billion Muslims who are not fanatics, who "just want to go to school, have some sandwiches." In the years since, Harris has doubled down, blaming Hamas entirely for Gaza's suffering, suggesting that Western civilisation alone represents "civilisation", and arguing that liberal institutions are being infiltrated by "stealth Islamists". Meanwhile, Bill Maher has continued to use his platform to attack Muslims. He has said Islam has "too much in common with ISIS", joked that he's afraid of people named "Muhammad", and mocked a Muslim teenager arrested for bringing a homemade clock to school. This is not principled critique. It's a pattern. And it's a pattern we see repeated in more respectable tones, too. In a recent op-ed for Newsweek, Dr Qanta Ahmed warned of the dangers of "radical Islamism" in the US, citing a Muslim housing development in Texas and its spiritual leader, Dr Yasir Qadhi, as causes for concern. But her argument rested on associations, not evidence. The implication was clear: visibly devout or politically engaged Muslims are to be viewed with suspicion. As someone who has spent years in both academic and legal circles defending religious freedom and civil liberties, I find this shift troubling. We are watching liberal ideals — free expression, equal protection and due process — increasingly applied selectively. Critique of extremism is necessary. But when that critique becomes a vehicle for collective blame, it ceases to be liberal. It becomes a form of ideological tribalism. Affleck's words that day stayed with me: "There's no place for hate." Not against Muslims. Not against Palestinians. Not against anyone. If liberalism is to mean anything at all, it must mean a consistent defence of human dignity, regardless of who is speaking, praying or resisting. We must challenge extremism wherever it arises. But we must also challenge the quiet, polite, professional Islamophobia that too often hides behind the mask of rationalism. In a world where celebrity voices are often louder than policy papers, Affleck's moment of moral clarity matters. And as the viral reaction to our brief encounter suggests, people are hungry for voices that speak up — not just for themselves, but for fairness. And this matters just as much in Pakistan as it does in the US. Those in the Global South are often on the receiving end of these narratives — through media, foreign policy, or biased gatekeeping in global discourse. When someone like Affleck uses his platform to push back against lazy stereotypes, it ripples far beyond Hollywood. Because there is, indeed, no place for hate.


Express Tribune
12-05-2025
- Express Tribune
Singles seek love at capital meetup
Whether it is the best of times, or the worst of times – or as some would say both – the marriage matchmaking market in Pakistan stays in business. Curated meetups for singles in the city appear to be the latest creative take on finding rishtey. Muzz, the matchmaking app for Muslims, recently hosted a Baat Pakki event for single candidates looking for a marriage partner in Islamabad. Around 70 eligible men and women attended along with their mothers, who were also invited to the event. The meetup was more than just a gathering; it was styled like a reality TV game show where attendees were given name tags that specified only their name and age, before they were divided across zones based on age groups. To start off, candidates who were closer in age were seated at the same table with nudges from the staff and icebreaking prompts to encourage discussion. Prompts included intriguing questions such as "Which of your five senses would you give up?" which had candidates agreeing with each other and more divisive ones like "What are your thoughts on dressing modestly?" Every 20 minutes or so, candidates were asked to switch tables, ensuring that they got a chance to meet the different people at the event. At the same time, the mothers, who were differentiated by Team Boy and Team Girl stickers, socialised with each other in a separate zone. The staff remained hands-on throughout the event, facilitating matches by providing interested candidates with a space to chat one-on-one and informing candidates of any potential matches their mothers had identified. "This is actually much better than the arranged marriage rishta process," said the mother of a male candidate. "I personally do not like going to people's houses and giving them an evaluation on whether we liked their daughter. It's better that youngsters meet and decide for themselves." Maheen, 27, who was able to find a match at the event and has continued talking to him since then, said, "My mother kind of forced me to come here. I don't even use the app. I just downloaded it to purchase the tickets, so, I didn't have high hopes, but it was actually a nice experience." Several candidates remarked that the in-person meetup was a more effective alternative to finding matches through the app. Requiring participants to bring their mothers and purchase tickets priced at Rs7,500 made it more likely that serious candidates attended the event. It was also apparent that the Muzz team had vetted the profiles of the participants beforehand. "We have introduced a number of changes to our app to ensure the candidates' legitimacy. We now verify their identity, age and salary, and we have added a lot more filters, so that people can find genuine connections based on their own preferences," Muzz CEO Shahzad Younas, who was in Pakistan for the Baat Pakki event, told the Express Tribune. Muzz, the Muslim-owned app for matchmaking, is active in over 190 countries and has 12 million users. "We have had a lot of new users join the app lately, and thousands have reached out to us in 2024 to share that they got married through the app," said Muzz PK Marketing Lead, Nayab Nazir, pointing towards her sister-in-law who had found her husband through the Muzz app. "What's most amazing is the cross-regional matches we have seen as people from different cultures and backgrounds, like those from the Middle East and the UK, are able to connect despite their differences," she added.


Express Tribune
03-04-2025
- Express Tribune
Sweets see surge in demand
As Muslims across the country celebrated Eidul Fitr, sweets reclaimed their traditional place at the heart of Eid festivities, bringing joy and delight to people of all ages. From traditional mithai like gulab jamun and barfi to modern creations, sweet treats and dishes are an integral part of Eid celebrations. Sweets are a star attraction of Eid celebrations, captivating the hearts and tantalising the taste buds of people from all walks of life, regardless of age or background. From young children to elderly grandparents, everyone indulges in sweet treats, savouring its elating flavours and different textures that bring immense joy and satisfaction. Naila Seemab, a housewife, shared enthusiastically, "Eid is incomplete without sweets and I love traditional desserts like gulab jamun and barfi, but my kids are fonder of modern sweets like chocolate cake and cupcakes." She said for many, sweets are a way to share the joy of Eid with loved ones. She explained how she likes to buy sweets for family and friends on Eid. With their colourful decorations, delicious flavours, and the joyful atmosphere they bring, sweets are unmissable at Eid gatherings. They make the festival even more special and memorable.