
The idea that immigration fuels our housing crisis might seem intuitive, but it's wrong
The idea that reducing
immigration
is the only way to solve the
housing crisis
– or more simply that 'immigrants are taking our housing' – might seem intuitive in the context of low housing supply and high immigration. It's also sure to become a more prominent part of our politics over the coming years.
Looking to other countries can give us a sense of what the future might hold. Anti-immigrant parties are part of governments in Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal and Hungary, not to mention the US. Here in Ireland, while we don't have a prominent anti-immigrant party, grassroots and online-based groups appear to be growing in size and confidence.
International research on the drivers of anti-immigrant sentiment points to economic grievances. For example, political scientists have found that
Trump
supporters are much less likely to have a college degree and their jobs are more likely to be threatened by globalisation. But in Ireland, economic inequality has not increased over the last four decades and globalisation has been largely positive for employment and incomes.
The alternative theory of 'resource scarcity' is more plausible. The argument here is that immigration can cause demand for services to increase quickly, leading to increased competition. This is especially true for things that take time to deliver, like housing and education. Researchers in Austria found that in areas that rely on social housing, perceived housing competition drives anti-immigrant voting. In the Netherlands, there is evidence that voters become less supportive of immigrants when more social housing in their area is allocated to refugees.
READ MORE
Although it may be intuitive, the idea that opposition to immigration is driven by this kind of competition doesn't stack up in the Irish case. True, housing supply has been inadequate for over a decade, and by historic standards immigration is indeed high. In 2023, 22 per cent of the population were born outside the State. Only two other EU countries had a higher level of foreign-born population – Malta and Cyprus – which are of course Mediterranean islands.
The argument that reducing immigration would alleviate the housing crisis therefore appeals to common sense. But what it misses is that it is immigrants themselves who are overwhelmingly the victims of the housing crisis. By any measure, immigrants come out much worse than Irish-born households.
Research from the
ESRI
shows that while a large majority of Irish-born people own their home (77 per cent), little more than a third of non-Irish born households do (37 per cent). In fact, the proportion of Irish-born households who are homeowners has not changed that much over the last few decades. And while we often hear about a 'generation rent' trapped in the private rental sector, in reality almost 60 per cent of immigrants are private renters, compared to just 13.8 per cent of those born here. Only a quarter of Eastern Europeans have got their foot on the property ladder, despite the fact that more than 60 per cent of them have been living in Ireland for more than a decade, and over 80 per cent of Brazilians and Indians are renters. Recent research by DCU's Valesca Lima also shows that discrimination is a common experience among migrants seeking rental accommodation.
[
Irish Times poll: Housing is main concern for all population groups
Opens in new window
]
Migrants are also less likely to live in social housing. Almost 10 per cent of those born here live in social housing, but only 6 per cent of immigrants do. Many immigrants don't have a long-term right to reside and aren't eligible for social housing – and because access to social housing is based on a waiting list, it doesn't favour newcomers.
When it comes to housing affordability the picture is much the same. More than one in three migrants spend more than 30 per cent of their income on housing costs, but less than one in 10 Irish-born residents do. This is because the vast majority of Irish-born households are homeowners (and around half of those have no mortgage on their house) and because they are more likely to be in social housing, where rents are very affordable.
[
Ireland can't use housing shortfalls as excuse for failing to accommodate single male asylum seekers, ECJ says
Opens in new window
]
Finally, non-Irish nationals accounted for 46 per cent of single adult homeless presentations and 44 per cent of families in emergency accommodation in 2019.
In short, all of the main issues associated with the housing crisis (inability to purchase, affordability, homelessness) are disproportionately experienced by immigrants. This is despite the fact that, on average, immigrants have higher levels of employment and education.
The facts don't support the idea that migrants are outcompeting Irish-born households when it comes to housing. In fact, it would be more accurate to say that immigrants are largely competing among themselves to rent overpriced housing from landlords who are overwhelmingly Irish. The idea that 'immigrants are taking our houses' twists the facts to project anger on to those most impacted by high rents and homelessness.
It's worth noting that a lot of anti-immigrant activism has focused on the groups of immigrants who are least likely to be driving up house prices and rents, or taking social housing. For those concerned with access to homeownership, it makes more sense to focus on immigration from the UK, the only group of immigrants who have high levels of homeownership. If the issue is high rents, the more likely culprits are Swedish software programmers in the Docklands and not International Protection Applicants who are, in some instances, literally living in tents.
This doesn't mean there is no possible case for reducing immigration. But it does mean that simplistically pitting natives against immigrants doesn't help us understand what is happening with Irish housing. And it obscures an issue that should be a major policy concern: making our housing system fairer for everyone who lives and works here.
Dr Michael Byrne is a lecturer at UCD and director of the Equality Studies MSc. He writes a weekly newsletter about Irish housing:
https://theweekinhousing.substack.com/

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The Journal
10 minutes ago
- The Journal
Irish citizens among activists detained in Egypt after arriving for march to Gaza border
EGYPTIAN AUTHORITIES HAVE detained more than 200 people who arrived in the country ahead of a planned peaceful march to the Rafah crossing on the border with Palestine, according to the march's spokesperson. Asked if there were Irish citizens among those detained, the Department of Foreign Affairs told The Journal it 'has been contacted by a small number of Irish citizens and is providing consular assistance'. Demonstrators from around the world have been arriving in Cairo this week, with dozens of Irish people among them. 'Over 200 participants were detained at Cairo airport or questioned at hotels across Cairo,' the march's spokesperson Saif Abukeshek told the AFP news agency, adding that those detained included nationals from the United States, Australia, the Netherlands, France, Spain, Morocco and Algeria. People Before Profit TD also plans to join the march and told RTÉ Radio this morning that the demonstrators have no intention of trying to enter Gaza. He described the demonstrators as people 'trying to do everything we can to highlight the absolute horror faced by the people of Gaza'. 'The aid must be allowed to enter and Israel must stop using starvation as a weapon of war. The blockade must be lifted and the genocide halted,' Murphy said in a statement yesterday. Meanwhile, a convoy that left Tunisia on Monday is making its way to Egypt to join the march, crossing through the divided and war-torn Libya. Following Israeli war minister's orders, Egyptian authorities directed its security services to block the International March to Break Gaza Siege from entering the country! Thousands taking part in the March, which has been launched from Tunisia, are planning to walk through… — Global March To Gaza (@globalmarchgaza) June 12, 2025 According to the Global March to Gaza website , participants plan to gather in Cairo tomorrow before travelling by bus the following day to Al Arish, where they will begin their 48km march to the besieged Palestinian territory to the north of Egypt's Sinai region. Advertisement 'Over the course of 2–3 days, we'll walk in solidarity toward Rafah,' the website says. The demonstrators have said they do not plan to try and enter Gaza and will camp at the border for three days before returning to Cairo on 19 June. Israel had asked Egyptian authorities to prevent people from making the march. 'I expect the Egyptian authorities to prevent the arrival of jihadist protesters at the Egypt-Israel border and not to allow them to carry out provocations or attempt to enter Gaza,' Defence Minister Israel Katz said in a statement. Katz added that such actions 'would endanger the safety of (Israeli) soldiers and will not be allowed'. Egypt said on Wednesday that it supports efforts to put 'pressure on Israel' to lift its blockade of Gaza, but added that any foreign delegations seeking to visit the border area must receive prior approval through official channels. Speaking this morning, Paul Murphy said the march aims to pressure Israel into lifting its blockade on Gaza, but also put 'pressure on our own governments'. 'I mean, these are peaceful Palestine solidarity protests. We have clear guidelines on what we're doing. 'We're not trying to forcibly break through into Gaza or anything like that. It is a peaceful demonstration. 'Unfortunately, this morning, we're hearing reports of people being detained at the airport, and I think at least two Irish citizens have been detained by Egyptian authorities.' With reporting from AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

The Journal
22 minutes ago
- The Journal
US anti-deportation protests continue and spread beyond 'test case' Los Angeles
PROTESTS AGAINST AGGRESSIVE immigration raids have continued in the United States after President Donald Trump ordered the deployment of National Guard troops and US marines in Los Angeles this week, against the wishes of the state's Democratic governor. More than 1,000 people massed yesterday in America's second-biggest city for a sixth day of demostrations, as peaceful protesters marched through the streets. A second night of curfew was in place as city leaders try to get a handle on the after-dark vandalism and looting that scarred a few city blocks in the city. 'I would say for the most part everything is hunky dory right here at Ground Zero,' protester Lynn Sturgis, 66, a retired school teacher, told the AFP news agency. 'Our city is not at all on fire, it's not burning down, as our terrible leader is trying to tell you.' The mostly peaceful protests are the result of a sudden escalation by the Trump administration to arrest and deport undocumented immigrants. Police kettle protesters under arrest on in LA Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Pockets of violence have included the burning of self-driving taxis and the hurling of stones at police. Arrests by masked and armed men, who have refused to identify themselves during raids, continued yesterday. A pastor in the LA suburb of Downey said five armed men driving out-of-state cars grabbed a Spanish-speaking man in the church's carpark. When she challenged the men and asked for their badge numbers and names, they refused. 'They did point their rifle at me and said, 'You need to get back,'' Lopez told broadcaster KTLA. 'The first, perhaps, of many' Police and National Guard members have fired rubber bullets at protesters, and reporters , while Los Angeles residents have been demanding the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency (ICE) to get out of the city. The deployment of US military personnel on the streets of a major American city has been met with shock and concern by many. This week, Mayor Karen Bass said LA residents are living in fear and that the city had become the site of an 'experiment' conducted by the Trump administration. 'Our city is actually a test case for what happens when the federal government moves in and takes the authority away from the state or away from local government,' she said on Tuesday. LA police officers on Wednesday Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo 'By having the military, it de-escalates,' Trump said about the decision to send 700 marines to LA. Advertisement 'They're stopping an invasion,' he told graduates in an address at West Point military academy. 'This is the first, perhaps, of many,' Trump said yesterday of the National Guard and Marine deployments. 'Democracy is under assault' Trump won the election last year partly on promises to combat what he claims is an 'invasion' by undocumented migrants. 'We're going to have a safe country,' he told reporters on his way into a performance of 'Les Miserables' in Washington. 'We're not going to have what would have happened in Los Angeles. Remember, if I wasn't there… Los Angeles would have been burning to the ground.' Around 1,000 of the 4,700 troops Trump deployed are actively guarding facilities and working alongside ICE agents, said Scott Sherman, Deputy Commanding General Army North, who is leading operations. The Pentagon has said the deployment will last for 60 days and cost taxpayers $134 million. Governor Newsom, a Democrat widely viewed as eying a 2028 presidential run, has charged that Trump is seeking to escalate the confrontation for political gain. He warned on Tuesday that the unprecedented militarization would creep beyond his state's borders, claiming 'democracy is under assault right before our eyes.' Los Angeles Metro police ride on a vehicle during a protest on Wednesday Alamy Stock Photo Alamy Stock Photo Lawyers for California are expected in court today to seek an order blocking troops from accompanying immigration officers as they arrest migrants. Trump administration lawyers called the application a 'crass political stunt.' Not just LA Despite Trump's threats to deploy the National Guard to other Democratic-run states, protesters appear to be undeterred. In Spokane, Washington, a night curfew was declared after police arrested more than 30 protesters and fired pepper balls to disperse crowds, police chief Kevin Hall told a news conference. Demonstrations were reported in St Louis, Raleigh, Manhattan, Indianapolis and Denver. In San Antonio, hundreds marched and chanted near city hall, reports said, where Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott has deployed the state's National Guard. A nationwide 'No Kings' movement is expected on Saturday, when Trump will attend a highly unusual military parade in the US capital. The parade, featuring warplanes and tanks, has been organized to celebrate the 250th anniversary of the founding of the US Army but also happens to be the day of Trump's 79th birthday. With reporting from AFP Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal


Irish Independent
32 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Government fined €550,000 by privacy regulator and warned over facial scans for Public Services Card
The Government department has also been ordered to stop the practice and cease using its biometric database by April of next year, unless it finds a correct legal basis under which to do it. The Department, the regulator said, holds biometric data on at least 70pc of the population here. It has been engaged in the 'ongoing collection, storage and processing of highly sensitive personal data, including biometric data consisting of facial templates, on a large scale', according to the DPC. The Public Services Card has been a privacy battleground between the Government and the regulator for years. While ministers and civil servants insist that it's necessary to bring more efficiency into public services, with facial scans being required to protect against fraud, critics have consistently labelled it an attempt to introduce a national identity card through the back door. In 2017, the then Social Protection Minister, Regina Doherty, infamously described it as being 'not compulsory but mandatory'. In 2021, the Irish privacy regulator began an investigation into what the Department was doing with regard to biometric facial templates and its usage of associated facial matching technologies as part of the registration process for the Public Services Card. The registration process, known as 'SAFE 2 registration', typically involves the submission of a digital photo of someone to make sure they're not already registered or claiming benefits under another identity. Under European GDPR law, biometric data is categorised as 'special category data' to which higher protections and safeguards must be applied. 'SAFE 2 registration is mandatory for anyone who wishes to apply for a Public Services Card,' said the DPC. ADVERTISEMENT 'Persons who do not submit to such processing cannot access DSP services, including welfare payments.' However the Department said it believes there is a legal basis to operate the process, but that the legal provision is 'not in it view, clear and precise enough to satisfy the requirements of the GDPR'. it said that it 'will carefully consider the DPC decision report, in conjunction with colleagues in the Attoreny General's Office with a view to determining an appropriate response within the nine-month timeframe'. It said that depending on the outcome, it may appeal any enforcement notice or work to rectify the issues as perceived by the DPC. The Department said that the DPC 'did not find any evidence of inadequate technical and organisational security measures. "There are no examples of any person suffering damage or loss as a result of SAFE registration.' It insisted that the process has led to a reduction in identity fraud and offered 'security and customer service benefits'. There are no immediate implications for users of the card or MyGov ID, according to the Department, and during the nine-month period the process will continue. The regulator had looked at whether the Department of Social Protection had a 'lawful basis' for collecting and retaining biometric data 'for the purposes of conducting facial matching' as part of this SAFE 2 registration. It also examined the Department had complied with transparency obligations and had carried out an adequate Data Protection Impact Assessment (DPIA) as part of SAFE 2 registration. It found the Department liable on all counts, by 'failing to identify a valid lawful basis for the collection of biometric data in connection with SAFE 2 registration' and, thus, incorrectly 'retaining biometric data collected' as part of the process. The watchdog said that it also 'failed to put in place suitably transparent information' to citizens and failed to include certain details in the DPIA it carried out. 'In light of the infringements identified above, the DPC has reprimanded the DSP, issued administrative fines totalling €550,000 and issued an order to the DSP requiring it to cease processing of biometric data in connection with SAFE 2 registration within nine months of this decision if the DSP cannot identify a valid lawful basis,' said the privacy regulator. However, the regulator did not suggest there was any security risk to the sensitive facial scans stored. 'The DPC did not find any evidence of inadequate technical and organisational security measures deployed by the DSP in connection with SAFE 2 registration in the context of this inquiry,' said Graham Doyle, deputy commissioner of the DPC. 'It is important to note that none of the findings of infringement identified, nor the corrective powers exercised by the DPC, pertain to the rollout of SAFE 2 registration by the DSP as a matter of principle. "This inquiry was concerned with assessing whether the legislative framework presently in place for SAFE 2 registration complies with the requirements of data protection law and whether the DSP operates SAFE 2 registration in a data protection-compliant manner, and the findings announced today identify a number of deficiencies in this regard.'