logo
More than 700 people submitted opponent testimony against controversial Ohio higher education bill

More than 700 people submitted opponent testimony against controversial Ohio higher education bill

Yahoo12-03-2025
Hundreds of students protested against Senate Bill 1 on Ohio State's campus on March 4, 2025. (Photo by Megan Henry, Ohio Capital Journal).
More than 700 college students, faculty, and staff submitted opponent testimony against a massive Ohio higher education bill that would significantly change colleges and universities.
Fourteen people testified against Ohio Senate Bill 1 for three hours during the Ohio House Higher Education and Workforce Committee meeting Tuesday morning. Committee Chair Tom Young, R-Washington Twp., enforced a hard stop at 12:10 p.m.
'If you pass this bill, you sow the seeds of a mass exodus of university students, leaving the economy, workforce, health, and reputation of the state of Ohio worse off than how you found it,' said Sabrina Estevez, an Ohio State University student.
Senate Bill 1 would ban diversity and inclusion efforts, prevent faculty from striking, set rules around classroom discussion, create post-tenure reviews, put diversity scholarships at risk, shorten university board of trustees terms from nine years down to six years, and require students take an American history course, among other things.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Regarding classroom discussion, it would set rules around topics involving 'controversial beliefs' such as climate policies, electoral politics, foreign policy, diversity and inclusion programs, immigration policy, marriage, or abortion. S.B. 1 would only affect Ohio's public universities.
State Sen. Jerry Cirino, R-Kirtland, introduced S.B. 1, which passed the Ohio Senate last month.
Those who testified Tuesday talked about the bill's strike ban, tenure review, collective bargaining, classroom discussion regulations, and the diversity and inclusion ban.
'S.B. 1 is a censorship bill,' said David Jackson, president of Bowling Green State University's American Association of University Professors chapter. 'The bill, full of contradictions, will leave stakeholders wondering: What can I say? What can't I say?'
Jackson also talked about how tenure protects academic freedom.
'Professors with academic freedom are the best thing that students have available to them, because it causes universities and faculty to be innovative in terms of teaching and research,' he said. 'The chilling effect that would be caused … would be bad, not just for the faculty members, but for the students whom we serve.'
State Rep. Josh Williams, R-Sylvania, asked many of those who testified about striking on campus.
'Why do you think that faculty at our at our public universities can threaten to hold back students from graduating or earning their degree simply to have it as a bargaining tool in your negotiations?' Williams asked.
University faculty strikes are rare in Ohio. Youngstown State University workers went on strike for a few days in 2020 over pay disputes and faculty at Wright State University went on strike for almost three weeks in January 2019 over pay disputes and health care.
'It is the only power that organized labor has in a bargaining process,' Jackson said. 'While strikes are vanishingly rare … the existence of those nuclear weapons, if you will, makes the parties work together and solve the problems that their campuses face, and that's why strikes rarely happen.'
Among public employees, first responders and corrections officers are not able to strike in Ohio.
'The thing in common that those professions have is public safety,' state Rep. Beryl Brown Piccolantonio, D-Gahanna, said while questioning Ohio Education Association Vice President Jeff Wensing.
'I don't believe that faculty members of higher institutions fall into the category of police and fire and protecting public safety,' Wensing said.
S.B. 1 is already affecting Ohio universities.
'Qualified, talented faculty have decided not to put their name in the hat for a search at some of our institutions because of a fear of what kind of environment they will be coming into,' Jackson said.
John Plecnik, an associate professor of law at Cleveland State University, theorized S.B. 1 came from a faculty member or an administrator from the University of Michigan.
'There'd be no greater way to damage Ohio State or Ohio's public universities,' he said.
University of Cincinnati Undergraduate Student President Madison Wesley shared testimonies from concerned students.
'One such student, from Appalachia, fears that the ripple effects of this bill could make it harder for students like her to pursue an education,' she said. 'A pre-med student recently expressed fears that the implications of this bill could negatively affect the accreditation of Ohio medical schools and, by extension, their future career.'
Wesley also talked about how the bill poses a threat to Ohio higher education.
'This will diminish the value of our degrees and make it harder to attract and retain top talent in our state,' she said.
Ohio State Professor Erynn Beaton said S.B. 1 is 'pulled from the Florida playbook.'
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis signed a bill into law in 2022 that affects tenured faculty and another bill in 2023 banning the state's public colleges and universities from spending money on diversity and inclusion programs.
'I personally know several faculty who have left Southern states due to the legislative environment,' Beaton said.
Ohio State Associate Professor Ashley Hope Pérez said she used to look forward to her two sons attending public universities in Ohio, but not anymore.
'S.B. 1 undermines every Ohioan's right to an effective and complete education,' she said. 'It also endangers students' competitiveness in a rapidly changing professional landscape.'
S.B. 1 has faced heavy opposition since being introduced in January. Hundreds of students, faculty, staff and alumni protested against the bill last week at Ohio State University. More than 800 people submitted opponent testimony against the bill when it was in the Senate committee. Ohio House Democrats bombarded Cirino with questions about his bill during last week's sponsor testimony.
Follow Capital Journal Reporter Megan Henry on Bluesky.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Stephen Miller blasts ‘stupid white hippies' protesting DC crackdown
Stephen Miller blasts ‘stupid white hippies' protesting DC crackdown

The Hill

time17 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Stephen Miller blasts ‘stupid white hippies' protesting DC crackdown

Deputy White House chief of staff Stephen Miller on Wednesday railed against what he called 'stupid white hippies' who were protesting the federal crackdown on crime in the nation's capital and argued they did not represent the citizens of Washington, D.C. Miller, Vice President Vance and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth visited Union Station on Wednesday, where National Guard troops have been stationed outside for days in a show of force near the transportation hub. 'We are not going to let the communists destroy a great American city, let alone the nation's capital,' Miller told the crowd near Shake Shack inside Union Station. 'And let's just also address another thing. All these demonstrators you've seen out here in recent days, all these elderly white hippies, they're not part of the city and never have been. And by the way, most of the citizens who live in Washington, D.C., are Black.' 'So we're going to ignore these stupid white hippies that all need to go home and take a nap because they're all over 90 years old,' he added. 'And we're going to get back to the business of protecting the American people and the citizens of Washington, D.C.' The Trump administration earlier this month began surging federal law enforcement across parts of the district to crack down on what the White House said was an unacceptable level of crime, despite statistics showing violent crime has declined in the city. Last week, Trump took federal control of the Metropolitan Police Department and deployed hundreds of National Guard troops across the city to further the crack down on crime. The White House has said officers across the district have made more than 550 arrests since the surge in federal resources began on Aug. 7. But local residents have largely expressed disapproval with the aggressive moves from the federal government. A Washington Post-Schar School poll of 604 D.C. residents published Wednesday found 65 percent do not think Trump's actions will make the city safer. Roughly 80 percent of residents said they opposed Trump's executive order to federalize the city's police department.

Protesters heckle Vance, Hegseth, Miller as they get photo op with DC National Guard

time18 minutes ago

Protesters heckle Vance, Hegseth, Miller as they get photo op with DC National Guard

As President Donald Trump's deployment of National Guard troops continued, protesters lashed out at three of his top officials who took time for a photo op with the guardsman Wednesday in Union Station. Protesters booed and jeered Vice President JD Vance, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller as they came to the station to thank the troops. "Free DC," the protesters shouted as three officials arrived in their motorcade. Vance, Hegseth and Miller stopped by at the station's Shake Shack and bought and ate lunch for the guard members. Vance and Miller dismissed the jeers of the protesters, which drowned out their press gaggle, calling them "crazy" and "communists." "They appear to hate the idea that Americans can enjoy their communities," Vance said. Vance was asked why the troops were stationed at Union Station instead of parts of the city with higher crime rates. The vice president claimed that the station was being overrun with homeless people and visitors didn't feel safe. "This should be a monument to American greatness," he said. Vance added that he believed that crime statistics do not report the full scope of crime on the streets, however he declined to talk about evidence that backed his claim up and told a reporter to "You just got to look around." The event happened at the same time that D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser was giving a news conference on Wednesday.

Judge rules that some Texas schools don't have to display Ten Commandments in classrooms
Judge rules that some Texas schools don't have to display Ten Commandments in classrooms

CNN

time18 minutes ago

  • CNN

Judge rules that some Texas schools don't have to display Ten Commandments in classrooms

A federal judge has ruled that several Texas school districts do not need to comply with a state law requiring the Ten Commandments to be displayed in all classrooms. The colorful 55-page opinion issued Wednesday by US District Judge Fred Biery is the latest court victory in a series of legal challenges to laws that have been enacted in three southern states over the last year that require public schools to display the Ten Commandments. 'Even though the Ten Commandments would not be affirmatively taught, the captive audience of students likely would have questions, which teachers would feel compelled to answer. That is what they do,' Biery wrote. The judge – who was appointed by Bill Clinton – skewered the controversial law, known as S.B. 10, concluding that it's likely unconstitutional and cannot be enforced in several Texas school districts, including ones in Houston, Austin and Fort Bend County. 'Teenage boys, being the curious hormonally driven creatures they are, might ask: 'Mrs. Walker, I know about lying and I love my parents, but how do I do adultery?'' Biery added. 'Truly an awkward moment for overworked and underpaid educators, who already have to deal with sex education issues, … and a classic example of the law of unintended consequences in legislative edicts.' The judge ended his opinion by writing, 'For those who disagree with the Court's decision and who would do so with threats, vulgarities and violence, Grace and Peace unto you. May humankind of all faiths, beliefs and non-beliefs be reconciled one to another. Amen.' More than a dozen Texas families of various faiths sued over the state's law – which was signed by Republican Gov. Greg Abbott in June and is set to take effect statewide starting next month – arguing it violates the First Amendment's Establishment Clause and Free Exercise Clause. Biery agreed. The law, he said, 'impermissibly takes sides on theological questions and officially favors Christian denominations over others.' The Texas law requires public schools to post in classrooms a 16-by-20-inch (41-by-51-centimeter) poster or framed copy of a specific English version of the commandments, even though translations and interpretations vary across denominations, faiths and languages and may differ in homes and houses of worship. Similar laws were enacted this year and last year in Arkansas and Louisiana. Court challenges to those measures have also resulted in favorable rulings. Legal experts have said that it's likely the cases will eventually be appealed to the US Supreme Court. Attorneys for the families behind the Texas case cast Biery's ruling as a strong rejection of state lawmakers' push to impose their religious preferences on to public school students in the Lone Star State. 'Today's ruling is a major win that protects the constitutional right to religious freedom for Texas families of all backgrounds,' said Tommy Buser-Clancy, an attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union. 'The court affirmed what we have long said: Public schools are for educating, not evangelizing.' CNN has reached out to Abbott's office and the Texas attorney general's office for comment on the ruling.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store