logo
Republican fails in attempt to censure House speaker

Republican fails in attempt to censure House speaker

Yahoo28-03-2025
Mar. 27—AUGUSTA — A Republican from Fairfield on Thursday launched an unsuccessful attempt to censure House Speaker Ryan Fecteau for holding a late-night vote on the two-year state budget, which passed mostly on party lines last Thursday.
Rep. Shelley Rudnicki argued that Fecteau, a Biddeford Democrat, broke House rules by holding the vote after 9 p.m. without receiving the support of two-thirds of lawmakers to allow a late-night vote.
"It is hard and binding rule," Rudnicki said. "You have failed to do that and willfully disregarded House Rule 501 at every opportunity. That is a dereliction of duty by the presiding officer and it is why we must censure Speaker Fecteau today, so this abusive and lawless pattern of behavior does not continue in this body."
But the motion divided her own caucus, with only 24 Republicans voting in support and 119 lawmakers opposed.
"I appreciate the frustration of the good representative from Fairfield, however the people sent us here to get serious work done," Rep. Ken Fredette, R-Newport, said. "I think, frankly, we need to focus on our work and not focus on censures, which I think has been a huge distraction of this body over the last two months."
During last week's budget debate, Rep. David Boyer, R-Poland, tried to invoke the House rule before 9 p.m. and was informed by Fecteau that the objection could only be raised at precisely 9 p.m. But the House went at-ease and didn't return until after 9 p.m., at which point Rudnicki was told that it was too late to raise the objection.
Rudnicki's censure motion said it was "a dereliction of duty and breach of procedure" to hold the vote after 9 p.m. without getting super-majority support of the chamber and "creates procedural irregularities, undermines legislative integrity and compromises the legitimacy and fairness of House proceedings."
Late-night voting has routinely occurred in the Legislature. And the censure motion was doomed to fail, with Democrats holding the majority.
But the motion from Rudnicki, who was censured along with Rep. Michael Lemelin, R-Chelsea, last year for floor comments about the Lewiston shooting and abortion, illustrates that lingering bad blood between the political parties after the budget debate and after Democrats censured Rep. Laurel Libby, R-Auburn, for a social media post targeting a transgender high school athlete.
Libby has not been allowed to speak or vote since the censure, but could regain those rights if she apologizes. She has said she will not apologize.
Instead, Libby has sued Fecteau, and Republicans have repeatedly tried to lift the censure, including an attempt after House Minority Leader Billy Bob Faulkingham, R-Winter Harbor, offered a teary apology on Libby's behalf.
Faulkingham opposed censuring Fecteau, saying he would "make a mockery of the censure process," as Faulkingham accused Democrats of doing by censuring three Republicans in the last year.
Last week, Democrats used their majorities in both the House and Senate to pass a continuing services budget that included funding to close a current $118 million shortfall in the state's Medicaid program, known as MaineCare, and for existing programs and services for the next two budget years.
No new spending initiatives, tax increases or service cuts were included in the budget. Those are expected to be taken up in a "Part II" budget.
Republicans, meanwhile, also have launched an effort to overturn the budget vote by petitioning for a people's veto referendum.
Copy the Story Link
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Texas lawmakers approve redistricting map favouring Republicans
Texas lawmakers approve redistricting map favouring Republicans

Yahoo

time18 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Texas lawmakers approve redistricting map favouring Republicans

Texas legislators have approved new congressional maps designed to give Republicans an edge in next year's elections for the US House of Representatives. After a two-week standoff, where Democrats fled the state to stall the vote and rally supporters against the redistricting plans, Republicans in the Texas House of Representatives passed the new voting lines in an 88-52 vote. The maps will now go to the Texas Senate, where they are expected to be swiftly approved. They create five new Republican-leaning seats that would shore up the party's US House majority in Washington DC. Democratic-led states are pushing to redraw their own maps to offset the Texas ones. President Donald Trump backed redrawing the maps to safeguard a Republican majority in the US House. Republicans hold a slim majority in the upper chamber of Congress, which Democrats aim to win back in the 2026 midterm elections. Wednesday's vote in Texas followed a dramatic showdown as Democrats fled across state lines to deny Republicans the quorum necessary in the state legislative body to take a vote. Texas Governor Greg Abbott, a Republican, ordered their absent Democrats' arrest, and some of them said law enforcement had monitored their homes while they were gone. The lawmakers returned this week, saying they had achieved their objective of drawing national attention to the matter. In an effort to ensure Democrats would not attempt to halt the vote again, Texas House Speaker Dustin Burrows ordered the statehouse chamber doors to be locked on Monday. He also said Democrats would be "released into the custody" of a designated police officer to ensure they returned to the statehouse on Wednesday for the redistricting vote. Several Democrats instead ripped up the written agreements that they were required to sign for the police escort. One lawmaker, Nicole Collier, decided to sleep in the chamber rather than be escorted by an officer. In the time since Texas started planning these new voting maps, other states controlled by both political parties - including Florida, New York, Ohio and Missouri - have been weighing similar changes. California lawmakers are currently debating new maps that would give new advantages to Democrats in five districts, which would cancel out changes made in Texas. A key provision in California says the maps would only go into effect if Texas or other states went ahead with changes favouring Republicans. After the vote on Wednesday, California Governor Gavin Newsom wrote on X: "It's on, Texas." The new maps in Texas sparked uproar over gerrymandering - the redrawing of electoral boundaries to favour a political party - which is practised by both main parties and is legal unless ruled to be racially motivated. Like other states, Texas typically redraws congressional districts once a decade when new population data is released by the US Census. Texas Democrats claimed that redrawing the maps before the next population count in 2030 was being done along racial lines - an argument that has been rejected by Republicans. Voting maps that were approved in 2021 after the last population count are still being litigated over claims of racial discrimination. During one of the many heated exchanges during debate in the Texas statehouse, Republican legislator Todd Hunter, who introduced the redistricting bill, was applauded as he scolded Democrats. "Don't come into this body and say we didn't include you," he said. "You left us for 18 days, and that's wrong." Democrats in the chamber questioned the legality of the maps and accused Republicans of trying to "steal" an election. "Let's talk about cowardice and cheats," Democratic legislator Ann Johnson said. "The root of all of this is around racism and power," she added. "A pure power grab." Democrats and civil rights groups have said the new maps will dilute voting power from minorities, which would violate federal law, and have threatened to sue. Texas Democrats return home after redistricting row California governor unveils voting lines plan to counter Texas Republicans Texas redistricting feud escalates as Democrats face bomb and FBI threats

Elon Musk must face lawsuit claiming he ran illegal $1 million election lottery
Elon Musk must face lawsuit claiming he ran illegal $1 million election lottery

CNBC

time19 minutes ago

  • CNBC

Elon Musk must face lawsuit claiming he ran illegal $1 million election lottery

Elon Musk was ordered on Wednesday by a federal judge to face a lawsuit by voters accusing the world's richest person of defrauding them into signing a petition to support the U.S. Constitution for a chance to win his $1 million-a-day giveaway. U.S. District Judge Robert Pitman in Austin, Texas said Jacqueline McAferty plausibly alleged in her proposed class action that Musk and his political action committee America PAC wrongly induced her to provide personal identifying information as part of the giveaway, late in the 2024 election campaign. Lawyers for Musk and America PAC did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Musk founded America PAC to support Republican Donald Trump's successful 2024 presidential run. McAferty, an Arizona resident, said Musk and America PAC induced voters in seven battleground states to sign his petition by promising that $1 million recipients would be chosen randomly, as in a lottery, though the voters had no real chance to collect. She said voters who signed were also required to provide names, addresses, email addresses and phone numbers. In seeking a dismissal, Musk listed several "red flags" as proof he had not run an illegal lottery. He said these included statements that the $1 million recipients were "selected to earn" the money and expected to become America PAC spokespeople, defeating the idea that the payment was a "prize." But the judge cited other statements suggesting the defendants were "awarding" the $1 million, and the money could be "won." "It is plausible that plaintiff justifiably relied on those statements to believe that defendants were objectively offering her the chance to enter a random lottery--even if that is not what they subjectively intended to do," Pitman wrote. The judge was appointed to the bench by President Barack Obama in 2014. Musk had also rejected the suggestion that petition signers suffered harm by providing contact information. Pitman said an expert in political data brokerage could testify what that information was worth for voters in battleground states. The lawsuit was filed on Election Day, Nov. 5, 2024. A day earlier, a Philadelphia judge refused to end Musk's giveaway, saying that city's top prosecutor failed to show it was an illegal lottery. Musk is a Texas resident, and his electric car company Tesla TSLA.O is based in Austin. The case is McAferty v Musk et al, U.S. District Court, Western District of Texas, No. 24-01346.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store