What Happens When a Passenger Dies Mid-flight? The Answer May Surprise You
An Australian couple detailed a tragic event where another passenger died and was seated next to them for several hours, according to media reports.
Airlines have different protocols for managing an in-flight death.
An international aviation agency says the deceased person should be moved away from passengers, or returned to their original seat if the plane is full.
A mid-flight tragedy is raising questions about the protocols for when someone dies on an airplane. On a recent Qatar Airways flight, a person tragically died and was placed next to another pair of passengers. Jennifer Colin and Mitchell Ring say they were on an hours-long flight when a woman became ill and collapsed to the ground near their row of seats, Nine.com.au reports."Unfortunately, the lady couldn't be saved, which was pretty heartbreaking to watch," Ring told the Australian outlet. "They tried to wheel her up towards business class, but she was quite a large lady and they couldn't get her through the aisle.'The crew reportedly asked them to move over one seat, and placed the deceased person in their original seat, despite the other seats being unoccupied. The passengers said the crew placed blankets over the body, and recalled seeing medical staff pull back the blankets upon landing.Qatar Airways reviewed the events internally, and determined that all protocols were followed.'Passengers were accommodated to other seats, and a crew member was sitting at all times with the deceased passenger for the duration of the flight until landing in Doha,' a spokesperson for Qatar Airways told Travel + Leisure. 'We have been in direct contact with the family of the deceased as well as other passengers who were directly affected by this difficult situation and have offered emotional support and compensation."The airline added that the tragedy is an unfortunate reality of unexpected deaths occurring on aircraft, and their crew is trained to deal with these situations with respect and dignity.
'After an internal review, it is clear that Qatar Airways cabin crew acted quickly, appropriately and professionally at all times in line with training and industry standard practice,' the spokesperson added to T+L. In the aftermath of the news, hundreds of people shared their perspective and confusion on how a deceased passenger could be seated next to other paying customers, when other seats were reportedly available. 'I simply don't understand the reasoning behind not allowing a change of seats,' one person shared on Reddit. 'If there were no other seats available I suppose someone would have to sit next to the decedent but it sounds like that wasn't the case.'
That said, aviation experts say that in-flight deaths are not common."There's no good outcome in this scenario for the airline or its customers,' Mike Arnot, head of airline communications firm Juliett Alpha, told T+L. 'In-flight deaths are extremely rare—about one per 8 million passengers—but medical emergencies, including overdoses, heart issues, seizures, are more common. Even births which are even more rare than in-flight death.'
International groups have provided frameworks for airlines. The International Air Transport Association (IATA), for example, has specific guidance for carriers to follow in the event of a death on board.
Airline crews are first advised to immediately notify the captain of a person who has been declared dead, or presumed to be dead. Following the notification, crew members are instructed to move the deceased person to an available seat. The specific order of the seat location is first finding a seat that is away from all passengers, and if the plane is full, the passenger should be moved back to their original seat. 'Take extra care when moving the person and be aware of the difficulty of the situation for companions and onlookers,' the IATA guidance states. (The IATA guidance also mentions covering the deceased individual with blankets, which was followed by the Qatar crew.)From a passenger rights perspective, there is little documentation for what those on the flight can expect. According to the IATA guidance, in some circumstances on a full flight, the deceased passenger may be moved back to their original seat. Within the United States, airlines do not have a specific listed protocol that prevents a deceased passenger from being seated next to other passengers. As an example, American Airlines has a section in its contract of carriage that outlines events beyond their control, citing "force majeure." 'If your ticket still has value (if you were, for example, re-accommodated in a different class of service) we'll refund the unused portion to the original form of payment, but beyond that we are not liable,' American shares on its website.
Read the original article on Travel & Leisure

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Buzz Feed
2 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Millennials Are Called Out For The Way They Use "LOL"
There I was, just being a millennial, enjoying my day and reminiscing about Pogs and Orbitz drinks and Beanie Babies, when suddenly, I was jolted from my "won't-ever-be-able-to-afford-to-buy-a-home" haze. Why, you ask? Well, I happened upon this blatant attack upon my generation from @gaulicsmith on Twitter (now known as X): And I quickly discovered the conversation has been happening all over the internet, including X, Threads, and Reddit. Unsurprisingly, my fellow millennials immediately felt called out. "Feeling attacked lol," said one person. "They're onto us lol first they came for our cheugy lol then our side part lol then our computer y2k crisis but they made it fashion lol" "my apartments on fire and i haven't felt joy since 2012 lol" And it will come as no surprise that millennials, the kindest generation, who have never done anything to anyone (except "kill" a bunch of industries and part our hair on the side and wear skinny jeans), quickly started apologizing, lol. "Sorry ( ) resisting the urge..." Then they moved on to their next tactic: trying to explain themselves. "lol does not mean LAUGH OUT LOUD! It means please don't be mad at me," this person said. "CLOSE! It actually means: 'I have anxiety so say it back or I'll think you hate me.'" "It is our way of communicating tone. We are a generation of people who feel like we are always in trouble/everyone is mad at us. lol" "If I don't put lol at the end of a sentence you might get mad at me. I blame having parents raised by traumatized WWII vets." "we cannot abide someone thinking we're mad at them" And one person hilariously added, "Remember when all our Nanas thought it meant 'lots of love'?" Of course, millennials also had to get in a few solid jabs at some other generations while they were at it. "at least i don't have tiktok voice," said one. "'Lol' is to millennials as '...' is to boomers." "frfr zoomers use 'frfr' like 'loud and clear' for radio comms." "Why does Gen Z wear pajamas everywhere lol" And finally, "At least we can read lol." To my fellow millennials, just remember: If you're a millennial, what do you think? Are you going to keep using "lol" despite the harsh and entirely unfair judgment? Let us know in the comments. And if you're not a millennial, give us a break lol.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Woman Doesn't Want to Have Kids Out of Fear They'll 'Inherit' Future Mother-in-Law's Personality
One woman's future mother-in-law crosses so many boundaries that the woman is now debating whether she wants any children of her own "I understand that when you marry someone you're marrying into their family but my partner is a great person despite his mother," she writes on Reddit Her mother-in-law crosses so many boundaries that the woman says she's worried about having children, writing, "what if they inherit her personality???"One woman says her future mother-in-law is so overbearing that she's questioning whether she wants to be a mother herself. In a Reddit post, the anonymous woman writes that she and her partner have been together for a few years but aren't yet married. "I understand that when you marry someone you're marrying into their family but my partner is a great person despite his mother," she writes. Despite her reassurances, the Reddit user claims her mother-in-law crosses so many boundaries that the woman says she's worried about having children, writing, "what if they inherit her personality???" She continues her post by detailing the things about her mother-in-law that make her most nervous. Among them is that she is "a time hog" and schedules video calls with her partner every weekend. She is also "rude and gives unsolicited advice a lot." "She thinks she's the expert on EVERYTHING. In the past she's even made comments trying to pitch my partner against me and make me seem like I'm the bad guy when I didn't do anything malicious," she adds. She continues: "I just know she's going to fill my house with 'gifts' for the kids (aka garbage) and dictate how I set up my child's nursery. She's obsessed with getting free things off Facebook and always tries to give my partner things." "I have anxiety issues in general and overthink a lot so maybe these things won't even happen. I'm just annoyed because I don't want to miss out on parenthood because of this nut," she writes in the post's conclusion. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Commenters say the woman's anxiety is justified. "MIL sounds like a full-time, unsolicited life coach nobody asked for. Kids or no kids, boundaries will be your best friend, because she's not just gonna dial it back on her own," one writes. "If she's already this invasive, parenting with her in the mix is a battlefield. Start setting limits now, or get ready to fight forever." Read the original article on People
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Dad Makes Son Leave Kids Party After Host Refuses to Lock Up Dogs During the Event
A Reddit user left the internet divided after recounting a story at a recent kids' birthday party The man recently took his son to a pool party, but was surprised to see a dog hanging out with the attendees, as it was not listed on the invitation He asked the host if they would mind putting the dog inside, as his son was afraid of dogs, but they declinedChildren's birthday parties are often chaotic but cheerful, filled with splashing, games, and plenty of noise. But one Reddit post sparked a heated debate after revealing he left a pool party because the host refused to put her dogs away. The 34-year-old, whose first-grade son has a fear of dogs, asked the host to confine the animals for the duration of the event, but was ultimately told no. The situation left commenters divided, raising questions about etiquette, boundaries, and balancing hospitality with safety. The father explained that he and his son were invited to a pool party with other kids from school and various sports teams. Upon arrival, they were approached by a Belgian Malinois, which he shooed off. 'My son does not like dogs since an incident at the park. I told it to get away a few more times in the next few minutes as we said hi to people. I noticed another dog outside,' he explained in the post. 'We were not told about the dogs ahead of time and my son didn't want to play with his friends as he was hesitant to be away from me.' After noticing his son grow more uncomfortable as the minutes went by, the dad decided to approach the host. 'I thanked her for the invitation and complimented their house,' he wrote. He then proceeded to ask her to lock the dogs away after explaining the situation with his son. According to the post, the host 'looked clearly annoyed' and told him her dogs were friendly and safe. 'She told me she doesn't react well to being locked away,' the poster wrote, referring to the dog. He then repeated that his son didn't want to be around dogs, but the host refused to confine them. She added that the dogs 'want to be a part of the party and they wouldn't be going anywhere.' Upset with the father's request, the host went on to imply they might not be invited over again. Feeling unwelcome, the poster decided to leave and noticed his son's mood improve almost immediately. However, later that day, the host texted the father to say his request had been 'inappropriate.' Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Reddit was divided. Some said the dad had every right to make the request. 'I am going to disagree with the majority here,' one user wrote. 'Fear of dogs is a real thing, especially with some children, so it would have been kind for the host to have somehow restricted the dogs from wandering freely among the kids.' A large number of people, however, disagreed with the father's request. 'I get why you asked, so that your son could feel more comfortable at the party, but asking someone, in their own house, to lock away their dogs is extremely out of line,' another user wrote. 'If you can't stand the dogs being out, you leave. You control yourself, not their household.' Read the original article on People