U.S. panel calls for suspending commercial salmon fishing in California for third year
The Pacific Fishery Management Council, a body established by Congress that manages ocean fishing along the West Coast, voted 13 to 1 to recommend banning all commercial salmon fishing off California, a decision the National Marine Fisheries Service is expected to adopt in May.
As part of the vote, held at a meeting in San Jose, the council called for allowing some limited recreational salmon fishing for the first time since 2022. The ocean recreational fishing season will be restricted to several days in the summer and fall, and the total catch will also be strictly limited.
The suspension of fishing for the last two years has brought major losses of income for those in the fishing industry, but some salmon boat skippers agree that extending the closure is needed.
"We need to do everything we can to save the species," said Kevin Butler, a commercial fisherman in Santa Cruz.
The fishing season typically runs from May to October, and in recent years the state's commercial salmon fishing fleet has numbered about 460 vessels. But many boat owners and crew members have recently turned to other work to make ends meet. Some have put their boats up for sale.
Butler said salmon previously represented about three-fourths of his income. He has continued fishing for halibut and lingcod, earning much less.
"Every fisherman has sacrificed everything for two years," Butler said. He said that for himself and others, being unable to catch salmon has meant 'insane financial hardship, stressing of your family's relationships, everything.'
'If the majority of your income disappeared, what would you do? Go find a new career? Well, that's a tough one for fishermen. We've fished our whole life,' he said. 'This is a life, this is a love.'
Although severe drought from 2020-22 contributed to the decline, those who work in fishing also blame California's water managers and policies for the low salmon numbers, saying too much water has been pumped to farms and cities, depriving rivers of sufficient cold water at the times salmon need it to survive.
'It's a water mismanagement issue,' Butler said. He blamed Gov. Gavin Newsom's administration, saying the state has prioritized water supplies for the $59-billion agriculture industry to the detriment of salmon.
Biologists say salmon populations have declined because of a combination of factors including dams, which have blocked off spawning areas, the loss of vital floodplain habitats, and global warming, which is intensifying droughts and causing warmer temperatures in rivers.
During the severe 2020-22 drought, the water flowing from dams sometimes got so warm that it was lethal for salmon eggs. And because salmon typically feed in the ocean for about three years and then return to their natal streams, the decline in the numbers of surviving juvenile fish during the drought left a reduced population of adult fish.
The state's policy of pumping heavily from rivers is "killing entire salmon runs, and it's beating down hardworking men and women trying to make a living from fishing," said Scott Artis, executive director of Golden State Salmon Assn., a nonprofit group that represents fishing communities. "This closed commercial and token recreational fishing season is a human tragedy, as well as an economic and environmental disaster."
He said his group is asking for "a little cold water to be left in our rivers for baby salmon so they can survive and return as adults."
Read more: Low salmon numbers in California could prompt shutdown of fishing for a record third straight year
State officials said that in addition to drought and global warming, salmon populations have been struggling because of wildfires, poor conditions in rivers, algae blooms and problems of thiamine deficiency in salmon linked to shifts in their ocean diet.
'Salmon populations are still recovering from severe drought and other climate challenges and have not yet benefited from our consecutive years of wet winters and other actions taken to boost populations," said Charlton 'Chuck' Bonham, director of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife. 'After years of full closure for salmon fishing, the opportunity for limited recreational salmon fishing brings hope. We know, however, that this news brings little relief for California's commercial salmon fisheries.'
Coastal salmon fishing was banned for two consecutive years once before, in 2008 and 2009. This is the first time the commercial season is set to be canceled for three years straight.
The Pacific Fishery Management Council cited the latest state estimates showing the number of Sacramento River fall-run Chinook salmon remains very low, with an estimated 166,000 fish in the ocean this year — down from a preseason estimate of 214,000 last year, and similar to the 2023 estimate of 169,000 fish.
Those figures represent a drop from the much larger numbers of salmon, in some years more than 1 million fish, that teemed along California's Pacific coast in the early 2000s.
'It's another unambiguous signal that salmon are declining in California, alongside many of the other native fishes,' said Andrew Rypel, director of Auburn University's fisheries school and former director of the UC Davis Center for Watershed Sciences. 'It's really very sad. I think it's an indicator of how we've managed the resource over time, and that we're failing salmon.'
The shutdown of fishing has taken a toll not only on the commercial fishing fleet but also on operators of charter fishing boats who were unable to fish for salmon in 2023 and 2024. Under the council's decision, recreational anglers are set to be allowed limited ocean fishing under state-administered quotas in two windows in the summer and fall, the first of which is set to open June 7-8 and allow for up to 7,000 salmon to be caught.
State regulators also set rules for inland recreational fishing on rivers, and the California Fish and Game Commission will decide this year's season at meetings this month and in May.
Before the shutdown, Jared Davis used to earn much of his income leading sportfishing tours out of Sausalito on his 56-foot boat Salty Lady. Lately, he has been turning to other types of cruises, leading whale watching tours and holding ash-scattering burials at sea.
"It hurts that the salmon fishing has been shut down. It definitely hurts," Davis said. "I just did my taxes and my deckhand made more than I did over these last couple years."
Read more: As salmon populations struggle, California bans fishing on rivers for a second year
He said he supports the planned regulations, which he views as a conservative approach to help the population recover.
The fishing industry depends on fall-run Chinook, which migrate upstream to spawn from July through December.
Other salmon runs have suffered more severe declines. Spring-run Chinook are listed as threatened under the Endangered Species Act, and winter-run Chinook are endangered.
The pattern that has emerged in successive droughts is a long-term, 'stair-step' decline, in which salmon and other species suffer a drop during dry years and then fare somewhat better during wetter times, but their numbers don't come back up to what they were previously, Rypel said.
Because the fish largely have a three-year life cycle, the population should improve somewhat next year because of the boost they received during 2023's historic wet winter, Rypel said, but in the long term, the fish are still struggling.
Changes that would help salmon include having larger flows in rivers at the right times to support fish, and opening up more floodplain habitats to support their recovery, Rypel said.
For decades, government-run hatcheries in the Central Valley have reared and released millions of salmon each year to help boost their numbers.
State officials say the Newsom administration's ongoing efforts to help salmon populations recover include restoring tidal habitats, modernizing infrastructure, removing barriers that hinder fish migration and reintroducing salmon in traditional spawning areas upstream from dams.
Despite those efforts, the situation facing California's salmon remains so dire, Rypel said, that agencies should be taking more chances to prevent the fish from suffering even larger declines.
'It is a huge emergency,' he said. 'We need to be trying big things at this point, big experiments."
Rypel said he feels for the people whose livelihoods have been upended by the fishing closures.
'It's always been a California way of life, and it's very much in jeopardy,' he said.
This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump vows to change how elections are run. The US Constitution doesn't give him that power
President Donald Trump on Monday vowed more changes to the way elections are conducted in the U.S., but based on the Constitution there is little to nothing he can do on his own. Relying on false information and conspiracy theories that he's regularly used to explain away his 2020 election loss, Trump pledged on his social media site that he would do away with both mail voting — which remains popular and is used by about one-third of all voters — and voting machines — some form of which are used in almost all of the country's thousands of election jurisdictions. These are the same systems that enabled Trump to win the 2024 election and Republicans to gain control of Congress. Trump's post marks an escalation even in his normally overheated election rhetoric. He issued a wide-ranging executive order earlier this year that, among other changes, would have required documented proof-of-citizenship before registering to vote. His Monday post promised another election executive order to 'help bring HONESTY to the 2026 Midterm elections.' The same post also pushed falsehoods about voting. He claimed the U.S. is the only country to use mail voting, when it's actually used by dozens, including Germany, Switzerland and the United Kingdom. Similar complaints to Trump's, when aired on conservative and conservative-leaning networks such as Newsmax and Fox News, have led to multimillion dollar defamation settlements, including one announced Monday, because they are full of false information and the outlets have not been able to present any evidence to support them. Trump's post came after the president told Fox News that Russian President Vladimir Putin, in their Friday meeting in Alaska, echoed his grievances about mail voting and the 2020 election. Trump continued his attack on mail voting and voting machines in the Oval Office on Monday, during a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. The announcement signals yet another way that Trump intends to stack the cards in his favor in the 2026 midterm elections, after he already has directed his attorney general to investigate a Democratic fundraising platform and urged states to redraw their congressional districts to help the GOP maintain its majority in the House of Representatives. Here's a breakdown of Trump's latest election post and why Congress is the one entity that can implement national election rules. Trump's post Trump for years has promoted false information about voting, and Monday was no exception. He claimed there is 'MASSIVE FRAUD' due to mail voting, when in fact voting fraud in the U.S. is rare. As an example, an Associated Press review after the 2020 election found fewer than 475 cases of potential fraud in the six battleground states where he disputed his loss, far too few to tip that election to Trump. Washington and Oregon, which conduct elections entirely by mail, have sued to challenge Trump's earlier executive order — which sought to require that all ballots must be received by Election Day and not just postmarked by then. The states argue that the president has no such authority, and they are seeking a declaration from a federal judge in Seattle that their postmark deadlines do not conflict with federal law setting the date of U.S. elections. Trump also alleged that voting machines are more expensive than 'Watermark Paper." That's a little-used system that has gained favor and investments among some voting conspiracy theorists who believe it would help prevent fraudulent ballots from being introduced into the vote count. Watermarks would not provide a way to count ballots, so they would not on their own replace vote tabulating machines. While some jurisdictions still have voters use electronic ballot-marking devices to cast their votes, the vast majority of voters in the U.S. already vote on paper ballots, creating an auditable record of votes that provides an extra safeguard for election security. In his post, Trump also claimed that states 'are merely an 'agent' for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes' and must do what the federal government 'as represented by the President of the United States' tells them to do. Election lawyers said that's a misrepresentation of the U.S. Constitution. It also flies in the face of what had been a core Republican Party value of prioritizing states' rights. Thousands of elections, none under presidential control Unlike in most countries, elections in the U.S. are run by the states. But it gets more complicated — each state then allows smaller jurisdictions, such as counties, cities or townships, to run their own elections. Election officials estimate there are as many as 10,000 different election jurisdictions across the country. A frequent complaint of Trump and other election conspiracy theorists is that the U.S. doesn't run its election like France, which hand counts presidential ballots and usually has a national result on election night. But that's because France is only running that single election, and every jurisdiction has the same ballot with no other races. A ballot in the U.S. might contain dozens of races, from president on down to city council and including state and local ballot measures. The Constitution makes the states the entities that determine the 'time, place and manner' of elections, but does allow Congress to 'make' or 'alter' rules for federal elections. Congress can change the way states run congressional and presidential elections but has no say in the way a state runs its own elections. The president is not mentioned at all in the Constitution's list of entities with powers over elections. 'The president has very limited to zero authority over things related to the conduct of elections,' said Rick Hasen, an election law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles. Courts have agreed — no presidential involvement Parts of Trump's earlier executive order on elections were swiftly blocked by the courts, on the grounds that Congress, and not the president, sets federal election rules. It's unclear what Trump plans to do now, but the only path to change federal election rules is through Congress. Although Republicans control Congress, it's unclear that even his party would want to eliminate voting machines nationwide, possibly delaying vote tallies in their own races by weeks or months. Even if they did, legislation would likely be unable to pass because Democrats could filibuster it in the U.S. Senate. Mail voting had bipartisan support before Trump turned against it during the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2020 election, but it's still widely used in Republican-leaning states, including several he won last November — Arizona, Florida and Utah. It's also how members of the military stationed overseas cast their ballots, and fully eliminating it would disenfranchise those GOP-leaning voters. The main significance of Trump's Monday statement is that it signals his continuing obsession with trying to change how elections are run. 'These kinds of claims could provide a kind of excuse for him to try to meddle,' Hasen said. 'Very concerned about that.' ___ Associated Press writer Eugene Johnson in Seattle contributed to this report.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
3 more GOP governors authorize deployment of National Guard troops as part of Trump show of force
WASHINGTON (AP) — Three more Republican governors authorized the deployment of National Guard troops to Washington on Monday, part of President Donald Trump's escalating show of force that he says is designed to crack down on crime and boost immigration enforcement in the nation's capital. The announcements by Mississippi, Tennessee and Louisiana brought the number of state troops detailed to the president's effort to more than 1,100 — and the number of states to six. Governors from the states said they were responding to requests from the Trump administration to join the operation. It was not immediately clear why the administration requested additional military support. About 800 troops have already been called up from the Washington, D.C., guard and have had a limited assigned role so far in Trump's 10-day-old attempted takeover of D.C. law enforcement. D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser said the descriptions of the operation needed to be more honest — and acknowledge that they weren't just about curtailing crime but about immigration enforcement, a centerpiece of the second Trump administration that has echoed across the country in recent months. During a news conference, Bowser pushed back on Trump's characterization of the city and voiced skepticism about the administration's intentions. 'I think it makes the point that this is not about D.C. crime,' Bowser said of the administration and states deploying National Guard members onto the streets of the capital. 'The focus should be on violent crime. ... Nobody is against focusing on driving down any level of violence. And so if this is really about immigration enforcement, the administration should make that plain.' Trump's executive order that launched the federal operation declared a 'crime emergency' in the District of Columbia and initiated a takeover of Washington's police department. The administration has ordered local police to cooperate with federal agents on immigration enforcement, orders that would contradict local laws prohibiting such collaboration. Federal agents have arrested 160 undocumented people in the district since the operation began, including people that White House officials allege are known gang members with prior felony offenses. Friction with local government and community continues The executive order has led to friction with the local government and heightened tensions in the community as a surge of federal agents in the capital garner praise and protest from residents. The nation's capital can govern itself through powers delegated to it by Congress, though the federal laws that grant that autonomy give wide breadth to the president and Congress to intervene when they see fit. That longstanding tension has led to a legal standoff between local officials and the White House in the current troop deployment and surge of federal officers into the district. In what could also heighten tensions on the streets, Washington has been informed about the intent for the National Guard to be armed, though it has not received details about when that could happen or where armed Guard members could be deployed in the District, according to a person familiar who was not authorized to disclose the plans and spoke on condition of anonymity. It would be a departure from what the Pentagon and Army have said about the troops being unarmed. The Army said in a statement last week that 'weapons are available if needed but will remain in the armory.' Pentagon press secretary Kingsley Wilson also said last week that troops won't be armed. In response to questions about whether Guard members in Washington would be armed in the coming days, the District of Columbia National Guard said troops 'may be armed consistent with their mission and training.' Maj. Melissa Heintz, a spokesperson for the D.C. Guard, didn't provide more details. The stepped-up guard presence grew further Monday with the new deployments from Louisiana, Mississippi and Tennessee, all led by Republican governors. A spokesperson for Tennessee Gov. Bill Lee said that the governor had granted a request from the Trump administration for the state's National Guard members 'to assist with monument security, community safety patrols, protecting federal facilities, and traffic control." The troops 'are ready to assist as long as needed," the governor's office said. In addition to Monday's announcements, West Virginia said it was deploying 300 to 400 troops, South Carolina pledged 200 and Ohio said it will send 150 in the coming days, deployments that built on top of Trump's initial order that 800 National Guard troops deploy as part of the federal intervention. National Guard members in the District of Columbia have been assisting law enforcement with tasks including crowd control and patrolling landmarks such as the National Mall and Union Station. Their role has been limited thus far, and it remains unclear why additional troops would be needed, though attention-getting optics have long been a part of Donald Trump's playbook. Questions remain about who is actually running the DC police On Friday, the city's attorney general sued the administration for appointing the head of the Drug Enforcement Administration as the city's 'emergency police commissioner." The administration walked back the move but then issued a follow-up order that directed local police to 'cooperate fully and completely with federal immigration authorities.' 'D.C. has been under siege from thugs and killers, but now, D.C. is back under Federal Control where it belongs,' Trump wrote on his social media website a day after issuing his order. 'The White House is in charge. The Military and our Great Police will liberate this City, scrape away the filth, and make it safe, clean, habitable and beautiful once more!' Federal agents from the DEA, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, the Federal Bureau of Investigation, the Secret Service and other agencies have patrolled high-traffic areas around the capital over the last week. ICE officers, who work under the Department of Homeland Security, have made arrests in neighborhoods across the city, dispersed some public gatherings and torn pro-immigrant signs, according to videos published by the administration. The White House has touted various arrests that local police and federal agents have made across the city since Trump's executive order. Federal agents have made 380 arrests in the week since the start of the operation and in some cases issued charges to detained people. The White House has touted the surge of agents on social media and posted pictures of people arrested by local and federal officers. 'Washington, DC is getting safer every night thanks to our law enforcement partners,' Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on social media. 'Just this weekend, 137 arrests were made and 21 illegal firearms were seized. In total, there have been nearly 400 arrests—and we are not slowing down.' Amid the crackdown, the administration has received criticism for the conduct of some federal agents, who in several high-profile incidents have arrested people while wearing masks that hide their identity and declined to identify themselves to media or members of the public when questioned. Bowser said Monday that she had asked D.C. Police Chief Pamela Smith to seek answers from the administration about the use of masked police. 'It's very important to us that agents be identified,' Bowser said. 'There's no reason for a law enforcement official to be masked.' On Monday, dozens of protesters gathered in the U Street neighborhood of Washington, where multiple federal agents patrols and arrests had taken place over the weekend, to protest the Trump administration's actions. ___ Associated Press writers Anna Johnson in Washington, Jeff Amy in Atlanta and Jonathan Mattise in Nashville, Tennessee, contributed to this report. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump's remarkable statement against states' rights
President Donald Trump's announcement Monday that he will sign an executive order aimed at getting rid of mail-in ballots and voting machines seems unlikely to amount to much. He doesn't appear to have any such authority, and legal challenges would surely follow. But it was instructive in one way: It made clear the president elected to lead the party of states' rights has very little regard for states' rights. Indeed, he almost seems to disdain them. It's difficult to read his comments any other way, especially as he has spent much of his second term attempting to chip away at states' rights — or at least, the ones he doesn't like. While selling his new pitch to get rid of mail-in voting and voting machines, Trump included this remarkable pair of sentences. 'Remember, the States are merely an 'agent' for the Federal Government in counting and tabulating the votes,' the president wrote on Truth Social. 'They must do what the Federal Government, as represented by the President of the United States, tells them, FOR THE GOOD OF OUR COUNTRY, to do.' Trump has described the states as 'agents' of the federal government before in this context, but without casting them as subservient to him personally. This is a rather novel take on the Constitution, to put it mildly. As CNN's Daniel Dale notes, the Constitution says the 'Times, Places and Manner of holding Elections … shall be prescribed in each State by the Legislature thereof.' Congress has a role, in that the Constitution says it can 'make or alter such Regulations.' But there is no role for the president. And Trump isn't saying that Congress should outlaw mail-in voting or voting machines, mind you. Instead, he's saying the states 'must' get rid of them because he tells them to — apparently because he was elected president and because he has determined it's 'FOR THE GOOD OF THE COUNTRY.' This is merely the latest in a long line of drastic Trump claims to power. He often claimed during his first term that the Constitution gave him absolute power. Even when out of office, he floated terminating portions of the Constitution, while repeating his false claims that the 2020 election was rigged. And earlier this year, he posted a quote often attributed to Napoleon Bonaparte suggesting his actions couldn't be illegal as long as he was acting to 'save' the country. But just as striking as Trump's claim to power on Monday was his explicit statement that states are merely his 'agents.' This is very difficult to square with decades of conservative orthodoxy, which holds that the federal government should be small and that states should lead the way. When Trump was first elected in 2016, the Republican Party platform devoted an entire section to its apparent devotion to states' rights. It said the federal government should not have any powers beyond those specifically enumerated in the Constitution. 'Every violation of state sovereignty by federal officials is not merely a transgression of one unit of government against another; it is an assault on the liberties of individual Americans,' the platform said. The platform also decried the 'bullying of state and local governments,' apparently a reference to the Obama administration. What were those state and local governments being bullied over? According to the platform, it was on 'matters ranging from voter identification (ID) laws to immigration' and on 'healthcare programs,' among other things. Trump has now taken constitutionally dicey executive actions that sought to undercut states' authority in all three of those areas: On voter ID, he signed an executive order seeking to boost proof of citizenship requirements for registering to vote. (A judge later blocked this.) On immigration, he has sought to target state and local governments' 'sanctuary' policies. (A judge recently dismissed the administration's lawsuit in Chicago over this.) On health care, Trump's new domestic agenda law creates, for the first time, federal 'work requirements' for Medicaid that the states administering it must abide by. But those aren't the only areas in which he's sought to impose the federal government on the states: When he dispatched troops to Los Angeles in June amid protests over his immigration crackdown, he became the first president in 60 years to do so without the consent of the governor. (California has sued over this.) This month, he became the first president to federalize the police in Washington, DC. He issued an executive order directing the Justice Department to prevent states from enforcing their own climate laws. He sought to end New York City's congestion pricing by withholding funding. (A judge later blocked this.) He has repeatedly sought to control how California uses its water. And he has repeatedly threatened to withhold federal funding from states and cities if they don't abide by more conservative social policies on issues such as transgender rights. But few of these efforts loom as large as Trump's growing attempts to exert himself over the American elections system. Trump has not only sought to expand citizenship requirements and talked about nixing mail-in voting and voting machines; as CNN's Fredreka Schouten wrote earlier this month, his administration and its allies have taken a series of steps to apply pressure on the elections system — often in line with Trump's false claims of widespread voter fraud. This has raised fears among Democrats and watchdogs about a concerted effort to reshape the elections system in a way that benefits Trump and his party. It remains to be seen how much his new executive order might ultimately play into that, given it's not clear how such a thing could pass legal muster. But this is also an area that interests Trump greatly, owing to his years of voter fraud conspiracy theories. And it's difficult to see him standing back, no matter what the Constitution says about his powers (or lack thereof). And if nothing else, Trump has finally said how he really feels about the concept of states' rights.
