Trump budget bill would ban AI regulation. What Americans think of that in poll
A majority of Americans are against banning states from regulating artificial intelligence — a provision included in the latest congressional spending bill, according to new polling.
A May 29 Common Sense Media/Echelon Insights survey found widespread concern about forcing states to sit on the sidelines as AI advances at a rapid clip, becoming increasingly embedded in everyday life.
The poll comes after the GOP-controlled House passed the 'One Big Beautiful Bill,' as dubbed by President Donald Trump, which would bar states and localities from restricting AI development for a decade.
'No State or political subdivision thereof may enforce, during the 10-year period beginning on the date of the enactment of this Act, any law or regulation limiting, restricting, or otherwise regulating artificial intelligence models, artificial intelligence systems, or automated decision systems entered into interstate commerce,' the bill states.
The legislation is now being considered in the Republican-controlled Senate, which is aiming to deliver it to Trump's desk by early July, as reported by CBS News.
Here is a breakdown of the results from the poll:
Opposition to AI regulation ban
The poll — which sampled 1,022 voters May 20-22 — found that 59% of respondents somewhat or strongly oppose the provision banning AI regulation. Meanwhile, just 25% somewhat or strongly support it.
Among Republicans, 50% said they are against the measure, while 31% said they support it.
Further, a majority of overall respondents, 52%, said the moratorium makes them less likely to support the GOP-backed spending bill. And just 15% said it makes them more inclined to support the legislation.
Voters also signaled that they have more faith in state governments to manage the development of AI.
Fifty-three percent said they have more trust in state and local leaders to 'regulate AI appropriately' than lawmakers in Washington, D.C. Meanwhile, 15% said they place more trust in federal lawmakers.
The survey — which has a margin of error of 3.4 percentage points — also asked respondents to react to a series of statements, with the results further indicating there is far-reaching concern about AI regulation.
For example, 77% of respondents agreed with the statement 'States should have the right to make laws about technology, and Congress should not take that right away from them.' Just 13% disagreed.
An even larger share, 81%, agreed with the statement 'Advances in AI are exciting but also bring risks, and in such fast-moving times, we shouldn't force states to sit on the sidelines for a full decade.' Meanwhile, 11% disagreed with this.
The same 81% share also agreed with the statement 'Congress should not ban states from enacting or enforcing their own laws when it comes to protecting kids' safety and privacy online.' Twelve percent disagreed.
This comes as several states have put forward laws protecting the privacy of minor's online that explicitly relate to AI. For example, California's Leading Ethical Development of AI (LEAD) Act, introduced in February, would require parents to consent before AI developers use a child's information to train AI models.
'The numbers are clear,' Kristen Soltis Anderson, the co-founder of Echelon Insights, said in a news release. 'Voters are concerned about the potential dangers AI-generated content can pose to kids and teens, and say they don't want the federal government to tell states what they can and can't do about the issue.'
James Steyer, the CEO of Common Sense Media, added that the AI provisions in the budget leave Americans 'to fend for themselves against the most powerful technology of our time.'
AI experts project that the technology will develop at an exceptionally fast pace, with significant advancements expected in the near term.
For example, the 2025 Stanford AI Index Report highlights that AI capabilities — generative AI, in particular — have already accelerated dramatically, outstripping some previous forecasts.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
19 minutes ago
Republicans urge Donald Trump and Elon Musk to end their feud
WASHINGTON -- As the Republican Party braces for aftershocks from President Donald Trump's spectacular clash with Elon Musk, lawmakers and conservative figures are urging détente, fearful of the potential consequences from a prolonged feud. At a minimum, the explosion of animosity between the two powerful men could complicate the path forward for Republicans' massive tax and border spending legislation that has been promoted by Trump but assailed by Musk. 'I hope it doesn't distract us from getting the job done that we need to,' said Rep. Dan Newhouse, a Republican from Washington state. "I think that it will boil over and they'll mend fences' Sen. Ted Cruz, a Texas Republican, was similarly optimistic. 'I hope that both of them come back together because when the two of them are working together, we'll get a lot more done for America than when they're at cross purposes,' he told Fox News host Sean Hannity on Thursday night. Sen. Mike Lee, a Republican from Utah, sounded almost pained on social media as Trump and Musk volleyed insults at each other, sharing a photo composite of the two men and writing, "But … I really like both of them.' 'Who else really wants @elonmusk and @realDonaldTrump to reconcile?' Lee posted, later adding: 'Repost if you agree that the world is a better place with the Trump-Musk bromance fully intact.' So far, the feud between Trump and Musk is probably best described as a moving target, with plenty of opportunities for escalation or detente. One person familiar with the president's thinking said Musk wants to speak with Trump, but that the president doesn't want to do it – or at least do it on Friday. The person requested anonymity to disclose private matters. In a series of conversations with television anchors Friday morning, Trump showed no interest in burying the hatchet. Asked on ABC News about reports of a potential call between him and Musk, the president responded: 'You mean the man who has lost his mind?' Trump added in the ABC interview that he was 'not particularly' interested in talking to Musk at the moment. Still, others remained hopeful that it all would blow over. 'I grew up playing hockey and there wasn't a single day that we played hockey or basketball or football or baseball, whatever we were playing, where we didn't fight. And then we'd fight, then we'd become friends again,' Hannity said on his show Thursday night. Acknowledging that it 'got personal very quick,' Hannity nonetheless added that the rift was 'just a major policy difference.' House Speaker Mike Johnson projected confidence that the dispute would not affect prospects for the tax and border bill. 'Members are not shaken at all,' the Louisiana Republican said. 'We're going to pass this legislation on our deadline.' He added that he hopes Musk and Trump reconcile, saying 'I believe in redemption' and 'it's good for the party and the country if all that's worked out.' But he also had something of a warning for the billionaire entrepreneur. 'I'll tell you what, do not doubt and do not second-guess and don't ever challenge the president of the United States, Donald Trump,' Johnson said. "He is the leader of the party. He's the most consequential political figure of this generation and probably the modern era.'
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Jeffries declines to embrace Musk amid the billionaire's feud with Trump
House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-N.Y.) is keeping his distance from Elon Musk even after the billionaire's extraordinary public rebuke of President Trump and the GOP's domestic agenda. Asked Friday if Musk's bitter break from Trump presents Democrats with an opportunity to form a strange-bedfellows alliance with the tech titan, Jeffries shifted the conversation immediately to the Democrats' efforts to kill Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' 'The opportunity that exists right now is to kill the GOP tax scam,' Jeffries told reporters in the Capitol. 'It's legislation that we have been strongly opposed to, and uniformly opposed to, from the very beginning. … It rips health care away from millions of people. It snatches food out of the mouths of hungry children. And it rewards billionaires and [GOP] donors in ways that are fiscally irresponsible.' Pressed on whether Musk should be 'welcomed back' to the Democratic Party after the high-profile split from Trump, Jeffries punted again. 'Same answer,' he said. Jeffries's cautious remarks demonstrate the limits of the old adage that the enemy of one's enemy is one's friend. They also highlight the potential difficulties Democrats would face if they embraced a polarizing and nationally unpopular figure in Musk — one they've spent most of the last year bashing for heavy spending on Trump's campaign and, more recently, for his role in heading Trump's efforts to gut the federal government. Still, some Democrats say Musk's influence is significant enough that Democrats should make the effort to try to court him to their side amid the Trump feud. Rep. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.), who represents parts of Silicon Valley, is leading the charge. 'If Biden had a big supporter criticize him, Trump would have hugged him the next day,' Khanna posted Thursday on social platform X, which is owned by Musk. 'When we refused to meet with @RobertKennedyJr, Trump embraced him & won. We can be the party of sanctimonious lectures, or the party of FDR that knows how to win & build a progressive majority,' referring to former President Franklin D. Roosevelt. Jeffries isn't going nearly so far. But he has welcomed Musk's attacks on Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' and the Republicans who voted for it. And he aligned Democrats with Musk's sentiments that the package piles too much money onto the federal debt, a figure the Congressional Budget Office estimated to be $2.4 trillion. 'To the extent that Elon Musk has made the same point that everyone who has voted for this bill up until this moment should be ashamed of themselves, we agree,' Jeffries said. 'And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the point that the bill is a 'disgusting abomination,' we agree. And to the extent that Elon Musk has made the observation about the GOP tax scam — that it is reckless and irresponsible to explode the deficit by more than $3 trillion, and that potentially could set our country on a path toward bankruptcy — we agree.' 'These are arguments that Democrats have been making now for months.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Vance Sucks Up to Trump to Deny He's Part of Musk Coup Plot
J.D. Vance was forced to reaffirm his allegiance to President Trump after Elon Musk backed a call for the vice president to replace his boss. A spat between Musk and Trump over the president's 'big beautiful bill,' which the Tesla CEO denounced as a 'disgusting abomination,' has blown up into an all-out MAGA civil war, with Musk and Trump dramatically trading blows in public. On Thursday, the Tesla and SpaceX CEO replied 'Yes' to a post by an X user who asked: 'President vs Elon. Who wins? My money's on Elon. Trump should be impeached and Vance should replace him.' Musk publicly mused about starting a political party, and told his followers in a bombshell allegation that Trump was named in the Epstein files, signing off by saying: 'Have a nice day, DJT!' He added in a follow-up post, 'Mark this post for the future. The truth will come out.' Vance also features in a conspiracy theory called 'Dark Enlightenment' or Dark MAGA" that suggests a secretive cabal of tech titans is plotting to blow up the government and rule as a giant corporation with a CEO instead of a president. The Silicon Valley plotters, including Musk, chose Vance as the person who would take over when Trump is toppled, according to the theory. Trump has yet to address the latest allegations personally. White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt issued a statement saying: 'This is an unfortunate episode from Elon, who is unhappy with the 'One Big Beautiful Bill' because it does not include the policies he wanted.' As the drama escalated, Vance posted a picture teasing a Friday appearance on the podcast of Trump-friendly comedian Theo Von. 'Slow news day, what are we even going to talk about?' Vance joked. In a follow-up post, the vice president added: 'President Trump has done more than any person in my lifetime to earn the trust of the movement he leads. I'm proud to stand beside him.' Musk and Trump's alliance began to unravel after the GOP-controlled House of Representatives narrowly passed Trump's flagship budget proposal last month. Before that, Musk had pushed Trump's agenda by leading his so-called Department of Government Efficiency, an initiative within the administration tasked with cutting government spending and jobs. Musk publicly attacked Trump's bill on the grounds that it would undermine his work with DOGE by adding trillions to the U.S. budget deficit. But on Thursday, Trump claimed that Musk was really upset about the effect the bill will have on his electric vehicle company, Tesla. 'I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote on Truth Social. 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' the president added.
