IAG says New Zealand at climate crossroads
Photo:
RNZ / Nathan Mckinnon
New Zealanders expect more severe and more frequent climate hazards which are set to drive their impact their insurance premiums, according to a new report.
The IAG commissioned report showed 71 percent agreed they should pay higher premiums to live in a high-risk area, but only 17 percent were willing to subsidise the insurance premiums of those that chose to do so.
IAG NZ climate spokesperson Bryce Davies said consumers were conscious of the choices facing them.
"I think there's a recognition of growing risks and there's an expectation that people are rewarded for their own actions and managing the risk that they face."
He said people want to be rewarded with lower premiums for the good decisions they made for living in lower risk areas.
The survey indicated widespread support for avoiding and reducing development in high-risk areas, making buildings and infrastructure more resilient and better protected, including by using natural solutions.
But at the same time, only 25 percent could be marked as doing a good job at reducing the impacts of climate change.
Australian owned IAG's local brands include AMI, State, NZI, Lumley and Lantern.
IAG NZ chief executive Amanda Whiting said the country was approaching a crossroads and faced having to make key decisions.
"We can commit to reducing risk and investing in resilience and adaptation to help keep insurance available and affordable for as many people as possible.
"Or we can keep doing what we are doing and risk rising costs, reduced coverage, and the possibility that some homes may become too risky or expensive to insure."
Seventy-five percent of respondents said it was the government's responsibility to act on climate change, but Bryce Davies said that while government does have a responsibility around infrastructure, it was not a simple of question of money.
He said the survey highlighted that people believe central and local government, business and individuals all have a role to in climate action. But what is needed from central government is good leadership, ensuring that good decisions are made around areas such as urban planning.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Otago Daily Times
2 hours ago
- Otago Daily Times
Clubs battling DCC charge increases
Higher ground and facility user charges could force a community football club to shut up shop, a Dunedin-based sports administrator says. Southern Football chief executive Dougal McGowan told the Otago Daily Times that Dunedin City Council charges have risen sharply since 2018 and the organisation is bracing itself for another price hike. Southern Football shelled out $42,202 to use the city's venues and grounds in 2018. But those costs have swollen considerably. This year, despite using six fewer fields, Southern Football was charged $98,119 and it expects the bill to climb to more than $100,000 in 2026. "You can't put the fees up to be able to cover all of that," Mr McGowan said. "It's just not possible because people can't afford to play the game otherwise." "We try to keep our game as cheap as we possibly can because ... we want to make it as accessible to everybody as we can. "But these price rises are making it really, really difficult." For one small community club in the region, who Mr McGowan declined to name, it could spell the end. "The amount we have to pay for the ground that they use ... is more than what we get from them in fees. "Next year this cost to the council will go up again for the ground usage and then lights and changing room costs on top. "So, we're going to have to have a conversation with them about maybe they might have to close. "That's a really sad indictment on what we're doing in our communities." Community sport is beset by other rising costs, and competition for funding has increased as the city's sinking lid policy on class-4 gambling starts to bite. The proposed Online Casino Gambling Bill could strip further funds from the community. But McGowan said every small increase was felt, and it was forcing administrators into making some tough decisions. "Even though we've got more people playing the game, we've had to cut the number of grounds we can use because we just can't afford it." Otago Rugby Football Union chief executive Richard Kinley said the main codes had met to discuss how they could work together to address the impact increased ground charges will have on clubs and "ultimately participants". "Most of our clubs actually operate really well, but they operate on a really fine margin," Mr Kinley said. "However, these potential impacts of fees going up and the Online Casino Gambling Bill just have more of an impact, and we know that class-4 gaming is dropping slightly anyway across the country." DCC group manager of parks and recreation Heath Ellis said staff were in contact with sports codes across the city and were always available to meet. "Councillors asked for a review of fees and charges for sports fields to ensure equity between different codes," Mr Ellis said. "Previously, some codes were paying up to 4.9% of total costs for sports field use, while others were paying as low as 3.2%. "Staff presented councillors with a table detailing the potential costs to the different codes — recovering 4% of costs from all sports field users, or alternatively 5%. "Councillors decided to consult the public on the 5% option, and later voted to confirm this amount. "Just two submissions were received raising concerns about potential increases in sports field fees." Sport Otago chief executive James Nation felt the savings to the ratepayers were minimal. "When you look at the actual money that the council's saving by going from a 4% to 5%, it's negligible in the grand scheme of things," Mr Nation said. "But the impact on an individual sports person is massive."
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Who pays when a supermarket price tag is wrong?
A Whanganui SuperValue displayed some dodgy maths recently, with the price per 100g not adding up to the main price shown. Photo: Supplied When a Whanganui SuperValue displayed some dodgy maths recently, shopper David Bradbury argued he should have been able to choose to pay the lower of the prices on offer. He spotted bacon that was advertised as selling for a different price per 100g than the main display price. Shoulder bacon was 200g for $4.69 but then 94c per 100g, and middle bacon was 200g for $5.79 but $1.16 per 100g. "I pointed out to the closest person in a shop uniform the poor arithmetic ... He said the big number was the right one. I said I should be able to choose. He said no." A SuperValue spokesperson said the unit price was incorrect . "On our pricing tickets customers will find the price of the item and a unit price which enables them to make an informed decision of value based on the unit of measure. "In this instance, the unit price was incorrect on the 200gm Grandpas Shoulder Bacon and Middle Bacon products. The price was however the correct price the customer would have paid at the apologise for the error and any confusion caused. "We know how important it is that all of our tickets are accurate and we have now corrected the pricing tickets to reflect the correct unit price." Vanessa Horne, Commerce Commission general manager, competition, fair trading and credit said she encouraged him to report the concern so the commission could assess whether the shop was complying with the laws it enforced. "The trader could be prosecuted where there is serious non-compliance with the Unit Pricing Regulations. "The Unit Pricing Regulations are there to help consumers easily compare products based on the price-per-unit and make informed choices about which product offers them the best value." She said the Commerce Commission had ongoing investigations into supermarket operators . "We have recently filed criminal charges against Woolworths NZ, Pak'nSave Silverdale, and Pak'nSave Mill Street for what the Commission alleges was inaccurate pricing and misleading specials that may have breached the Fair Trading Act. "Supermarkets have long been on notice about the importance of accurate and clear pricing and specials, and we're not satisfied with the continuing issues we're seeing across the industry. "The major supermarkets are large, well-resourced businesses that should invest the time and effort to get pricing and promotions right." Consumer NZ spokesperson Sahar Lone said a supermarket that displayed incorrect unit pricing could be breaching the Fair Trading Act. "If you notice an incorrect unit price, point this out to a supervisor in store. The store has the right to correct its pricing mistakes. If it doesn't sort the issue, or it's widespread, you can lodge a complaint with the Commerce Commission." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
RNZ News
12 hours ago
- RNZ News
Air New Zealand's online payment system down
A Boeing Dreamliner 787, from the Air New Zealand fleet. Photo: Supplied/ Air NZ Air New Zealand customers are unable to make online bookings due to a problem with the company's online payment system. "We are currently experiencing an issue with our online payment systems," the airline said on social media. "Customers can't make payments for bookings through our website or app." Air NZ said in-person payments at airports and the Airpoints Store are no affected. "Our teams are working hard to fix the problem and get things running again as quickly as possible," Air NZ said. "We apologise for the inconvenience and appreciate your patience while we work through this." Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
