ITR forms yet to be notified by Income Tax Department: Will it lead to ITR filing deadline extension?
The Income Tax Department is yet to notify the income tax return (ITR) forms for the financial year 2024-25 or assessment year 2025-26. Over the last 3-4 years, it has been seen that the Income Tax Department usually notifies the forms either before the end of the financial year or at the start of the assessment year. However, this year, the tax department has yet to notify the ITR forms, even though one month is about to pass.
#Pahalgam Terrorist Attack
The groundwork before India mounts a strike at Pakistan
India considers closing airspace to Pakistani carriers amid rising tensions
Cold Start: India's answer to Pakistan's nuclear threats
ET Wealth online decodes the reasons for the delay in the ITR forms notification and whether this delay could lead to an extension of the
ITR filing deadline
.
Reasons for delay in ITR forms notification
According to tax experts, there are certain reasons for the delay in the notification of ITR forms. These include income tax changes announced in the Finance Act in July 2024 and structural changes.
Gopal Bohra, Partner, NA Shah & Associates - a tax consulting firm says, "If one look at the last three years release of ITR Forms by CBDT, it will be observed that ITR Forms are released well before the end of the relevant financial year for which taxpayer is required to file his tax return. For example, ITR Forms for AY 2022-23, 2023-24 and 2024-25 were notified on 30.03.2022, 10.02.2023 and 22.12.2023, respectively. For AY 2025-26, the ITR Forms have not yet been notified by CBDT. This delay could be attributed to the fact that the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) is trying to upgrade or fix their ITR utilities to accurately map the data fetched from various sources to avoid any error in processing the tax return."
Usually, taxpayers who need to claim
income tax refunds
file their income tax return as early as possible so that they can get their income tax refund in a timely manner from the tax department.
Live Events
Ashish Karundia, Practising Chartered Accountant, says, "The delay in issuing the ITR forms and their corresponding utilities for AY 2025-26 may stem from enhanced disclosure requirements, integration with Annual Information Statement (AIS)/Taxpayer Information Statement (TIS) data, and the implementation of new provisions of income tax relevant to assessment year 2025-26. The intention could be to ensure a comprehensive verification process before ITR forms release, aiming for accurate data mapping to minimise errors and avoid mismatches that may lead to taxpayer grievances."
Tarun Kumar Madaan, Practising Chartered Accountant, says, "The full Budget for FY 2024-25 was presented on 23rd July and became an Act in August 2024. In regular years, the Budget is presented in February and becomes an Act by March. So, the CBDT have sufficient time to make changes in ITR forms by adding relevant changes according to the changes in the income tax laws. This could be a possible reason for the delay in releasing forms. Further in Budget 2024, there were a lot of amendments and capturing them in ITR forms that will take time. At least that capital gains date of 23rd July 2024 and change in holding period & rate in all asset classes, removal of indexation, etc, are some of the changes that need time to incorporate in this year's ITR forms."
It is important to note that certain court judgments have asked the CBDT to notify the ITR forms by April 1 to provide sufficient time to the taxpayers to file their income tax returns.
Madaan says, "The timely availability of Income Tax Return (ITR) forms is crucial for enabling taxpayers to meet their compliance obligations within prescribed statutory timelines. Multiple High Courts have emphasised this through various landmark judgments, such as the Punjab and Haryana High Court in the Vishal Garg v. Union of India case, the Delhi High Court in Avinash Gupta v. Union of India and the Gujarat High Court in the case of All Gujarat Federation of Tax Consultants v. CBDT. Through these rulings, the courts across multiple jurisdictions, i.e., Punjab & Haryana, Delhi, and Gujarat, have stressed that:
ITR forms and audit report utilities must be made available by 1st April of the assessment year.
Any delays must be justified with recorded reasons.
If delays impact taxpayers' ability to comply, authorities must consider extending filing deadlines and notify the public.
The judiciary has consistently recognised the inconvenience and hardship caused by administrative delays and placed the responsibility squarely on the tax authorities to ensure smooth and fair compliance processes.
Will ITR filing deadline be extended due to delay in ITR forms?
There is a delay in notifying ITR forms, which means taxpayers will have less time to file their income tax returns. Will CBDT extend the
ITR filing
deadline from July 31, 2025, for AY 2025-26?
Karundia says, "Ideally, these forms should be made available by March 31 to give taxpayers sufficient time to file their tax returns, especially since the deadline for ITR filing is fixed. As there is a delay in ITR forms, CBDT should extend the last date to file ITR."
Concurring with the view Shah says, "In the past, it has been seen that if there is a delay in notifying ITR Forms or utilities, the CBDT has extended the due date of filing the tax returns. This year, also, almost one month has already been lost, and the ITR Forms and necessary utilities for filing the tax returns have not been notified. Therefore, taxpayers are deprived of this time for preparing the tax return and considering this, it is possible that CBDT may extend the due date."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
2 hours ago
- Mint
CBDT investigates tax evasion through crypto assets
NEW DELHI : Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) is presently investigating tax evasion and laundering of unaccounted income by high-risk persons through investment in crypto currency, a person informed about the development said on Friday. The direct tax authority identified persons and entities which dealt in virtual digital assets (VDA) but have failed to comply with the Income Tax Act, for verification, said the person who spoke on condition of not being named. Data analytics has shown that a large number of persons have violated provisions of the law by not filing schedule VDA in income returns and by offering tax on the income earned at lower rate or by claiming cost indexation, the person said. Also Read: E-way bills shoot up to 122.7 million in May, the second-highest on record Gains from transactions in virtual digital assets like crypto currencies are taxed at a flat 30% without any set off for past losses and without indexation benefit—adjustment of costs to take inflation into account—because these digital assets are considered distinct from traditional capital assets. The tax provision does not allow deduction of any expense except the cost of acquisition. In addition to the 30% flat tax rate, the applicable cess and surcharges are also levied on these. Also, loss from virtual digital asset investment or trading is not allowed to be set off against any other income. Voluntary disclosure push The government introduced the new tax regime for virtual digital assets in the Finance Act of 2022 that provided for the 30% tax without any set-off for losses and without deductions other than cost of purchase. The new regime also provides for a tax deducted at source (TDS) of 1% tax on payment for transfer of virtual digital asset to a resident. Also Read: Reform push: Insurance amendment bill heads to Parliament The Income Tax department has recently sent e-mails to thousands of persons to review their tax returns and update if any income on account of virtual digital asset transactions have not been properly declared, the person said. Income tax returns filed by taxpayers is being verified with the tax deducted at source returns filed by the Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) popularly known as crypto exchanges and defaulters may be selected for further verification or scrutiny, the person quoted above said. CBDT has recently kicked off on a new approach termed as NUDGE or Non-intrusive Usage of Data to Guide and Enable taxpayers, as a part of its 'trust first' philosophy, the person said. This is the third Nudge campaign launched by CBDT in the last six months. Earlier campaigns were to encourage voluntary compliance on declaration of foreign assets and income by taxpayers and for withdrawal of bogus claims of deduction of donations to electoral trusts. Also Read: Govt to launch nationwide drive to return unclaimed bank deposits, dividends and policies Queries sent to the CBDT on Friday seeking comments for the story remained unanswered at the time of publishing. (ends) Gireesh.p@
Indian Express
4 hours ago
- Indian Express
Income Tax Department investigating evasion from crypto assets
The Income Tax Department is investigating tax evasion and laundering of unaccounted income by high-risk persons through investments in virtual digital assets (VDAs) after its data analytics showed 'significant violations' of income tax rules by individuals in transactions involving crypto assets, sources said. The Department under the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) has identified such crypto transactions for verifications and has sent emails to defaulting persons to review their income tax returns (ITRs) to update any income that has not been properly declared on account of VDA transactions, they said. 'Data analytics has shown that a significant number of persons have violated provisions of Income-tax Act by not filing Schedule VDA of ITR and offering tax on the income earned at a lower rate or claiming cost indexation. ITRs filed by taxpayers are being verified with TDS returns filed by the Virtual Asset Service Providers (VASPs) popularly known as crypto exchanges and defaulters may be selected for further verification or scrutiny,' a source said. India had introduced a 30 per cent flat income tax on gains made from cryptocurrencies from April 2022 after inserting Section 115BBH in the Income Tax Act, 1961 by the Finance Act, 2022. In July 2022, rules regarding 1 per cent tax deducted at source (TDS) on cryptocurrency came into effect. The provision does not allow deduction of any expenses except cost of acquisition. Also, set-off of loss from VDA investment or trading is not allowed to be set off against any other income or for carry forward to subsequent years. 'Such entities and individuals which are engaged in Virtual Digital Asset (VDA) transactions and have failed to comply with the Income-tax Act, 1961 have been identified for verification…the CBDT has recently sent emails to thousands of defaulting persons to review their ITRs and update if any income on account of VDA transactions have not been properly declared,' a source said. This is the third such 'NUDGE (Non-intrusive Usage of Data to Guide and Enable)' campaign by the CBDT in the last six months. Earlier campaigns were linked to declaration of foreign assets and income by taxpayers and withdrawal of bogus claims of deduction under Section 80GGC of the I-T Act. Aanchal Magazine is Senior Assistant Editor with The Indian Express and reports on the macro economy and fiscal policy, with a special focus on economic science, labour trends, taxation and revenue metrics. With over 13 years of newsroom experience, she has also reported in detail on macroeconomic data such as trends and policy actions related to inflation, GDP growth and fiscal arithmetic. Interested in the history of her homeland, Kashmir, she likes to read about its culture and tradition in her spare time, along with trying to map the journeys of displacement from there. ... Read More
Indian Express
5 hours ago
- Indian Express
FM Sitharaman to take stock of tax issues: Depts seek data from field offices
Pending refunds, investigations, adjudications, litigation along with the number of frauds and recoveries — these are some of the specific queries being asked from field offices by the headquarters of direct and indirect tax authorities under the Ministry of Finance ahead of a brainstorming conclave next week. Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman will hold detailed interactions with the indirect tax and direct tax authorities on June 20 and June 23, respectively, to discuss a broad range of issues including refund processing and their rejection trends, pending investigations, systems, and non-processing of returns. The Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs (CBIC) is going to hold a two-day conclave on June 19-20, while the Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) will host a similar session with its field officers on June 23. The Finance Minister is expected to lay special emphasis on timely refund processing, especially in export and SEZ-linked categories, officials said. 'Delays beyond 60 days will be scrutinised, and zones may be asked pendency and rejection trends with detailed analytics,' an official said. The Minister will also review the dwell time of cargo clearance across ports and airports. 'High pendency in DGGI (Directorate General of GST Intelligence) investigations, especially those pending over 180 days, is likely to draw critical attention,' the official said. On the direct tax front, delays in issuing refunds, systems accountability and litigation management along with age-wise pendency of appeals will be reviewed by the Minister to push for faster disposal of legacy cases to reduce litigation burden, the official said. In a series of missives sent to the field officers this week, the CBIC and CBDT have sought detailed information regarding the pendency claims, pending refunds, frauds, investigations and the cases stuck in litigation. Officials said data is being collated ahead of the meeting to have a threadbare discussion on all the issues affecting taxpayers in the conclave. In a letter sent on Friday, seen by The Indian Express, the Goods and Services Tax (GST) field officers have been asked to provide details about cases where a large number of fake firms are being managed or operated by one mastermind. 'The registration data of these groups of fake firms may be examined on priority in detail (in one or two big cases) as to how the mastermind was able to obtain GST registration without being caught during the registration process. This will enable us to plug loopholes in the registration system and achieving the objective of making the registration process more robust, more simple, quick and automated while preventing fake dealers from getting registration,' the letter stated. In another letter issued on June 12, the GST field offices have been asked to provide details about the number of investigations completed, average time taken for completing the investigation for the last two financial years 2023-24 and 2024-25 and the ongoing financial year of 2025-26. The officers have also been asked to provide information about the total number of pending investigations for more than two years, the reasons for pendency of such cases. They have then been asked to give details about the number of investigations pending because of the pendency reasons along with specific queries about the timeframe of the pending investigations. For instance, the officers have been asked to give the breakup of pending investigations for 1 year to 2 years. Details have also been sought about recoveries made during investigation and after adjudication along with pending adjudication details, with the field offices being asked to give data for pending adjudication for more than one year as on May 31, 2025.
