World's first robot ‘could give birth to human baby'
Experts are developing technology that will mimic a pregnancy from conception to delivery, with the infant growing inside an artificial womb and receiving nutrients through a tube.
After nine months, a live baby will be born, according to Dr Zhang Qifeng, who founded the company Kaiwa Technology, in the city of Guangzhou.
Dr Zhang, a PHD graduate from Nanyang Technological University in Singapore, has claimed the technology is already in a 'mature stage'.
He added: 'Now it needs to be implanted in the robot's abdomen so that a real person and the robot can interact to achieve pregnancy, allowing the fetus to grow inside'.
A prototype of the humanoid is set to be sold for around £10,000 (100,000 yuan) next year.
Reports in the Chinese media said that the humanoid has been designed to mimic the entire process of pregnancy, from the moment of conception to birth.
However, the specifics on exactly how the egg and sperm are fertilised are currently unclear.
For the entire gestation period, the infant will live inside the robot's body, although experts have not yet stated how the foetus will be implanted in the tech womb.
The developing babies will be surrounded by artificial amniotic fluid to create a womb-like environment.
Dr Zhang said the technology is not an entirely new concept, as scientists in the past have successfully kept premature lambs alive inside a 'biobag' for weeks.
The innovation has already prompted a legal and ethical debate. Dr Zhang said he had already been in talks with Guangdong Province authorities to prepare drafts for policy and legislation.
If successful, the science could revolutionise medical science and our notions of family and fertility.
The humanoid could be seen as a tool to tackle rising rates of infertility in China, which has gone up from 11.9 per cent in 2007 to 18 per cent in 2020.
'Problematic' technology
But some critics have condemned the 'problematic' technology, arguing that depriving a foetus of maternal connection is unethical and cruel.
Chinese News outlet The Standard reported that some medical experts are sceptical over the technology's ability to replicate human gestation.
The experts have allegedly stated that complex biological processes, such as maternal hormone secretion, cannot be duplicated by science.
Andrea Dworkin, the radical feminist writer, has previously hit out at artificial womb technology for fears that it would result in 'the end of women'.
Researchers from The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia published an article in 2022 in which they said that such technology might 'pathologise' pregnancy.
However, some argue that artificial wombs could liberate women from pregnancy risks so that they would no longer have to endure the physical burden of carrying a baby.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
American Military News
15 minutes ago
- American Military News
Pentagon investigates after Microsoft used Chinese workers to maintain sensitive tech systems: Report
A new report claims that Microsoft withheld important information from the Defense Department regarding the company's use of Chinese-based employees. The new report has sparked an investigation by the Pentagon. According to a 2025 security plan obtained by ProPublica, while Microsoft is required to submit security plans to the Defense Department regarding how the technology company plans to protect the government's computer systems, the company did not disclose the use of Chinese-based employees to work on sensitive computer systems for the Pentagon. ProPublica reported that the Defense Department launched an investigation of technology companies using foreign operators to work on sensitive systems in the aftermath of the outlet's report on Microsoft's controversial practices last month. The outlet revealed that Microsoft uses 'digital escorts,' identified as U.S. personnel with security clearances, to supervise engineers based in foreign countries who work on the Pentagon's cloud systems. According to ProPublica, Microsoft did not notify the Defense Department that some of the employees who were not screened to access the Azure Government cloud platform included foreign citizens based in other countries. ProPublica's report has led to a quick response and an investigation by the Pentagon. In a memorandum last month, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth wrote, 'I direct the Department of Defense (DoD) Chief Information Officer (CIO), in coordination with the Under Secretaries of Defense for Acquisition and Sustainment, Intelligence and Security, and Research and Engineering, to take immediate actions to ensure to the maximum extent possible that all information technology capabilities, including cloud services, developed and procured for DoD are reviewed and validated as secure against supply chain attacks by adversaries such as China and Russia.' READ MORE: Radio system used by military, law enforcement exposed through major vulnerabilities In a letter to Hegseth last month, Sen. Tom Cotton, the chairman of the Senate Select Committee on Intelligence, warned that the Defense Department needs to take action and avoid 'contracts and oversight processes that fail to account for the growing Chinese threat.' 'As we learn more about these 'digital escorts' and other unwise — and outrageous — practices used by some DoD partners, it is clear the Department and Congress will need to take further action,' Cotton stated. 'We must put in place the protocols and processes to adopt innovative technology quickly, effectively, and safely.' Hegseth's office told ProPublica on Friday that the Pentagon had completed its investigation into the use of foreign employees by technology companies and that the Pentagon 'identified a series of possible actions the Department could take.' Hegseth's office added, 'As with all contracted relationships, the Department works directly with the vendor to address concerns, to include those that have come to light with the Microsoft digital escort process.'
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump administration reportedly wants a 10% stake in Intel
The Trump administration is in talks to take a roughly 10% stake in Intel in a deal that would make the U.S. the largest shareholder in the struggling chipmaker, according to a report. The federal government is mulling an investment that would convert some or all of the grants allocated to the company under the U.S. bipartisan Chips and Science Act into equity, Bloomberg reported. Intel was granted a combined $10.9 billion in grants under the act for commercial and military manufacturing, which former President Joe Biden signed into law in 2022. That figure would equate to a little over 10% of Intel's $103.8 billion market value as of Aug. 18, though sources told the news outlet that the White House has not yet decided whether to go ahead with the plan. The potential investment, first reported last week , would support Intel's plans to build a factory hub in Ohio and would come at a time when Intel has been cutting jobs as part of a cost cutting drive, having fallen behind rivals like Nvidia in the global AI chipmaking race. A stake in Intel would be President Donald Trump's latest try at intervening in the chipmaking industry. Earlier this week, the U.S. government announced a deal that would have two of Intel's rivals, Nvidia and Advanced Micro Devices, pay it 15% of their revenues from sales in China. The reported deal with Intel would also mark a sharp turnaround after Trump demanded last week that its CEO Lip-Bu Tan resign over purported connections to the Chinese government, describing him as someone who's 'conflicted' in his business dealings. 'The CEO of INTEL is highly CONFLICTED and must resign, immediately. There is no other solution to this problem. Thank you for your attention to this problem!' Trump wrote in an Aug. 7 social media post. Tan took over Intel in March, as the company was locked in negotiations with the Trump administration to shift its chip-making plants to a Taiwanese rival. Intel is seen by many as the best chance for the U.S. to compete with global rivals like TSMC, and the Ohio plant would help the country make sure it can make high-end semiconductors on home soil. However, it has struggled amid stagnant sales and ongoing losses in recent years, with the likes of Nvidia surging ahead. Already under Tan it has announced plans to lay off 20% of its staff to pare back bureaucracy within the company. The funding under the Chips Act was meant to be directed to fortify Intel's domestic computer chip manufacturing with new projects including the Ohio plant, and was supposed to be dispersed over time. A deal with the government would not necessarily mean significantly more cash, but it could mean the company gets hold of it faster. Trump announced a new 100% tariff on semiconductor imports earlier in August, but included an enormous caveat that could spare tech firms like Intel. U.S. companies that have planned a domestic spending spree in the country are likely to avoid the sizable import tax. Intel has stated it will pour $100 billion in new U.S. corporate spending over the next five years, a move it had announced before the 2024 election. Intel and U.S. government did not immediately respond to Quartz's requests for comment.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why Appian (APPN) Shares Are Trading Lower Today
What Happened? Shares of low-code automation software company Appian (NASDAQ:APPN) fell 3.3% in the afternoon session after the major indices continued to pull back, with technology stocks accounting for most of the market's largest decliners. A key reason for this trend is that much of the recent market gains were concentrated in the "AI trade," which includes these large technology and semiconductor companies. So this could also mean that some investors are locking in some gains ahead of more definitive feedback from the Fed. Despite the downturn, some analysts viewed this as an opportunity to own some of the "Core AI winners." Dan Ives of Wedbush Securities commented, "In our view, the tech bull cycle will be well intact for at least another 2-3 years, given the trillions being spent on AI infrastructure/software/chips/power/apps looking ahead. This remains our tech playbook and investor roadmap." Additionally, mixed earnings reports from retailers, such as Target, have added to the market's weakness. Investors are closely monitoring these reports for insights into the broader economic health and the potential impact of new tariffs on inflation. The stock market overreacts to news, and big price drops can present good opportunities to buy high-quality stocks. Is now the time to buy Appian? Access our full analysis report here, it's free. What Is The Market Telling Us Appian's shares are very volatile and have had 21 moves greater than 5% over the last year. In that context, today's move indicates the market considers this news meaningful but not something that would fundamentally change its perception of the business. The previous big move we wrote about was 7 days ago when the stock gained 3.3% on the news that the SaaS sector continued to rally as favorable inflation data bolstered hopes for a Federal Reserve interest rate cut. This optimism was largely driven by a benign July Consumer Price Index (CPI) report, which solidified investor expectations for a Federal Reserve interest rate cut. Following the release of the inflation data, which showed a year-over-year increase of 2.7%, the probability of a rate cut in September surged to over 96%. Lower interest rates are typically beneficial for growth-oriented technology stocks, as they can reduce borrowing costs and increase the present value of future earnings. Adding to the positive sentiment was a 90-day delay in the imposition of higher tariffs on Chinese goods, which reduced trade-related uncertainty for the technology sector. Appian is down 12.9% since the beginning of the year, and at $28.90 per share, it is trading 30.5% below its 52-week high of $41.56 from November 2024. Investors who bought $1,000 worth of Appian's shares 5 years ago would now be looking at an investment worth $538.38. Unless you've been living under a rock, it should be obvious by now that generative AI is going to have a huge impact on how large corporations do business. While Nvidia and AMD are trading close to all-time highs, we prefer a lesser-known (but still profitable) semiconductor stock benefiting from the rise of AI. Click here to access our free report on our favorite semiconductor growth story. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
