Allahabad High Court disposes of petition seeking CBI probe into Rahul Gandhi's citizenship
The Lucknow Bench of the Allahabad High Court on Monday (May 5, 2025) disposed of a public interest litigation (PIL) petition seeking a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) probe into the citizenship of the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi.
A Bench of Justices A.R. Masoodi and Rajiv Singh allowed the petitioner to approach the appropriate forum to seek relief. A detailed order on the issue was not available till the time of the filing of this report.
In previous hearings, Deputy Solicitor General S.B. Pandey had submitted in court that, acting on the petitioner's complaint, the concerned Ministry had written to the U.K. government, seeking details on Mr. Gandhi's alleged British citizenship, and hence the government needed more time to take a final decision on the petitioner's representation.
Sources in the government said that as the Central government had not been able to provide any time limit on resolving the petitioner's complaint, the court had observed that there was no justification in keeping the petition pending.
'The PIL was disposed of, giving liberty to the Government of India to take a decision on the petitioner's representation on Mr. Gandhi's citizenship. On the issue that the petitioner sought the cancellation of Mr. Gandhi's Lok Sabha membership, the court noted that this relief could not be granted to him as he did not fulfil the criteria to demand it,' a senior official involved in the matter said.
The matter pertains to a plea filed by S. Vignesh Shishir, who had petitioned the court to order the Chief Election Commissioner (CEC), the Chief Electoral Officer of Uttar Pradesh, and the Returning Officer of Raebareli to cancel Mr. Gandhi's electoral certificate, apart from seeking a CBI probe into his citizenship.
Mr. Shishir's social media profile says he is a member of the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).
In his application, he claimed that he had submitted a detailed representation-cum-complaint to the Foreigners Division of the Ministry of Home Affairs, in which he had requested the concerned authorities to cancel Mr. Gandhi's Indian citizenship under the Rules and Regulations of Section 9(2) of the Citizenship Act, 1955; Rule 40(2) of the Citizenship Rules, 2009; and Schedule III of the 2009 Rules.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
31 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Rahul's allegation of Maha poll rigging triggers BJP, EC retorts
The Congress's rivals lashed out on Saturday against the opposition leader Rahul Gandhi for alleging systematic rigging of the November 2024 Maharashtra elections, a claim also rebuffed by Election Commission officials who called it misinformation. The Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha published an op-ed on Saturday, claiming the Maharashtra polls were a 'blueprint for rigging democracy' and alleging 'industrial-scale rigging involving the capture of our national institutions'. Maharashtra deputy chief minister Eknath Shinde dismissed Gandhi's claims as baseless, pointing out the inconsistency in the Congress leader's position. 'In the Lok Sabha elections, when Maha Vikas Aghadi won the elections in Maharashtra, they did not say anything. At that time, the EVMs and ECI were right,' Shinde told reporters in Thane. BJP chief JP Nadda accused Gandhi of manufacturing 'fake narratives' out of desperation following election defeats, saying the Congress leader was 'cooking up bizarre conspiracies' and 'defaming institutions with zero proof'. Gandhi outlined what he termed a five-step rigging process: rigging the panel for appointing the EC, adding fake voters to electoral rolls, inflating voter turnout, targeting bogus voting where the BJP needed wins, and hiding evidence. Election Commission officials, who did not want to be named, reiterated their stance of following laid-down procedures as per law, dismissing allegations of voter percentage spikes and substantial jumps in elector numbers. One of these officials emphasised that electoral roll preparation for the assembly elections occurred under the oversight of over 100,000 booth level agents appointed by political parties, including 27,099 from the Congress itself. 'Instead of writing to the EC directly, it is very strange that Rahul Gandhi keeps approaching the media seeking answers to his doubts again and again,' said this top-level official. 'After losing the match, blaming the referee has become the standard practice.' EC did not respond to requests for a comment. The official cited above added: 'If there was an issue with the elector numbers, why were hardly any appeals preferred with the DM and the CEO under the Representation of the People Act, 1950?'. The person cited above provided comparative data to counter Gandhi's allegations, noting that Maharashtra's 8.14 per cent elector growth between 2019 and 2024 was actually lower than other states. Jharkhand recorded a 13.40 per cent jump, Telangana saw a 16.16 per cent increase, and West Bengal had an 11.36 per cent rise during comparable periods. On allegations of inflated turnout figures, the EC official explained that voter turnout data on the VTR App would logically increase after 5 PM due to logistical challenges. 'Polling teams come from varying distances and face different logistical challenges, such as late-hour voting trends, difficult geographical and weather conditions, communication issues, and tough terrain,' this person said Following the off-record responses by EC officials, Gandhi took to X at 6:56 PM on Saturday and wrote on the issue again: 'Dear EC, You are a Constitutional body. Releasing unsigned, evasive notes to intermediaries is not the way to respond to serious questions,' Gandhi posted, demanding the publication of consolidated, digital voter rolls and release of post-5 PM CCTV footage from Maharashtra polling booths. 'Evasion won't protect your credibility. Telling the truth will,' he added. With agency inputs
India Gazette
an hour ago
- India Gazette
Indelible inspiration for women's leadership: Delhi CM Rekha Gupta at 300th birth anniversary event of Ahilyabai Holkar
New Delhi [India], June 8 (ANI): Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta attended the 300th birth anniversary event of Lokmata Devi Ahilyabai Holkar on Saturday and said she symbolises harmony and courage. Later, in a social media post on X, CM Gupta described the queen as visionary who ruled with justice. 'Lokmata Ahilyabai Holkar was not just a queen - she was a visionary who ruled with justice, policy, harmony and indomitable courage and gave a new identity to Indian women power through her leadership. Her entire life is an indelible example of nation building, public welfare and women empowerment. The inspiring life of Queen Mother Ahilyabai not only empowers the role of women in Indian history, but also proves that a visionary woman can lay the foundation of a prosperous and welfare nation with her wisdom, policies and courage. His memory is both an ideal and an inspiration for us' . 'She is not just a queen, she is a symbol of policy, harmony and courage - an indelible inspiration for women's leadership. Her life tells us that even a woman can lead an entire era,' CM Gupta said. Union Minister of State SPS Baghel ji and Harsh Malhotra ji were also present at the event. Lokmata Ahilyabai Holkar is remembered for her people-centric policies, deep commitment to economic and socio-cultural issues, especially those that affected the life of women. She encouraged the education of women and their participation in the social and religious life of the local community. She supported and encouraged women weavers to make Maheshwari sarees. Her contributions were wide-ranging from infrastructure development (water bodies, roads, dharamshalas) to reconstruction and revival of temples across the length and breadth of the land. The edifices created by her have not only left an indelible mark on India's cultural and spiritual landscape but also stood the test of time. (ANI)
News18
an hour ago
- News18
'Technology Must Complement, Not Replace, Human Mind In Judicial Decision-Making': CJI Gavai
The CJI said that complex legal issues often require an understanding of human context, societal implications, and ethical dilemmas that AI, in its current form, cannot fully grasp Chief Justice of India (CJI) BR Gavai delivered a keynote address on the 'Role of Technology in the Indian Legal System" at the School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), University of London. His speech emphasised that technology should complement, not replace, the human element in judicial decision-making. The CJI highlighted the irreplaceable value of discretion, empathy, and nuanced judicial interpretation. While acknowledging the transformative potential of technological advancements, he delineated clear boundaries for their application within the judiciary. 'Though the judiciary welcomes innovations like automated cause lists, digital kiosks, and virtual assistants," he stated, 'it must ensure that human oversight, ethical guidelines, and robust training are integral to their implementation." This perspective reflects a cautious yet progressive stance. The Indian judiciary has indeed embraced various technological advancements to enhance efficiency and accessibility. Automated cause lists streamline case management, digital kiosks improve public access to information, and virtual assistants aid in administrative tasks. However, the CJI's address underscored the fundamental difference between processing information and exercising judgment. He elaborated that complex legal issues often require an understanding of human context, societal implications, and ethical dilemmas that artificial intelligence, in its current form, cannot fully grasp. Judicial interpretation frequently involves delving into legislative intent, societal norms, and the unique circumstances of each case, demanding human reasoning, ethical considerations, and a capacity for empathy that transcends algorithmic processing. 'Technology must complement, not replace, the human mind in judicial decision-making," the CJI said, adding, 'The emphasis must always be on using technology to enhance trust and transparency—never to replace the human conscience at the heart of justice." The CJI's remarks signal that while technology can vastly improve the procedural aspects of justice delivery, making processes faster, more transparent, and accessible, the ultimate responsibility and the nuanced decision-making power must remain firmly with human judges. (With PTI inputs) First Published:
