The moon: Facts about our planet's lunar companion
Quick facts about the moon
How far away it is: An average of 238,855 miles (384,400 kilometers) from our planet
How big it is: 2,159 miles (3,475 km) across, or about one-fourth our planet's size
How old it is: About 4.4 billion years old
The moon is our constant companion and the only natural object that always orbits Earth. It's about four times smaller than Earth and its gravity is much weaker, which is why astronauts bounce around on it like a trampoline. But even though our moon is relatively small, it still has a big effect on our planet. The moon is why our oceans have tides, and it may even help stabilize Earth's tilt and rotation, keeping the lengths of our days and seasons the same. Read on to learn more fascinating facts about the moon.
The moon's orbit isn't a perfect circle. Instead, it's more stretched out, kind of like an oval, which means its distance from Earth varies by about 30,000 miles (48,000 km).
The surface of the moon is rusting. It's turning redder as Earth's atmosphere interacts with iron in the soil.
NASA has spotted water on the moon.
The same side of the moon always faces Earth.
Scientists have grown plants in moon dirt from the Apollo missions.
The leading theory is that the moon formed about 4.4 billion years ago, not long after the solar system was born. Many enormous space rocks were flying near the early Earth at that time. Astronomers believe a massive object called Theia crashed into early Earth. The crash would have melted part of our world and destroyed our planet's atmosphere, but the collision created the material that eventually formed the moon.
Some astronomers have different versions of this theory, such as the possibility that a baby Earth was turned into a doughnut of molten rock called a synestia after Theia vaporized our planet. According to this idea, as the space doughnut cooled, material at its outer edges combined into small "moonlets" and, eventually, the moon itself. An even stranger theory suggests that Earth's gravity allowed the planet to steal the moon from Venus.
Whatever its origin story, the moon has been with us throughout human history, as evidenced by its many names. The Latin word for the moon is "luna," and the English word "lunar" is derived from it. In Greek, Selene is the name of a mythical moon goddess, which gives us the word "selenology," or the study of the moon's rocks.
The moon is made mostly of rocks that are rich in iron and magnesium. The moon's face is covered in craters, which were left by various space objects that slammed into the moon over billions of years. And because the moon doesn't have wind to wipe away these scars, or plates of crust that sink and carry different surface features into the planet's core, the scars stick around. On the far side of the moon is the South Pole-Aitken Basin — a giant hole 1,550 miles (2,500 km) wide and 8 miles (13 km) deep. Scientists are still scratching their heads over how it formed.
The moon also has large, dark features called "maria," or "seas" in Latin, since they were once believed to be bodies of water. Today, researchers know these areas were carved from the moon's crust billions of years ago, when lava flowed over the lunar surface.
Although we know that maria aren't actually bodies of water, trace amounts of water may exist in dark regions at the moon's poles.
Much like a comet, the moon also has a long tail. It's made of sodium atoms blasted out of the moon's soil by meteor strikes and then pushed hundreds of thousands of miles away by the sun's rays. Earth sometimes wears this tail like a scarf.
The moon has an atmosphere, but it's much different from Earth's atmosphere. An extremely thin layer of gas blankets the moon. In comparison, Earth's atmosphere at sea level has around a billion billion times more molecules in the same space.
The moon's atmosphere contains many types of atoms, including oxygen, nitrogen, carbon monoxide, carbon dioxide, helium and even tiny amounts of water. It also has weirder chemicals, such as argon, radon and polonium. Some of these chemicals came from the moon itself, which "breathed" them out as it cooled. Others were delivered by comets. Although there is oxygen on the moon, there's not enough for humans to breathe.
The moon is also full of dust. Moon dust is made from extremely sharp and tiny pieces of volcanic glass that have been smashed out of the lunar soil by tiny meteorites. The thin atmosphere means these fragments hardly ever get worn away, so dust on the moon is toxic and dangerous; it even clogged the equipment and zippers Apollo astronauts brought to the moon.
Humans have worked to explore the moon since the beginning of the Space Age. It's the only place in the solar system, besides Earth, that humans have set foot upon. NASA's historic Apollo program first brought astronauts to the moon's surface on July 20, 1969, winning the space race for the United States.
Instruments placed on the moon during the Apollo missions are still being used by scientists today. Measurements from these missions have shown that the moon is moving away from Earth by about 1.5 inches (3.8 centimeters) per year and that quakes on the moon spread from cliff-like cracks on the surface. Apollo astronauts also brought back 842 pounds (382 kilograms) of moon rocks with them that are still being studied today.
China's Chang'e program and India's Chandrayaan program have both landed spacecraft on the moon. Soviet probes have also landed on the moon, and the Russian and Japanese space agencies have sent spacecraft to circle the moon. Israel tried to land on the moon's surface, but the lander crashed. NASA also wants to revisit the moon. As part of its Artemis program, the space agency wants to place American astronauts back on the moon's surface as a launching point to Mars.
Image 1 of 4
Humans landed on the moon for the first time on July 20, 1969.
Image 2 of 4
A total lunar eclipse happens when the full moon passes directly through Earth's shadow. This makes the moon appear red and is often called a "blood moon."
Image 3 of 4
A supermoon occurs when there's a full moon during the moon's nearest point to Earth in its orbit. This makes the moon appear bigger and brighter than usual.
Image 4 of 4
An image of the Apollo 17 moon rock troctolite 76535. This study was focused on sample 79221.
Will Earth ever lose its moon?
Why can't we see the far side of the moon?
Why can we sometimes see the moon in the daytime?
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
X-ray telescope finds something unexpected with the 'heartbeat black hole'
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A black hole's bizarre "heartbeat" is forcing astronomers to reconsider how these cosmic heavyweights behave. Observations of IGR J17091-3624 — a black hole in a binary system roughly 28,000 light-years from Earth — were taken using NASA's Imaging X-ray Polarimetry Explorer (IXPE). Nicknamed the "heartbeat" black hole for its dramatic, rhythmic pulses in brightness, the object feeds on matter stolen from a companion star. The black hole's pulses are the result of fluctuations in the superheated plasma swirling around it (also known as the accretion disk) and the inner region called the corona, which can reach extreme temperatures and radiate incredibly luminous X-rays. IXPE measured the polarization — the direction of the black hole's X-rays — to determine the alignment of its vibrations. The space probe recorded a surprising 9.1% polarization degree, which is much higher than theoretical models predicted, according to a statement from NASA. Studying the polarization degree offers insight about the geometry of the black hole and motion of matter nearby. Typically, such high readings suggest the corona is viewed almost edge-on, where its structure appears highly ordered. However, other observations of IGR J17091-3624 don't seem to match that picture, leaving scientists with a puzzling contradiction. Astronomers tested two different models to help explain the recent observations of IGR J17091-3624. One posits that powerful winds are being launched from the accretion disk, scattering X-rays into a more polarized state even without an edge-on perspective. The other suggests the corona itself is moving outward at extraordinary speeds, causing relativistic effects that amplify polarization. Simulations of both scenarios reproduce the IXPE results, but each model challenges long-held assumptions about black hole environments. "These winds are one of the most critical missing pieces to understand the growth of all types of black holes," Maxime Parra, co-author of the study from Ehime University in Matsuyama, Japan, said in the statement. "Astronomers could expect future observations to yield even more surprising polarization degree measurements." Their findings were published May 27 in the journal Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
78,000-year-old footprints from Neanderthal man, child and toddler discovered on beach in Portugal
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Just before the first COVID lockdown in March 2020, Carlos Neto de Carvalho and his wife, Yilu Zhang, were walking along Monte Clérigo beach in southern Portugal. As the geologist and geographer couple scrambled over rocky outcrops and an old collapsed cliff, they stumbled on a series of ancient Neanderthal footprints. "It was early in the morning of a sunny day, with perfect light for checking tracks," Neto de Carvalho told Live Science in an email. But when they brought colleagues back to the site to take photos of the tracks, "we were almost trapped by the sudden rise of the tide and needed to swim and climb a 15-meter [49 feet] nearly vertical cliff with all our gear," Neto de Carvalho said. Their daring adventure paid off. The researchers ultimately discovered five trackways comprising 26 footprints at Monte Clérigo and, in turn, substantially increased experts' understanding of Neanderthals' activities along the Atlantic coast 78,000 years ago. "The fossil record of hominin footprints, and especially the ones attributed to Neanderthals, is exceedingly rare," Neto de Carvalho and colleagues wrote in a study published July 3 in the journal Scientific Reports, since Neanderthal footprints are nearly identical to humans'. In this case, the footprints were identified as Neanderthal because modern humans weren't in Europe at that time. Rather, evidence suggests that besides a few earlier failed attempts, Homo sapiens started leaving Africa around 50,000 years ago. Only six sets of Neanderthal footprints had been discovered previously. Along with the Monte Clérigo tracks, the researchers have reported the new finding of a single footprint from Praia do Telheiro, also in southern Portugal, bringing the total number of Neanderthal trackways discovered in Europe to eight. At Monte Clérigo, the ancient footprints were made near the shoreline in a coastal dune. Optically stimulated luminescence dating, which measures the last time a mineral was exposed to sunlight, placed the footprints in the range of 83,000 to 73,000 years old. Related: DNA of 'Thorin,' one of the last Neanderthals, finally sequenced, revealing inbreeding and 50,000 years of genetic isolation Based on the size and shape of the Monte Clérigo prints, the researchers think an adult Neanderthal male walked up and down the dune, accompanied by a child between 7 and 9 years old and a toddler under 2 years old. "The fact that in the context of Monte Clérigo infant footprints were found together with those of older individuals suggests that children were present when adults performed day-to-day activities," the researchers wrote. Because the trackways were heading both toward and away from the shore, these Neanderthals may have been foraging for food, such as shellfish. But another possibility is that the Neanderthals were practicing ambush hunting or stalking prey such as horses, deer or hares, according to the researchers, since some of the Neanderthal footprints were "overprinted" with large mammal tracks. RELATED STORIES —Endurance athletes that carry Neanderthal genes could be held back from reaching their peak —125,000-year-old 'fat factory' run by Neanderthals discovered in Germany —140,000-year-old child's skull may have been part modern human, part Neanderthal — but not everyone is convinced "At the Monte Clérigo site, the presence of footprints attributed to, at least, one male adult, one child and one toddler, negotiating the steep slope of a dune, allow us to speculate about close proximity to the campsite," the researchers wrote. But if the Neanderthals had established a camp at Monte Clérigo, no evidence of it remains today. "The presence of Neanderthals in these environments was intentional even if seasonal," the researchers wrote, "taking benefits from ambush hunting or stalking prey in a rugged dune landscape." Neanderthal quiz: How much do you know about our closest relatives?
Yahoo
7 hours ago
- Yahoo
Never-before-seen cousin of Lucy might have lived at the same site as the oldest known human species, new study suggests
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Roughly 2.6 million-year-old fossilized teeth found in Ethiopia might belong to a previously unknown early human relative, researchers say. The teeth are from a species of Australopithecus, the genus that includes Lucy (A. afarensis). But these newly discovered teeth don't appear to belong to any known species of Australopithecus, according to a new study published in the journal Nature on Wednesday (Aug. 13). What's more, at the same site the researchers found extremely old teeth from Homo, the genus that includes modern humans (Homo sapiens). These teeth may belong to the oldest known Homo species on record, which scientists haven't yet named, the study found. These new discoveries show that at least two lineages of early hominins — a group that includes humans and our closest relatives — coexisted in the same region around 2.6 million years ago, the researchers said. Discoveries at Ledi-Geraru archaeological site The researchers found the teeth at the Ledi-Geraru archaeological site in northeastern Ethiopia, which is known for earlier groundbreaking discoveries: a 2.8 million-year-old jawbone that's the oldest known human specimen, as well as some of the oldest known stone tools made by hominins, which date to 2.6 million years ago. Paleontologists and archaeologists hypothesize that the region was an open and arid grassy plain during this period, based on grass-eating animal fossils from that time. The area offered resources Homo and Australopithecus could use, Frances Forrest, an archaeologist at Fairfield University in Connecticut who was not involved with the new research, told Live Science in an email. Grasslands and rivers would have provided water to drink, plants to eat and large animals to hunt. Related: 'Huge surprise' reveals how some humans left Africa 50,000 years ago But the unusually rich fossil record in this area could also be because of excellent preservation of remains, due to volcanic eruptions, for example — not necessarily that this was a hominin hotspot, Forrest said. Australopithecus and Homo teeth In the new study, the researchers used layers of volcanic ash above and below the newly discovered fossils to determine their age. Of the 13 teeth discovered, the team found 10 are 2.63 million years old and belonged to an unidentified species of Australopithecus, which for now the researchers are calling the Ledi-Geraru Australopithecus. Previously, researchers had found remains in the region from A. afarensis and Australopithecus garhi. But the newfound teeth look different from the teeth of those species. "It doesn't match any of these, so it could be a new species," study co-author Kaye Reed, a paleoecologist at Arizona State University, told Live Science. However, the research team hasn't officially named it as a newly identified species because the teeth don't have any especially unique features. "In the fossil record, researchers usually define a new species by finding anatomical traits that consistently differ from those of known species," Forrest said, adding that the evidence from this discovery is too limited to define a new species. The researchers also identified two teeth that are 2.59 million years old, and one that is 2.78 million years old, all belonging to the genus Homo, which Reed believes are from the same species as the oldest known Homo specimen — the jawbone discovered in Ledi-Geraru — although this hasn't been confirmed. Image 1 of 2 Study authors J. Ramón Arrowsmith and Christopher J. Campisano examine the geology of the area near the new fossils. Image 2 of 2 An aerial view of the Ledi-Geraru excavation site, home of the newly discovered fossilized teeth, and where the oldest known Homo specimen has been uncovered. The new discovery means at least three hominin species were living in this region of Ethiopia before 2.5 million years ago: the Homo and Australopithecus species these teeth belong to, as well as A. garhi. At the same time, A. africanus lived in South Africa, and Paranthropus, another hominin genus, lived in what is now Kenya, Tanzania and southern Ethiopia. This evolutionary trial-and-error within the extended hominin family is why humans' evolutionary tree is considered "bushy" rather than linear. "It has become clear over the last decade or so that during most of our evolutionary history … there have been multiple species of human relatives that existed at the same time," John Hawks, an anthropologist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison who was not involved in the new research, told Live Science. "The new paper tells us this is happening in Ethiopia … [in] a really interesting time frame, because it's maybe the earliest population of our genus Homo." Next steps The research team is now studying the enamel on the newfound teeth, as their chemistry can reveal what these species were eating. This may shed light on whether these hominins were eating the same things and competing for similar resources. "Right now, we can say very little with certainty about direct interaction between Australopithecus and Homo," Forrest said. "We know that both genera sometimes overlapped in time and space, but there is no behavioral evidence linking the two." RELATED STORIES —300,000-year-old teeth from China may be evidence that humans and Homo erectus interbred, according to new study —78,000-year-old footprints from Neanderthal man, child and toddler discovered on beach in Portugal —Stunning facial reconstructions of 'hobbit,' Neanderthal and Homo erectus bring human relatives to life Chimpanzees and gorillas live in some of the same forests, Hawks pointed out, but they're mostly geographically separated from each other, not living side by side. The fact these early hominins may have lived closer together than primates typically do now is interesting, Hawks said. "They probably weren't eating the same things," Reed noted. "But right now we don't really know." The researchers are also searching for more information and fossils at the site. "Everything we find is a piece in the puzzle of human evolution," Reed said. Human evolution quiz: What do you know about Homo sapiens?
