Oil falls 5.3% as Iran's response to US strikes spares energy assets
Oil fell as Iran's retaliatory strikes on US bases in Qatar were less severe than investors feared, allaying some concerns that the conflict would immediately disrupt supplies from West Asia.
Futures for West Texas Intermediate fell 5.3 per cent to $69.9 a barrel, while
Brent oil futures
fell by similar amounts after Iran launched six missiles toward US bases in Qatar, according to an Axios report. Traders had initially feared that Iran's retaliatory response would involve a closure of the Strait of Hormuz chokepoint, through which about a fifth of the world's oil passes.
Earlier in the session, prices weakened after Trump warned against rising oil prices in a social media post, urging the Energy Department to facilitate more drilling "now." Energy Secretary Chris Wright replied, "We're on it."
Crude's gains had begun fading even before Trump's post. While there was initial concern that Iran would interfere with energy flows in retaliation for US air attacks on its nuclear sites over the weekend, those fears have ebbed somewhat. Tehran warned earlier that the strikes would trigger "everlasting consequences," and Reuters reported that the US sees a high risk of a strike against US forces soon.
"This appears to me well orchestrated, Iran hits an empty US base, plenty of warning ahead with airspace closure and guidance for shelter. Iran gets its face saving response and stays clear of the Straits of Hormuz," said Harry Tchilinguirian, group head of research at Onyx Capital Group.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Stop Fighting Iran': How Netanyahu 'SUCCUMBED' To Trump Phone Call After Qatar Attack
/ Jun 24, 2025, 02:55PM IST A report by Axios says US President Donald Trump has been making efforts to achieve a ceasefire between Iran and Israel since the US military struck three nuclear facilities– Fordow, Natanz, and Isfahan– in Iran on June 22. The report revealed that Iran had sent a message to the Trump administration via Qatar before it attacked an Al-Udeid airbase. Meanwhile, the US president refused to retaliate against the Iranian attack and instead sought negotiations for a truce. Trump also wants to resume nuclear talks with Tehran, the report adds.
Time of India
30 minutes ago
- Time of India
US readies another bunker-buster for India. What can happen?
A bipartisan bill in the US Senate, the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025, threatens India with 500% tariffs for continuing to purchase Russian oil, aiming to cripple Russia's energy revenue. While the bill gains traction, the Trump administration resists, fearing it will undermine efforts to mend US-Russia relations and mediate an end to the Ukraine war. Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads The rationale of the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025 Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads What is Trump's stance on the economic bunker buster? Are 500% tariffs feasible? Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads India's unique position After dropping bunker-buster bombs on Iran's underground nuclear facility at Fordow, America is threatening to drop a bunker-buster on India -- an "economic bunker-buster", as one of the proponents of the bill has called it. India stares at astronomically high 500% tariffs if it continues to buy Russian oil as a bill for new sanctions on Russia gathers bipartisan support in the US. In April, Senators Lindsey Graham (Republican) and Richard Blumenthal (Democrat) introduced the Sanctioning Russia Act of 2025, a bipartisan legislative proposal that seeks to fundamentally alter the global response to Russia's ongoing war in Ukraine. The bill mandates punitive economic action not only against Russia but also against any country that continues to purchase its energy products. Chief among these measures is an unprecedented 500% tariff on all US imports from countries that buy Russian oil, gas, petrochemicals or bill's intent is to hit Russia where it hurts most, its energy revenue, and thereby force it to engage in genuine negotiations or risk economic isolation. Graham has labeled it an 'economic bunker-buster', a metaphor for the bill's aim to detonate the financial underpinnings of the Russian war machine by targeting its energy clients, primarily India and the perspective of its sponsors, the bill is necessary because traditional sanctions and diplomatic overtures have failed to bring the war in Ukraine to a meaningful halt. Russia continues to benefit from robust energy trade, and much of this commerce flows through two of the world's largest economies, China and India, who have shown little interest in joining Western targeting these energy buyers with enormous tariffs, Graham and Blumenthal hope to choke Russia's export profits and deter countries from enabling its war economy. The bill's enforcement mechanism is rigid and automatic: if Russia refuses to negotiate in good faith or violates any future peace agreement, the tariffs kick in immediately, leaving little room for diplomatic Graham had warned India and China that if the bill got through, they would have "nobody to blame but yourself". "To China and India: if you continue to prop up Putin's war machine, you'll have nobody to blame but yourself," he the bill's growing popularity on Capitol Hill, the Trump administration seems to be resisting it. Trump, who has made repairing US-Russia relations a central tenet of his second-term foreign policy, sees the bill as a direct obstacle to his strategic ambitions. According to The Wall Street Journal, the administration is quietly lobbying Senator Graham to weaken the bill, particularly by changing the mandatory language from 'shall' to 'may,' which would give Trump discretion over is also pushing for broad waiver authority that would allow exemptions for allies, essential goods and national security priorities. His core argument is that rigid, automatic sanctions undermine presidential flexibility and could derail his efforts to mediate an end to the Ukraine war through diplomacy rather than White House resistance, the bill has attracted overwhelming support in the Senate. "I've got 84 co-sponsors for a Russian sanctions bill that is an economic bunker-buster against China, India and Russia for their brutal invasion... Russia's brutal invasion of Ukraine. I think that bill is going to pass. We're going to give the president a waiver. It will be a tool in his toolbox to bring Putin to the table," Graham told NBC News a few days ago."We are in conversations with the White House, obviously, about that subject and that issue … there's a high level of interest here in the Senate, on both sides of the aisle and moving on it, and it's very well could be something that we would take up in this work period," Senate Majority Leader John Thune told reporters early this month. "Obviously we're working with the White House to try and ensure that what we do and when we do it works well with the negotiations that they've got underway." The bill's success depends not only on its passage through both chambers of Congress but also on its ability to survive a potential presidential bill is likely to change significantly as it moves through Congress and in consultations with the Trump administration, Matt Zweig, senior policy director of FDD Action, a nonprofit advocacy organization affiliated with the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, has told Politico. It may also take a long time. 'With sanctions legislation, you're also normally dealing with iterative processes where you would want to go through every nook and cranny,' Zweig supporters of the bill argue that harsh consequences are necessary to achieve peace in Ukraine, critics warn that rigid mandates could backfire, turning allies against the US, weakening multilateral opposition to Russia and harming the US itself. The most controversial feature of the bill, the imposition of 500% tariffs on all imports from countries that buy Russian energy, raises serious questions about feasibility and unintended consequences. While such a measure makes for a powerful political message, its implementation could trigger a cascade of economic Fishman, a senior researcher with the Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University, told Politico nearly two weeks ago that countries in the crosshairs of the bill would struggle to halt their imports of Russian energy overnight. Tariffs of 500 percent on imports of goods made in China would send prices soaring, disrupt supply chains and could drive up US unemployment to recessionary levels. Most likely, it would lead to a screeching halt in U.S. trade with China. 'It would hurt Americans quite a bit,' Fishman said. India and China buy roughly 70 percent of Russian energy exports, but several other countries that buy any oil, gas or uranium from Russia could also be exposed to tariffs under the bill. The US itself is still reliant on imports of enriched uranium from Russia to fuel its nuclear reactorsTrump himself has struggled with the fallout from aggressive tariffs. He imposed very steep tariffs on Chinese imports, only to backtrack within a month amid fears of consumer price spikes and market instability, leading to traders coining a phrase "TACO trade" in which TACO meant Trump Always Chickens Out. Applying such massive tariffs to economies as large and integrated as India and China could unleash retaliatory measures, inflation and even potential recessionary pressures. The result might be more damaging to the US than to the countries it seeks to coerce, weakening the sanctions' overall had to exempt several electronic goods, including iPhones, from his earlier tariffs on China, before scaling them back within a month because the tariffs would have significantly raised prices for American buyers. India too represents a particularly complex challenge. As a leading buyer of Russian crude, it falls squarely in the bill's crosshairs. Yet India is also the United States' largest supplier of generic pharmaceuticals, including many critical medications used daily in American hospitals and 500% tariffs on Indian imports would almost certainly lead to a big spike in US drug prices, possibly triggering shortages and pushing many treatments out of reach for lower-income patients. Such an outcome would be politically and economically untenable. Though the bill allows for a one-time 180-day national security waiver, experts argue this may not be enough to shield critical sectors like healthcare from its an India-US trade deal is in the works but facing hurdles. Indian officials are resisting the insistence of their American counterparts to allow lower-duty import of American agricultural products, fearing adverse impact on Indian farmers and health concerns related to genetically modified food, as per a recent TOI report.(With inputs from agencies)
Time of India
32 minutes ago
- Time of India
Netanyahu agrees to ceasefire with Iran: Will Donald Trump-brokered ceasefire survive rising tensions & failed nuclear talks?
Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has confirmed that Israel has agreed to a ceasefire with Iran, stating that all the objectives of the military operation were met. The 12-day conflict saw Israel target key elements of Iran's military and nuclear programs. Netanyahu thanked the U.S. President Donald Trump for proposing the ceasefire and for his continued support of Israel's security interests. Israel says war objectives are met Netanyahu told Israel's security cabinet that the operation against Iran had achieved its main objectives. These included damaging Iran's nuclear and missile programs, striking military leadership and government targets, and gaining air dominance over Tehran. 'We have reached our goals. Israel will respond forcefully to any breach of the ceasefire,' Netanyahu said. Trump's role in mediating the ceasefire According to a senior White House official, Donald Trump personally led the talks with Netanyahu on Monday. The ceasefire was confirmed shortly after those discussions. Simultaneously, U.S. Vice President JD Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and special envoy Steve Witkoff held communications with Iranian officials—some directly and others through indirect channels. US President Donald Trump | Credit: X Trump later announced that a "complete and total" ceasefire between Israel and Iran would begin within hours, despite earlier threats of further escalation from both sides. Events leading to the ceasefire announcement The sequence of events began when Iran fired missiles at a U.S. air base. No casualties were reported. This came in response to U.S. airstrikes that dropped 30,000-pound bunker-buster bombs on Iran's underground nuclear facilities. The White House official stated that Trump reacted quickly to the escalation, instructing his team to initiate conversations with both Iran and Israel. 'Get me Bibi. We're going to make peace,' Trump reportedly said. Although the U.S. had held talks with Iran multiple times in the weeks leading up to the airstrikes, negotiations fell apart due to Iran's refusal to stop uranium enrichment, as reported by Reuters. Trump balances pressure with restraint Trump had initially announced on June 19 that he would decide on the use of American military force within two weeks. However, by June 21, he had authorized the strikes. The decision to attack Iranian nuclear sites marked a major shift from Trump's previous stance against deep foreign military involvement. The official said Trump was careful to keep U.S. interests at the forefront and wanted to avoid prolonged entanglement. 'He has shown restraint while making U.S. priorities clear,' the official noted. For more news and current affairs from around the world, please visit Indiatimes News.
