
Harry Brook to Washington: ‘F*&#ing hell … Washi, get on with it'
Stokes headed to Jadeja for a handshake that would officially bring an end. 'It's not on me who can decide when the game is over.' – Jadeja could be heard refusing the offer on the stump microphone. He would point to the Indian skipper Shubman Gill standing in the dressing room balcony and who seemed to be enjoying the resolute batting of his batsmen. Stokes would throw the ball to part-timers, reducing the final phase of the thrilling Test to a farce. Harry Brook would bowl loopy full tosses and rank long hops.
Jadeja would soon complete his hundred but Washington would take time to reach his maiden ton. The Tamil Nadu all-rounder would defend a couple of balls and the English frustration would peak.
Bowler Harry Brook would sledge – 'F*&#ing hell Washi, get on with it'. Pacer Jofra Archer too would chip in. 'If you wanted a hundred you should have batted like it earlier,' he would say.
The other England players too would start chirping. Opener Zak Crawley would utter: 'If you shake our hands, it's done.' England's motor-mouth opener Ben Duckett couldn't keep quiet. 'How long do you need, an hour?', he would check.
But the Indians would still take their own sweet time. Washi would eventually complete his hundred and the two teams would eventually shake hands.
Though, it was a draw, this was a moral victory for Indians in many ways. One, they had managed an unlikely draw and had also got the nerves of the English. Stokes and his men, despite an all-out effort, failed to have any impact on the Indian batsmen. They seem to have put all their energy into winning this Test. England were keen to seal the series at Old Trafford but that was not to be.
Stokes was walking wounded – dodgy shoulder, strained hamstring and pain in lower back being some of his ailments. England seemed to have punted too heavily for a win at Old Trafford and now they looked worried. They have a problem at hand for the Oval.
Two of their pacers – Brydon Carse and Chris Woakes – have played all four Tests and would be crying for a break. The medical advice for Jofra Archer – the pacer returning from long injury break – would be against him playing a Test with a three-day turn over.
Stokes would justify bowling Brook towards the end. 'All the hard work was done by India, they both played incredibly well. They got to the point where there was only one result and there was no chance I would risk a fast bowler with injury. [Liam Dawson] had bowled so many overs and he was tired and cramping. I wasn't risking any of my frontline bowlers in the last half hour.'
Indian captain Shubman Gill would clarify his stand of playing on. 'It's no less than a win for us, this draw. I think both the batsmen batted brilliantly, both were around 90. A Test hundred is a Test hundred and we thought they deserved a century. We thought three or four overs is not a lot of overs.'
Former England player Michael Vaughan would say: 'I quite admired it. The young captain, the two out in the middle could have shaken hands but they had played so well and fought hard. You earn the right to get three figures. The last 10 runs were farcical, but you earn the right and India deserve a huge amount of credit.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
Asaduddin Owaisi tears into Modi govt over India-Pakistan cricket match - ‘does your conscience allow?'
AIMIM chief Asaduddin Owaisi voiced his concern over the upcoming cricket match between India and Pakistan in the 2025 Asia Cup and raised questions regarding accountability for the Pahalgam terror attack. The Hyderabad Member of Parliament was speaking during a heated debate in parliament over Operation Sindoor on Monday. 'Does your conscience allow you to ask the family members of the people who were killed in Baisaran to watch India's cricket match with Pakistan?... We are stopping 80% of Pakistan's water, saying that water and blood will not flow together. Will you play a cricket match? My conscience does not allow me to watch that match.' Posing a question directly to the government, he asked, "Does this government have the courage to call the 25 dead people and say we have taken revenge in Operation Sindoor, now you watch the match with Pakistan?" Owaisi's remarks came after the Asian Cricket Council (ACC) President and Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) Chairman Mohsin Naqvi announced that the Men's Asia Cup 2025 will be hosted in the United Arab Emirates from September 9 to 28. Group A features India, Pakistan, UAE, and Oman, while Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, Afghanistan, and Hong Kong make up Group B. Owaisi also questioned how the perpetrators of the Baisaran incident managed to infiltrate India territory. "Who did Pahalgam? We have 7.5 lakh army and central paramilitary force. From where did these four rats enter and kill our Indian citizens? On whom will accountability be fixed?...", he asked, referencing the incident in Pahalgam. Earlier, former Indian skipper and ex-BCCI president Sourav Ganguly also weighed in on the upcoming India-Pakistan clash in the Asia Cup 2025, stressing that while sports must continue, terrorism must be firmly dealt with. "I am okay. The sport must go on. At the same time, Pahalgam should not happen, but the sport must go on. Terrorism must not happen; it needs to be stopped. India took a strong stance towards terrorism... Sport needs to be played," Ganguly told ANI. Does your conscience allow you to ask the family members of the people who were killed in Baisaran to watch India's cricket match with Pakistan? The Lok Sabha on Monday afternoon began discussion on 'India's strong, successful and decisive Operation Sindoor, launched in response to the recent terrorist attack in Pahalgam. The debate was initiated by Defence Minister Rajnath Singh.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Stokes lost his cool – but let's not lose ours
What happened in the cricket match between England and India In a big cricket match in Manchester, England's captain Ben Stokes got really upset. He wanted to stop the game early — kind of like ending a game before the final whistle — because he felt no one could win. But there's a rule in cricket: both teams have to agree before a match can end early. Stokes forgot that rule. When India didn't agree, Stokes and some of his teammates behaved badly — they were grumpy and rude, which isn't what good sports should do. In fact, the match referee (the person who watches over the game) might even step in to look at their behaviour. Things like this have happened before. In 1983, Pakistan's captain walked off the field too early, and umpires had to bring his team back so the game could finish properly. Some fans online said Stokes' behaviour reminded them of colonial attitudes — meaning, they thought it showed old British arrogance. But that's not really true. Stokes was born in New Zealand, and even England's head coach, Brendon McCullum, is also a New Zealander. What really happened was Stokes got frustrated because England was winning earlier but couldn't finish the job. India's young team, led by captain Shubman Gill, stayed strong and didn't give up. That was the real highlight of the match. The series now stands at 2-1 in England's favour, and the final match at the Oval promises to be super exciting! Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer Views expressed above are the author's own.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Stoking the game
England's cricket captain forgot the rules, was churlish, but some Indian fans read too much into it In The Godfather, Don Corleone famously talks about an offer the other side cannot refuse. In the fading lights of Manchester, Ben Stokes made a cricket's version of that offer. The England skipper wanted to 'declare' India's innings. But the cessation of a Test cannot depend on the needs and desires of one captain. It must follow the Laws of Cricket, or, to be specific, ICC's match playing conditions, where Clause 12.7.6 clearly states: 'On the final day, if both captains (the batsmen at the wicket may act for their captain) accept that there is no prospect of either side achieving a victory, they may agree to finish the match after.' Simply put, calling off a game must be mutual. The consequent acts of petulance by Stokes and his teammates were downright unsportsmanlike. The match referee should look into it. Such innocence about the game's laws has happened before. In Bangalore, 1983, Pakistan captain Zaheer Abbas and his side left the field, leaving Gavaskar stranded on 86. Umpires had to bring them back. Gavaskar scored his 28th century. In those pre-internet days, the incident didn't degenerate into an online scrap. Sunday night, some Indian fans saw evidence of colonial 'hangovers' in Stokes. Wrong. Stokes is a New Zealander by birth, and England's 'bazball' progenitor coach Brendon McCullum is a bona fide Kiwi. This was just an outburst born out of utter frustration of having drawn a game that was once firmly in England's grasp. The needless spat sadly took the focus away from a steely display by captain Shubman Gill's young India. That needs to be roundly applauded. With the series 2-1 in England's favour, Oval should see a cracker of a fifth Test. Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email This piece appeared as an editorial opinion in the print edition of The Times of India.