Why Trump's tariffs could be disaster for Brazil's acai industry, American consumers
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
Impact already being felt
Flavour explosion
Tired of too many ads?
Remove Ads
When US President Donald Trump imposed tariffs of 50 per cent on Brazilian exports in July, acai producer Ailson Ferreira Moreira felt immediately concerned.After all, who was going to eat all of that Amazon berry, globally famous as a delicious, refreshing and nutritious superfood, if American consumers suddenly could no longer afford it?As the main importer of the Brazilian berry, prices of acai smoothies and bowls look certain to go up in the United States."The acai that's all produced here ... If only people here eat it, it's going to be a lot of acai, right?" Moreira told The Associated Press outside of Belem, an Amazon city of 1.4 million residents that will host this year's UN climate summit COP30 climate summit in November. "If there's too much acai here, people won't be able to eat it all and the price will drop."A single full crate of acai sells for around USD 50 at local markets in Brazil, a price that is now expected to plummet. The US is by far the largest acai importer of a total Brazilian output currently estimated at about 70,000 tons per year.The most vulnerable acai producers in the northern state of Para say they have already been hit by tariffs imposed by the US government, as a surplus of the berry without a clear destination starts to mount only days after the new economic scenario unfolded.More powerful exporters, such as Sao Paulo-state based company Acai Tropicalia Mix, are also feeling the impact.One of its owners, Rogerio de Carvalho, told the AP that last year he exported to the US about 270 tonnes of acai cream - an industrialised version of the berry - ready for consumption. As tariffs started to loom, he said, American importers steered away and clients suspended negotiations. Until the end of July, de Carvalho estimates that his company sold 27 tonnes to the US."That's 1.5 million Brazilian reais (USD 280,000) that we lost," the businessman said. "We are confident there will be a deal between the two countries to allow not only our clients to return, but also getting some new ones."Trump has linked the higher tariffs on Brazil to the trial of former President Jair Bolsonaro, who is now under house arrest for his alleged role in leading an alleged coup plot to remain in office, despite his election loss to current leftist President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.And despite several Brazilian exports being exempted from the tariffs, acai berries aren't among them.Brazil's industry ministry didn't reply to a request for comment on whether acai berries are among the items that remain on the negotiating table with US trade representatives.Nearly all of the acai consumed in the US originates from Brazil, with the state of Para alone accounting for 90 per cent of the country's total production. Several communities in the Amazon depend on its harvest.The harvesting of acai is a physically demanding job that requires workers to climb tall trees with minimal safety equipment, and then sliding down branches full of berries to fill baskets and then place them carefully in crates.Analysts say its producers also help protect the rainforest from illegal loggers, miners and cattle ranchers.The night markets of Belem, such as the Ver-o-Peso acai market, are a hub of activity where the freshly harvested berries are brought in by boat and prepared for sale.The Brazilian Association of Fruit and Derivative Producers and Exporters estimates there was an explosive growth of acai exports from Para state, from less than one tonne in 1999 to more than 61,000 tons in 2023. Another explosive rise was expected for this year, before the tariffs.On Thursday, Brazil requested consultations at the World Trade Organisation over tariffs imposed by the Trump administration against the South American nation that went into effect on Wednesday.That could be took little too late for acai harvester Mikael Silva Trindade, who agrees that the future of the trade is at risk as higher US tariffs can disrupt the delicate balance of supply and demand that holds the industry."There will be nowhere to market (the excess of acai)," Trindade told the AP as he picked berries in Para state. "The more you export, the more valuable it becomes. But if there's too much to sell, it will stay here and become cheap."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
6 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump's DC police takeover echoes historic racist urban crime narratives
Trump threatened to take over and beautify the nation's capital on the campaign trail and claimed the district was a nightmare of murder and crime AP Washington President Donald Trump has taken control of the District of Columbia's law enforcement and ordered National Guard troops to deploy onto the streets of the nation's capital, arguing the extraordinary moves are in response to an urgent public safety crisis. Even as district officials questioned the claims underlying his emergency declaration, the president promised a "historic action to rescue our nation's capital from crime, bloodshed, bedlam and squalor and worse." His rhetoric echoed that used by conservative politicians going back decades who have denounced American cities, especially those with majority non-white populations or led by progressive politicians, as lawless or crime-ridden and in need of outside intervention. This is liberation day in DC, and we're going to take our capital back, Trump promised Monday. Trump's action echoes uncomfortable historical chapters But for many residents, the prospect of federal troops surging into the district's neighbourhoods represents an alarming violation of local agency. To some, it echoes uncomfortable historical chapters when politicians used language to paint historically or predominantly Black cities and neighbourhoods with racist narratives to shape public opinion and justify aggressive police action. April Goggans, a longtime Washington resident and grassroots organiser, said she was not surprised by Trump's actions. Communities had been preparing for a potential federal crackdown in the district since the summer of 2020, when Trump deployed National Guard troops during racial justice protests after the murder of George Floyd. We have to be vigilant, said Goggans, who has coordinated protests and local civil liberties educational campaigns for nearly a decade. She worries about what a surge in law enforcement could mean for residents' freedoms. Uncertainty about what's a safe environment raises alarms According to White House officials, National Guard troops will be deployed to protect federal assets in the district and facilitate a safe environment for law enforcement to make arrests. The administration believes the highly visible presence of law enforcement will deter violent crime. It is unclear how the administration defines providing a safe environment for law enforcement to conduct arrests, raising alarm bells for some local advocates. The president foreshadowed that if these heavy-handed tactics take root here, they will be rolled out to other majority-Black and Brown cities, like Chicago, Oakland and Baltimore, across the country, said Monica Hopkins, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union's DC chapter. We've seen before how federal control of the DC National Guard and police can lead to abuse, intimidation and civil rights violations from military helicopters swooping over peaceful racial justice protesters in 2020 to the unchecked conduct of federal officers who remain shielded from full accountability, Hopkins said. A history of denigrating language Conservative lawmakers have for generations used denigrating language to describe the condition of major American cities and called for greater law enforcement, often in response to changing demographics in those cities driven by nonwhite populations relocating in search of work or safety from racial discrimination and state violence. Republicans have called for greater police crackdowns in cities since at least the 1965 Watts Riots in Los Angeles. President Richard Nixon won the White House in 1968 after campaigning on a "law and order" agenda to appeal to white voters in northern cities alongside overtures to white Southerners as part of his Southern Strategy. Ronald Reagan similarly won both his presidential elections after campaigning heavily on law and order politics. Politicians ranging from former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani to former President Bill Clinton have cited the need to tamp down crime as a reason to seize power from cities like Washington for decades. District of Columbia Mayor Muriel Bowser called Trump's takeover of the local police force unsettling but not without precedent. The mayor kept a mostly measured tone during a Monday news conference following Trump's announcement but decried the president's reasoning as a so-called emergency and said the district's residents know that access to our democracy is tenuous. Trump threatened to take over and beautify the nation's capital on the campaign trail and claimed the district was a nightmare of murder and crime. He also argued the city was horribly run and said his team intended to take it away from the mayor. The president repeated comments he'd previously made about some of the nation's largest cities during his news conference, including Baltimore, Chicago, Los Angeles, Oakland, California, and his hometown of New York City. All are currently run by Black mayors. You look at Chicago, how bad it is. You look at Los Angeles, how bad it is. We have other cities in a very bad, New York is a problem. And then you have, of course, Baltimore and Oakland. We don't even mention that anymore. They're so far gone. We're not going to let it happen, he said. Civil rights advocates see the president's rhetoric as part of a broader political strategy. It's a playbook he's used in the past, said Maya Wiley, CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights. The president's rhetoric "paints a picture that crime is out of control, even when it is not true, then blames the policies of Democratic lawmakers that are reform- and public safety-minded, and then claims that you have to step in and violate people's rights or demand that reforms be reversed, Wiley said. Civil rights leaders denounce DC order as unjustified distraction Trump's actions in Washington and comments about other major American cities sent shock waves across the country, as other cities prepare to respond to potential federal action. Democratic Maryland Gov. Wes Moore said Trump's plan lacks seriousness and is deeply dangerous in a statement and pointed to a 30-year-low crime rate in Baltimore as a reason the administration should consult local leaders rather than antagonize them. In Oakland, Mayor Barbara Lee called Trump's characterization of the city fearmongering. The administration already faced a major flashpoint between local control and federal power earlier in the summer, when Trump deployed National Guard troops to quell protests and support immigration enforcement operations in Los Angeles despite opposition from California Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Time of India
6 minutes ago
- Time of India
Pak Army Chief Threatens India From U.S. Soil, India Rips The Jihadi General Apart
/ Aug 12, 2025, 12:10PM IST India has ripped apart the Pakistan Army's Jihadi General over his threats Issuing a scathing condemnation the Ministry of External Affairs today said "Our attention has been drawn to remarks reportedly made by the Pakistani Chief of Army Staff while on a visit to the United States. Nuclear sabre-rattling is Pakistan's stock-in-trade It's military is hand-in-glove with terrorist groups'. Pakistan Army Chief self-styled Field Marshal Asim Munir had issued yet another nuclear threat to India He also threatened the international community saying if his country faced an existential threat in a future war with India. Pakistan would take down half the world with it While this nuclear blackmail neither scares nor surprises India if anything it's amusing. What makes this particular threat different from the rest is this. It was made from American soil a supposedly friendly nation. Watch
Economic Times
6 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Gold prices trade lower as safe haven buying declines, but trade above Rs 1 lakh. Do analysts see capped upside?
Triggered by U.S. President Donald Trump's clarification on gold being tariffed, safe-haven buying eased, with Gold October futures on MCX trading slightly lower at Rs 1,00,234 per 10 grams, down Rs 88 or 0.09% on Monday. ADVERTISEMENT Meanwhile, silver September contracts were trading at Rs 1,13,675 per kg, up Rs 379 or 0.33%. On Monday, gold and silver settled weaker in both domestic and international markets. Gold October futures closed at Rs 1,00,322 per 10 grams, down 1.45%, while silver September futures ended at Rs 1,13,296 per kg, down 1.38%. Both metals faced heavy sell-offs following the US President's tweet stating that 'gold will not be tariffed,' reversing last Friday's gains after a US customs ruling on steep tariff hikes for gold bar clarification erased last week's rally in precious metals. 'Gold and silver prices also fell ahead of the scheduled meeting between the US and Russian Presidents to discuss ending the war in Ukraine. However, robust demand for the metals, driven by US trade tariff uncertainty and the possibility of US Fed rate cuts, continues to provide support,' said Manoj Kumar Jain of Prithvifinmart Commodity Research. ADVERTISEMENT Today's US CPI inflation data is expected to set the tone for the Fed's monetary easing and could guide precious metals' direction. Unlock 500+ Stock Recos on App The US Dollar Index (DXY) hovered near 98.52, trading flat. ADVERTISEMENT 'We expect gold and silver prices to remain volatile this week amid U.S. tariff uncertainty, key economic data releases, and the U.S.-Russia meeting. Gold is expected to trade between $3,340–3,540 per troy ounce, while silver is expected in the $36.80–40.00 per troy ounce range,' he added. ADVERTISEMENT Manoj Kumar Jain suggested the following ranges for gold and silver on MCX: Gold has support at Rs 99,900-99,475 and resistance at Rs 1,00,650-1,01,100 has support at Rs 99,900-99,475 and resistance at Rs 1,00,650-1,01,100 Silver has support at Rs 1,12,700-1,12,000 and resistance at Rs 1,14,000-1,14,650 Jain suggests buying gold around Rs 1,00,100 with a strict stop loss of Rs 99,660 for a target of Rs 1,00,750. ADVERTISEMENT Standard gold (22 carat) prices in Delhi stand at Rs 57,712/8 grams while pure gold (24 carat) prices stand at Rs 61,544/8 gold (22 carat) prices in Mumbai stand at Rs 56,936/8 grams while pure gold (24 carat) prices stand at Rs 60,696/8 gold (22 carat) prices in Chennai stand at Rs 56,688/8 grams while pure gold (24 carat) prices stand at Rs 60,416/8 gold (22 carat) prices in Hyderabad stand at Rs 57,168/8 grams while pure gold (24 carat) prices stand at Rs 60,944/8 grams. (Disclaimer: Recommendations, suggestions, views and opinions given by the experts are their own. These do not represent the views of the Economic Times)
