Drivers warned about life-changing consequences of using phone behind the wheel
Distractions can make drivers slower to recognise and react to dangers on the road, the group say.
Using a mobile phone while driving is a significant cause of road traffic collisions in Greater Manchester, leading to death and life-changing injury of drivers, passengers and others.
Superintendent Gareth Parkin (Image: Supplied) Between 2014 and 2024, there were 1,174 incidents where driver distraction was a contributing factor, with 117 serious collisions and 17 resulting in fatalities.
Read more: Men arrested in Farnworth with 'drugs and combat knife'
Read more: Bolton man, 40s, charged with assault and criminal damage
These offences are often under-reported, meaning the full extent of the problem is probably worse in Greater Manchester.
Last year a trial of state-of-the-art cameras in the region caught 3,205 people using their phone while driving or not wearing seat belts, with 812 incidents of mobile phone usage recorded over a 51-day period.
In some instances, drivers were caught using their phone with passengers in the car.
Read more: Woman arrested after girl 'known to her' dies in house fire
The trial, carried out by Acusensus and AECOM on behalf of Safer Roads Greater Manchester, was held throughout September and October to gather data to better understand the scale of the issue in Greater Manchester.
Dame Sarah Storey (Image: Supplied) Last year Greater Manchester adopted Vision Zero, an ambition to eliminate all traffic fatalities and life changing injuries in the city-region by 2040.
In 2023, 45 people lost their lives on our roads and a further 754 people were seriously injured.
Peter Boulton, TfGM's highways network director, said: 'Using mobile phones while driving is a key factor in a number of road traffic collisions in Greater Manchester which have resulted in people being killed or suffering life changing injuries on our roads.
'These images unfortunately show that there are many drivers that seem comfortable putting their own lives, and the lives of their passengers and other road users, in harm's way. If you use your phone while driving, you are four times more likely to be in a crash, so it's not worth the risk.
'I hope these images serve as a wake-up call for drivers and passengers on the risks and potential consequences of not driving distracted.'
It is illegal to use a handheld mobile phone while driving a motor vehicle on the roads in the UK.
Even using a hands-free option can incur penalties if your driving is deemed to be dangerous.
Drivers must stay in full control of their vehicles at all times.
The police can stop you if they think you're not in control because you're distracted and you can be prosecuted.
You can get six penalty points on your licence and a £200 fine if you use a hand-held phone when driving. If you get six points within two years of passing your test you will lose your licence.
Superintendent Gareth Parkin, of GMP's Transport Operations Department said: 'Whilst our officers are out on patrol we see on far too many occasions the reckless actions drivers take when being distracted by their mobile phone.
'The road requires your full attention and any lapse in concentration, however quick, can lead to catastrophic consequences, not only for yourself and loved ones, but other members of the public who are going about their day unaware of what may happen to them.
'We are constantly trying to send a clear and strong message that if you do take the chance of being on your phone whilst driving you are breaking the law. This means you will receive the relevant punishment when caught, which can include potentially losing your licence, having to pay a large fine and in some cases of causing serious injury having to spend time behind bars meaning it isn't worth the risk.
'Anyone can report their concerns through the usual methods, but especially through our Operation Snap portal online where we can look to take retrospective action if caught on dashcam or footage from other devices for those who commit offences such as this on a regular basis.'
Dame Sarah Storey, Active Travel Commissioner for Greater Manchester, added: 'I am regularly contacted by people who feel helpless to what they describe as the plague of people using a mobile phone behind the wheel of their vehicle.
'Witnesses are from all modes, whether that's a bus or tram passenger, pedestrians or cyclists, in slow moving traffic or at higher speeds - more and more people are observing the sheer number of people using their mobile phones whilst driving - and as the images in this campaign show, it's terrifying."
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 days ago
- Yahoo
Portland City Council to review Vision Zero effect
PORTLAND, Ore. (KOIN) — In 2016, the Portland City Council adopted Vision Zero, a plan to stop traffic deaths completely by 2030. Clearly, that's not working, as two more pedestrians were killed in crashes this past weekend in separate parts of the city. One of those crashes happened around , one of Portland's Last year in Portland, 69 people died in traffic crashes, up from 62 the year before. Pedestrian dies after late night Northwest Portland crash Highway safety experts are pushing for city leaders to go for a new plan instead of . The plan by 30% over the next 5 years. David Harkey the president of the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety, said they 'still believe in the concept of Vision Zero, but we feel like we really need this interim target to help us move in the right direction.' Harkey, who spoke to , North Carolina, said he saw a sharp incline in traffic-related deaths in recent years. 'If we can get everybody on the same page and moving in the same direction, I think people will take notice and we will start to see changes in policy and practice that will make a difference,' Harkey said. On Wednesday, the Portland City Council will review the progress made with Vision Zero. KOIN 6 News will follow this story. Gina Hicks, who lives near SE 122nd and Ash, said she's not surprised at the fatalities in the area. Portland traffic deaths decline, but deadly trends persist, new report says 'We have a lot of people here with mental health problems right out in traffic, and the traffic doesn't always stop at this white line,' Hicks said. 'When the traffic's backed up, they will go through the intersection and nobody's expecting that. And so it's a danger to pedestrians.' She said she's nearly been hit at this intersection. 'Being in a wheelchair, unless they're looking, they can't see me.' 'We got the intersection behind me and that walk signal takes a long time to change. And so people tend to just walk out in and take their chances,' she said. 'The traffic is really heavy through here.' In the meantime, Gina Hicks said something needs to be done. 'They need to have, like, better marking through here, maybe more warning signs if there's a stop coming up here,' she said. 'It's a danger to pedestrians.' Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
31-07-2025
- Yahoo
Police caught almost 7,000 speeding drivers in Essex roads over a three month period
ESSEX police officers caught nearly 7,000 speeding drivers in Essex roads across a three-month period. The roads policing unit carried out thousands of road checks across the county between April to June and caught 6,914 drivers speeding. The checks took place in towns, villages, and the force focused its efforts on areas where crashes are more likely to take place. In April, police caught 1,692 drivers, 2,504 in May, and 2,718 in June. An Essex Police spokesperson said: 'Speeding is one of the contributing factors to fatal collisions. 'Even a small increase in speed can lead to longer stopping distances and if you are involved in a crash, more serious injuries.' Between April and June, the force also recorded 7,602 road offences which included offences such as driving under the influence, careless or dangerous driving, and MOT violations. The spokesperson added: 'Each of these offences carries serious consequences from fines and penalty points to, in some cases, imprisonment. 'People living in these areas have welcomed the extra checks. Many say it makes them feel safer. 'Enforcement and road safety checks will continue across Essex throughout the summer months and beyond. 'This is part of Vision Zero, our joint ambition with road safety partners to have no fatal collisions by 2040 or sooner. 'We're asking all road users to play their part. Drive within the speed limit, never drive under the influence, and always ensure your vehicle is roadworthy. 'Together, we can reduce harm and make Essex's roads safer for all.' To find out more about Vision Zero, visit
Forbes
31-07-2025
- Forbes
Many Countries – Including Canada –Top U.S. In Road Safety, Study Says
The United States is an outlier when it comes to keeping people safe on the roads. Among 29 high-income countries, it has the highest per person crash fatality rate — more than twice the average of the other 28. Canada, which ranks 14th among the 28 countries, has stronger road safety policies overall than the U.S., where deaths in traffic crashes have been generally inching up since 2011 after a long period of decline, while in Canada they have continued to fall. Those are the highlights of new research released on Thursday by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety(IIHS), a nonprofit financed by the insurance industry. 'The U.S. could learn a lot from our northern neighbor,' David Harkey, president of the Insurance Institute, said in a statement. 'Our countries are culturally very similar, so there is reason to believe that many policies that work there could help the U.S. get back on the right track when it comes to road safety.' Traffic deaths rose 33% between 2011 and 2021 nationwide, and in Canada, deaths declined 18% over a similar period. Stronger distracted driving and seat belt laws, as well as more widespread use of speed safety cameras are among the policies that have helped Canada save lives and reduce serious injuries. The study, 'A comparison of recent crash fatality trends in Canada and the United States: Why do they differ?,' conducted by the Insurance Institute and Canada's Traffic Injury Research Foundation (TIRF), explored fatality trends and differences in policies between the two countries. Many other countries have been more proactive with their safety policies in recent decades, particularly when it comes to factors like speed and alcohol, including Canada, whose per person fatality rate is less than half that of the U.S. Embracing the Vision Zero or Safe System approach to road safety and design, according to the researchers, is considered a major factor for the progress. The initiative takes human error into account and was first put into effect in Sweden in the 1990s. The goal is to eliminate all road deaths and serious injuries by creating multiple layers of protection, so if one fails, the others will create a safety net to lessen the impact of a crash. Improvements are designed to result in: safer people, safer roads, safer vehicles, safer speeds and better post-crash care. Canada's advances occurred even though its population, number of licensed drivers and miles driven all increased at a greater pace than in the U.S. during this time period, according to the report. Interestingly, crash types that were linked with the biggest fatality increases in the U.S. were the same types that went down by large percentages in Canada. Both pedestrian and cyclist fatalities rose 64% in the U.S., but fell 17% in Canada, for example, and deaths involving large trucks increased 54% in the U.S. and decreased 24% in Canada. Crash deaths involving young drivers fell by slightly more than 50% in Canada, but increased by 17% in the U.S. And deaths involving alcohol impairment and speed rose in the U.S. and went down in Canada. Many U.S. states have strong laws on seat belts and distracted driving and laws allowing speed safety cameras, but in Canada, laws in those areas were more widespread, covering a larger share of the country's population than in the U.S. during the study period, researchers said. Differences in laws around impaired driving were among the factors not included in the analysis, but may have also contributed to the diverging trends. For example, in most U.S. states, there are no penalties for most drivers if they are stopped with a blood alcohol concentration (BAC) between 0.05% and 0.08%. In contrast, the study noted, 'all Canadian provinces except Quebec impose administrative penalties at low-BACs. In addition, Canadian police can demand a roadside breath test from any driver without suspicion of impairment as is required in the U.S.' Refusing a test, the report noted, is a criminal offense in Canada. Harkey, the Insurance Institute's president, will host a live conversation about what the U.S. can learn from Canada on Thursday, July 31, at 11:30 a.m. ET. on YouTube. The full recording will be available afterward. For more information and to read the full report, click here and here.
