She Did What? This GA Judge Is Accused of All Kinds of Strange Shenanigans
The agency in charge of investigating judicial misconduct has one Georgia Superior Court Judge on its radar. According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, the Judicial Qualifications Commission (JQC) has filed several charges against Judge Shermela Williams, accusing her of a growing list of ethics violations, including delaying rulings and using her position to get involved in the legal proceedings of a relative.
Williams was elected in 2020 and has served as a judge in Fulton County's Superior Court since January 2021. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports the Director of the Judicial Qualifications Commission is trying to find out if any of Williams' actions since she's been on the bench have violated the Georgia Code of Judicial Conduct. The first hearing is scheduled to start on March 5.
Some of the conduct in question includes allegations of Williams giving preferential treatment to a sorority sister in a child custody case and reaching out to an attorney for her uncle, who was facing a contempt case in front of a different judge, hoping to 'work something out.' But one of the strangest allegations was that Williams held a young woman in a courthouse holding cell 'without any legal findings or justification' during her parents' divorce case after she admitted to damaging things in his apartment due to their strained relationship.
'Today you came here and admitted to … 36 years' worth of prison on this stuff. Do you understand that?' the JQC alleges Williams told the woman. 'And all for a divorce that had nothing to do with you, right?'
Although Williams isn't speaking out publicly about the charges, her attorney, Gabe Banks, said removing his client from the bench would be 'inconsistent with the manner in which the JQC has resolved other cases' and a betrayal of the Fulton County voters who elected her.
'All Judge Williams wants and deserves is to be treated fairly. The same rules should apply to every judge. Most importantly, discipline should be meted out evenhandedly and should not be politically motivated,' he told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Axios
31 minutes ago
- Axios
Freshman wishlist: Adam Schiff vs. Trump 2.0
Sen. Adam Schiff has some advice for President Trump when attempting to demean him: Pick one nickname. Why it matters: Schiff rose to cable TV stardom as an anti-Trump foil while leading the first impeachment. "Shifty Schiff" or "Watermelon Head" learned to give as good as he got. Trump called Schiff names. Schiff ensured he was impeached — twice. "[T]he cardinal rule of nicknames is: Just stick with one," Schiff told Axios in an interview. Schiff translated his MAGA notoriety into a safe Senate seat, first battling through a tough, expensive primary. Now he's ready for round two with Trump. "I've been thrust back into a lot of that responsibility again because what he's trying to do in the second term is even worse than what he tried to do in the first term," Schiff said. Zoom out: Before Trump dominated the national conversation, Schiff considered himself a fairly nonpartisan national security expert. He endorsed Jim Mattis for Secretary of Defense in 2016 when other Democrats didn't. Schiff had hoped for another rebrand in the Senate. "I was expecting a Biden or a Harris presidency, and the ability to just focus exclusively on what positive things I could get done," he told Axios. What to watch: He is enjoying visiting redder areas of the state after spending years representing just a slice of heavily Democratic Los Angeles. He shared about one such visit in the state's northeast. "I knew I had made progress when one of the farmers looked at me and said, 'I don't know why he calls you watermelon head. You have a perfectly normal-sized head.'" But it's doubtful he'll revert back to a less partisan posture, given the direction of Trump's second term. Driving the news: Two days after our interview, Trump deployed National Guard troops to tamp down on ICE protests in Los Angeles in opposition to Gov. Gavin Newsom (D-Calif.). "This action is designed to inflame tensions, sow chaos, and escalate the situation," Schiff posted on X on Saturday. He also repeatedly called for violence to stop at protests. "Assaulting law enforcement is never ok," he posted Sunday. Zoom in: Schiff tried to pass a resolution shortly before our interview to stop the administration from stripping civil rights leader Harvey Milk's name from a Navy ship. He has demanded financial disclosures from the White House, written letters to stop DOGE from shutting down USDA offices and tried to block the repeal of EV rules. "Most of my days are spent trying to walk this line between stopping the administration from violating the law and ignoring the Constitution on the one hand," Schiff said, "and continuing to deliver for Californians..." Schiff recognizes that his clashes altered his career trajectory. "I have my brand pre-Trump and my brand post-Trump," Schiff told Axios. Between the lines: Schiff's leadership in the House's first Trump impeachment made him a mortal enemy to Trump and his allies, leading to a "weirdly personal" dynamic, Schiff said.
The Hill
2 hours ago
- The Hill
California files lawsuit against Trump for deploying National Guard to Los Angeles
California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and the state's attorney general filed their much-anticipated lawsuit over President Trump's decision to send in California National Guard troops to Los Angeles to quell immigration protests, calling it an 'unprecedented power grab.' Filed in federal court in San Francisco on Monday afternoon, the suit asks a federal judge to block Trump's authorization as an unconstitutional incursion into state authority under the 10th Amendment. 'One of the cornerstones of our Nation and our democracy is that our people are governed by civil, not military, rule,' the 22-page complaint reads. 'The Founders enshrined these principles in our Constitution— that a government should be accountable to its people, guided by the rule of law, and one of civil authority, not military rule,' it continues. As protests erupted in Los Angeles, Trump signed the order on Saturday authorizing the deployment of 2,000 National Guard troops. Neither the state nor city officials requested the deployment, and Newsom formally asked the administration to rescind the announcement. Late Sunday, Newsom announced he would be filing the lawsuit. Trump is the first president to deploy a state's National Guard without the consent of a governor since then-President Lyndon B. Johnson in 1965 sent troops to Alabama to protect civil rights protesters. Beyond the constitutional argument, the lawsuit claims the statute Trump invoked to deploy the troops required Newsom's consent, which he did not give. 'Only under the most exigent of circumstances can the President, over the objections of a State, call the National Guard into federal service,' the complaint reads. The Los Angeles protests intensified over the weekend, devolving at times into violence. White House officials have highlighted images of burning vehicles and clashes with law enforcement to make the case that the situation had gotten out of control, maintaining Trump intervened after the demonstrations had already escalated. California has pinned the blame on the administration, insisting the deployment injected chaos into the situation. 'This was not inevitable. We'll never know what might've been had the president left our state and local authorities to continue the important work they were already doing and were more than capable of doing,' California Attorney General Rob Bonta (D), whose office is suing alongside Newsom, said at a press briefing earlier Monday. The demonstrations continued Monday, and the Pentagon has announced it is set to move about 700 Marines to the city. The lawsuit is one of two California launched against the Trump administration Monday. Earlier in the afternoon, Bonta's office sued the Justice Department for threatening to revoke federal funding over a 16-year-old transgender track and field athlete who qualified over the weekend for the high school state championship meet.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
L.A. immigration raids draw California Gov. Gavin Newsom back into the fight with Trump
Gov. Gavin Newsom resisted a fight with President Trump over transgender youth in women's sports. He forced his way onto a runway tarmac to make peace with the Republican leader after the Los Angeles wildfires. Just last week, he hesitated before speaking out when rumors swirled about a massive federal funding cut to California. Newsom's restraint ended when Trump usurped the governor's authority over the weekend by deploying the California National Guard to the streets of Los Angeles to quell protests against immigration raids. "I'm still willing to do what I can to have the backs of the people I represent and whatever it takes to advance that cause, I'll do, but I'm not going to do it when we see the trampling of our Constitution and the rule of law," Newsom said in an interview with The Times. "So we all have our red lines. That's my red line." Newsom said the arrival of troops in the largest city in the Golden State escalated tensions between protesters and law enforcement, which he blamed Trump for intentionally inflaming to sow chaos. Whether Newsom likes it or not, the president's actions also catapulted the governor to the front lines of a Democratic resistance against Trump that he has been reluctant to embrace after his party lost the presidential election in November. On Monday, Trump said his border czar Tom Homan should follow through on threats to arrest the governor. The president has cast California as out of control and Newsom incompetent for not stepping in and ending the unrest, or protecting federal immigration agents from protesters. "I would do it if I were Tom," Trump said. "I think it's great. Gavin likes the publicity, but I think it would be a great thing. He's done a terrible job." Newsom also baited Homan: "Come and get me, tough guy." Read more: Breakdown between Trump and Newsom fueling Los Angeles crisis Newsom's position as the leader of a state that has become an immigration target for the federal government offers both risks and rewards for a governor considering a 2028 run for the White House. Democrats and progressives are thirsty for a leader to challenge Trump and his controversial policies. The National Democratic Party quickly took to social media to publicize the governor's challenge to Homan to arrest him. Being carted away in handcuffs by officials in Trump's Justice Department would probably elevate Newsom to Democratic martyr status. "In a way, he was channeling Trump, because he knows how much Trump benefited in the Republican Party from his own criminal conviction," said John Pitney, the Roy P. Crocker Professor of American Politics at Claremont McKenna College. Even without an arrest, the political battle is likely to boost Newsom's standing with Democrats. But immigration is one of Trump's best policy issues with voters and it's not an ideal political fight for any Democrat with presidential aspirations. "This is the brilliance of Donald Trump," said Thad Kousser, a professor of political science at UC San Diego. "He's picking these fights over executive power and over the power of federal government on a political terrain in which he's most popular: immigration, transgender athletes, DEI, 'woke' universities. He's picking these governance fights where he thinks he can win on the politics." Read more: Amid Trump's order, California tries to not play into his hands For Newsom, the raids provide an opportunity to challenge the president's narrative that his immigration policy is all about removing criminals and protecting the border, Kousser said. In interviews, Newsom has repeated that the Trump administration is targeting children in elementary school classrooms and law-abiding citizens who have been in California for a decade or more. He's also framing Trump's deployment of troops to Los Angeles as about more than immigration. "This is something bigger," Newsom said. "This is certain power and control over every aspect of our lives. This is about wrecking the constitutional order. This is about tearing down the rule of law. This is about, literally, the cornerstone of our founding fathers, and they're rolling in their graves." Trump's Los Angeles takeover could derail the work the governor has put in to showcase his more moderate policy positions to America. While judiciously picking and choosing his battles with Trump, Newsom used his podcast this year to air his belief that it's unfair for transgender athletes to compete in women and girls' sports. Through interviews with controversial conservative figures such as Stephen K. Bannon, the governor attempted to demonstrate his ability to be cordial with anyone regardless of their political affiliation. Newsom has been strategic about the attacks he makes against Trump, such as criticizing the tariffs that are a political vulnerability for the president. Read more: California will sue Trump over 'unlawful, unprecedented' National Guard deployment "Anybody who wants to lead the Democratic Party needs the support or at least the acquiescence of the progressive wing of the party, but Democrats need to appeal to the broader general public, and so far, this situation is not helping," Pitney said of the battle over immigration. The images streaming out of Los Angeles also create an electoral vulnerability for the governor. "Perchance Newsom were the Democratic nominee in 2028, you would expect to see pictures of burning Waymos on the streets of Los Angeles with the tagline of 'what Newsom did for California, he'll do for America,"' Pitney said. Kousser contends that Newsom, in a presidential campaign, will be held responsible for all of California's shortcomings, regardless of whether he stood up to Trump's immigration raids. Although the governor is fighting in the courts with a lawsuit announced Monday, by supporting peaceful protests and using his public podium, there's little he can do to stop the federal government. The situation highlights the challenge for Newsom and any state leader with interest in the White House. "This is the blessing and the curse of a governor who wants to run for higher office. When something happens in their state, they get the eyes of the nation upon them even if it's not the political ground on which they'd rather fight," Kousser said. Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
