She Did What? This GA Judge Is Accused of All Kinds of Strange Shenanigans
Williams was elected in 2020 and has served as a judge in Fulton County's Superior Court since January 2021. The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reports the Director of the Judicial Qualifications Commission is trying to find out if any of Williams' actions since she's been on the bench have violated the Georgia Code of Judicial Conduct. The first hearing is scheduled to start on March 5.
Some of the conduct in question includes allegations of Williams giving preferential treatment to a sorority sister in a child custody case and reaching out to an attorney for her uncle, who was facing a contempt case in front of a different judge, hoping to 'work something out.' But one of the strangest allegations was that Williams held a young woman in a courthouse holding cell 'without any legal findings or justification' during her parents' divorce case after she admitted to damaging things in his apartment due to their strained relationship.
'Today you came here and admitted to … 36 years' worth of prison on this stuff. Do you understand that?' the JQC alleges Williams told the woman. 'And all for a divorce that had nothing to do with you, right?'
Although Williams isn't speaking out publicly about the charges, her attorney, Gabe Banks, said removing his client from the bench would be 'inconsistent with the manner in which the JQC has resolved other cases' and a betrayal of the Fulton County voters who elected her.
'All Judge Williams wants and deserves is to be treated fairly. The same rules should apply to every judge. Most importantly, discipline should be meted out evenhandedly and should not be politically motivated,' he told the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
For the latest news, Facebook, Twitter and Instagram.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Los Angeles Times
a minute ago
- Los Angeles Times
Schools to open with unprecedented protections for children and their parents amid ICE raids
Los Angeles public schools are opening Thursday for the new academic year confronting an intense and historically unique moment: They will be operating in opposition to the federal government's immigration raids and have set in motion aggressive moves to protect children and their immigrant parents. School police and officers from several municipal forces will patrol near some 100 schools, setting up 'safe zones' in heavily Latino neighborhoods, with a special concentration at high schools where older Latino students are walking to campus. Bus routes are being changed to better serve areas with immigrant families so children can get to school with less exposure to immigration agents. Community volunteers will join district staff and contractors to serve as scouts — alerting campuses of nearby enforcement actions so schools can be locked down as warranted and parents and others in the school community can be quickly notified via email and text. L.A. Mayor Karen Bass spoke about 'how profound this moment is in U.S. history' during a Monday news conference with local officials. 'Here you have an entire array of elected officials, appointed officials, education leaders, people committed to our children, and we are gathered here today to talk about protecting our children from the federal government,' Bass said. L.A. schools Supt. Alberto Carvalho said recently that the nation's second-largest school system will oppose 'any entity, at any level, that seeks to interfere with the educational process of our children. We are standing on the right side of the Constitution, and years from now, I guarantee you, we will have stood on the right side of history. We know that.' The worries among school officials and parents are not without cause. On Monday federal agents reportedly drew their guns on a 15-year-old boy and handcuffed him outside Arleta High School. The confrontation ended with de-escalation. Family members persuaded federal agents that the boy — who is disabled — was not the person they were looking for, Carvalho said. The situation was largely resolved by the time the school principal realized what was going on and rushed out to assist. School police also arrived and scooped up unspent bullets dropped on the ground by the agents, Carvalho said. A spokesperson for U.S. Customs and Border Protection said Tuesday that Arleta High was not being targeted. Instead agents were conducting 'a targeted operation' on a 'criminal illegal alien,' they described as 'a Salvadoran national and suspected MS-13 pledge with prior criminal convictions in the broader vicinity of Arleta.' At a Tuesday White House briefing, Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt, responded to a question that referenced the L.A. Times reporting about the incident. 'I'll have to look into the veracity of that report,' Leavitt said. 'I read the L.A. Times almost every single day, and they are notorious for misleading the public... This administration wants to ensure that all school children across the country, in every city, from Los Angeles to D.C., can go to school safely.' The incident outside Arleta High is among the ongoing confrontations across the region that have provoked public protests and prompted the Trump administration in June to deploy troops to Los Angeles. Enforcement actions have included masked agents arresting people at parking lots, in parks, on sidewalks and next to bus stops. Litigation, including a temporary restraining order, appears to have slowed down local immigration raids, but federal officials have strongly affirmed that they have not stopped. Trump administration policy is that no location — including a school — is off limits for enforcement actions in his drive to deport at least 1 million immigrants a year. 'People in our country illegally can self-deport the easy way, or they can get deported the hard way. And that's not pleasant,' Trump said in a video posted to a White House social account. 'A big part of it is to create the sense of fear so people will self-deport,' said Jimmy Gomez, a Trump critic and Democratic member of Congress representing Los Angeles. The ripple effect is that school communities are experiencing fear and trauma, worried that agents will descend on or near campuses. Most in the state's public school systems, including in L.A. Unified have embraced a counter mission, protecting the right of children — regardless of immigration status — to a public education. That right to an education is, so far, protected by past U.S. Supreme Court rulings. For most school officials up and down the state, a necessary corollary to that right is safeguarding students' guardians and close relatives. On Tuesday, 30 school board members from L.A. County — which has 80 school districts — convened in Hawthorne to emphasize their own focus on protecting immigrant families. 'We're about to welcome students back to schools, but we're very concerned that these fears and anxieties may potentially have an impact for students not wanting to come back,' said Lynwood Unified school board member Alma Castro, an organizer of the event. She called her district a 'safe haven.' Among other measures, her district has trained staff to 'restrict the sharing of any student files, any student information, and there's been some work with thinking about our facilities to ensure that we have campuses that are closed off, that people can't just walk in.' L.A. Unified, with about 400,000 students, has been layering on protections for months, recently working to incorporate ideas advocated by the teachers union and immigrant-rights groups. A major ongoing effort is building safe-passage networks one, two and three blocks out from a campus. Participants include paid outside groups, district employees and volunteer activists. School police — though diminished in numbers due to staffing cuts — are to patrol sensitive areas and are on call to move quickly to where situations arise. Some anti-police activists want the protective mission accomplished without any role for school police. A safe-passage presence has expanded from 40 schools last year to at least 100 this year, among about 1,000 campuses total, Carvalho said. 'It is virtually impossible, considering the size of our community, to ensure that we have one caring, compassionate individual in every street corner in every street,' Carvalho said. 'But we are deploying resources at a level never before seen in our district.' Other various efforts include: Carvalho and leaders of other school districts reiterated that K-12 campuses and anything related to schooling, such as a school bus or a graduation ceremony, will be off limits to immigration agents unless they have a valid judicial warrant for a specific individual — which has been rare. 'We do not know what the enrollment will be like,' Carvalho said. 'We know many parents may have already left our community. They may have self-deported... We hope that through our communication efforts, our awareness efforts, information and the direct counseling with students and parents, that we'll be able to provide stable attendance for kids in our community.' Mary, a Los Angeles mother of three without legal status, was terrified, but more or less knew what to do when immigration agents came to her door twice in May for a 'wellness check' on her children: She did not let them in to her home. She did not step outside. And, eventually, the agents — at least eight of them who arrived with at least three vehicles — left. Mary had learned about what to do in this situation from her Los Angeles public school. Mary, who requested that her full name not be used, has three children, one of whom attends an Alliance College-Ready charter school, a network of 26 privately operated public schools. Like L.A. Unified, Alliance has trained staff on the legal rights of immigrants and also trained parents about how to handle encounters with immigration agents and where to go for help. Alliance largely serves low-income, Latino communities and the immigration raids affected attendance in the school last year. Normally, attendance runs about 90% at the end of their school year. This June, average daily attendance at 14 Alliance high schools had dipped below 80%. Six fell below 70% and one dropped as low as 57.5%. Alliance also attempted to gather deportation data. Nine families responded in a school network that enrolls about 13,000. In two cases, students were deported; three other students had family members deported; one student and a sibling were in a family that self-deported; one student was detained; two families reported facing deportation proceedings. While these numbers are small, the reports are more than enough to heighten fear within the community. And some families may have declined to be candid about their circumstances. 'What's happening now is that no one is safe anywhere, not even in your home, at work, outside, taking a stroll,' L.A. school board member Rocio Rivas said in an interview. Still, Rivas is encouraging families to send children to school, which she considers safer than other places. Alliance is focusing heavily on mental-health support and also arranging carpools to and from school — in which the driver is a U.S. citizen, said Omar Reyes, a superintendent of instruction at the Alliance charter group. Carvalho, a onetime undocumented immigrant himself, said that students deserve a traditional and joyous first day followed by a school year without trauma. Children, he said, 'inherently deserve dignity, humanity, love, empathy, compassion and great education. Times staff writer Andrea Castillo contributed to this report.


Fox News
20 minutes ago
- Fox News
What we know about Trump's meeting with Vladimir Putin in Alaska
A historic summit is set to be held between President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday. Though specifics on the summit like the time and exact location remain unknown, all eyes will be on the talks as world leaders wait to see what, if anything, can be accomplished in Putin's first trip to the U.S. in a decade. Here's what we know: White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed on Tuesday that Trump will travel to Anchorage on Friday morning for what she described as a "listening exercise" with Putin. Trump, who on Monday described the talks as a "feel-out meeting," has made clear that his chief agenda item will be to determine whether a ceasefire in Ukraine is even possible. When pressed by reporters this week as to what he specifically hopes to achieve from the in-person talks with Putin — particularly following seemingly positive calls that only resulted in a "frustrated" Trump and continued Russian bombardment in Ukraine — the president was light on specifics. Though he told reporters that he thinks he will know whether a ceasefire deal with Putin is even possible within the first "two minutes." "I'm not going to make a deal. It's not up to me to make a deal," he said. "I think a deal should be made for both [Putin and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy]. "I'd like to see a ceasefire. I'd like to see the best deal that could be made for both parties. You know, it takes two to tango," he added. Trump has raised geopolitical eyebrows over the last week when he suggested there would be a land "swap" that Russia and Ukraine would need to agree to. While it remains unclear which borders he thinks will likely be moved around, particularly which Russian borders he foresees Putin handing over to Kyiv, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and his allies in NATO have made clear any deal forged without Ukraine will not be acceptable. Zelenskyy over the weekend reiterated that he cannot unilaterally agree to cede territory illegally occupied by Russia without a national referendum under Ukraine's Constitution. "Any decisions that are without Ukraine are at the same time decisions against peace," he added. "They will not bring anything. These are dead decisions. They will never work." Following a meeting with top EU officials on Monday, chief diplomat for the EU Kaja Kallas told Fox News Digital, "Ukraine's right to exist as a sovereign nation is under attack, as well as the security of our European continent." "As far as Russia has not agreed to full and unconditional ceasefire, we should not even discuss any concessions," she said. "It has never worked in the past with Russia, and will not work with Putin today. Trump, who is slated to hold talks with Ukraine and NATO allies on Wednesday, said he will first call Zelenskyy following his talks with Putin, followed by calls to European leaders. Though geographically speaking, Anchorage is a near equal distance from Moscow and Washington, D.C., the president prompted surprise when he said Putin had agreed to meet him in Alaska rather than a third-party state, like Switzerland or Hungary, both of which were floated as potential meeting locations. However, both locations held dubious optics, as Switzerland, a member of the International Criminal Court, could be obligated to act on the 2023 ICC arrest warrant issued against Putin, and Hungary, though frequently seen as sympathetic to Russia, is a NATO member state. "They probably avoided Europe, because if they included Europe, then Europe would have demanded that they're actually at the table," Dan Hoffman, former CIA Moscow Station Chief, told Fox News Digital. "Probably your two choices were go to Russia — which Trump would never do — or invite him here. "It also exposes the challenge that you can't solve this without Ukraine and without Europe," he added. But Alaska also has a shared history with the U.S., which Washington purchased from Saint Petersburg — then the capital of Russia — in 1867. Though this shared past was championed by some in Russia and the U.S., like the Kremlin's special economic envoy Kirill Dmitriev, who called it the "perfect stage" for the Putin-Trump talks, others took to social media to suggest it showed the precarious nature of sovereign borders. Zelenskyy does not appear to have been officially invited to the talks, which the White House on Tuesday confirmed are the result of a direct invitation from Putin. "The president is agreeing to this meeting at the request of President Putin," Leavitt said Tuesday. "And the goal of this meeting for the president is to walk away with a better understanding of how we can end this war." Zelenskyy is set to hold talks with the U.S. president ahead of the high-level bilateral meeting on Wednesday alongside other European leaders. Zelenskyy has repeatedly said he is open to meeting with Putin directly to end the war, though Putin has thus far refused. Trump on Monday said his goal is that following his meeting with Putin, the Kremlin chief will sit down with Zelenskyy to begin hashing out terms for a ceasefire — whether or not it includes him in direct negotiations. "Ultimately, I'm going to put the two of them in a room. I'll be there, or I won't be there," Trump said Monday. "And I think it'll get solved." Zelenskyy on Tuesday said he also discussed the possibility of holding high-level talks organized by Turkey, which has hosted previous diplomatic negotiations that have failed to secure any lasting ceasefire agreements, but have released thousands of Ukrainian and Russian prisoners of war (POWs). "We are ready for any format of meeting aimed at stopping the killings and ending the war," Zelenksyy said. "President Erdoğan confirmed his country's readiness to organize a summit of the leaders of Ukraine, the United States, Russia, and Türkiye." Experts have warned it is too soon to tell what could come out of the talks with Putin on Friday.


NBC News
an hour ago
- NBC News
As Democrats slam Trump's D.C. crackdown, Mayor Bowser walks a fine line
In the end, President Donald Trump's offer was one that Washington, D.C., Mayor Muriel Bowser could not refuse. In mobilizing the D.C. National Guard, pressing federal agents into urban law enforcement and taking control of the Metropolitan Police Department — all in the name of fighting violent crime in the nation's capital — Trump invited Bowser to cooperate with his administration. The law, federal money and a long-standing threat to repeal self-government in the city lined up behind him, giving Bowser, who one former aide described as having a rare ability to "remove emotion" from political and policy calculations, little choice but to comply. "What I'm focused on is the federal surge and how to make the most of the additional officer support that we have," Bowser told reporters after a Tuesday meeting with Attorney General Pam Bondi. That's not to say Bowser is thrilled with the position she finds herself in, effectively handing over law enforcement in her city to a president with whom she has had a complicated relationship since his first term. During a videoconference with Washington, D.C., community leaders Tuesday evening, Bowser described Trump's maneuvers as an "authoritarian push." But on the whole, her response has been far more measured than those of Democrats — both in the D.C. area and nationally — who, less encumbered by practical consequences of a fight with the president, have repeatedly and forcefully hammered Trump. "The Trump administration has consistently broken the law and violated the Constitution to further the personal and political agenda of a wannabe king," House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., said in a statement Monday. "We stand with the residents of the District of Columbia and reject this unjustified power grab as illegitimate." In a Monday news conference announcing his assertion of power through an executive order, Trump called Bowser "a good person who has tried," adding that he acted because "she has been given many chances." As Bowser noted during a Monday news conference, the city and federal agencies have a long history of working together to plan, execute and protect special events in the city, including during both of Trump's terms. The two are also largely aligned on the goal of bringing the Washington Commanders back to the city from the Maryland suburbs, and Bowser attended a White House news conference on the topic in May. But Bowser criticized Trump in the summer of 2020 when he deployed federal law enforcement officers in the nation's capital and activated the D.C. National Guard to combat protests against police violence. Those forces, including the U.S. Park Police, were used to violently break up a peaceful demonstration outside Lafayette Square, just steps from the White House, clearing a path for Trump to walk to a nearby church to address the news media. In a letter to Trump in June 2020, before officers on horseback drove demonstrators away from the park, Bowser accused him of "inflaming" and "adding to the grievances" of protesters, creating a more dangerous dynamic. In order to push federal agents and guardsmen into the streets, Trump declared an emergency in Washington, D.C., even as violent crime rates in the city have been falling. Bowser is at a disadvantage at a time when her administration is fighting to get Congress and Trump to reverse course on a law enacted this year that froze $1 billion in city money. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., said in May that he would move "as quickly as possible" to fix what some Republicans said was a mistake in the drafting of the law. The Senate passed a change earlier this year, but the House, which is out of session for its August recess, has made no move toward sending it to the president for his signature. Beyond that, federal law plainly gives the president the power to assume control of Washington's Metropolitan Police Department for up to 30 days at a time when he declares an emergency, as he did this week, and to activate the D.C. National Guard. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said Tuesday that roughly 850 federal law enforcement officers and agents fanned out across the city Monday night and made 23 arrests on charges ranging from homicide and drug crimes to skipping out on a fare and reckless driving. Leavitt did not reply to a request for comment on Trump's relationship with Bowser, nor did city spokesperson Susana Castillo. Justin Bibb, the mayor of Cleveland and president of the Democratic Mayors Association, said in an interview with NBC News that municipal leaders across the country are watching what's happening in Washington — on the heels of Trump activating the California National Guard to assist with immigration enforcement in Los Angeles — with wary eyes. "Absolutely, we're concerned about it," he said. "I want to be very crystal clear about something: We do not want the National Guard in our cities.' Bibb also defended Bowser's handling of Trump's crackdown this week, pointing to the unusual situation Bowser finds herself in compared to leaders of other major cities. 'She understands and recognizes that she's in a unique position where there's no real statehood in D.C., and her autonomy can be limited, but at the end of the day, she's going to continue to do the job she's been doing on reducing violent crime, with or without the support of Donald Trump,' he said. Trump has publicly mused about returning the limited powers of Washington's local government to federal control. Since 1973, the city has operated under a "home rule" charter granted by Congress that allows for residents to elect a mayor and city council. But ultimately, the Constitution gives Congress authority to determine the laws of the nation's capital. Though residents of Washington, D.C., pay federal taxes, the city does not have voting representation in Congress. Declining to directly criticize Trump, Bowser nodded to the city's subservient position during her Monday news conference. "He has prerogatives in D.C. unlike anywhere else in the country," she said of Trump. "There are things that, when a city is not a state and not fully autonomous and doesn't have senators, that the federal government can do."