Dogecoin enthusiasts reveal biggest fear after Trump-Musk fallout
Employees of the Department of Government Efficiency are worried Elon Musk's infamous chainsaw to government waste may come for them after his falling out with Donald Trump. Musk and Trump's bromance showed signs of unraveling when the SpaceX boss departed the White House but their differences were made apparent publicly over the president's 'big, beautiful bill.'
The ex-'First Buddy' has spent the days since torching the relationship, everything from publicly slamming Trump's spending bill to claiming the president is in The Epstein Files (which he quietly later deleted). Trump has also knifed a key Musk ally by pulling his nomination to become NASA administrator. That has many of those who remain at the Department of Government Efficiency worried that they may 'get DOGE'd' themselves, as group chats between employees have reportedly lit up wondering where their future in government lies.
As former DOGE software engineer Sahil Lavingia (pictured left) said, he and many of the people attempting to streamline the government were already allies or employees of Musk. 'I worry with Elon gone, no one will join, and it will just slowly fade away,' Lavingia told the Wall Street Journal. Even if they remain, without Musk, the organization that claimed it has already cut $180 billion in government waste may never be the same. 'Working there felt like pushing a boulder up a mountain, and it'll just fall back down if the work doesn't continue,' Lavingia added.
For now, the Trump White House remains proud of the department's work and looks for it to continue. 'Trump's success through DOGE is undisputed, and [the president's] work will continue to yield historic results,' spokesperson Harrison Fields said. However, sources told WSJ that many are worried that at the very least, DOGE will see massive staffing cuts without Musk's protection.
Russell Vought, the head of the Office of Management and Budget, seemed to confirm that they are now at the mercy of whomever is in charge of the department that they were hired to cut waste from. 'Cabinet agencies that are in charge of the DOGE consultants that work for them are fundamentally in control of DOGE,' he told Congress earlier this week. The fallout between Trump and Musk - who were political allies for a little less than a year - started in recent weeks when the billionaire started resisting Republicans' 'Big, Beautiful Bill,' arguing that the spending wiped out DOGE's cost-cutting efforts.
However, there were signs of the strain between the two on the day Musk left the White House, as Trump pulled the nomination for Jared Isaacman (pictured) to be the new NASA administrator despite reports he was a shoe-in for confirmation. Isaacman, 42, had his nomination pulled after a 'thorough review' of his 'prior associations,' Trump said. He believes the nomination was withdrawn to coincide with his friend Musk parting ways with the administration and was pushed for by Sergio Gor, an anti-Musk White House official. Then, on Thursday, when Trump was supposed to be hosting the new German Chancellor Friedrich Merz in the Oval Office, he was asked about Musk's recent criticism. From there the dam broke. 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more, I was surprised,' Trump told reporters.
The president suggested that Musk was angry - not over the bill ballooning the deficit - but because the Trump administration has pulled back on electric vehicle mandates, which negatively impacted Tesla, and replaced the Musk-approved nominee to lead NASA, which could hinder SpaceX's government contracts. 'And you know, Elon's upset because we took the EV mandate, which was a lot of money for electric vehicles, and they're having a hard time the electric vehicles and they want us to pay billions of dollars in subsidy,' Trump said. 'I know that disturbed him.' Musk posted to X as Trump's Q&A with reporters was ongoing. 'Whatever,' the billionaire wrote.
'Keep the EV/solar incentive cuts in the bill, even though no oil & gas subsidies are touched (very unfair!!), but ditch the MOUNTAIN of DISGUSTING PORK in the bill,' he advised. 'In the entire history of civilization, there has never been legislation that [is] both big and beautiful. Everyone knows this!' Musk continued. 'Either you get a big and ugly bill or a slim and beautiful bill. Slim and beautiful is the way.' The spat quickly turned personal with Musk then posting that Trump would have lost the 2024 election had it not been for the world's richest man - him. Musk publicly endorsed Trump on the heels of the July 13th assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania and poured around $290 million into the Republican's campaign.
The billionaire also joined Trump on the campaign trail when he returned to the site of the Butler shooting in early October, a month before Election Day. After his meeting with Merz, Trump continued to throw punches online. He asserted that he had asked Musk to leave his administration and said he was 'CRAZY!' 'Elon was "wearing thin," I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump wrote. It was after that post that he then threatened to pull SpaceX and Tesla's government contracts.
Musk then taunted Trump to act. 'This just gets better and better,' he wrote. 'Go ahead, make my day …' In a follow-up post, Musk said he would 'begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately.' Trump continued his 'crazy' remarks on Friday when speaking with CNN Anchor and Chief Political Correspondent Dana Bash. He said: 'I'm not even thinking about Elon. He's got a problem. The poor guy's got a problem.' The tech billionaire also claimed Trump appeared in files relating to disgraced Jeffrey Epstein in a post on his social media platform X as the pair traded blows in a sensational public row. Musk gave no evidence for the claim, which has since been deleted, and the White House dismissed the allegation. On Sunday, Trump said his relationship with Musk was over and rejected the idea of repairing their relationship.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Two Jan. 6 police officers sue to force US Capitol to install memorial plaque
June 12 (Reuters) - Two police officers on duty during the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the U.S. Capitol by U.S. President Donald Trump's supporters sued federal officials on Thursday, saying the government has refused to install a federally-mandated memorial to officers who fought to defend the iconic building. The lawsuit, opens new tab, filed in federal court in Washington, said the agency that operates and maintains the Capitol is violating a law that required a plaque to be erected commemorating the actions of law enforcement on Jan. 6. Officers on that day battled a mob of Trump supporters who stormed the Capitol in a bid to block his 2020 election defeat to Democrat Joe Biden. More than 100 police officers were injured during the riot. Congress in 2022 had passed a law that directed the Architect of the Capitol to honor the officers who defended the building. The law, signed by then-President Joe Biden, gave the Capitol office one year to display a plaque in the building. Representatives from the Capitol and the Justice Department did not immediately respond to requests for comment. The plaintiffs in the new lawsuit are Harry Dunn, a former U.S. Capitol police officer, and Daniel Hodges, an officer at the Metropolitan Police Department. During the riot, Dunn protected injured officers, the lawsuit said. Hodges at one point during the assault was kicked in the chest, and someone tried to gouge out his eyes, the lawsuit said. In a statement, a lawyer for the plaintiffs said 'Congress's refusal to install the plaque is an attempt to rewrite history. So many politicians' careers now depend on ignoring the fact that Donald Trump tried to overthrow democracy.' Architect of the Capitol Thomas Austin testified at a U.S. House subcommittee in April that the U.S. House speaker's office has not told his office to make any modifications to the House. 'We have not received final instructions to install the plaque,' Austin said. A spokesperson for House Speaker Mike Johnson did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The lawsuit could become a new flashpoint over Jan. 6. After his election to his second term as U.S. president in January, Trump pardoned about 1,500 of his supporters who were charged in the attack. Some of those individuals had been accused of attacks on police officers. Trump's pardons drew criticism from some police organizations and Republicans. "Pardoning the people who went into the Capitol and beat up a police officer violently, I think was a mistake,' Republican U.S. Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina said at the time. The case is Harry Dunn and Daniel Hodges v. Architect of the Capitol, U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, No. 1:25-cv-01844. For plaintiffs: Brendan Ballou of Lichten & Liss-Riordan For defendant: No appearance yet Read more: Republican Senator Graham calls Trump's Jan. 6 pardons a 'mistake' US judge says Trump Jan. 6 pardons reflect 'revisionist myth' Hundreds of Capitol rioters released from prison after Trump's sweeping pardon
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US House passes Trump cuts of $9.4 billion for foreign aid, broadcasting
WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - The U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday narrowly passed President Donald Trump's request to slash $9.4 billion in spending on foreign and public broadcasting, sending the package for consideration by the Senate. The measure passed the House, where Trump's Republicans hold a slim majority and have shown little appetite for opposing his initiatives, by 214 to 212.
Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
US says China's Huawei can't make more than 200,000 AI chips in 2025
WASHINGTON, June 12 (Reuters) - China's Huawei Technologies [RIC:RIC: is capable of producing no more than 200,000 advanced artificial intelligence chips in 2025, a top U.S. exports controls official told lawmakers on Thursday, warning that though the number is below the company's demand, China is quickly catching up to U.S. capabilities. Since 2019, a slew of U.S. export rules aimed at curbing China's technological and military advancements have limited access by Huawei and other Chinese firms to high-end U.S. chips and the equipment needed to produce them. The issue has become a flashpoint in U.S.-China relations. Facing those restrictions, Huawei aims to ship its Ascend 910C AI chips to Chinese customers as an alternative to those made by the United States' Nvidia (NVDA.O), opens new tab, the global leader. "Our assessment is that Huawei Ascend chip production capacity for 2025 will be at or below 200,000 and we project that most or all of that will be delivered to companies within China," Jeffrey Kessler, Under Secretary of Commerce for Industry and Security at the Commerce Department, told a congressional hearing. Kessler said that the U.S. should not take comfort in the figure. "China is investing huge amounts to increase its AI chip production, as well as the capabilities of the chips that it produces. So, it's critical for us not to have a false sense of security, to understand that China is catching up quickly," he told the House of Representatives Foreign Affairs South and Central Asia subcommittee. White House AI Czar David Sacks said on Tuesday that China was only 3-6 months behind the U.S. in AI. The White House later said he was referring to China's AI models, adding that Chinese AI chips are one to two years behind their U.S. counterparts. Huawei's CEO Ren Zhengfei told Chinese state media on Tuesday that the company's chips were a generation behind those of U.S. competitors, but that it invests more than $25 billion annually to improve performance. Nvidia's AI chips are more powerful than Huawei's but Washington's export controls on its most sophisticated chips have caused it to lose market share. The U.S. and China reached a tentative trade truce at talks in London this week after a previous agreement faltered over China's continued curbs on minerals exports. That prompted the Trump administration to apply additional export controls on shipments of semiconductor design software, jet engines for Chinese-made planes and other goods. Democratic Representative Greg Meeks expressed concern that the Trump administration had conflated U.S. exports controls with broader discussions on trade. "What I will say is export controls have been strong and I'm confident that they will remain strong," Kessler said. Kessler said he was not planning any immediate new restrictions on U.S. semiconductors sold to China, but that the Commerce Department will "remain active in this space." "It's a constantly evolving landscape, and we need to make sure that our controls remain effective," he said.
