
How one company is revolutionizing the way we use everyday water
Mike Sale has two great gigs: Not only is he a ' certified water sommelier,' he also is the director of home water systems in the innovation lab at the Delta Faucet Company. There, he and his team spend their days solving problems for consumers by listening to them, visiting their homes, and then acting on what they see and hear. 'We go very deep to intimately understand our [customers],' Sale says. 'And that comes through in the authenticity of our products and the story behind them.' It's why Sale sought out more advanced training on water quality and taste, leading him to become a water sommelier. By better understanding the complexity of water and how certain inputs can contribute to its taste, he can identify what to add or remove to improve it.
These days, water quality is increasingly front of mind for consumers, as evolving science pinpoints newly recognized contaminants giving rise to myriad safety concerns. That's why this year, Delta Faucet debuted its Clarifi Tankless Reverse Osmosis System, a reliable and easy-to-use, high-capacity, under-sink water-filtration system that removes more than 90 contaminants and has been certified to meet National Sanitation Foundation standards. Here, Sale explains how innovation at Delta Faucet led to Clarifi and why that certification matters. (The conversation has been edited for clarity and length.)
Delta Faucet has more than 70 years of experience in transforming the way people connect to water. How does that play out in your customers' lives?
Water can be viewed as a simple utility or an input; we see it as a source of comfort, convenience—even inspiration—and want to transform the way people connect to it through innovative solutions. Our Touch 2 O faucets, for instance, evolved from ethnographic research, watching people in their homes struggle with tasks. Touch 2 O faucets can turn on and off with a tap or even a wave [of the hand] and employ an illuminated color-coded gauge to provide a clear indication of the temperature.
Why is innovation such a key focus at Delta?
Our focus has always been on meeting the evolving needs of our consumers' daily lives with water. We look at solving problems, enhancing convenience, and helping them [complete] the jobs they want to do. But we're also thinking of that within the broader ecosystem of sustainability, efficiency, and safety. That's been paramount to our strategy for years now.
Describe what you and your team do in the innovation lab.
I love our work because it fits around our core ethos of truly understanding our consumers, understanding their needs. And those needs aren't always articulated—sometimes they're spotted through observation. Our role is to identify gaps, and then, through development and testing, find ways to surprise and delight.
I think of product development as a relay race where multiple parties touch projects at different times. We try lots of interesting and unexpected things—some that never see the light of day because they did not solve the problem or they created added complexity. We have a very heavy testing and looping process before the brand puts them into market at scale.
What are some of the more exciting developments to come out of the lab?
I think the Touch 2 O features we mentioned fit there. And most recently, we've spent a lot of time with consumers getting to understand their needs around water quality and water treatment. That is extremely meaningful to me because of how deeply it impacts not just your use and your experience, but frankly your health, your family's health. The excited [response from] consumers after they've tested these products motivates my whole team and brings meaning to our work.
Reverse osmosis sounds daunting. Explain it in layman's terms.
Water is great at absorbing things on its journey from rain to groundwater to rivers, to wherever your local municipality or well sources the water. That process is osmosis. That's where it gets its minerals from rocks, as well as man-made things like chemicals or fertilizer runoff. Reverse osmosis is just reversing that process, with some type of carbon filtration and then, specifically, a reverse-osmosis membrane. I describe it like a big roll of wrapping paper. The water goes through this paper that has extremely small holes, clean water comes out the other side, and impurities get trapped in between the layers and flushed down the drain.
What are the benefits of having a tankless reverse osmosis system?
Historically, reverse osmosis has been a tank-based system. It uses line pressure, and it fills a large tank that sits under your sink. Once it's drained, it stops and has to refill. We've eliminated that tank and moved it to a packaged system that has a pump to push the water through more efficiently. It uses significantly less water to flush contaminants down the drain. It's a very efficient system. It takes up a lot less space. And systems can be rated at 600 or 800 gallons per day versus a two-gallon tank that, when it's empty, is gone. But not every manufacturer has been able to design their tankless system to hit the same level of third-party certifications. Ours is the only system certified to reduce more than 90 contaminants. You can find that full listing on our website as well as through third-party certification labs for important standards like NSF/ANSI 45, 53 and 401, and NSF/ANSI 58. So, we encourage consumers to do their homework on ensuring the system is as robust as they need.
Do consumers really need to go that distance?
Reverse osmosis is generally considered the gold standard of residential filtration. It is one of the most effective ways that you can create a baseline of your water and remove man-made inputs. It is a good solution for people who either know they have things in their water that they're concerned about that lower-tier filtration will not remove—like where we see breaks in water quality, like areas known for higher nitrates from fertilizer runoff, or something has spilled in their area—or they have concerns with emerging contaminants such as PFAS or microplastics. The system is relatively agnostic and removes most everything.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
What we know so far: Trump and Musk's spectacular public blowup rocks Washington
President Trump's signature 'Big Beautiful Bill' has precipitated an epic fallout between the US president and one of his closest allies, billionaire Elon Musk. The blowup played out publicly on social media, with both men using their respective platforms, X and Truth Social, to exchange criticisms. Related: Eyes on Senate Republicans as Trump and Musk feud over tax and spend bill Here is a summary of how the rift unfolded, and what we know so far: Donald Trump kicked off the fight during an Oval Office meeting with German chancellor Friedrich Merz. Asked about Elon Musk's criticism of his 'Big, Beautiful Bill', the US president told reporters: 'Elon and I had a great relationship. I don't know if we will any more.' Trump told reporters he was 'very disappointed in Elon', telling them: 'He knew every aspect of this bill. He knew it better than almost anybody, and he never had a problem until right after he left. … He said the most beautiful things about me, and he hasn't said bad about me personally, but I'm sure that'll be next, but I'm very disappointed in Elon. I've helped Elon a lot.' Soon after Musk posted on X denying Trump's statement, beginning a flurry of posts that stepped up his feud with the president. Musk wrote: 'False, this bill was never shown to me even once and was passed in the dead of night so fast that almost no one in Congress could even read it!' He went on to claim that without him Trump would have 'lost the election' before bemoaning what he called 'such ingratitude'. The president followed up by , prompting a return threat from the SpaceX boss to decommission the Dragon spacecraft (which brought home astronauts stuck on the ISS for months), potentially throwing US space programmes into turmoil. Hours later Musk rescinded the threat. Musk also suggested Trump should be impeached and that JD Vance should replace Trump, warning that Trump's global tariffs would 'cause a recession in the second half of this year'. Musk went on to say on X the reason the had not released the files into convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein was because they implicated the president. The White House called the assertions an 'unfortunate episode'. Meanwhile, Steve Bannon, a longtime ally and Elon Musk critic, suggested there were grounds to deport the tech billionaire, who has US citizenship. Bannon told the New York Times: 'They should initiate a formal investigation of his immigration status because I am of the strong belief that he is an illegal alien, and he should be deported from the country immediately.' The spectacular blowout between Trump and Musk sent Tesla shares into free fall. They The decline in Tesla's share price on Thursday knocked about $8.73bn off Musk's total net worth, according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index. The reported $152bn drop also decreased the value of the company to roughly $900bn.
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump drops Nasa nominee Jared Isaacman, scrapping Elon Musk's pick
The White House has withdrawn as its nominee for Nasa administrator, abruptly yanking a close ally of Elon Musk from consideration to lead the space agency. Donald Trump said he would announce a new candidate soon. 'After a thorough review of prior associations, I am hereby withdrawing the nomination of Jared Isaacman to head Nasa,' the US president posted online. 'I will soon announce a new Nominee who will be mission aligned, and put America first in space.' Related: Drugs, marital advice and that black eye: key takeaways from Trump's Oval Office send-off for Elon Musk Isaacman, a billionaire private astronaut who had been Musk's pick to lead Nasa, was due next week for a much-delayed confirmation vote before the US Senate. His removal from consideration caught many in the space industry by surprise. Trump and the White House did not explain what led to the decision. Isaacman, whose removal was earlier reported by Semafor, said he was 'incredibly grateful' to Trump 'and all those who supported me throughout this journey'. 'I have gained a much deeper appreciation for the complexities of government and the weight our political leaders carry,' he posted. 'It may not always be obvious through the discourse and turbulence, but there are many competent, dedicated people who love this country and care deeply about the mission.' Isaacman's removal comes just days after Musk's official departure from the White House, where the SpaceX CEO's role as a 'special government employee' leading the so-called department of government efficiency (Doge) created turbulence for the administration and frustrated some of Trump's aides. Musk, according to a person familiar with his reaction, was disappointed by Isaacman's removal. 'It is rare to find someone so competent and good-hearted,' Musk wrote of Isaacman on X, responding to the news of the White House's decision. Musk did not immediately respond to a request for comment. It was unclear whom the administration might tap to replace Isaacman. One name being floated is the retired US air force Lt Gen Steven Kwast, an early advocate for the creation of the US space force and a Trump supporter, according to three people familiar with the discussions. Isaacman, the former CEO of the payment processor company Shift4, had broad space industry support but drew concerns from lawmakers over his ties to Musk and SpaceX, where he spent hundreds of millions of dollars as an early private spaceflight customer. The former nominee had donated to Democrats in prior elections. In his confirmation hearing in April, he sought to balance Nasa's existing moon-aligned space exploration strategy with pressure to shift the agency's focus on Mars, saying the US can plan for travel to both destinations. As a potential leader of Nasa's 18,000 employees, Isaacman faced a daunting task of implementing that decision to prioritize Mars, given that Nasa has spent years and billions of dollars trying to return its astronauts to the moon. On Friday, the space agency released new details of the Trump administration's 2026 budget plan that proposed killing dozens of space science programs and laying off thousands of employees, a controversial overhaul that space advocates and lawmakers described as devastating for the agency. The Montana Republican Tim Sheehy, a member of the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation committee, posted that Isaacman had been 'a strong choice by President Trump to lead Nasa'. Related: Universe's mysteries may never be solved because of Trump's Nasa cuts, experts say 'I was proud to introduce Jared at his hearing and strongly oppose efforts to derail his nomination,' Sheehy said. Some scientists saw the nominee change as further destabilizing to Nasa as it faces dramatic budget cuts without a confirmed leader in place to navigate political turbulence between Congress, the White House and the space agency's workforce. 'So not having [Isaacman] as boss of Nasa is bad news for the agency,' Harvard-Smithsonian astronomer Jonathan McDowell posted. 'Maybe a good thing for Jared himself though, since being Nasa head right now is a bit of a Kobayashi Maru scenario,' McDowell added, referring to an exercise in the science fiction franchise Star Trek where cadets are placed in a no-win scenario. With Reuters
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Musk backs down on threat to retire SpaceX Dragon spacecraft amid Trump dispute
Elon Musk, the world's richest person, on Thursday said his company SpaceX would begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft after he engaged in an extraordinary public fallout with Donald Trump who had threatened to cancel government contracts with Musk's businesses. He later appeared to back down. 'In light of the President's statement about cancellation of my government contracts, @SpaceX will begin decommissioning its Dragon spacecraft immediately,' Musk posted on the social media platform X, which he owns. A few minutes earlier Trump had posted on Truth Social – the media platform that he owns – that he might cancel huge lucrative contracts with Musk's businesses, which include the SpaceX company that is building a fleet of rockets. Related: Trump and Musk's very public feud is like Alien v Predator for political nerds 'The easiest way to save money in our Budget, Billions and Billions of Dollars, is to terminate Elon's Governmental Subsidies and Contracts. I was always surprised that Biden didn't do it!' Trump said. Nasa relies on SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft to ferry astronauts to and from the International Space Station (ISS). Hours after issuing his threat, Musk appeared to take pleas from users on his social media platform X to 'cool down' and he posted: 'Good advice. Ok, we won't decommission Dragon.' Since 2008, SpaceX has received more than $20bn in government contracts, largely from Nasa and the Department of Defense. In March, two Nasa astronauts returned to Earth in a Dragon capsule after being stranded on the ISS for nearly nine months, after their Boeing Starliner capsule faced technical issues and returned to Earth without them. The next SpaceX Dragon launch is scheduled to take place on 10 June. The Dragon is expected to carry four people to and from the ISS on Axiom Mission 4. Nasa's press secretary, Bethany Stevens, in a statement on X after Musk's announcement, said the agency 'will continue to execute upon the president's vision for the future of space'. Related: Trump v Musk: 10 ways they can further hurt each other 'We will continue to work with our industry partners to ensure the president's objectives in space are met,' she added. Musk's announcement came amid an escalating dispute with Trump that began after he denounced the president's tax and spending bill as a 'disgusting abomination'. Musk later accused Trump of 'ingratitude' for the millions he spent to get him elected. Trump, in turn, said he was 'very disappointed' in Musk. The president wrote earlier on Thursday that Musk was 'wearing thin' and that the tech billionaire 'went crazy' after he was asked to depart the White House last week as head of Trump's 'department of government efficiency' .