Israeli Prime Minister says he believes Trump can help seal a ceasefire deal
Israeli negotiators taking part in the ceasefire talks have clear instructions to achieve a ceasefire agreement under conditions that Israel has accepted, Netanyahu said on Sunday before boarding his flight to Washington.
'I believe the discussion with President Trump can certainly help advance these results,' he said, adding that he was determined to ensure the return of hostages held in Gaza and to remove the threat of Hamas to Israel.
It will be Netanyahu's third visit to the White House since Trump returned to power nearly six months ago.
Public pressure is mounting on Netanyahu to secure a permanent ceasefire and end the war in Gaza, a move opposed by some hardline members of his right-wing coalition. Others, including Foreign Minister Gideon Saar, have expressed support.
Palestinian group Hamas said on Friday it had responded to a U.S.-backed Gaza ceasefire proposal in a 'positive spirit', a few days after Trump said Israel had agreed 'to the necessary conditions to finalize' a 60-day truce.
But in a sign of the potential challenges still facing the two sides, a Palestinian official from a militant group allied with Hamas said concerns remained over humanitarian aid, passage through the Rafah crossing in southern Israel to Egypt and clarity over a timetable for Israeli troop withdrawals.
Netanyahu's office said in a statement that changes sought by Hamas to the ceasefire proposal were 'not acceptable to Israel'. However, his office said the delegation would still fly to Qatar to 'continue efforts to secure the return of our hostages based on the Qatari proposal that Israel agreed to'.
Netanyahu has repeatedly said Hamas must be disarmed, a demand the militant group has so far refused to discuss.
Netanyahu said he believed he and Trump would also build on the outcome of the 12-day air war with Iran last month and seek to further ensure that Tehran never has a nuclear weapon. He said recent Middle East developments had created an opportunity to widen the circle of peace.
Hostages
On Saturday evening, crowds gathered at a public square in Tel Aviv near the defence ministry headquarters to call for a ceasefire deal and the return of around 50 hostages still held in Gaza.
The demonstrators waved Israeli flags, chanted and carried posters with photos of the hostages.
The latest bloodshed in the decades-old Israeli-Palestinian conflict was triggered on October 7, 2023, when Hamas attacked southern Israel, killing around 1,200 people and taking 251 hostages, according to Israeli tallies.
Gaza's health ministry says Israel's retaliatory military assault on the enclave has killed over 57,000 Palestinians. It has also caused a hunger crisis, displaced the population, mostly within Gaza, and left the territory in ruins.
Around 20 of the remaining hostages are believed to be still alive. A majority of the original hostages have been freed through diplomatic negotiations, though the Israeli military has also recovered some.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
12 minutes ago
- Express Tribune
Indo-Pak stand-off
India's Minister of External Affairs S Jaishankar on the occasion of QUAD meeting held in Washington DC the other day again challenged President Donald Trump's claim of brokering ceasefire between Pakistan and India after the May 7-10 military conflict between them. In an interview with Newsweek, Jaishankar said, "I can tell you that I was in the room when Vice-President JD Vance spoke to Prime Minister [Narendra] Modi on the night of May 9. There was no linking of trade and ceasefire." Two months after the four-day war, India is still in a denial mode, as Jaishankar went on to say that "later that day, Pakistan's Director General of Military Operations, Major General Kashif Abdullah, directly contacted his Indian counterpart to request a ceasefire", and that was how the standoff was managed. Trump has, however, repeatedly taken credit for the ceasefire and offered mediation on the Kashmir conflict. Pakistan, endorsing the American president's stance on ceasefire, has welcomed his offer to mediate on the Kashmir conflict despite the fact that since the singing of Shimla pact of July 1972, New Delhi has been against any external role over its unresolved issues with Islamabad. For how long will the Indo-Pak standoff continue and will New Delhi assert its position in the White House and Capitol Hill? Will the once influential Indian lobby in Washington DC re-establish its clout in the American policymaking circles? Or the Modi regime needs to transform its approach on terrorism and instead of blaming Pakistan without any evidence pursue a policy on pragmatic lines? As long as Modi and Trump differ on their stance on the ceasefire and mediation, there is a marginal likelihood of a patch-up between the two. It also means the US will continue to equate India with Pakistan. New Delhi believes that in view of the power asymmetry between India and Pakistan, America should not consider the two countries equal and should give it more weightage. When the US gives special treatment to Pakistan, hurting India's pride and ego, it means the failure of Indian diplomacy. Indian media was critical of the US when President Trump invited Prime Minister Modi to the White House after the G-7 summit in Canada at a time when he had also invited Pakistan's Chief of Army Staff General Asim Munir. Considering it a clever move on the part of Trump to arrange a meeting between the two powerful men in the White House, Modi politely refused the invitation. Calling himself a 'man of peace', Trump seeks to arrange a meeting between the leaders of the two hostile countries as part of a strategy to strengthen his claim to earn the Nobel peace prize. But Trump's hopes were dashed when India openly contradicted his claim of brokering ceasefire, thereby averting a nuclear showdown in South Asia. Trump had initially ruled out any US role in defusing the Indo-Pak tension, but later in a tweet took the credit for arranging ceasefire - something the reflects a U-turn in his approach. Also, in the case of the 12-day war between Iran and Israel last month, Trump initially made it clear that America was not behind the Israeli attack on Iran. But later on, he took credit for the ceasefire between the two warring countries. Iran firmly rejected Trump's claim that the US attack obliterated its nuclear installations. Nevertheless, Trump tried to give the impression that it was he who stopped the war between the two adversaries. In reality, he failed to end the Russo-Ukrainian war and the war in Gaza contrary to the promises he made during his election campaign. The de-escalation in the May 7-10 Indo-Pak conflict needs to be examined from three angles. First, both India and Pakistan knew that further escalation of the conflict would have lethal consequences. As a result, the DGMOs of the two countries agreed to a ceasefire which was done via the hotline established several decades ago between New Delhi and Islamabad as an essential military CBM. It means India preferred having a direct contact with Pakistan instead of relying on President Trump's ceasefire efforts. How far Pakistan will subscribe to the Indian stance of a direct contact to deescalate the conflict remains to be seen. When the Indo-Pak border tension was at its peak following the attack on the Indian parliament on December 13, 2001 and around half a million troops from both sides were in an eyeball to eyeball confrontation, it was the direct communication between Islamabad and New Delhi which helped defuse the tension leading to the withdrawal of the forces from the border. But, one needs to bear in mind that during those days, Atal Behari Vajpayee was the Indian prime minister who acted as a statesman and his pragmatic approach was reciprocated by President Pervez Musharraf of Pakistan. Ironically, today India is led by Modi who has acute dislike for Pakistan which provide space to extremist elements in New Delhi. Second, Prime Minister Modi is repeatedly saying that Operation Sindoor is not yet over and Pakistan will be taught a lesson if there is another alleged act of terrorism, but the momentum which existed after the May 7-10 conflict is over and the world is not going to intervene again in case of another Indian adventure against Pakistan. Modi is trying to keep the momentum going and the assertion of Rajnath Singh, the Indian defense minister, to use Indian navy to cut off Pakistan's supply chain from the port of Karachi is tantamount to a stern warning to Islamabad. Pakistan has been constantly offering India dialogue to sort out issues instead of pursuing a jingoistic approach. Indian opposition parties, including Congress, are also highly critical of the Modi regime for its mishandling of the crisis with Pakistan. Poor performance of Indian air force and India's failure to teach Pakistan a lesson following the Pahalgam attack expose New Delhi's capability to launch another adventure against its western neighbour. Third, defusing any future standoff between India and Pakistan would require professional handling of things with better lines of communication. The two neighbours should bear in mind that a slight miscalculation can lead to dangerous consequences.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Trump imposes 25% tariffs on Japan, South Korea ahead of trade deal deadline
US President Donald Trump attends the Saudi-U.S. Investment Forum, in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, May 13, 2025. REUTERS Listen to article US President Donald Trump said Monday he was slapping 25 percent tariffs on Japan and South Korea, in his first letters to trading partners ahead of a deadline to reach a deal with Washington. Trump had said at the weekend that starting from Monday he would send a first batch of up to 15 letters to countries informing them that he would reimpose harsh levies that he had postponed in April. In near-identically worded letters to the Japanese and South Korean leaders, Trump said the tariffs would apply from August 1 because their trading relationships with Washington were "unfortunately, far from Reciprocal." Trump warned the countries, both key US allies in East Asia, of an escalation if they responded to the new US tariffs. But he also said he was ready to modify levies "downwards" if Japan and South Korea changed their trade policies. Japan's Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba said Sunday that he "won't easily compromise" in trade talks with Washington. Trump originally announced sweeping tariffs on world economies on what he called "Liberation Day" on April 2, claiming the United States was being "ripped off." More Read: Rubio to attend ASEAN meeting in first visit to Asia Amid market turmoil, Trump then suspended the initial tariffs for 90 days, a deadline that expires on Wednesday. But the Trump administration has said that the duties will not "boomerang" back until August 1, apparently extending the deadline despite denials from officials. While the Trump administration has signaled hopes of striking dozens of deals by early July -- at one point boasting of "90 deals in 90 days" -- there have been limited results so far. Washington has unveiled pacts with only Britain and Vietnam, while the United States and China agreed to temporarily lower tariff levels on each other's products that earlier reached three-digits. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said there would be a number of deals coming up. "We are going to have several announcements in the next 48 hours," Bessent told CNBC in an interview Monday. "We've had a lot of people change their tune in terms of negotiations. So my mailbox was full last night with a lot of new offers, a lot of new proposals," Bessent said. There was no immediate response from the White House on whether Trump would formally extend the Wednesday deadline for the tariffs to snap back. Asked about Trump's letters, Bessent said these would inform partners of the tariff rate their products face when trading with the United States, unless they want to "come back and try to negotiate." Bessent told CNBC Monday that he would "be meeting with my Chinese counterpart sometime in the next couple of weeks." Also Read: US professors take Trump's immigration policies to court over pro-Palestinian activities The two sides have so far held high-level talks in Geneva and London. But Washington and Beijing's pause on tit-for-tat tariffs is due to expire in mid-August. On whether he was disappointed in the number of trade deals achieved so far, Trump's trade adviser Peter Navarro maintained that he is "happy with the progress we've had." "Every country that we run a major deficit with is fully engaged," he told CNBC on Monday. Trump has also threatened another 10 percent tariff on countries aligning themselves with the emerging BRICS nations, accusing them of "Anti-American policies" after they slammed his duties at a summit. For now, partners are still rushing to avert Trump's tariffs altogether. The European Commission said that EU chief Ursula von der Leyen had a "good exchange" with Trump on trade when the pair spoke Sunday.
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
US ‘unbelievably satisfied' with Lebanon reply to proposal on disarming Hezbollah
BEIRUT: A U.S. envoy said on Monday he was 'unbelievably satisfied' with Lebanon's reply to a U.S. proposal on disarming Hezbollah, following meetings in Beirut held hours after Israel launched new air strikes and a cross-border incursion. Envoy Thomas Barrack's proposal, delivered to Lebanese officials during his last visit on June 19, would see Hezbollah fully disarmed within four months in exchange for Israel halting air strikes and withdrawing troops from posts in south Lebanon they still occupy following a war last year. Speaking to reporters after meeting Lebanon's president on Monday, Barrack said he had received a seven-page reply, although he gave no details of its contents. 'What the government gave us was something spectacular in a very short period of time,' Barrack said. 'I'm unbelievably satisfied with the response.' Barrack, a longtime adviser to U.S. President Donald Trump who also serves as U.S. ambassador to Turkey and special envoy for Syria, said he believed 'the Israelis do not want war with Lebanon'. 'Both countries are trying to give the same thing - the notion of a stand-down agreement, of the cessation of hostilities, and a road to peace,' he said. Israel crushed the leadership of Lebanon's Hezbollah group in a bombing campaign last year, one of many fronts on which it has inflicted severe blows against Iran and its allies since the start of the war in Gaza in 2023. Lebanon president says disarming Hezbollah 'delicate' as two dead in strikes on south Hezbollah has already relinquished some weapons and withdrawn from southern areas under a ceasefire agreed last year. Israel has kept troops at five posts in southern Lebanon and continued targeting Hezbollah fighters with air strikes, saying it wants the group to pose no threat to Israel. An Israeli official, who asked not to be named, said Israel would only withdraw once Hezbollah completely disarmed - and that Israel would keep reinforcing the posts as long as it saw Hezbollah trying to rebuild its forces in south Lebanon. Hezbollah has not publicly responded to the U.S. disarmament proposal, but its leader said on Sunday the group needed to keep some weapons to defend Lebanon from Israel. Sources have told Reuters that the group is considering shrinking its arsenal, without disarming in full. Barrack also met with Lebanon's prime minister and its parliament speaker, Nabih Berri, who is an ally of Hezbollah. Berri's office released a statement saying the meeting was 'good and constructive, taking into account Lebanon's interests and sovereignty, the concerns of all Lebanese, and the demands of Hezbollah'. Hezbollah has future as political party, envoy says In the hours before Barrack's visit, Israel carried out a wave of air strikes on Lebanon's south and east as well as a cross-border ground assault on a Lebanese border village. The Israeli escalation was seen by Lebanese officials and diplomats as an attempt to ratchet up pressure on Hezbollah. Western countries have long said changes in the region could provide a chance for Lebanon to strengthen state institutions that have remained weak for decades in the shadow of powerful sectarian groups. Barrack said Hezbollah needed reassurance that it would still have a future in Lebanon as a major political party. Regional changes provided an opportunity for Lebanon, he said, noting that Syria's new government, which took power last year after the fall of Iranian ally Bashar al-Assad, was now opening dialogue with Israel. 'The dialogue has started between Syria and Israel, just as the dialogue needs to be reinvented by Lebanon,' he said. 'If you don't want change, it's no problem. The rest of the region is moving at Mach speed and you will be left behind.'
