Chris Selley: Earth to Liberals — First Nations are not an anti-development monolith
Sean Fraser — the federal Liberals' supposed master communicator who did a bad job as immigration minister, and then a bad job as housing minister, and then said he wasn't running again to spend time with his family, and then opportunistically changed his mind and was rewarded with the justice and attorney general portfolio — laid his first dog's egg of the Mark Carney era this week.
Article content
Article content
Fraser said Indigenous groups don't have a 'complete veto' over natural-resource projects or any other government decisions — but that wasn't the turd in question, because it was absolutely true.
Article content
Article content
The turd came later, apparently after getting his ears boxed by Assembly of First Nations National Chief Cindy Woodhouse: Fraser disavowed his entirely truthful statement.
Article content
'I think even accepting the premise of the question that was put to me (about a 'veto') really made people feel like there may be an attempt by the government to work unilaterally, not in partnership (with First Nations),' Fraser told reporters in a public apology.
Article content
'Despite innocent intentions, I think my comments actually caused hurt and potentially eroded a very precarious trust that has been built up over many years to respect the rights of Indigenous people in this country,' he said.
Article content
Article content
Coming up on 500 years since Jacques Cartier first set foot here and named it Canada, and 150-plus years after the Crown concluded the first treaties with First Nations, and with President Donald Trump suddenly bringing our crippling dependence on the United States into very sharp focus, if we can't even speak the plain truth to each other in plain language, we might be in even bigger trouble than we realized.
Article content
Article content
But I think we can speak the plain truth to each other in plain language, so long as we rightly marginalize fringe and unreasonable voices. While apologizing for speaking the truth, Fraser also accurately pointed to 'a frankly dangerous trope that paints a false picture of Indigenous peoples as being anti-development.'
Article content
The 2021 Census recorded 1.8 million Indigenous Canadians — five per cent of the Canadian population, give or take. No one would ascribe monolithic opinions like 'supports/doesn't support resource development' to any other ethnic five per cent of the Canadian population. Yet most Canadian media reliably frame these issues as 'First Nations versus the colonialist menace.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
36 minutes ago
- National Post
Adam Pankratz: B.C.'s shameful race to give up public land
Shame. There used to be more of it and that was a good thing. Nowadays, a lack of shame runs rampant as people gaslight the world in the hopes no one will check up on them. In British Columbia, our current gaslighter-in-chief is Randene Neill, the minister of water, land and resource stewardship. Article content In a lengthy Aug. 1 Facebook post, Neill addressed recent changes to land use planning in B.C., which she claimed had been 'misunderstood.' Article content Article content The province first tried to overhaul land use planning earlier in 2024 with changes to the Land Act. The proposed changes to the act would have given decision-making powers to First Nations over public lands. However, the government continually claimed the changes were far less impactful than they would have been. At the time, the opportunity for public engagement on these enormous amendments was released in a low-key posting on the government website with little fanfare. The government did not want the public involved, but got caught when veteran journalist Vaughn Palmer began following the issue and brought it to the public's attention. Article content Article content In the face of the public reaction due to Palmer's reporting, the government backed down on its amendments to the Land Act, but not on its idea to transfer decision-making power to First Nations by other means. Article content In August 2024, the NDP agreed to transfer six square kilometres of public land to the Shishalh Nation, in a deal that was only made public in January 2025. Neill, who was just elected in October, wasn't made aware of this until after the 2024 provincial election. This summer, the government is following the same playbook. On June 3, the government announced consultations for land use planning in northwestern B.C., which covers nearly a third of the entire province. Few people would have seen the opportunity for engagement or been aware of the vast changes underway. Article content While not explicitly hidden by the government, changes of this magnitude require a far, far more concerted effort to raise public awareness on the full impact of proposed land use changes. This takes years, not weeks or a few short months as with the current government timelines. Article content Then, on June 26, the government signed a new land use agreement with the Squamish Nation, updating their 2007 deal. In the new deal, the province and the First Nation agreed on the boundaries of Squamish Nation 'areas of importance,' which are candidate sites for protection 'based on various cultural, spiritual and other interests.' These areas, says the deal, are a 'high priority to develop management direction for claim staking, subsurface resource exploration and development that protects the integrity of Squamish Nation's cultural and other interests.' Article content Some of the Squamish Nation's areas of importance are substantially within 'municipal jurisdiction or private lands,' including parts of Vancouver. Regarding these zones, the deal stipulates that B.C. 'agrees to, at the request of Squamish Nation, participate in future discussions, including with a local government or third party, focused on protecting or resolving Squamish Nation interests….' Article content It's possible that private lands will be affected down the road, but we don't know for sure. In any case, no government releases news like that just prior to a long weekend unless it desperately wants to avoid any scrutiny about a secretive process that affects public access to public (and possibly private) lands. The government then remained quiet about land use planning until Neill's Aug. 1 Facebook post. There, she announced that online feedback surveys had been open since June 3 and would close Aug. 8. These surveys were not mentioned in the minister's initial news release and X announcement in June. Article content Article content On Facebook, Neill assured that land use plans 'do not, and will not, apply to private land.' Article content 'If you own private property within a planning area, your land is not included in the plan and your rights as a property owner remain the same,' she continued. 'The planning process is transparent and requires extensive public engagement to identify the values that people care about in the planning area, from industrial and agricultural to recreation and conservation uses.' Article content This reeks of a government doing its best to achieve its desired Land Act changes under the guise of multiple one-off deals with First Nations without meaningful public engagement. It is being done on extremely tight timelines during the summer when, rather than reading obscure government news releases, British Columbians are outside enjoying the public lands they could soon not have full access to if Neill and Premier David Eby get their way. Article content B.C.'s NDP government has done nothing to earn public trust when it comes to land use. It has a track record of obfuscation, secrecy and silence when it comes to communicating its plans to the public, which is unacceptable considering that 94 per cent of the province belongs to the citizens of British Columbia. Article content Neill, Eby and the NDP are derelict in their democratic responsibility to the public interest by their rushed and secret land use actions. Shame on them. Article content
Winnipeg Free Press
3 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Many public servants ran for federal office in the spring — only one of them made it
OTTAWA – Out of the many federal public servants who ran as candidates in the last federal election, only one was elected: Caroline Desrochers, the Liberal member of Parliament for Trois-Rivières, Que. Originally from Montreal, Desrochers worked at Global Affairs Canada for almost 25 years; her first posting was in Haiti. She later worked for about a decade on Canada-U.S. relations and was posted to New York during U.S. President Donald Trump's first mandate. During that time, she worked on the first round of tariffs and the renegotiation of the North American trade pact. 'I always knew one day I would want to do that,' Desrochers said of entering politics, adding that she was interested in doing work that felt closer to people. 'For me, it was important to have a solid experience to come and do this kind of work.' Desrochers ran for the Liberals in the La Prairie riding in 2021 but was defeated by Bloc Québécois candidate Alain Therrien. Desrochers said her experience in dealing with the Americans on steel and aluminum tariffs and her outreach with the U.S. Congress will be valuable in this 'consequential' moment. She said she's also interested in working on economic development and industry issues, noting the presence of a federal port and a large steel and aluminum industry in her new riding. This is the first time the Trois-Rivières riding has been held by a Liberal since the 1980s. It has been held most recently by Conservative, Bloc and NDP members of Parliament. The Public Service Commission of Canada gave 54 federal public servants permission to run in the recent federal election. Federal government employees who want to run in federal, provincial, territorial or municipal elections need to get permission from the commission, said a commission spokesperson. Before that permission can be granted, the commission has to be satisfied that there are no risks to the political impartiality of the public service. More federal public servants showed interest in running in the recent election than in previous years. The commission received requests from 65 public servants for permission to run in the 2025 campaign — 11 later withdrew their requests. The commission received 29 requests from public servants for permission to run in 2021, and 44 in 2019. The commission granted 38 requests in 2015 and 12 in 2011. The commission says it doesn't have data on the total number of requests filed in those years. While she's keen to work on economic issues and housing — she's now parliamentary secretary to the minister of housing and infrastructure — Desrochers said she also wants to be part of ongoing conversations about modernizing the public service. While Prime Minister Mark Carney promised during the election to 'cap,' not cut, the size of the public service, most departments and agencies have since been asked to find program spending cuts of up to 15 per cent by 2028-29. A recent report by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives said the public service could shed almost 60,000 jobs over the next four years as Ottawa looks to cut costs. Desrochers — who worked on transforming Global Affairs Canada before the election — said she believes the public service needs to be trimmed down to make it more efficient. She said that complex processes and multiple levels of bureaucracy are slowing down the work of government. 'We owe that to the Canadian public, to be more efficient in how we do things,' she said. Reducing the size of the public service will be 'a dance' and will 'take some coordination,' Desrochers said, because people retiring or leaving for other opportunities may not be working in the places where cuts are most needed. Desrochers also said that the ratio of executives to non-executives is 'quite high' in some departments and the plan seems to be to cut back in that area as well. The Carney government has struck a new cabinet committee focused on government transformation. Desrochers said she already has started to engage with colleagues on that committee. 'It's important that we get it right,' she said. 'I hope it can be a constructive conversation also with the public service.' Desrochers said there will also be a 'conversation' if some departments are unable to achieve their targets without cutting essential items and services. She said some departments may be able to cut deeper than others, which could allow other departments to make smaller cuts. Desrochers said her main focus when Parliament returns will be housing, particularly for students. She said she's also working on the new Build Canada Homes initiative promised by the Liberals during the election. Desrochers said the government is exploring options for Build Canada Homes, which could become a separate agency or a unit within Housing, Infrastructure and Communities Canada. 'We're going to start doing work right now with what we have already, the programs that we have, and then we're going to see about what's the best governance of it, but our goal is really to not create more layers of bureaucracy and approvals,' she said. 'This is why you do politics … to work on something that is going to have impact on people. And so, I think to have the privilege of working on that is really, it's really awesome.' This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 11, 2025.
Winnipeg Free Press
4 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Ex-MKO employee defends video
A former Manitoba Keewatinowi Okimakanak employee being sued for defamation by the organization and its executive director says information she posted online is true and fair comment. Stephan Thliveris, Loretta Rudrum's lawyer, said in a statement of defence filed Friday that Rudrum posted a YouTube video touching on numerous issues about MKO and its executive director Kelvin Lynxleg. They include 'governance, employment practices, fiscal responsibility, and accounting and reporting.' The information was 'fair comment on matters of public interest' and was 'based on truth from documentation, personal observations and experiences and communications,' the document states. 'There was a social, moral and even legal duty and interest of (Rudrum) to produce and publish the YouTube video as the contents deal with matters of public interest.' Rudrum worked at MKO, which represents northern First Nations, until resigning on Feb. 15, 2023. Rudrum said that after watching the YouTube video in September 2024, Keewatin Tribal Council Grand Chief Walter Wastesicoot asked her to prepare a report. The report was later given to the council and Indigenous Services Canada. She said the federal department then 'opened a file to undertake a formal analysis of the report' and that the analysis has recommended a forensic audit be done 'of all MKO programs that received federal funding.' 'If (MKO and Lynxleg) are the subject of public odium or contempt, it is the result of their own conduct and public comments and not as a result of the alleged defamatory statements,' Rudrum said in the statement of defence. MKO and Lynxleg filed a statement of claim in Court of King's Bench in May asking for general and punitive damages for various online postings by Rudrum starting in February 2023. They are also seeking a permanent injunction restraining Rudrum from continuing to publish allegedly defamatory statements and to delete them online. Both the statements of claim and defence include allegations that have not yet been proven in court. Kevin RollasonReporter Kevin Rollason is a general assignment reporter at the Free Press. He graduated from Western University with a Masters of Journalism in 1985 and worked at the Winnipeg Sun until 1988, when he joined the Free Press. He has served as the Free Press's city hall and law courts reporter and has won several awards, including a National Newspaper Award. Read more about Kevin. Every piece of reporting Kevin produces is reviewed by an editing team before it is posted online or published in print — part of the Free Press's tradition, since 1872, of producing reliable independent journalism. Read more about Free Press's history and mandate, and learn how our newsroom operates. Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
