ERROR: The request could not be satisfied
The Kremlin confirmed the conversation but said Mr Putin blamed the West for the conflict and said any peace deal should be 'long-term'.
The talks lasted for more than two hours and the two agreed to hold more contacts on Ukraine and Iran in the future, the French presidency said.
Mr Macron 'emphasised France's unwavering support for Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity' and 'called for the establishment, as soon as possible, of a ceasefire and the launch of negotiations between Ukraine and Russia for a solid and lasting settlement of the conflict,' said an Elysee Palace statement.
A Kremlin statement said Mr Putin 'reminded (Mr Macron) that the Ukrainian conflict is a direct consequence of the policy of Western states.'
Mr Putin added that Western states had 'for many years ignored Russia's security interests' and 'created an anti-Russian bridgehead in Ukraine'.
The Kremlin said Mr Putin told the French president that any peace deal should be 'comprehensive and long-term, provide for the elimination of the root causes of the Ukrainian crisis and be based on new territorial realities.'
On Iran, 'the two presidents decided to coordinate their efforts and to speak soon in order to follow up together on this issue,' the French statement added.
The talks came after a ceasefire last week ended a 12-day conflict between Iran and Israel. Mr Macron has previously urged Iran to ease tensions by moving to 'zero enrichment' of uranium in its nuclear programme.
Mr Macron 'emphasised the urgent need' for Iran to comply with its obligations under the Nuclear Proliferation Treaty 'in particular by cooperating fully with the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), whose inspectors must be able to resume their work without delay,' the statement said.
'He expressed his determination to seek a diplomatic solution that would allow for a lasting and demanding settlement of the nuclear issue, the question of Iran's missiles and its role in the region.'
The French leader tried in a series of phone calls in 2022 to warn Mr Putin against invading Ukraine and travelled to Moscow early that year.
He kept up phone contact with Mr Putin after the invasion but talks then ceased, with the last call between the presidents dating back to September 2022.
Mr Macron has over the last year toughened his line against Russia, saying its expansionism is a threat to all of Europe.
The French president has also refused to rule out putting troops on the ground in Ukraine.
In April 2024, Russia's then defence minister Sergei Shoigu and French counterpart Sebastien Lecornu, a close confidant of Mr Macron, held talks focused on security in the run-up to the Olympic Games in Paris.
That was the last official high-level contact between the two countries. AFP
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
The US sends lots of plastic trash overseas. Malaysia just said no thanks
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox American scrap brokers sent more than 35,000 tonnes of plastic waste to Malaysia in 2024. KUALA LUMPUR - In the shadow of US President Donald Trump's tariff fights, a different kind of trade war is playing out involving candy wrappers and plastic bottles. On July 1, Malaysia, which received more discarded plastic from rich nations than any other developing country in 2024, effectively banned all shipments of plastic waste from the United States. That might not seem like a big deal. But the United States has increasingly relied on countries like Malaysia to deal with plastic trash. American scrap brokers sent more than 35,000 tonnes of plastic waste to Malaysia in 2024, according to trade data analysed by the Basel Action Network, a non-profit group that tracks plastic waste issues. In 2024, after seizing more than 100 shipping containers of hazardous materials sent from Los Angeles that had been improperly labeled as raw materials, Malaysian environment minister Nik Nazmi told reporters that 'we do not want Malaysia to be the world's rubbish bin'. The country's Ministry of Investment, Trade and Industry did not respond to a request for comment July 1. Turmoil in the little-known trade in plastic waste has its roots in a decision by China in 2018, for the same reasons as Malaysia, to ban imports of wastepaper and plastic. Before that, China had for years accepted as much as half of the globe's discarded plastic and paper. Western nations have since struggled with a buildup of plastic trash. The United States recycles less than 10 per cent of the plastic it discards. Food and other contamination in plastic waste hinders recycling, and a significant portion of plastic, like chip bags that contain layers of different plastics and other materials, simply can't be recycled economically. The rest ends up in landfills, is burned or is shipped overseas. And while new overseas destinations have emerged, a growing number of countries are starting to say no to trash. In 2025, Thailand and Indonesia also announced bans on plastic waste imports. The world produces nearly 500 million tonnes of plastic each year, more than double the amount from two decades ago, and a growing amount of plastic waste is turning up on coastlines and riverbanks, as well as in whales, birds and other animals that ingest them. Researchers have estimated that one garbage truck's worth of plastic enters the ocean every minute. China's ban 'sent shock waves through the global plastic waste trade,' said professor Tony R Walker at the School for Resource and Environmental Studies at Dalhousie University in Halifax, Nova Scotia, who researches the global flow of plastic waste. The countries that started to accept that discarded plastic 'quickly became overwhelmed,' he said. Much of that plastic trash ends up dumped in landfills or is burned, which releases harmful air pollution, or is simply released into the environment. People in rich countries may assume the plastic they diligently separate is being recycled, he said, something he termed 'wish cycling'. However, instead of going into a recycling stream, 'a lot of it gets redirected to waste,' he said. Malaysia's amended Customs Act bans all plastic waste shipments from countries that have not signed the Basel Convention, a global agreement that regulates hazardous waste, including plastic. That puts the United States, the only major country that is not a party to the agreement, in a particularly tricky spot. The amended law also sets stringent restrictions on plastic waste imports from other countries, saying they must contain only one type of plastic, with at most two per cent contamination, to ensure that the imported plastics are recycled and not discarded. That level would be challenging to meet for any plastic waste collected from consumers. In an email to clients sent June 20 and shared with The New York Times, chief executive Steve Wong of global plastic waste broker Fukutomi said shipments of scrap plastic to Malaysia had already 'come to a virtual standstill'. Ross Eisenberg, president of America's Plastic Makers, an industry group, said the effects of Malaysia's import policy on plastic waste remained unclear. Nevertheless, 'our industry remains focused on scaling up the use of recycled plastics in new products,' he said. 'These efforts support American jobs and drive economic growth, while conserving our natural resources and helping to prevent plastic pollution.' Malaysia's ban on plastic waste imports from the United States was prompted by the discovery of hundreds of containers filled with hazardous electronic and plastic waste that had been falsely declared as raw materials in order to bypass the country's trade control laws, said researcher Wong Pui Yi at the Basel Action Network. But local industry associations have urged the government to lift the ban on clean, recyclable plastic imports, arguing that the imports are necessary to help manufacturers meet their recycled-content targets. Brands like Nestlé, Coca-Cola and Pepsi have committed to using more recycled material in their products, said president CC Cheah of Malaysian Plastics Manufacturers Association, and the Malaysian recycling industry could still play a role. Dr Kate O'Neill, a professor of environmental science, policy and management at the University of California, Berkeley, said Malaysia's ban could mean that plastic waste starts flowing to other countries that are less able to handle the waste. Monitoring will be important, she said. 'The recycling industry still hasn't caught up with the disruption, so these exports are still needed.' That's why experts increasingly say that, on top of investing in recycling infrastructure, policies are needed to help rein in plastic production itself, for example by curbing demand for single-use plastics. Some countries negotiating a new treaty aimed at curbing plastic pollution have also called for caps on plastic production. That could come from packaging designs that cut down on plastic use, measures like plastic bag bans and overall policies that make manufacturers more responsible for the waste their products generate. Those policies have been spreading across the United States as well as globally. On July 1, a law went into effect in Illinois that prohibits large hotels from providing small, single-use plastic bottles for toiletries like shampoo and conditioner. Smaller hotels have until 2026 to comply. Also on July 1, Delaware began prohibiting restaurants from providing foam food containers, plastic beverage stirrers and plastic cocktail and sandwich picks, and requires that single-use plastic straws are only given out at the customer's request. NY TIMES
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
Top Russian general convicted in high profile corruption case
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Timur Ivanov was sentenced to 13 years in a penal colony for embezzlement and given a fine of nearly US$1.3 million (S$1.65 million). ISTANBUL – A top Russian general was convicted of embezzlement and jailed on July 1, state news media reported, in one of the highest-profile cases from a months-long Kremlin campaign to root out military corruption amid the war in Ukraine. Timur Ivanov, a general and longtime deputy defence minister who oversaw military construction projects, was detained in April 2024 on charges of taking a 'large-scale' bribe – the first in a string of arrests of senior officers. Ivanov, who was known as a protégé of Mr Sergei Shoigu, the former Russian defence minister and a close associate of President Vladimir Putin, had pleaded not guilty and denied any wrongdoing. The arrest of Ivanov, and other defence officials after him, signalled a turning point in the Kremlin's invasion of Ukraine . Coming at a moment of rising costs and increasing criticism from supporters of the war over the distribution of frontline resources, the moves were seen as an effort by Mr Putin to put the war effort on more economically sustainable footing after more than two years of fighting – and to show that Russia had the discipline and capacity to wage a long conflict. In delivering the verdict on July 1 at Moscow City Court, Judge Sergei Podoprigorov sentenced Ivanov to 13 years in a penal colony for embezzlement and also imposed a fine of nearly US$1.3 million (S$1.65 million), according to Russian state news agency Tass. Ivanov will lose his military medals and honours, Tass reported. Mr Denis Baluyev, an attorney for Ivanov, told Tass that he planned to appeal. Ivanov still faces bribery charges. The verdict on July 1 was a rare conviction of a prominent member of the Russian elite with ties to Kremlin officials. Details of the indictment had been scarce, since the judge closed the trial to the public, saying classified information could be revealed during the proceedings. Tass had previously reported that Ivanov stood accused of embezzling US$2.7 million from ferry purchases and of receiving more than US$15 million in bribes. In his final statement to the court, according to Tass, Ivanov said he had 'absolutely nothing to do' with the accusations levelled against him. Russian military bloggers, some of whom had raised the alarm about graft in the military, welcomed the ruling. 'It has been clear since the first days of the war that the army's coffers were being pilfered in their entirety, and the army was not ready for hostilities,' one blogger, who goes by the name Alex Parker Returns, wrote in a Telegram post on July 1. The post called the verdict a 'half-measure' while hailing it as a rare example of justice. 'Who could have thought two years ago that a deputy defence minister would be sentenced to 13 years in prison?' the post added. Ivanov, who served as a deputy defence minister starting in 2016, had long been in charge of military construction projects, including huge contracts awarded to rebuild the Russian-occupied city of Mariupol in eastern Ukraine, which was devastated by Russian attacks soon after the February 2022 invasion. He was also responsible for building Patriot Park, a military theme park outside Moscow that sought to cast the experiences of the Russian armed forces in a holy light, and was awarded the Order for Merit to the Fatherland several times. Before his arrest, Ivanov had attracted the attention of Mr Alexei Navalny's Anti-Corruption Foundation for his and his wife's conspicuously lavish lifestyle, including yacht rentals on the French Riviera. He also was placed under US sanctions in 2022 for his role in Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Ivanov's detention in April 2024 marked the beginning of a month-long purge of high-ranking Defence Ministry officials and generals, charged with bribery and misappropriation of funds. In May 2024, Mr Putin unexpectedly removed Mr Shoigu, his long-serving defence minister, and replaced him with a member of his economic team. In addition to Mr Ivanov, a number of others swept up in the campaign have been convicted. Lieutenant-General Vadim Shamarin, former deputy chief of Russia's general staff, was sentenced in April to seven years in a maximum-security prison for taking bribes. A week later, a Russian military court sentenced Major General Ivan Popov, a former top commander in Russia's invasion of Ukraine, to five years in a penal colony for fraud and stripped him of his rank. NYTIMES
Straits Times
2 hours ago
- Straits Times
US halts key Ukraine weapons deliveries amid Russian barrage
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox The move came after a review of US munitions stockpiles and amid concerns they had fallen too low. WASHINGTON - The Trump administration is halting the transfer of artillery rounds and air defences to Ukraine, depriving the country of much-needed weapons as it endures stepped-up missile and drone attacks from Russia. The White House confirmed a Politico report on the stoppage, which said the move came after a review of US munitions stockpiles and amid concerns they had fallen too low. The move was spearheaded by Under Secretary of Defence for Policy Mr Elbridge Colby, Politico said. Mr Colby has long argued that the US is overextended abroad militarily, and has joined Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth in repeatedly saying that European allies should assume greater responsibility for the continent's security, including the defence of Ukraine. 'This decision was made to put America's interests first following a DOD review of our nation's military support and assistance to other countries across the globe,' White House spokeswoman Anna Kelly said in an emailed statement confirming the report. 'The strength of the United States Armed Forces remains unquestioned – just ask Iran.' The decision comes as Ukraine struggles to repel large-scale Russian missile and drone strikes across the country. On June 29, Ukraine said Russia fired a record 537 missiles and drones in 'massive' overnight attacks. Russia has intensified its attacks in recent weeks as President Vladimir Putin defies US and European calls to accept a ceasefire to allow for peace talks. Among the weapons that are being paused are 155mm artillery shells, Stinger shoulder-fired missiles, Patriots and Hellfire missiles, PBS Newshour's Nick Schiffrin reported. The Biden administration used two methods to send weapons to Kyiv, relying on drawdowns of equipment from US stockpiles in the short term and allocating money to purchase new equipment. While the US has billions of dollars in congressional funding left over from the Biden administration to supply Ukraine weapons, those could take years for manufacture and delivery. US President Donald Trump has previously signalled he'd be willing to cut support, and he hasn't sought more money from lawmakers. The Pentagon didn't immediately respond to a request for comment on the move. The State Department referred questions to the Pentagon, which is responsible for weapons shipments. BLOOMBERG
