logo
Peace remains a distant hope as Sudan's battle lines shift

Peace remains a distant hope as Sudan's battle lines shift

Arab News09-02-2025

LONDON: When two shells exploded 100 meters from Al-Nau Hospital in the Sudanese city of Omdurman last week, medical staff felt the explosion and feared the worst.
A few days earlier, a blast at a busy market nearby killed 54 people and injured 158. Medics had battled to treat the dozens of bloodied casualties brought through the doors.
This time the explosions killed six people, including a hospital volunteer.
Even within the devastation of Sudan's war, two such deadly attacks taking place within days of each other shocked those working at the hospital.
The shelling came amid an escalation in fighting across the heavily populated Khartoum state as the Sudanese army (SAF) and its allies attempt to retake full control of the capital from the Rapid Support Forces (RSF) militia.
If successful, it would be a victory that reshapes the conflict but, analysts say, is unlikely to bring it to an end.
Jean-Nicolas Armstrong Dangelser, Sudan emergency coordinator for the charity Doctors Without Borders (MSF), was in Al-Nau Hospital's emergency room at the time of the two attacks.
'The map of the conflict is changing literally by the hour,' he told Arab News. 'It's obviously coming with a big increase of violence, because there is fighting now spreading on multiple front lines.
'The hospital staff are seeing the direct impact of the conflict with the war wounded coming in and a lot of civilians being affected.'
The market attack and shelling near Al-Nau Hospital was blamed on the RSF as it rapidly withdraws from greater Khartoum, which includes Omdurman.
When the war broke out in April 2023 as part of a power struggle between Gen. Abdel Fattah Al-Burhan, SAF's leader and Sudan's de-facto ruler, and RSF commander Mohammed Hamdan Dagalo, the militia seized control of much of Khartoum, along with large swaths of the vast country.
The military-led government relocated to Port Sudan as fighting raged, killing tens of thousands of people, displacing almost 12 million and leading to famine in several parts of the country.
Late last year, SAF mounted a comeback after sourcing more weapons, including drones, and carrying out a recruitment drive. After months of fighting, there was a major breakthrough in January when they seized Wad Madani, the capital of Al-Jazirah state.
Since then, the army has launched offensives from multiple directions into the outskirts of Khartoum, getting the upper hand in the adjacent cities of Omdurman and Khartoum North, also known as Bahri, which make up greater Khartoum.
On Friday, the army said it had retaken Kafouri district in Khartoum North, an important base for the RSF in what would be one of its most significant defeats so far.
The expulsion of RSF fighters from Wad Madani was followed by allegations of summary executions and reprisals against those accused by SAF soldiers of being RSF informants or collaborators. These reports are a cause for concern for Khartoum residents who have lived through months of RSF control over their neighborhoods.
Retaking the whole of Khartoum seems inevitable and would undoubtedly be a major symbolic and strategic victory for the army.
But hope that it may usher in an end to the conflict, either militarily through a defeat of the RSF or through a negotiated settlement, remains highly unlikely.
The RSF still holds sway in much of western Sudan, which includes the Darfur region, where Dagalo and many of his fighters come from.
Ahmed Soliman, a senior research fellow at international affairs think tank Chatham House, says the RSF's full retreat from Khartoum would not mean that the militia had been defeated.
'It would be a significant setback for the RSF, but we have to keep that in context also to what the RSF has been able to do during this war, which is to capture very substantial amounts of territory,' he told Arab News.
The RSF controls four of the five states in Darfur and has ramped up its siege of El-Fasher, the capital of North Darfur. It also controls gold mines in other parts of Darfur and holds large parts of the Kordofan region.
'The RSF is very focused also on maintaining supply lines to the border areas with South Sudan, particularly the southwest,' Soliman added.
If the army can consolidate power in Khartoum, it is unsure whether there would be enough incentive for the RSF to enter ceasefire talks given the 'substantial amounts of territory and resources' it controls.
Even without a truce, taking the capital would certainly change the dynamics of the conflict along with the calculations of the two sides, Soliman said.
For the military and its supporters, which include the political elites from the regime of deposed President Omar Bashir, reinstating the government in Khartoum may feel like 'mission accomplished' in the conflict.
That would still leave the RSF in control of huge areas and effectively lead to a fragmented Sudan with different regions of de-facto governance, Soliman added.
'The preservation of Sudanese unity may be at stake,' he said.
A clue as to how the military's retaking of Khartoum might affect Sudan's future came on Saturday when Burhan announced plans to form a transitional government.
He said the administration's main objective would be to 'accomplish the remaining military tasks … and cleanse all of Sudan' of the RSF, AFP news agency reported. It would also prepare for a broader political transition and eventually elections.
While the uncertainty over the direction of the conflict will do little to reassure Sudanese over their futures, the recapturing of areas near Khartoum has allowed some to return to their homes or gain access to medical help.
Over the weekend, MSF assisted the health ministry to set up mobile clinics in North Khartoum in areas recently retaken by the army.
Populations there have spent nearly two years struggling to find food, clean water and medicine, Armstrong Dangelser said.
Their condition, however, is evidence of the suffering the conflict has inflicted.
The MSF-supported hospitals are dealing with injuries related to shelling and airstrikes, but there are also the health effects of people living without clean water to wash and drink, no electricity and a lack of food.
• 10,000+ People suffering from famine in Khartoum alone.
• 12m+ People displaced by Sudan's conflict since April 2023.
• 28,700+ Conflict's death toll as per ACLED records.
They have dealt with cholera outbreaks and other diseases associated with not having access to basic services, and malnutrition is rife.
Disturbingly, Armstrong Dangelser said they had recently seen a surge in stabbing wounds and close-range gunshots, something he associated with outbreaks of looting in areas recently captured from the RSF.
There have also been widespread reports of reprisal killings in areas taken over by the army. The violence is in keeping with the level of brutality meted out by the two sides throughout the war.
The US accused the RSF last month of committing genocide and placed sanctions on its leader, Dagalo, who is known as 'Hemedti.' Washington also sanctioned Al-Burhan for killing civilians and targeting schools and hospitals.
Al-Burhan and Dagalo led a coup together in October 2021 that overthrew a transitional government before the two men fell out spectacularly and led the country into war.
This latest phase has led to a sharp rise in civilian deaths, the UN said on Friday, with 275 civilians killed between Jan. 31 and Feb. 5 by shelling and airstrikes.
For aid workers dealing with the world's worst humanitarian disaster, a new front has also emerged in recent weeks — President Donald Trump's decision to suspend foreign aid.
As of September, the US had provided nearly $2 billion to the emergency response in Sudan since the conflict started, making it by far the biggest provider of aid to the country.
"What we are seeing now with the US funding cuts is truly devastating for a lot of people," Armstrong Dangelser said.
Whatever direction the conflict takes next, the suffering of the Sudanese is set to continue.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UK faces choice next week between health and other spending, IFS think tank warns
UK faces choice next week between health and other spending, IFS think tank warns

Arab News

time4 days ago

  • Arab News

UK faces choice next week between health and other spending, IFS think tank warns

LONDON: British finance minister Rachel Reeves' key decision in next week's multi-year spending review will be how much to spend on health care versus other public services, the Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank said on Sunday. Reeves is due to set out day-to-day spending limits for other government departments on June 11 which will run through to the end of March 2029 — almost until the end of the Labour government's expected term in office. Britain has held periodic government spending reviews since 1998, but this is the first since 2015 to cover multiple years, other than one in 2021 focused on the COVID pandemic. The non-partisan IFS said this spending review could prove to be 'one of the most significant domestic policy events' for the current Labour government. Prime Minister Keir Starmer's announcement in February that defense spending would reach 2.5 percent of national income by 2027 had already used the room for further growth in public investment created in Reeves' October budget, it said. 'Simultaneously prioritising additional investments in public services, net zero and growth-friendly areas ... will be impossible,' said Bee Boileau, a research economist at the IFS. Non-investment public spending is intended to rise by 1.2 percent a year on top of inflation between 2026-27 and 2028-29, according to budget plans which Reeves set out in October — half the pace of spending growth in the current and previous financial year. The IFS sees no scope for this to be topped up, as Reeves' budget rules leave almost no room for extra borrowing and tax rises are now limited to her annual budget statement. This forces Reeves and Starmer to choose between the demands of the public health care system — plagued by long waiting times and a slump in productivity since the COVID-19 pandemic — and other stretched areas. In past spending reviews, annual health care spending has typically risen 2 percentage points faster than total spending. If that happened this time — equivalent to an annual increase of 3.4 percent — spending in other departments would have to fall by 1 percent a year in real terms, the IFS forecast. Raising health care spending at roughly the same pace as other areas — a 1.2 percent rise — would only just keep pace with an aging population and not allow any reversal of recent years' deterioration in service quality, the IFS said. Spending cuts could be achieved by scaling back services provided by the state, reducing public-sector employment or real-terms cuts in public-sector pay, it added. But it warned the government needed to be specific about how it planned to make cuts, or risk financial markets losing confidence in its ability to keep borrowing under control. The review does not cover spending on pensions or other benefits, which the government is tackling separately.

Anti-aircraft missiles fire as drones fly over Port Sudan: witnesses
Anti-aircraft missiles fire as drones fly over Port Sudan: witnesses

Arab News

time4 days ago

  • Arab News

Anti-aircraft missiles fire as drones fly over Port Sudan: witnesses

PORT SUDAN, Sudan: Anti-aircraft missiles fired over Sudan's wartime capital Port Sudan on Saturday, eyewitnesses reported, as drones flew over the once-safe haven city. Since April 2023, war has raged between Sudan's regular army and the paramilitary Rapid Support Forces. Port Sudan, seat of the army-backed government, came under attack by drones blamed on the RSF for the first time early this month. The campaign of drone strikes attacked infrastructure including the country's last functioning civilian international airport, power stations and major fuel depots. The near-daily strikes had stopped for over a week until Saturday, when residents in the city heard 'the sound of anti-aircraft missiles north and west of the city and drones flying in the sky,' one witness told AFP. Since Sudanese authorities fled the capital Khartoum early in the war, Port Sudan has hosted government ministries, the United Nations and hundreds of thousands of people. Nearly all aid into the country — home to nearly 25 million people suffering dire food insecurity — transits through Port Sudan. The war has killed tens of thousands, uprooted 13 million and created what the UN describes as the world's largest hunger and displacement crises. It has also effectively split Sudan in two, with the army holding the center, east and north, while the paramilitaries and their allies control nearly all of Darfur and parts of the south. Since losing Khartoum in March, the RSF has adopted a two-pronged strategy: long-range drone strikes on army-held cities accompanied by counteroffensives to reclaim territory in the country's south. The drone strikes have impacted infrastructure across Sudan's army-held northeast, with attacks on power stations causing blackouts for millions of people. A blackout in Khartoum also cut off access to clean water, according to health authorities, causing a cholera outbreak that has killed close to 300 people this month.

UK ban on disposable vapes goes into effect
UK ban on disposable vapes goes into effect

Arab News

time5 days ago

  • Arab News

UK ban on disposable vapes goes into effect

LONDON: A ban on disposable vapes goes into effect across the UK on Sunday in a bid to protect children's health and tackle a 'throwaway' culture. 'For too long, single-use vapes have blighted our streets as litter and hooked our children on nicotine,' junior environment minister Mary Creagh said. She said the government was calling 'time on these nasty devices' — a type of e-cigarette which are very popular with young people — and banning sales of single-use vapes or their supply in a crackdown on UK corner shops and supermarkets. Those caught flouting the ban will face a £200 fine, while repeat offenders risk up to two years in prison. Young people and children in particular have been attracted to cheap and colorful disposable vapes, which have snazzy flavours such as mint, chocolate, mango or watermelon, since they were introduced in the UK in 2021. In 2024, nearly five million disposable vapes were thrown away each week, according to Material Focus, an independent UK-based non-profit. More than 40 tons of lithium, a key metal used in the technology industry, was discarded each year along with single-use vapes — enough to power 5,000 electrical vehicles, the NGO said. Fire services have also warned about the risk of discarded vapes catching light among household rubbish. 'Every vape has potential to start a fire if incorrectly disposed of,' said Justin Greenaway, commercial manager at electronic waste processing company SWEEEP Kuusakoski. The new law, first proposed by the previous Conservative government, also aims to stem a rise in vaping. 'This new law is a step toward reducing vaping among children, while ensuring products are available to support people to quit smoking,' said Caroline Cerny, deputy chief executive for health charity Action on Smoking and Health . A recent ASH survey said 11 percent of adults vape, or about 5.6 million people, and 18 percent of 11 to 17 year olds — about 980,000 under-18s. Among vapers, some 52 percent of young adults aged between 18 to 24 preferred single-use vapes. The long-term health risks of vaping remain unclear. E-cigarettes do not produce tar or carbon monoxide, two of the most harmful elements in tobacco smoke. But they do still contain highly addictive nicotine. The upcoming ban has already led to a fall in disposable vapes. According to ASH, the use of disposables by 18-24-year-old vapers fell from 52 percent in 2024 to 40 percent in 2025. The UK ban follows similar European moves. Belgium and France became the first EU countries to ban sales of disposable vapes. Ireland is also preparing to introduce new restrictions. But critics have argued many users will simply switch to refillable or reusable vaping devices, which will limit the impact on nicotine consumption. And industry experts say the ban could lead to more illegal products entering the UK market. The bill 'only makes it illegal to sell disposable vapes — it does not prohibit their use,' warned Dan Marchant, director of Vape Club, the UK's largest online vape retailer. 'We risk a surge of illegal and potentially dangerous items flooding the black market.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store