
He Can Get the Details Right, Except in His Own Messy Life
Hollywood aspirants had the William Morris mailroom. Junior literati long vied to join The New Yorker's fact-checking department (or, for the gals, the typing pool). They hoped to breathe the magic vapors of E.B. White while cooking up the Great American Novel.
In the age of 'truthiness' and 'fake news,' and with ChatGPT hovering like a mockingbird, the role of fact checker has been newly narrowed and consecrated. Or so suggests 'The Fact Checker,' the first novel by Austin Kelley, a former New Yorker fact checker. It's a sprightly hyperlocal caper that is also, intentionally or not, a Notes and Comment on the fragile state of urban intellectual masculinity.
We've come a long way from 'Bright Lights, Big City,' which jump-started the career of Jay McInerney, another former New Yorker fact checker, in 1984 … or have we?
Both books have unnamed young male protagonists. Both lampoon entrenched procedures and starchy characters at the New Yorkerish magazines where they toil: In 'The Fact Checker,' which is set in 2004, there's a veteran checker named Mr. Lancaster, 'a frail old ghost of a man' who stocks the house library with multiple volumes on Civil War artillery and is comically conscripted to check a piece on the rapper 50 Cent.
Both narrators bop around downtown and go on benders, though the preferred poison of Kelley's is whiskey, not Bolivian marching powder. Both pine for their exes; then, a fashion model named Amanda; now, a graduate student, Magdalena.
Our 21st-century fact checker used to be a graduate student, too, specializing in 19th-century utopianism, until he realized 'no one really wanted to read academic history.' He worships the Fonz and looks like Tony Shalhoub, the actor. He loves watching baseball and hates playing. 'There was that painful slow time when the ball arced through the air. It was excruciating. Was I under it? Yes. No. Yes. No. Too late.'
Since Magda ran off with a professor, he has struggled with romance in New York, where — and this was before the apps — dates and meetings are oft confused and 'everyone was tentative and ambiguous.' He is, he comes to realize with some consternation, 'a meat eater who's never killed anything.' One of the things he's compulsive about checking is the fly of his pants.
Kelley's hero doesn't long to escape his duties, as McInerney's dissolute alter ego did, but takes pride in his variegated beta role. He's been assigned to check a story about the Union Square Greenmarket, by a debonair but careless restaurant critic named John Mandeville, one of whose sources is a farmer, Sylvia. Mandeville neglected to get her surname, and so the checker — encouraged by the promise that she's 'interesting' — goes to interview her.
Who is Sylvia? Cryptic, lanky and scarred, she feeds him a life-changing heirloom tomato. She herself is something of a hot tomato.
One of the novel's charms is uncovering the vulnerable ornaments — wacky statues, call girls on 11th Avenue, subterranean oyster restaurants — of an increasingly 'Big Box Manhattan.' Sylvia and the 'blank man,' as a friend of hers calls him, visit a graveyard in the financial district on an ambiguous date, then an illegal farm-to-table supper club called Heads and Tails, consuming tongue, offal pie and pork served five ways. They hook up. And then, lacking a cellphone, as some did then — 'trying to maintain some freedom' — she disappears.
Is there something more, something sinister, to Mandeville's story? To Mandeville himself?
Especially in one chapter so gruesome I had to read it through reluctantly parted fingers, 'The Fact Checker' argues for a heightened sensitivity to the brutality of the food chain. (In this it reminded me of 'The Vegan,' Andrew Lipstein's 2023 novel about a financier who starts hearing the animals.)
But it's also about the looming gig economy, the division of labor in the field of writing as well as potatoes. Not for nothing do we now refer to 'content farms.'
Planning a story about the Swift Boat smear campaign, the magazine's staffers can't quite see yet that they're in a changing ecosystem, where supply is soon to outpace demand and alternative facts are hopping onto the conveyor belt of public record.
In one Don Draper moment, Kelley's fact checker considers 'how strange it is to stand inside a giant building held up so high in the air, with other people standing inside a giant building on other floors, each in their own world, and how hard it is, at any minute, to know exactly where you are and what caused you to be there, and what you should do next.'
He's researching the collapse of the twin towers, which were so boldly featured on the original cover of 'Bright Lights, Big City.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
2 hours ago
- USA Today
Patti LuPone controversy: Offensive comments, backlash and apology, explained
Patti LuPone controversy: Offensive comments, backlash and apology, explained Patti LuPone is a Broadway and musical theater legend who's as famous for her performances as her unfiltered opinions about everything from mid-show interruptions to the president. She's appeared in dozens of shows, and among her many accolades are three Tony Awards — two for Best Actress in a Musical (Evita, 1980 and Gypsy, 2008) and one for Best Featured Actress in a Musical (Company, 2022). The 76-year-old actress — who also has had an extensive film and TV career — knows a lot about theater. Probably more than most. But one thing she clearly still needs to learn is that you can still be an outspoken diva without being mean, derogatory or straight-up racist. Leading up to the 2025 Tony Awards on Sunday, LuPone has been in the middle of an ugly controversy seemingly entirely of her own making. In a May 26 New Yorker profile, she made disparaging remarks about six-time Tony Award winner Audra McDonald — the most nominated and awarded performer in Tony's history — and fellow Tony-winner Kecia Lewis. This sparked tremendous backlash from fans and those in the Broadway community and LuPone ultimately apologized. Here's a breakdown of the Patti LuPone controversy. Who is Patti LuPone? As we mentioned, she's a theater star with three Tony Awards, two Grammy Awards and two Emmy Award nominations. Along with Gypsy, Evita and Company, LuPone has been in productions of Anything Goes, Sweeney Todd, Sunset Boulevard and Les Misérables, among many others. After making her stage debut in the 1970s, she's been part of shows on Broadway and West End. What did Patti LuPone say in her New Yorker profile about Audra McDonald and Kecia Lewis? The New Yorker profile by Michael Schulman about LuPone was long, wide-ranging and in-depth, but we're here to focus on a couple specific parts at the end of the feature. LuPone was in a 2024 two-woman play The Roommate, for which her co-star Mia Farrow earned a 2025 Tony nomination. The show shared a wall with the theater showing Hell's Kitchen, the Tony-winning Alicia Keys jukebox musical. The New Yorker notes the musical sound was so loud it could be heard through the walls leading LuPone to ask the show to address the noise issue. She then sent thank-you flowers after it was fixed. Kecia Lewis — a star of Hell's Kitchen who won a 2024 Tony Award for her performance — took to Instagram in November 2024 to read an open letter responding to LuPone labeling "a Black show loud in a way that dismisses it" and accusing her of committing microaggressions. "These actions, in my opinion, are bullying," Lewis says in her Instagram video. "They're offensive. They are racially microaggressive. They're rude. They're rooted in privilege, and these actions also lack a sense of community and leadership for someone as yourself who has been in the business as long as you have." From The New Yorker: 'Oh, my God,' LuPone said, balking, when I brought up the incident. 'Here's the problem. She calls herself a veteran? Let's find out how many Broadway shows Kecia Lewis has done, because she doesn't know what the [expletive] she's talking about.' She Googled. 'She's done seven. I've done thirty-one. Don't call yourself a vet, [expletive].' (The correct numbers are actually ten and twenty-eight, but who's counting?) She explained, of the noise problem, 'This is not unusual on Broadway. This happens all the time when walls are shared.' But LuPone didn't stop the insults there. When Schulman pointed out that Audra McDonald responded to Lewis' Instagram video with "supportive emojis", LuPone insulted McDonald and her Tony-nominated portrayal of Rose in Gypsy, the same role LuPone won a Tony for in the 2008 revival. More from The New Yorker: I mentioned that Audra McDonald—the Tony-decorated Broadway star—had given the video supportive emojis. 'Exactly,' LuPone said. 'And I thought, You should know better. That's typical of Audra. She's not a friend'—hard 'D.' The two singers had some long-ago rift, LuPone said, but she didn't want to elaborate. When I asked what she had thought of McDonald's current production of 'Gypsy,' she stared at me, in silence, for fifteen seconds. Then she turned to the window and sighed, 'What a beautiful day.' Did Audra McDonald or Kecia Lewis respond to Patti LuPone? In an interview with CBS Mornings published this week, Gayle King asked McDonald if she was surprised by LuPone's comments about her. McDonald said: "If there's a rift between us, I don't know what it is. That's something you'd have to ask Patti about. I haven't seen her in about 11 years just because we've been busy just with life and stuff, so I don't know what rift she's talking about. So you'd have to ask her." Despite previously responding to LuPone on Instagram in November, it doesn't seem that Lewis has responded publicly to LuPone's recent comments. How did the Broadway community respond to Patti LuPone's comments? Outrage on behalf of McDonald and Lewis was abundant. More than 500 actors from around the industry signed and published an open letter on May 30 condemning LuPone's comments as "degrading and misogynistic" and "a blatant act of racialized disrespect." According to Playbill, the total number of signatures on the letter is more than 700. Before demanding a broad and consistent standard of accountability in the industry, the letter added: "It constitutes bullying. It constitutes harassment. It is emblematic of the microaggressions and abuse that people in this industry have endured for far too long, too often without consequence. "To publicly attack a woman who has contributed to this art form with such excellence, leadership, and grace—and to discredit the legacy of Audra McDonald, the most nominated and awarded performer in Tony Award history—is not simply a personal offense. It is a public affront to the values of collaboration, equity, and mutual respect that our theater community claims to uphold." Others reactions included one from Emmy Award winning actress Sheryl Lee Ralph, a current star on Abbott Elementary who starred in the original Broadway production of Dreamgirls in 1981, for which she was Tony nominated. Speaking to Page Six from the Gotham Television Awards red carpet, Ralph explained why she's not judging LuPone, 'Why not be nice?' before adding: "But was it a moment where, maybe, you wanted to say, 'Zip it, girl. Zip it'? Inner thoughts need not always be outer thoughts." Patti LuPone ultimately apologized for her comments about Audra McDonald and Kecia Lewis LuPone posted her apology on social media. It read, in part: "I am deeply sorry for the words I used during The New Yorker interview, particularly about Kecia Lewis, which were demeaning and disrespectful. I regret my flippant and emotional responses during this interview, which were inappropriate, and I am devastated that my behavior has offended others and has run counter to what we hold dear in this community. I hope to have the chance to speak to Audra and Kecia personally to offer my sincere apologies." Taking responsibility and committing to doing better is a good thing. But after so many performances, accolades and decades in the industry, she should have known how offensive the words coming out of her mouth were.
Yahoo
20 hours ago
- Yahoo
We asked AI to show us what Bromley will look like in 2050 - and the results are wild
Flying cars, vertical gardens, neon-lit high streets - is this the future of Bromley? We asked artificial intelligence to imagine what Bromley might look like in the year 2050, and the results are both fascinating and a little wild. From futuristic shopping centres to eco-friendly transport and robot-assisted living, these AI-generated images offer a fun, speculative glimpse into what our borough could become in the next 25 years. Bromley High Street One of the most eye-catching images reimagines Bromley High Street as a neon-lit boulevard, bustling with futuristic fashion and autonomous vehicles. Traditional shopfronts appear transformed by digital facades and vertical light displays, offering a glimpse at how retail might evolve in a tech-dominated age. We're not entirely sure how likely UFOs are to hover over the high street, but then again, we're not ChatGPT. AI image of Bromley High Street (Image: ChatGPT/AI) Bromley South Station Bromley South is pictured as a sleek, glass-walled transport hub, with drones and futuristic public transit zipping overhead. Eco-friendly transport seems to be front and centre, with greenery integrated into the design - suggesting a strong emphasis on sustainability. AI image of Bromley South Station (Image: ChatGPT/AI)The Churchill Theatre Though not pictured in this set, the AI imagined venues like The Churchill Theatre being adapted for multi-sensory entertainment and virtual experiences, reflecting how culture and performance might change in an increasingly digital future. AI image of The Churchill Theatre in 2050 (Image: ChatGPT/AI) The Glades Shopping Centre The Glades gets a dramatic sci-fi upgrade, with high-rise walkways, green rooftops and open-air platforms. The scene looks like something out of a futuristic metropolis - part shopping centre, part vertical garden. AI Image of The Glades Shopping Centre (Image: ChatGPT/AI) Bromley houses The future of housing in Bromley, according to AI, includes sleek, energy-efficient buildings with rooftop gardens, solar panels, and smart tech woven into the design. Traditional rows of homes give way to eco-conscious living and automated home systems. AI-image showing the future of homes in Bromley (Image: ChatGPT/AI)Of course, this is all pure speculation, and by 'speculation'', we mean it was dreamed up by ChatGPT, a chatbot that once confidently told someone penguins could fly. So, flying buses and neon Bromley might be a stretch... but then again, so was contactless payment once.

Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Today in history: 1911,H.W. Ross, before starting New Yorker magazine, is editor of the Marysville Appeal
On June 7, 1911, the name H.W. Ross appeared for just the second day in a row of a short stint as managing editor of the Marysville Appeal. Not only was one of the youngest editors of the Marysville Appeal. He was one of the most famous privates of World War I. And he created one of the world's most enduring magazines after convincing a poker buddy, whose family made a fortune in yeast, that it would be a good investment. Harold Ross, or H.W. Ross as he was known in his one and only byline story in Marysville, was the founder and first editor of The New Yorker magazine, a weekly periodical published continuously since 1925, and considered one of the top political and literary magazines in the world. Even today, it remains one of the rare magazines that earns more from subscriptions than advertising. A native of Aspen, Colorado, who left home at an early age, Harold Ross, then 18, convinced 62-year-old Marysville Appeal editor John H. Miller, to hire him in early 1911. Although Ross would later work for newspapers in San Francisco, Sacramento, Santa Rosa, Pasadena, Panama, New Orleans, Atlanta, Brooklyn, and Hoboken, New Jersey, one of his most significant assignments turned out to be his first, at the Marysville Appeal, according to Thomas Kunkel, author of "Genius in Disguise: Harold Ross of The New Yorker." In his biography of Ross, Kunkel begins chapter 2, entitled "Tramp"—Ross was among the last of the tramp journalists who roamed from newspaper to newspaper and whose numbers included Mark Twain and Bret Harte—with this story: "On a clear Sunday morning in March 1911, some three dozen anxious people crowded onto a smallish gasoline-powered freighter, the Sioux, which was docked on the Feather River in tiny Nicolaus, California, just north of Sacramento. The short trip they were about to make, upriver to Marysville, would take only a few hours, but there was a great deal more at stake than a diverting excursion. The passengers were rivermen, engineers, business leaders, the merely curious, and a handful of newspaper reporters. Representing the Marysville Appeal was H.W. Ross, as his byline had it, a gangly, gawky man-child of eighteen. "Marysville had a problem: it was a river town whose river had silted up, useless, from years of unrestrained hydraulic mining. This had the effect of marooning Marysville from Sacramento (and therefore San Francisco), and put its future directly into the unwelcome hands of the railroads. With the mining finally shut down, there was new cause to think the Feather might again accommodate big steamers, but it all depended on whether the Sioux—which, though small, had a deep draft—could make it all the way upriver without getting stuck. As Ross summed it up in the Appeal two days later, 'The renavigating of the Feather is one of the most important moves in the history of Marysville—probably the most important…When boats are again running shippers will not be at the mercy of the railroads.' And beyond the obvious business ramifications, Ross reminded his readers, there were 'unbounded' social possibilities: 'The excursion of the future will not be made in a small launch with a dozen or so passengers, nor in a fifty-or sixty-foot pleasure craft—but it will be possible for excursion boats carrying hundreds of passengers to ply between this city and Sacramento—yes, even to {San Francisco] bay.' "The news that day, as duly reported by H.W. Ross, was good: the Sioux had been unimpeded. The Appeal signaled the importance of the story not only in big headlines and top-of-the-page treatment, but by attaching Ross's byline to it. At this time in American journalism, a byline—the writer's name at the beginning of a story—was rare, for the most part reserved for articles of real significance or distinction. This is just one of the reasons it is difficult to follow the zigzag, vaporous trajectory of Ross's newspaper career." Miller took a strong liking to his young reporter, and taught him the newspaper arts. "…Ross, for his part, was a quick study. He had to be, merely to survive the grueling regimen. The Appeal published six days a week, eight pages a day. Since it specialized in local news (said one headline: 'Beggars Have Come To Town') and competed with the evening paper for readers, exhausting hours were required to report and write enough material to mill that maw. "Five weeks after Ross wrote that story, Miller took ill. He was hospitalized in Sacramento but died on May 31. Out of respect (if not out of printer's inertia), Miller's name remained on the newspaper's masthead until June 3. Then, on June 6, it is replaced with this: 'H.W. Ross, Editor.' Still learning the finer points of eluding railroad Pinkertons and scarcely old enough to shave, Ross suddenly found himself in charge of a daily newspaper. Almost certainly he gave himself the battlefield promotion, but he had little choice: when Miller died, the Appeal's owner, Colonel E.A. Forbes, adjutant general of the state of California, was traveling on military business. At the time it all must have been a little terrifying, but two decades later Ross recalled the episode with the newspaperman's sangfroid: 'Someone had to edit the paper. The only part I couldn't do was write the editorials—we got a man for that and I did the rest.'" Two months later, Ross's name disappeared from the mast without explanation. Whether he was fired or just moved on, we'll never know. In 1917, Ross was in the military as World War I erupted. His newspaper skills landed him a position with a brand new adventure: the military wanted a publication that spoke to the soldiers. During his time as as a contributor, and ultimately an editor of the brand new Stars and Stripes newspaper, Ross passed up every opportunity for a promotion and met several of the writers, including his first wife, who would later be critical to the successful launch of The New Yorker. He was praised by the military brass and President Wilson for his contributions. In New York, he launched a magazine called Home Front modeled on Stars and Stripes, and was editor of two other magazines, before he convinced Raoul Flesichman, whose family had gotten reach selling yeast, to go in with him on creating a new magazine focuses on life in New York, in 1925. The magazine struggled, but survived, during the Depression, but it came of age during and after World War II. The magazine is known for its cartoonish covers and brilliant writing and editing, a tradition started by a man who cut his teeth writing about, and editing stories about, activities on, and around, the Feather River.