logo
What does a comfortable retirement cost? New figures reveal how much YOU need

What does a comfortable retirement cost? New figures reveal how much YOU need

Daily Mail​5 days ago

The cost of a comfortable retirement has tipped over £60,000 a year for a couple, according to benchmark pension industry figures released today.
A couple aiming for a 'moderate' lifestyle, which includes enjoying meals out and trips abroad, will now find it costs them £43,900 annually.
The moderate lifestyle is the Pension and Lifetime Savings Association's middle of the road retirement, covering the essentials plus some splashing out on food and entertainment, and running a car.
But the annual sum needed soars to £60,600 for a couple aspiring to a 'comfortable' retirement, with more holidays, theatre trips and higher motoring costs.
Individuals will need to save even harder than couples, as the moderate retirement level would cost them £31,700 and the comfortable level £43,900.
Lower energy prices have dampened the annual rise in what it costs to retire, comfortably or otherwise, according to the influential industry study of living standards.
The income needed to fund a moderate or a more luxurious lifestyle has increased only modestly, by a few percentage points since the last survey by the Pensions and Lifetime Savings Association.
Cuts in household energy bills have also led to a welcome drop in how much it takes to fund a basic retirement, which covers necessities plus some eating out and leisure activities, but no car.
The cost of a minimum lifestyle has fallen 4 per cent for a couple to £21,600 and 7 per cent for an individual to £13,400.
That means a couple could manage on two full state pensions - now £12,000 per person a year.
But a single person will need some private pension savings to get by, as will anyone who aspires to more than a basic standard of living in old age.
The PLSA's headline income figures also leave out some very important items which you will have to factor in - income tax, housing costs if you are still paying a mortgage or rent, and potentially care costs in later life.
>How much do you need to save up for the retirement YOU want? Find out below
What the retirement living standards mean and what you need to know
The PLSA's Retirement Living Standards report indicates what annual incomes people need for a minimum, moderate or comfortable retirement.
These are based on different baskets of goods and services like food and drink, transport, holidays, clothes and social outings.
The report is very useful in making people think about what kind of life they want to lead after they stop work, how much it is likely to cost and whether their current pension savings are anywhere near on track.
However, an important thing to bear in mind is that people's lifestyles change as they age.
You might want to aim for a comfortable income in the early more active stage. but only need a more basic income later in retirement.
Also, an individual needs to save up more because they will only have one state pension to rely on in old age, and couples also have greater combined purchasing power.
What do you need to save for a comfortable retirement?
The retirement living standards study shows costs now and the potential pension pot you need to meet them.
But if you are planning ahead, you need to consider the cost in the future and how much your pension will be then.
The PLSA has used annuity rates to estimate how much you need to save for the different income levels.
It has given a range to account for fluctuations in interest rates that determine price, and the different products you might buy - joint life for a couple, single life, good and poor health, for example.
What does a couple need to save for retirement?
What does an individual need to save ?
Although annuity rates have recovered in recent years, many people now invest their pension and live on the income in retirement.
If you invest successfully, your pot can potentially keep growing to keep covering your needs, although there is a risk of running out if financial markets fall or you spend beyond your means.
People also often use property - via buy to let or equity release - savings and investing Isas and other investments and assets to fund retirement.
> How to invest your pension and live off it in retirement: A 12-step starters' guide
Affluent lifestyle: A couple needs £60,600 between them for a budget that covers luxury holidays, theatre trips and higher motoring costs
The retirement living standards study was compiled by the Centre for Research in Social Policy at Loughborough University on behalf of the PLSA.
The research is based on in-depth discussions with members of the public from across the country on what they expect and hope their retirement to look like - it therefore undergoes some adjustments from year to year.
This year there were some small changes in what people said they needed for minimum living costs, clothing, hairdressing, technology purchases, taxi use, and charitable giving.
Expectations of annual rail fares also jumped from £100 to £180 per person.
The PLSA notes that across all retirement living standards, weekly domestic fuel budgets have fallen by more than a quarter since its 2023/24 study.
It adds: 'This year also sees a change in how living arrangements are described.
'The terms 'one-person' and 'two-person' households have replaced 'single' and 'couple' to recognise that not everyone in retirement lives with a romantic partner – but many do share their housing and multiple living costs with someone.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thomas Frank ally is leading search for new Tottenham manager
Thomas Frank ally is leading search for new Tottenham manager

Telegraph

time36 minutes ago

  • Telegraph

Thomas Frank ally is leading search for new Tottenham manager

Tottenham Hotspur have cleared the decks for Ange Postecoglou's successor to arrive with a new backroom team by dismissing three of the Australian's staff, but Johan Lange has remained as sporting director to lead the search for a new head coach. Assistant coaches Mile Jedinak, Nick Montgomery and Sérgio Raimundo have followed Postecoglou out of the exit. Senior assistant coach Matt Wells and goalkeeping coach Rob Burch have remained in position, although it remains to be seen whether or not that changes when a new appointment is made. Sources believe that Thomas Frank is interested in taking over from Postecoglou and that he would ideally want to take a number of members of his Brentford backroom staff with him to Spurs. As revealed by Telegraph Sport, Tottenham sacked Postecoglou and chief football officer Scott Munn on Friday, but Lange has not been part of the cull. His position remains unchanged and he is expected to be helped by Fabio Paratici. Paratici has remained a consultant to Spurs and chairman Daniel Levy, and is expected to return to a full-time post at the club this summer once his worldwide football ban is lifted. Spurs understood to be 'carefully assessing' options Frank is considered a leading candidate to succeed Postecoglou, although his exit fee – believed to be in the region of £10 million – may still provide a stumbling block and interest has existed in Fulham manager Marco Silva and his Bournemouth counterpart Andoni Iraola. Tottenham are said to be carefully assessing their options, with Levy aware of the expense involved in hiring Frank, and Lange perfectly positioned to assess his capabilities for the post. Lange and Frank used to share an office when they were coaching together at Danish club Lyngby, and are said to have maintained a good relationship. That could be a boost to Frank, although Lange may also be aware of any of the potential drawbacks in Tottenham replacing Postecoglou with a coach who has never managed in a full European competition and is yet to win a title. As well as presenting their preferred candidate for the head coach role to Levy and the Spurs board, Lange and Paratici are expected to take responsibility for the club's summer transfer window. That may include decisions over the futures of defender Cristian Romero, who is wanted by Atlético Madrid and captain Son Heung-min, who has left some players and staff with the impression he could leave Spurs amid interest from Saudi Arabia. Telegraph Sport reported that Levy is facing the threat of a Tottenham player revolt over the decision to sack Postecoglou and the way in which it was done, and Son has led a number of dressing-room tributes to the Australian. In a message posted on Instagram, Son wrote: 'Gaffer. You've changed the trajectory of this club. You believed in yourself, and us, since day one and never wavered for a second. Even when others did.

Warning UK's housing crisis will deepen if Reeves makes further cuts in spending review
Warning UK's housing crisis will deepen if Reeves makes further cuts in spending review

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Warning UK's housing crisis will deepen if Reeves makes further cuts in spending review

It comes as the struggle between the Treasury and Angela Rayner 's Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government over its budget continues, just days before Ms Reeves is set to outline the spending plans until the next election on Wednesday. With no agreement having been reached on housing, the chief executive of one of Britain's largest housing associations has raised the alarm that of a 'cliff edge' over building more homes – which means money is set to run out by 2026. The warning from Fiona Fletcher-Smith, chief executive of L&Q and until last week chair of the G15 group of London housing associations, comes as the Local Government Association (LGA) has warned that 51 per cent of councils are now running deficits on their housing budgets. Homeless charities are also warning of an impending crisis with new supply unable to keep up with increasing demand for social housing. Crisis has pointed out that over the past 10 years there has been a net loss of more than 180,000 social homes in England. Currently, 1.33 million households in England are currently stuck on council waiting lists for a social home. Ms Fletcher-Smith explained that the problem began with George Osborne's austerity budgets in 2010 when he slashed 63 per cent of the capital budget to build new homes. She said he then 'welched' on a deal to allow them to make up for the loss by charging CPI inflation plus 1 per cent in rent. which housing associations and councils now want restored for a decade. This will allow them to borrow money to build as it comes through as guaranteed income. The cumulative effect now means that housing associations no longer have the funds to build projects. Ms Fletcher-Smith said: 'Housing decisions are so long, it's not just planning permission, you've got to get all utilities, everything else lined up to build. It's a five to seven years to run in to build housing. We could see from our own predictions, we were just going to go off cliff edge, by 2025/2026.' The sector is also still struggling with the impact of the Grenfell fire tragedy in 2017, with thousands of homes now subject to problems with cladding which is costing them £2.6bn in London alone. In London alone, £4 million a month is being spent on 'keeping people in temporary accommodation' because homes with cladding are too dangerous to return to and clogged courts mean legal cases to fix the problem are taking years. Ms Fletcher-Smith also noted that the 'combination of Brexit, Covid-19 and the war in Ukraine' has hit the sector not least with inflation which saw building materials go up as much as 30 per cent well above the 11 per cent peak of the headline rate. There are now fears that Ms Reeves and the Treasury will force cuts to the housing budget to balance the books as the chancellor seeks to ringfence health spending, increase defence to 2.5 per cent of GDP and water down proposals on benefit cuts as well as U-turn on ending the winter fuel payments for millions of pensioners. The deputy prime minister is leading a charge to protect budgets and instead push for a series of wealth taxes on big corporations and millionaires. But this has been resisted by Ms Reeves. However, the fears over housing are shared by homeless charities who are calling for 90,000 new social housing homes to be built per year. Matt Downie, chief executive of Crisis, said: 'This spending review is an opportunity for significant investment to start to see homelessness levels come down. 'Small tweaks aren't enough to fix the problems we face.' Mairi MacRae, director of policy and campaigns at Shelter, said: 'With homelessness at a record high and councils spending huge chunks of their budgets just to keep families off the streets, now is the time to invest in building social rent homes, not cut back." The issue is also vexing Labour backbenchers looking at the party's slide in the polls. One Labour MP said cuts in this area would cause upset among backbenchers, especially those with seats in areas with councils that are already on the verge of collapse. Another pointed out that Labour's flagship housing pledge 'means nothing if the current stock of social housing suffers" as a result of cuts. The government provides financial support to local authorities for social housing provision, including funding for new builds, repairs, and improvements. Commenting on the finding that 51 per cent of councils running a deficit with housing, the LGA warned: 'These trends are not sustainable. There is a growing risk to the financial sustainability of some councils' HRAs, and revenue pressures in councils' HRAs are now being passed directly into their HRA capital programmes.' In the Autumn Statement, the government announced over £5 billion total housing investment in 2025/26 to boost supply, including a £500m extension to the current Affordable Homes Programme which runs out in 2026. At the Spring Statement, the government announced a down payment of £2bn for a successor programme. To make it cheaper for councils to finance new development, the government has extended the preferential borrowing rate available for council house building from the Public Works Loan Board until the end of 2025/26.

Why play at new casinos? Main reasons UK players choose new casino brands
Why play at new casinos? Main reasons UK players choose new casino brands

The Independent

timean hour ago

  • The Independent

Why play at new casinos? Main reasons UK players choose new casino brands

With over 2,500 regulated gambling sites available to UK players, the online casino landscape is more competitive than ever. While household names like 888 and Grosvenor continue to attract large audiences, new online casinos are emerging at a rapid pace, and they're giving established brands a run for their money. Many of these new casino sites offer sleeker interfaces, more generous bonuses and mobile-first platforms built with the modern player in mind. But before signing up, it's crucial to check that any new casino you're considering holds a valid licence from the UK Gambling Commission. You can confirm this using the UKGC public register. So, why play at new casinos? This article explores the benefits and drawbacks to help you decide whether a new brand could be your next favourite place to play. What Makes New Casinos Appealing to UK Players? One of the biggest advantages of new online casinos is their modern approach to user experience. Freshly launched casinos and new slot sites alike often feature cleaner design, faster load times and intuitive navigation, particularly for mobile users. Many are built from the ground up as mobile-optimised casinos, offering seamless gameplay across smartphones and tablets. New casino brands are also more likely to introduce unique and exclusive slot games you won't find elsewhere. These titles often come from emerging game developers that aren't yet stocked by the bigger names. Payment flexibility is another plus, with newer casinos more likely to support popular e-wallets and vouchers like Skrill, Neteller, and Paysafecard. One of the most obvious reasons to try new casino sites is the value they offer new players. To attract sign-ups, new operators usually offer more competitive casino sign up bonus promotions compared to older brands, who don't typically need the new custom as much. These promos may include lower wagering requirements, free spins with no wagering at all, or cashback offers without complicated terms. Bally Casino and Neptune Play are excellent examples of newer sites that stand out for their no-fuss, no-wagering welcome deals. Are New Casino Sites Safe to Use? A common concern is: are new casinos safe? The answer is yes — provided the site is regulated by the UK Gambling Commission. Every UKGC licensed casino must comply with strict rules on fair play, financial security and responsible gambling. Look for visible signs like SSL encryption (shown via the padlock icon in your browser), clear privacy policies and access to safer gambling tools such as deposit limits, self-exclusion and time reminders. All new casinos mentioned on this page are fully licensed and meet these high standards. Games & Software: Fresh Choices at New Casinos If you've grown tired of playing the same games at the same old slot sites, new online casinos can breathe life into your gaming routine. Many launch with hundreds of modern slots, including progressive jackpots, slingo hybrids and interactive live casino games. These new platforms often partner with leading developers such as Pragmatic Play, NetEnt and Evolution, while also introducing innovative games from up-and-coming studios like 1Spin4Win. For players seeking variety and innovation, this is a major plus. The Downsides of New Casinos: What to Watch Out For Of course, not everything is better at a brand new casino. Some newer casino apps have smaller game libraries, and their customer service options may be limited to email-only support or restricted live chat hours. And while most new casinos are safe and legitimate, the reality is that not all of them will stand the test of time. That's why it's important to read user reviews, check UKGC licensing, and start with smaller deposits until you're confident in the site. So, why play at new casinos sites? For players who value modern interfaces, mobile-first gaming, and better bonus value, new sites are often the smarter choice. They're particularly appealing for bonus hunters, eWallet users, and those seeking fresh games not available at the big-name brands. However, if you prefer an extensive game library, round-the-clock support, or the reliability of long-established brands, a new site might not tick all the boxes. The best approach is to weigh your preferences, review the site's credentials, and try it out with a modest first deposit. The same applies if you're using other types of gambling sites such as betting sites, poker sites or bingo sites for example. Use safer gambling tools like deposit limits, reality checks, and time-outs from the moment you sign up. If you feel your gambling is becoming a concern, help is available from reputable organisations such as: We may earn commission from some of the links in this article, but we never allow this to influence our content. This revenue helps to fund journalism across The Independent.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store