
Italy: Low turnout sinks citizenship, labour referendums
Rome, Italy – Italian citizenship and labour reform referendums look likely to fail due to low voter turnout.
As two-day voting wound down in Europe's fourth-largest economy only about 30% of Italy's 51mn eligible voters had turned out to cast ballots in five referendums championed by centre-left opposition groups as well as the country's labour unions.
Referendums require 50% plus one voter participation to be legally binding in Italy.
The result is seen as a major victory for Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, who vehemently opposed the measures.
Meloni arrived at a Rome polling station on Sunday – when turnout was 22% – to declare that she would not cast a vote.
Meloni then once-again encouraged her supporters to likewise boycott the ballot.
The referendums
Four of the referendums centred on workplace protections including better protections against firing, increased severance pay, unemployment benefits, the end of fixed-term contracts and better workplace accident compensation.
A fifth referendum addressed whether voters wanted to ease citizenship laws in the country, allowing non-EU immigrants to apply for Italian passports after five rather than the current 10 years.
At the moment, the rule would apply to roughly 2.5mn non-EU immigrants.
Arguments for easing citizenship requirements were driven by the demographic fact of Italy's dwindling birth rates and calls for better integrating foreign workers in an effort to boost the country's economy.
Data compiled by the polling organisation YouTrend said voter turnout was higher in the country's industrialised north than the agricultural south, as well in cities and in areas where left-leaning parties preformed best in Italy's most recent general and EU elections.
'The opposition wanted to turn this into a referendum on the Meloni government,' said Cabinet undersecretary and Meloni ally Giovanbattista Fazzolari. 'The response is very clear: The government emerges from this stronger and the opposition weaker.'
Speaking of the vote's failure, YouTrend's Lorenzo Pregliasco said: 'Whether just above 30% or just below, this is a low figure… below the expectations and targets set by the promoters.'
DW

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Times of Oman
10 hours ago
- Times of Oman
Poland: PM Tusk faces confidence vote amid political turmoil
Warsaw: Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk will face a vote of confidence in parliament on Wednesday, just days after a stinging presidential election defeat. The confidence vote, called by Tusk himself, comes as right-wing nationalist Karol Nawrocki, backed by the opposition Law and Justice (PiS) party, narrowly beat his candidate Rafal Trzaskowski. Nawrocki was also has the backing of US President Donald Trump. Announcing the vote, Tusk said his party is prepared for the challenge, understands the stakes, and does not "intend to take a single step back." "The vote of confidence should be a new opening," Tusk said. Behind the call for a confidence vote is Tusk's aim to rally support for his pro-European coalition. Tusk's governing coalition has sought to reverse the previous PiS government's judicial reforms, which the European Union said undermined democracy and the rights of women and minorities. However, the outgoing President Andrzej Duda blocked those efforts, and Nawrocki is expected to maintain this position. This inability to deliver on key reforms — which also includes abortion rights — despite holding a parliamentary majority, has been a dark cloud over Tusk's government. Critics point out that since coming to power in December 2023, little change has been seen under Tusk's government.


Times of Oman
19 hours ago
- Times of Oman
"Natural partners": EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas on holding first-ever EU-India strategic dialogue
Brussels : In a significant move, India and the European Union held the first-ever EU-India strategic dialogue on cyber security, defense, and space in Brussels on Tuesday (local time). External Affairs Minister Dr S Jaishankar held a press conference along with the EU High Representative for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy and Vice-President of the European Commission, Kaja Kallas. In her opening remarks, Kallas said the two sides are "natural partners," jointly representing a quarter of the world's population and GDP. "The European Union and India are natural partners. We make up a quarter of the world's population and GDP. By working together, we have great potential to make a global impact. Today, we are holding the first-ever EU-India strategic dialogue. This marks a significant step forward in our partnership and in addressing threats like cyberattacks and foreign interference. It also paves the way for much deeper defence cooperation, sharing expertise and exploring joint initiatives. First on security, Europe and India face many of the same challenges. Terrorism, military build-ups and violations of international law affect both of us," said EU foreign policy chief Kaja Kallas. India and the EU conducted a joint naval exercise in the Indian Ocean, demonstrating their shared commitment to upholding international law at sea. The two sides are strengthening their cooperation on counter-terrorism, including information sharing, capacity building, and joint efforts to combat terrorism financing. Kallas said, "Last week, India and the European Union held a joint naval exercise in the Indian Ocean. This is more than symbolic. It shows our shared commitment to uphold international law at sea. EU-India cooperation on counter-terrorism is also growing stronger. We have already worked together on information sharing, capacity building, and joint efforts to combat terrorism financing. Today, we also agreed to hold our next counter-terrorism dialogue in autumn. The EU is working together with India and together more on space." There is a strong case for an EU-India Security and Defense Partnership, given the interconnectedness of peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific and Europe. Noting that EU already has such partnerships with seven other countries, she noted, "Today we renewed our intention to work towards this goal because peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific are closely intertwined with peace and security in Europe. Beyond defence, we cooperate in many other areas, from digital connectivity to research and innovation to green energy and trade." India and the EU have agreed to establish a formal dialogue on space, covering areas such as satellite navigation and security. The two sides already share data from Earth's observation satellites, further enhancing their cooperation in space. "We already have access to each other's data from Earth's observation satellites. And at our meeting, we agreed to establish a new formal dialogue on space. This will cover areas such as satellite navigation and security and the first session is to take place also autumn this year. Looking ahead, there is a strong case for EU-India Security and Defense Partnership," said EU foreign policy chief. India and the EU are committed to progressing towards an ambitious free trade agreement this year. Both sides reaffirmed their shared commitment to multilateralism and a rules-based international order, emphasizing the importance of strong and trusted partnerships. Speaking about the progress on the Free Trade agreement discussions between India and EU, Kallas said, "We are committed to progress towards an ambitious free trade agreement this year. This was agreed by President von der Leyen and Prime Minister Modi in February, and finally, Minister Jaishankar and I also reaffirmed our shared commitment to multilateralism and stable, rules-based international order. In today's contested global landscape, it is more than ever important to build strong and trusted partnerships. The European Union is a reliable, predictable and credible partner for India. With the visit of the European Union College to Delhi in February and next year's EU-India Summit, we want to deepen our partnership at all levels further." Kallas stressed the EU's support for India's right to protect its citizens and condemned the terrorist attack in Pahalgam. Kallas said, "I want to reiterate the EU's strong condemnation of the terrorist attack in Pahalgam, Jammu and Kashmir. Those responsible must be held accountable. India has the right to protect its citizens in accordance with international law. Minister Jaishankar, you and I were in close contact after the attack." She further added, "I regret the tragic loss of lives in India and Pakistan. The EU supports continued talks between India and Pakistan to reduce tensions. No one stands to gain from renewed conflict in the region." Moreover she responded to nuclear threats and said, "It is clear from the discussions that we had right now that nuclear threats cannot pay off, and this is a mutual concern. We see different actions, in our case, Russia using nuclear threats, and we also see other actors in the world using this. So we will discuss this further." Speaking about India's policy, she said, "Our India policy is related to our bilateral relations. It's not against anybody, but it's really to our benefit to see where the mutual interests of both sides are."


Observer
a day ago
- Observer
This is what autocracy looks like
Since Donald Trump was elected again, I've feared one scenario above all others: that he'd call out the military against people protesting his mass deportations, putting America on the road to martial law. Even in my more outlandish imaginings, however, I thought that he'd need more of a pretext to put troops on the streets of an American city — against the wishes of its mayor and governor — than the relatively small protests that broke out in Los Angeles last week. In a post-reality environment, it turns out, the president didn't need to wait for a crisis to launch an authoritarian crackdown. Instead, he can simply invent one. It's true that some of those protesting Immigration and Customs Enforcement raids in Los Angeles have been violent; on Sunday one man was arrested for allegedly tossing a Molotov cocktail at a police officer, and another was accused of driving a motorcycle into a line of cops. Such violence should be condemned both because it's immoral and because it's wildly counterproductive; each burning Waymo or smashed storefront is an in-kind gift to the administration. It's important to understand that for this administration, protests needn't be violent to be considered an illegitimate uprising. The presidential memorandum calling out the National Guard refers to both violent acts and any protests that 'inhibit' law enforcement. That definition would seem to include peaceful demonstrations around the site of ICE raids. In May, for example, armed federal agents stormed two popular Italian restaurants in San Diego looking for workers in the country illegally; they handcuffed staff members and took four people into custody. As they did so, an outraged crowd gathered outside, chanting 'shame' and for a time blocking the agents from leaving. Under Trump's order, the military could target these people as insurrectionists. The administration, after all, has every reason to want to intimidate those who might take part in civil disobedience. Violent protests play into its hands; peaceful ones threaten the absurd narrative it's trying to bludgeon America into accepting. Just look at the lengths to which it's going to silence David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union of California. Last week, Huerta was arrested after sitting on a sidewalk and blocking a gate while protesting an immigration raid at a work site in Los Angeles. While he was being detained, he was knocked to the ground, resulting in his hospitalisation. On Monday, the Justice Department charged him with 'conspiracy to impede an officer,' a felony that carries a maximum prison term of six years. Trump also, on Monday, called for the arrest of Newsom. If you saw all this in any other country — soldiers sent to crush dissent, union leaders arrested, opposition politicians threatened — it would be clear that autocracy had arrived. The question, now, is whether Americans who hate tyranny can be roused to respond. Many people have speculated that the confrontation in Los Angeles will play into Trump's hands, allowing him to pose as a champion of law and order bringing criminal mobs to heel. Maybe they're right; Trump is a master demagogue with a gift for creating the scenes of conflict his supporters crave. We now know that TV celebrity Dr Phil McGraw was on the ground with ICE during the raids that set off the Los Angeles unrest, filming a prime-time special. The administration appeared to want a spectacle. Public opinion, however, isn't set in stone, which is why it's important for everyone who has a platform — politicians, veterans, cultural and religious leaders — to denounce the administration's authoritarian overreach. Administration officials like Stephen Miller are pushing the idea that Los Angeles is 'occupied territory,' as evidenced by the foreign flags some protesters are carrying. Americans who still have hope for democracy should be saying, as loudly and as often as they can, that this is an insultingly stupid lie to justify a dictatorial power grab. Yes, America has lurched to the right since Trump's first term, and he can get away with abuses now that would have set off mass outrage then. Plenty of Democrats, burned by the backlash against Black Lives Matter and large-scale illegal immigration, would rather not have a fight over disorder in Los Angeles. 'For months, Democrats scarred by the politics of the issue sought to sidestep President Donald Trump's immigration wars — focusing instead on the economy, tariffs or, in the case of deportations, due process concerns,' reported Politico. But there's no sidestepping a president deploying the military in an American city based on ludicrous falsehoods about a foreign invasion. Indeed, it's hard to think of a clearer signpost on the road to dictatorship. This Saturday, on Trump's birthday, he's planning a giant military parade in Washington, ostensibly to celebrate the Army's 250th anniversary. Tanks have been photographed en route to the city, the Lincoln Memorial standing tragically in the background, like an image from some Hollywood dystopia. On that day, there will be demonstrations all over the country under the rubric 'No Kings.' I desperately hope that Trump's attempt to quash protest ends up fuelling it. Those who want to live in a free country may be scared, but they shouldn't be cowed. — The New York Times Michelle Goldberg The writer is an American journalist and author, and an op-ed columnist for The New York Times