Plea in SC challenges revision of electoral rolls in Bihar
As per the petition, order of Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar, if not set aside, can 'arbitrarily' and 'without due process' disenfranchise lakhs of voters from electing their representatives, and disrupt free and fair elections and democracy — a part of basic structure of the Constitution.
'The documentation requirements of the directive, lack of due process as well as the unreasonably short timeline for the said Special Intensive Revision of Electoral Roll in Bihar (SIR) further make this exercise bound to result in removal of names of lakhs of genuine voters from electoral rolls leading to their disenfranchisement,' contended the petition.
It added that the SIR order issued on June 24 by the ECI excluded identification documents such as Aadhar or ration cards, which make marginalised communities (such as SC, STs and migrant workers) and the poor more vulnerable to exclusion from voting. The declaration as required under the SIR process is violative of Article 326 in so far as it requires a voter to provide documents to prove his citizenship and also the citizenships of his mother or father, failing which his name would not be added to the draft electoral roll and can be deleted, further stated the petition.
It said, 'The ECI has issued unreasonable and impractical timeline to conduct SIR in Bihar with close proximity to state (Assembly) elections, which are due in November 2025.' Referring to reports from Bihar, the plea claimed that lakhs of voters from villages and marginalised communities do not possess the documents being sought from them, and they should not be excluded from voting due to the stringent requirements as mentioned in the SIR order. The petition said that the ECI's directive, issued under Section 21(3) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950, lacks recorded reasons supported by any evidence or transparent methodology, rendering it 'arbitrary' and thus liable to be struck down.
As per the plea, the requirement of citizenship documents contravenes the requirement of specific grounds for deletion of names from electoral rolls (e.g., death, non-residence, or disqualification under Section 16 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950). Saying that since 2003, five general elections and five Assembly elections have taken place in Bihar with continuous addition and deletion of names in electoral roll, the petition said that the manner in which ECI has issued SIR orders in a poll bound state like Bihar, has raised questions from all stakeholders, particularly the voters.
It added that there is no reason for such a 'drastic exercise' in a poll-bound state in such a short period of time, violating the right to vote of lakhs of voters.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
23 minutes ago
- India Today
Activist Yogendra Yadav moves Supreme Court over Bihar voter rolls revision
Social activist and psephologist Yogendra Yadav has approached the Supreme Court, challenging the Election Commission of India's (ECI) order for a 'Special Intensive Revision' (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar ahead of the upcoming Assembly public interest litigation (PIL) seeks a stay on the ongoing revision process and asks the Supreme Court to set aside the poll body's order, terming it "arbitrary". He argues that carrying out a de novo revision of the electoral rolls just months before the state elections is unjustified and could disenfranchise vulnerable sections of the plea highlights how the Special Intensive Revision exercise could disproportionately affect marginalised groups such as women, Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (SC/STs), and migrants, many of whom lack valid documentation. 'The 90-day verification window, overlapping with Bihar's monsoon season, is also criticised as impractical given the fact that a large number of these sections of people lack birth certificates, land documents, or other mandated identity proofs,' the plea notes, as reported in the a non-governmental organisation (NGO), the Association of Democratic Reforms, filed a similar petition in the Supreme Court, calling the ECI's 24 May order 'arbitrary' and warning that "millions of voters could be deprived of their right to vote". ADR urged the top court to intervene, citing the issue as a serious matter related to civil ECI's Special Intensive Revision is scheduled to take place from June 25 to July 26. Initially, the commission made it mandatory for all voters to submit identity documents, including proof of 77,000 Booth Level Officers (BLOs), along with government staff and political party workers, are currently engaged in verifying the records of more than 7.8 crore registered voters across the state. The election commission has also asked both existing and new voters to furnish proof of Indian citizenship.- EndsMust Watch IN THIS STORY#Bihar Assembly Elections
NDTV
41 minutes ago
- NDTV
Amid Uproar, Poll Body's Big Decision On Documents For Bihar Roll Revision
In a major decision following scathing criticism by opposition parties, the Election Commission has said voters can get verified in the electoral rolls as part of the Special Intensive Revision in Bihar even without submitting the mandatory documents. If the documents are not given, the Electoral Registrar Officer will carry out verification based on investigation at the local level. The Special Intensive Revision (SIR), which is being carried out months ahead of the Assembly elections in Bihar, has been criticised by the opposition, which has said crores of voters risk being left out and even termed the exercise a "conspiracy" to ensure the BJP wins. One of the key sticking points for the opposition is the fact that the Election Commission (EC) made submitting at least one of 11 documents a must for verification. The documents being accepted include birth certificates, passports, identity cards or pension payment orders issued to government employees or pensioners, permanent residence certificates, forest right certificates, caste certificates, family register prepared by state and local authorities, and land or house allotment certificates issued by the government. Aadhaar is not part of the list. Rashtriya Janata Dal leader Tejashwi Yadav had told NDTV earlier this week that, according to the Government of India, only two to three per cent of people have these documents. "This is clearly a conspiracy to remove crores of people from the voter list... The Constitution has given everyone the right to vote," he had said. His views have been echoed by other opposition parties, including the Congress, Samajwadi Party, Trinamool Congress, NCP (Sharadchandra Pawar), the Uddhav Thackeray faction of the Shiv Sena, and the Left parties. Verification Process In a poster on the enumeration forms, the Election Commission has now said that the Electoral Registration Officer can take a decision on verification for the rolls even without the documents being submitted. "If the necessary documents and photo are not available, then just fill the enumeration form and provide it to the Booth Level Officer," the poster says. It adds, crucially, that, "If you are unable to provide the necessary documents, the Electoral Registration Officer (ERO) can take a decision on the basis of local investigation or evidence of other documents." Sources in the Election Commission said the EROs will go to the spot and meet the voters who have not submitted documents. They will ensure that the person filling the form is 18 years old, get information about their residence period, talk to people living in the area and decide on the basis of available evidence and other documents. According to data from the Election Department, 1.21 crore voters in Bihar have filled and submitted enumeration forms so far. Of these, 23.9 lakh have been uploaded. The forms are supposed to be submitted by July 25. The Election Commission had earlier made it clear that 4.96 crore voters - accounting for 60 per cent of total electors - who were listed in the 2003 special intensive revision need not submit any supporting document. The poll body has also maintained that the exercise is being conducted in a transparent manner and "every eligible citizen will be a part" of the voters' list.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
For the first time, SC introduces OBC quota for staff recruitment
The Supreme Court has for the first time introduced reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBCs) in recruitment of its staff. This comes after the top court came out with a roster specifying the post-wise quota for Scheduled Castes (SCs) and Scheduled Tribes (STs) in matters of recruitment and promotion. A gazette notification dated July 3 said that the Chief Justice of India, in exercise of the powers conferred by clause (2) of Article 146 of the Constitution, amended Rule 4A of the Supreme Court Officers and Servants (Conditions of Service and Conduct) Rules, 1961. As per the amended Rule 4A, 'Reservation in direct recruitment to various categories of posts specified in the Schedule, for the candidates belonging to Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes, Other Backward Classes, Physically Challenged, Ex-servicemen and dependant of Freedom Fighters shall be in accordance with the Rules, orders, and Notifications issued from time to time by the Government of India in respect of posts carrying the pay scale corresponding to the pay scale prescribed for the post specified in the Schedule, subject to such modification, variation or exception as the Chief Justice may, from time to time, specify.' Though the court had a quota for SC/STs, the Rules did not have any provision for OBC quota. Now, it has happened for the first time under CJI B R Gavai. The roster specifying post-wise quota for SCs/STs was done in keeping with the five-judge Constitution Bench ruling in R K Sabharwal vs State of Punjab in 1995. The ruling said that in government appointments, reservation should be post-based (based on the number of posts in a cadre) and not vacancy-based (based on the number of vacancies arising in a given year). The judgment also said there should be separate rosters for direct recruitment and promotion. Under the roster, a post identified for a particular category will continue to remain with it even after the retirement of the person holding the post.
