logo
Legislative town hall to keep Texarkana citizens engaged in state politics

Legislative town hall to keep Texarkana citizens engaged in state politics

Yahoo04-06-2025
TEXARKANA, Ark. (KTAL/KMSS) — A political advocacy group invited the community to a legislative town hall on Monday.
Federal agencies come to Texarkana to provide in-person storm recovery aid
'We're doing town halls across the state to help educate people about the Arkansas Legislature, which just adjourned, about all the new laws that they passed and educating people about how their legislators voted on some of those key bills that came up,' said Bill Kopsky, Executive Director of the Arkansas Public Policy Panel, who organized the event along with Citizens First Congress.
They are applauding legislation passed concerning maternal health and childhood nutrition.
'We're excited about students getting free breakfast, and now we're saying, how about lunch?' said April Reisma, President of the Arkansas Education Association.
However, they feel other new pieces of legislation, such as DEI restrictions, are a step backward for the state.
'Our view is that if you're in a community that's 60% black and the school staff doesn't look like that, then that's an issue that the school district should be able to at least talk about,' said Kopsky.
Changes coming to downtown Texarkana in the name of pedestrian safety
Looking to the future, they hope to find support for securing access to ballot measures after several new laws were passed that make the process more difficult.
'I mean it's been in the Arkansas constitution for over 100 years. Arkansans have used it to do really important things that legislators just aren't capable of doing, so like passing ethics and term limit laws, for example, or campaign finance reform laws, or raising the state's minimum wage. Those are issues that politicians are never going to really take much action on, but they're not very controversial with the public,' said Kopsky.
They say the main purpose of these town halls is to keep citizens engaged in the political process.
Over 1 million meals served by Texarkana Resource Center during first year
'Legislators or politicians go up to Little Rock and they make decisions on a lot of laws that the public doesn't really have any idea about, and our whole view is that when the public knows more about what's happening at the Capitol and they can talk to the legislators about it, those legislators do a better job,' said Kopsky.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Appeals court: Arkansas can ban gender-affirming care for minors
Appeals court: Arkansas can ban gender-affirming care for minors

UPI

time13-08-2025

  • UPI

Appeals court: Arkansas can ban gender-affirming care for minors

Participants walk up Market Street in the 55th annual San Francisco Pride Parade in San Francisco on Sunday, June 29, 2025. An appeals court on Tuesday permitted Arkansas to enforce its gender-affirming care ban for minors. File Photo by Terry Schmitt/UPI | License Photo Aug. 13 (UPI) -- A federal appeals court has ruled that Arkansas may enforce its ban on minors receiving gender-affirming care, overturning a lower court's decision that found the law unconstitutional. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit issued its ruling Tuesday, stating the lower court erred in June 2023 when it struck down Arkansas' Save Adolescents From Experimentation Act for violating the First Amendment and both the 14th Amendment's Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause. It said the lower court's ruling was incongruent with a recent Supreme Court decision that upheld Tennessee's gender-affirming care ban for minors. "Because the district court rested its permanent injunction on incorrect conclusions of law, it abused its discretion," the appeals court ruled. Arkansas' Republican attorney general, Tim Griffin, celebrated the ruling. "I applaud the court's decision recognizing that Arkansas has a compelling interest in protecting the physical and psychological health of children and am pleased that children in Arkansas will be protected from risky, experimental procedures with lifelong consequences," he said in a statement. Gender-affirming care includes a range of therapies, from psychological, behavioral and medical interventions with surgeries for minors being exceedingly rare. The medical practice has been endorsed by every medical association. Despite the evidence and the support of the medical community, Republicans and conservatives, often with the use of misinformation, have been targeting gender-affirming care amid a larger push threatening the rights of the LGBTQ community. Arkansas passed the SAVE Act in 2021, but then-Gov. Asa Hutchinson vetoed it that same year, calling the ban a "product of the cultural war in America" that would interfere with the doctor-patient relationship. The GOP-majority legislature then overrode his veto, making Arkansas the first state to pass a bill banning gender-affirming care for minors in the United States. Four transgender minors and their parents then challenged the law, saying it violated their rights, resulting in the 2023 ruling overturning the ban, which marked a victory in the fight for LGBTQ healthcare until Tuesday. "This is a tragically unjust result for transgender Arkansans, their doctors and their families," Holly Dickson, executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas, said in a statement. "As we and our clients consider our next steps, we want transgender Arkansans to know they are far from alone and we remain as determined as ever to secure their right to safety, dignity and equal access to the healthcare they need." The ruling comes as Republicans seeking to restrict transgender healthcare have gained a support in the White House with President Donald Trump who has implemented several federal policies that align with their efforts. On his first day in office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order making it federal policy that there are only two genders, male and female, both of which were determined at "conception." He has also banned transgender Americans from the military and has sought to bar transgender athletes from competing on teams and in competitions that align with their gender identity. Twenty-six states and the territory of Puerto Rico have banned gender-affirming care for minors, according to the Movement Advancement Project.

Appeals court allows Arkansas to enforce gender-affirming care ban
Appeals court allows Arkansas to enforce gender-affirming care ban

The Hill

time12-08-2025

  • The Hill

Appeals court allows Arkansas to enforce gender-affirming care ban

A federal appeals court ruled Tuesday that Arkansas can enforce its 2021 ban on gender-affirming care for minors, reversing a lower court decision that struck down the first-in-the-nation law as unconstitutional and following a June Supreme Court decision. The 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said Tuesday that a federal district court had erred in striking down Arkansas's Save Adolescents From Experimentation (SAFE) Act in 2023. U.S. District Judge Jay Moody ruled at the time that the law, adopted by the state Legislature in 2021 after former Gov. Asa Hutchinson (R) vetoed it, discriminates against transgender people and poses 'immediate and irreparable harm' to trans youth. In its decision, the 8th Circuit said Moody's ruling conflicts with the Supreme Court's decision in U.S. v. Skrmetti, which found that a similar law banning gender-affirming care for minors in Tennessee does not discriminate based on sex. 'Because the district court rested its permanent injunction on incorrect conclusions of law, it abused its discretion,' Judge Duane Benton, an appointee of former President George W. Bush, wrote in Tuesday's order. 'The judgment is reversed and the case remanded for proceedings consistent with this opinion.' Four families of transgender children and two doctors challenged Arkansas's law in 2021, arguing that it violates their constitutional rights. Holly Dickson, executive director of the ACLU of Arkansas, one of the groups representing the plaintiffs in court, called Tuesday's decision 'a tragically unjust result for transgender Arkansans, their doctors, and their families.' 'The state had every opportunity and failed at every turn to prove that this law helps children; in fact, this is a dangerous law that harms children,' Dickson said in a statement on Tuesday. The organization is considering its next steps, she said. Arkansas Attorney General Tim Griffin (R) applauded Tuesday's ruling, writing on the social platform X that he is 'pleased that children in Arkansas will be protected from experimental procedures.' Griffin announced immediately after the Supreme Court issued its ruling in Skrmetti on June 18 that the decision had 'positive implications' for Arkansas's appeal to the 8th Circuit, 'because our law is similar to Tennessee's law.' Twenty-seven states have banned the use of certain prescription medications and rare surgeries to treat gender dysphoria in minors since Arkansas passed its first-in-the-nation prohibition in 2021. In July, Puerto Rico became the first U.S. territory to ban gender-affirming care for youth, restricting treatment for anyone under 21, the island's age of majority. With Arkansas now able to enforce its ban, only Montana's law restricting transition-related care for minors remains blocked by court orders, according to the Movement Advancement Project, a nonprofit tracking LGBTQ laws. A district court judge struck down the state's 2023 law in May, finding the measure violates Montana's constitution. Tuesday's decision comes as the federal government also looks to broaden its approach to limiting access to gender-affirming care for minors, one of President Trump's campaign promises. An executive order Trump signed in January during his first days back in office states the U.S. 'will not fund, sponsor, promote, assist, or support the so-called 'transition' of a child from one sex to another, and it will rigorously enforce all laws that prohibit or limit these destructive and life-altering procedures.' In May, Trump's Department of Health and Human Services broke with major medical groups, which have said gender-affirming care for trans youths and adults is medically necessary, in an unsigned report declaring there is a 'lack of robust evidence' to support providing such care to minors. Health Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. has called for providers and medical boards to update treatment protocols to align with the department's report, which recommends greater reliance on psychotherapy over medical interventions. The Department of Justice, the FBI and the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) are also investigating providers of gender-affirming care, and the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) is expected to announce a proposal to bar funding for hospitals or clinics that offer transition care to minors.

Judge allows two additional groups to intervene in Arkansas ballot referendum case
Judge allows two additional groups to intervene in Arkansas ballot referendum case

Yahoo

time30-07-2025

  • Yahoo

Judge allows two additional groups to intervene in Arkansas ballot referendum case

LITTLE ROCK, Ark. – A federal judge on Wednesday permitted to additional groups to intervene in a case intending to strike down changes made to Arkansas ballot referendum laws. Protect AR Rights and For AR Kids will now be able to join in the League of Women Voters of Arkansas vs. Jester case. That complaint challenges a host of recently enacted laws by the Arkansas legislature, making it harder for Arkansans to file ballot referendums. Protect AR Rights ballot title to overturn recent ballot title laws rejected by attorney general a second time The motion to intervene was filed by the American Civil Liberties Union of Arkansas, Elias Law Group LLP, and Shults Law Firm LLP. 'We're pleased that the court has granted our motion to intervene,' ACLU of Arkansas Legal Director John Williams said. 'This decision ensures that the voices of grassroots groups actively engaged in the ballot initiative process will be fully represented in this case.' Williams added: 'Our clients are already feeling the impact of these unconstitutional laws, and now they'll have the opportunity to stand up in court and defend the First Amendment rights of all Arkansans who seek political change through direct democracy.' Previously, Protect AR Rights had filed to place a question on the Arkansas general election ballot to overturn the new laws. It had been rejected twice by the attorney general's office due to the proposed ballot title being above an eighth-grade reading level, as required by one of the laws passed by the 95th General Assembly. Appeals court reinstates Arkansas ban on teaching Critical Race Theory Protect AR Rights is made up of a coalition of Arkansas Appleseed, Arkansas Citizens First Congress, Arkansas Public Policy Panel, For AR People, the Arkansas State Conference of the NAACP and the Arkansas Education Association. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store