China's Baidu to deploy robotaxis on rideshare app Lyft
Chinese internet giant Baidu plans to launch its robotaxis on rideshare app Lyft in Germany and Britain in 2026, pending regulatory approval, the two companies said on Monday.
Last month, Baidu announced a similar agreement with Uber in Asia and the Middle East as it seeks to take pole position in the competitive autonomous driving field both at home and abroad.
Lyft and Baidu said Monday that "in the following years" the fleet of Apollo Go driverless cars will be expanded to thousands of vehicles across Europe.
They did not specify which other countries the cars would be deployed in, and it was not clear how long it might take to gain regulatory approval for the initial deployment.
Driverless taxis are already on some roads with limited capacity in the United States and China, most notably in the central city of Wuhan, where a fleet of over 500 can be hailed by app in designated areas.
Their reach is spreading, with Shanghai's financial district Pudong recently announcing a batch of permits for multiple companies to operate robotaxis.
China's tech companies and automakers have poured billions of dollars into self-driving technology in recent years, with intelligent driving the new battleground in the country's cutthroat domestic car market.
Baidu is not alone among Chinese companies in searching to expand its foothold abroad.
Its rival WeRide is also active in the Gulf region, and in January announced it had been picked to lead a small pilot project in Switzerland.
Pony.AI, another Chinese company, said in May that it had signed a deal to launch its self-driving taxis on Uber in "a key market in the Middle East later this year".
San Francisco-based Lyft in April said it had agreed to buy German taxi app Freenow, planting a flag in the European market.
The acquisition marked Lyft's "most significant expansion outside North America", the group said.
© 2025 AFP
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Diplomat
a few seconds ago
- The Diplomat
China-EU Relations in China-US Strategic Competition
From left to right: António Costa (president of the European Council), Xi Jinping (president of the People's Republic of China), and Ursula von der Leyen (president of the European Commission) at the China-EU Summit in Beijing, July 24, 2025. The Diplomat author Mercy Kuo regularly engages subject-matter experts, policy practitioners, and strategic thinkers across the globe for their diverse insights into U.S. Asia policy. This conversation with Prof. Reuben Wong, deputy head and associate professor in the Department of Political Science, National University of Singapore, is the 473rd in 'The Trans-Pacific View Insight Series.' Identify the top three outcomes of the recent China-EU Summit and their strategic relevance for China-EU relations. Taking place on July 24 to mark the 50th anniversary of the establishment of trade ties between the EU and China, and one week before the August 1 deadline to negotiate deals with the U.S. or face higher tariffs, many observers were anticipating a breakthrough or some reset in the deteriorating relations between the EU and China. After all, China and the EU were the biggest targets of Trump's tariff war, and both were determined to keep access to each other's markets open. The EU and China sought to minimize their recent public differences (over electric vehicles, the EU's view that China was supporting Russia in the war in Ukraine, etc.), to portray themselves as responsible powers who would uphold global free trade and cooperation. The Chinese media's coverage noted that both China and the EU faced common challenges from U.S. protectionism, especially in sectors like electric vehicles, and had reason to work together to uphold global trade openness. The China Chamber of Commerce to the EU emphasized that economic ties should not be hijacked by geopolitics but serve as a stabilizer for global trade. The Western media was more skeptical, noting that the summit was cut from two days to one, was moved from Brussels to Beijing, and almost did not happen at all. For a 50th anniversary summit, I would agree that the summit could not boast of any major achievements. Beijing had no incentive to be conciliatory; the EU's leverage – under pressure from the U.S. ahead of [European Commission President] von der Leyen's meeting with Trump just a few days later – was weakened in its trade talks with China, and it failed to push China on its trade with Russia. But there were important outcomes nonetheless. Both sides reiterated their commitment to the Paris Agreement and pledged deeper cooperation on green technologies and climate finance. This positions China and the EU as global leaders in climate governance, counterbalancing U.S. retrenchment in many multilateral fora. China appeared to ease pressure on the EU before the summit with a surge in exports of Chinese rare earth magnets to the EU in May. They also discussed an 'upgraded supply chain mechanism' to help secure stable, long-term supplies to the EU. But while the EU is actively pressing China's Ministry of Commerce to issue export licenses, Beijing may be using this tool as a source of leverage to push back against EU export controls affecting Chinese firms. There were also signs (but no agreement) that China was taking EU complaints of Chinese overcapacity seriously. Explain how Beijing is capitalizing on U.S. tariff threats toward the European Union. Beijing is leveraging U.S. tariff threats in two strategic ways: positioning itself as a reliable trade partner and encouraging EU strategic autonomy. First, China is offering tariff-free access and investment incentives to European firms, especially in automotive and green tech sectors. Second, by highlighting U.S. unilateralism, Beijing reinforces narratives that the EU should pursue independent trade policies. This approach aims to fragment transatlantic unity and deepen China-EU economic ties. Evaluate Brussels's efforts to optimize the EU's negotiating position amid China-U.S. strategic competition. Brussels is adopting a multi-pronged strategy involving a strategic autonomy doctrine, the diversification of trade partnership, and normative power projection. First, the EU is promoting policies that reduce dependence on both China and the U.S., especially in critical sectors like semiconductors and rare earths. It is also strengthening ties with ASEAN, India, and Latin America to reduce vulnerability to great power pressures. Finally, Brussels is using regulatory tools (e.g., Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, Digital Markets Act) to shape global standards and assert EU influence. This strategy enhances the EU's leverage by positioning it as a balancing force rather, than an actor subordinate to U.S. or Chinese interests. Analyze von der Leyen's attempts to forge closer economic and trade cooperation between the EU and the Comprehensive Progressive Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) countries to advance rules-based free trade. President von der Leyen has pursued several initiatives. The EU has initiated exploratory talks on CPTPP accession – informal dialogues with CPTPP members to assess compatibility with EU standards. The EU is also accelerating bilateral agreements with CPTPP member states Australia, New Zealand, and Chile to build momentum toward broader engagement. It is also advocating for rules-based trade, promoting WTO-compatible frameworks and digital trade norms in CPTPP forums. These efforts aim to counterbalance China's influence in the Indo-Pacific and reinforce the EU's commitment to open, rules-based trade. Assess salient threats to the durability of transatlantic relations vis-à-vis China-U.S. great power competition. Key threats include diverging economic interests, technology decoupling, and geopolitical risk perception gaps. EU firms face collateral damage from U.S. tariffs and export controls targeting China, leading to friction over trade policy. U.S. demands for alignment on tech restrictions (e.g., Huawei, AI chips) strain EU autonomy. Finally, the EU views China as a 'partner, competitor, and systemic rival,' while the U.S. increasingly sees China as a strategic adversary. The EU is also viewing its geopolitical friendships through the prism of external powers' (whether the U.S. or China) support or sanction of the Russian government over Ukraine. Trump's scorn for NATO in his first term, and his attempts in the early months of his second to reach a quick end to the Russia-Ukraine war over Ukrainian and broader EU interests, alienated many European capitals. Tensions between the EU, U.S. and China risk undermining coordinated transatlantic responses to the war in Ukraine, or any negotiated settlement involving Chinese auspices.
Yomiuri Shimbun
31 minutes ago
- Yomiuri Shimbun
Hamamatsu Eager to Attract Highly Skilled Workers from India; Backed by Yamaha Corp., City Organizes Culture and Music Exchange Programs
HAMAMATSU — The municipal government of Hamamatsu is making a concerted effort to attract human resources with high skills and expert knowledge from overseas for the purpose of implementing technological innovation at companies and securing a capable workforce for them. The city of Hamamatsu, where numerous manufacturing companies are concentrated, is particularly interested in attracting people from India, who are often well-versed in the field of information technology. Therefore, the city is actively organizing exchange programs related to that country. ''Namaste' means 'hello' in India,' said Binay Kumar, 54, who runs a curry restaurant in Hamamatsu, as he stood in front of about 60 fifth graders at an elementary school in the city. This was part of an exchange program to teach students about Indian culture and music, held at the school on June 6. The children then learned about India in fun ways, such as trying to answer quiz questions about the Taj Mahal, a famous World Heritage site in India. The program was jointly organized by the city and musical instruments manufacturer Yamaha Corp. The Hamamatsu-based company is keen on promoting the spread of music education in India and other countries. The program will consist of seven sessions, lasting until January next year. For the final session, there is a plan to hold a joint music exchange event with an elementary school in India by remotely connecting both schools over the internet. 'If we are to attract skilled people from India, it is necessary to support their daily lives, too,' said an official of the municipal government's industry promotion division when asked about the significance of the program. 'For that purpose, it's important for the residents who will receive them to have opportunities to deepen their understanding of Indian culture, starting in childhood.' In light of these circumstances, the city is making plans for active economic exchanges with India. It has allocated about \100 million in the initial budget for its general account for fiscal 2025 to cover expenses associated with enhancing coordination between Indian government organizations and local companies in Hamamatsu. Furthermore, the municipal government is planning to open an international school for multinational students in fiscal 2027 at the earliest, since many high-skilled workers are hoping to bring their families with them when they come to Japan. 'Amid a declining population, local economies are subject to restrictions due to shortage of skilled workers,' Hamamatsu Mayor Yusuke Nakano said regarding acceptance of high-skilled foreign workers. 'Having highly skilled workers come to Japan from all over the world is a vital method of addressing this problem. An increasing number of such people are bringing their families when they start living in Japan, so I'd like to prepare a comfortable environment for them.' Yasutaka Saeki, an associate professor of the Hamamatsu-based Shizuoka University of Arts and Culture's department of intercultural studies who is well-versed in issues regarding non-Japanese workers, said, 'If [a municipality] can attract highly skilled foreign workers who come to live and work there with their families, then their children who grow up there could go on to contribute to the development of the town in the future. 'So even from the viewpoint of sustained development, it is important for companies and municipalities to work together to create a receptive environment for foreign workers,' he said.
The Diplomat
35 minutes ago
- The Diplomat
China's Diplomatic Campaign Following Trump's Tariffs
In April, U.S. President Donald Trump announced his so-called 'Liberation Day,' a set of double-digit tariff hikes on essentially every country in the world. While the original announcement put China squarely in the middle of the pack, when Beijing responded with tariffs of its own Trump made China his primary target. The Trump administration hiked the tariffs on Chinese goods to 74 percent, followed by an additional 50 percent tariff in response to China's retaliation. After negotiations in early May, both sides agreed to reduce tariffs on May 14. However, since the announcement of this preliminary agreement, there has been no further progress in the negotiations, despite two more rounds of talks in June and July. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent commented that the bilateral talks had become 'a bit stalled.' In June, Trump accused China of violating the trade agreement and threatened further action. Shortly after, however, Trump called China's Xi Jinping and claimed to have had a 'very good talk.' He also spoke of plans to visit China and meet with Xi in person. In contrast to Trump's unpredictable nature, China adopted a firm and uncompromising stance. Following the announcement of Trump's tariffs, the Chinese leadership refused to back down. On April 5, the Chinese government issued an official statement outlining its position. In the statement, China accused the United States of acting like a bully and infringing on China's economic interests. It also portrayed itself as a defender of the international trade system, with the WTO at its core, and criticized the U.S. for pursuing hegemony and unilateralism at the expense of others. China asserted that 'the world needs justice, not hegemony,' and declared that 'most countries believing in justice will choose the historically correct side.' The statement further emphasized that 'Chinese people… do not cause problems, but are not afraid of problems,' signaling the government's resolve to fight back. China's decision to confront the United States is driven not only by strategic considerations but also by nationalism. It represents a moment that Chinese elites – dating back to the late Qing dynasty – have long awaited: the opportunity to push back against the world's strongest power and assert a dominant position. Despite uncertainty about China's economic future, the public reacted positively to the government's unyielding stance. Following Trump's global tariff announcement, China launched a diplomatic campaign to rally international support for its position. In meetings with foreign counterparts, Chinese officials conveyed two key messages. First, China positioned itself as a global leader, openly criticizing the Trump tariffs as examples of U.S. 'unilateralism, protectionism, and hegemony.' It emphasized the harmful effects of these actions on the international free trade system and the global economy. In this context, China framed its firm stance as a defense of 'WTO-centered multilateral trade, the global supply chain, and international justice.' Second, by reaffirming its commitment to global trade, Beijing sought to present itself as a viable economic partner and alternative to the United States. Amid an economic slowdown, China hoped that expanding business opportunities with other international partners would help offset the negative export impact of Trump's tariffs. China tailors its messaging to different international audiences. Toward Europe, it presents itself as a defender of the existing international political and economic order. For years, China has sought to weaken the transatlantic alliance by encouraging Europe to pursue greater 'strategic autonomy.' Beijing views Trump's unpredictability as an opportunity to deepen European skepticism toward the United States. For example, during an event in Beijing marking the 50th anniversary of China-EU diplomatic relations, Vice President Han Zheng stated that China and Europe should 'defend multilateralism, the international system centered on the UN and international law, and the multilateral trade system centered on the WTO.' Similarly, during a phone call with his German counterpart, Foreign Minister Wang Yi declared that China and Germany should 'jointly promote free trade and oppose protectionism and unilateralism.' Beijing hopes that U.S. unpredictability will drive European countries closer to China, providing it with additional leverage in ongoing trade negotiations. For instance, China used the tariff dispute as an opportunity to call for deeper economic cooperation during its negotiations with Germany and subsequently pressured Berlin to address the issue of tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles. China crafts a different message for the developing world. While continuing to criticize the United States for its 'unilateralist' and 'hegemonic' policies, China also expresses a stronger commitment to reforming the international system. Restructuring global governance has become a central priority in Xi Jinping's foreign policy agenda. The overarching goal is to reshape the international order in a way that resembles the traditional Sino-centric model, in which China occupies a dominant and influential position. While Western countries have largely resisted Beijing's initiatives, China seeks to build broader support among developing nations. Beijing positions itself as the leader of the Global South, claiming that its development will help empower other developing countries to defend their interests on the world stage. Following the China-Latin America Forum, for example, Beijing issued a statement calling for reform of the United Nations Security Council to include greater representation from Latin America and other regions in the developing world. China also pledged its support for a Latin American candidate for U.N. secretary-general. In addition, it promised to push for reforms in the international financial system to better reflect the needs and priorities of developing countries. China's diplomatic campaign to advance Xi's Sino-centric global vision faces several challenges. The first is the contradiction between China's desire to present itself as a reliable economic partner and the perception that it poses an economic threat to many countries. Xi seeks to convert China's economic strength into international institutional influence by expanding its role in global rule-making. Although China claims to share the benefits of its economic rise, its support for globalization is conditional – primarily pursued when it serves China's interests. As a result, China's economic expansion is often perceived as coming at the expense of host countries. For example, China has become a major competitor in several of Europe's key industrial sectors, including electric vehicles (EVs), machinery, and wind power. As a result, the Chinese market has become significantly less important to the European Union, as domestic Chinese products have increasingly displaced European goods within China. At the same time, European companies now face growing competition from Chinese firms within their own markets. The most prominent example is the automobile industry: leading European carmakers fear that an influx of Chinese EVs could overwhelm the European market and threaten the survival of local manufacturers. In response, the EU imposed tariffs on Chinese EVs to protect one of its most vital manufacturing sectors. While China has sought to use Trump-era tariffs as leverage to secure concessions from Europe on EV tariffs, the EU has shown little willingness to back down. This highlights a fundamental divergence between China and the EU on trade policy and industrial competitiveness. Southeast Asia occupies a central place in China's strategic calculus. Immediately following Trump's tariff announcement, Xi visited several Southeast Asian countries, and Premier Li Qiang also traveled to the region in May to meet with local leaders. While both China and Southeast Asian nations pledged to deepen economic ties in response to U.S. trade pressure, the trade relationship is not without its tensions. The influx of Chinese goods threatens to crowd out Southeast Asian firms in their own domestic markets. Although China's promises of increased investment bring economic opportunities, the expansion of Chinese factories – often accompanied by imported Chinese labor – has raised concerns about local unemployment and even the potential for ethnic tensions. Furthermore, many Chinese companies are investing in Southeast Asia as a strategy to circumvent U.S. tariffs and restrictions, including those on the U.S. Entity List. This practice risks placing Southeast Asian countries in a difficult position between the United States and China, increasing their exposure to potential American trade penalties. China's diplomatic campaign also fails to address the pressing security concerns of its audiences. While Beijing might hope to solely focus on economic cooperation, many countries view national security challenges from China as too significant to set aside. Hence, they often examine Beijing's offer with caution. For instance, China's joint declarations with Southeast Asian countries offer little substance on the South China Sea dispute – an issue central to the security interests of many regional states. The security gap is perhaps even more pronounced in China-Europe relations. Beijing's continued support for Russia underscores that Europe's most urgent security challenge is not shared by China. This year marks the 50th anniversary of China-EU diplomatic relations. The EU invited Xi to visit Brussels to commemorate the occasion. However, Xi declined the invitation and instead traveled to Moscow to attend a military parade, where he reaffirmed China's close ties with Russia. For European leaders, this move was seen as a diplomatic snub. From the EU's perspective, China is signaling that it does not view Europe as a priority partner and instead aligns itself with Russia – Europe's most serious security threat. In doing so, Beijing risks positioning itself as a growing security concern for Europe. Beijing seeks to capitalize on the Trump administration's unpredictability to showcase its own leadership, which is central to Xi's vision of placing China at the center of an alternative world order. In the view of Chinese leaders, a volatile and unreliable United States could push more countries to align with China. However, the reality is far more complex. While Trump's foreign policy may have eroded international trust in the U.S., this does not necessarily translate into recognition of China's leadership.
