US, China Trade Row Could Ease After Trump-Xi Talks: Treasury Chief
US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday that President Donald Trump could speak with China's Xi Jinping "very soon," and that such a call could help break the logjam in the trade talks between the world's two biggest economies.
Trump on Friday accused Beijing of violating a deal reached last month in Geneva -- negotiated by Bessent -- to temporarily lower staggeringly high tariffs they had imposed on each other, in a pause to last 90 days.
China's slow-walking on export license approvals for rare earths and other elements needed to make cars and chips have fueled US frustration, The Wall Street Journal reported Friday -- a concern since confirmed by US officials.
But Bessent seemed to take the pressure down a notch, telling CBS's "Face the Nation" that the gaps could be bridged.
"I'm confident that when President Trump and Party Chairman Xi have a call that this will be ironed out," Bessent said, however noting that China was "withholding some of the products that they agreed to release during our agreement."
When asked if rare earths were one of those products, Bessent said, "Yes."
"Maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system. Maybe it's intentional. We'll see after the president speaks with" Xi, he said.
On when a Trump-Xi call could take place, Bessent said: "I believe we will see something very soon."
Since Trump returned to the presidency, he has slapped sweeping tariffs on most US trading partners, with especially high rates on Chinese imports.
New tit-for-tat levies on both sides reached three digits before the de-escalation this month, where Washington agreed to temporarily reduce additional tariffs on Chinese imports from 145 percent to 30 percent.
China, meanwhile, lowered its added duties from 125 percent to 10 percent.
In an interview with ABC's "This Week," Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said China was "slow-rolling the deal," adding: "We are taking certain actions to show them what it feels like on the other side of that equation."
"Our president understands what to do. He's going to go work it out," Lutnick said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
16 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Japan's Nikkei erases day's gains as caution grows over global trade
TOKYO, - Japan's Nikkei share average dropped in the final minute of trading on Tuesday, extending its losing streak to a third day, as traders turned increasingly nervous about global trade tensions. The Nikkei ended the day 0.06% lower at 37,446.81, with 122 of its 225 components declining, 98 rising and five ending flat. The broader Topix slipped 0.22%. Japan's safe-haven yen provided a headwind after strengthening as far as a one-week high of 142.40 per dollar early on Tuesday. A firmer currency reduces the value of overseas revenues for Japan's exporters. Automakers underperformed, with Suzuki Motor tumbling 4.51% to be the Nikkei's biggest percentage decliner. Honda lost 0.94%. Toyota Motor declined 0.59%, showing little reaction to domestic media reports that Toyota Industries would accept its $42 billion takeover bid. Toyota Industries rose 0.77%. U.S. President Donald Trump's administration wants countries to submit their best offer on trade negotiations by Wednesday, as officials seek to accelerate talks with multiple partners ahead of a self-imposed deadline in just five weeks, Reuters reported. Trump and China's President Xi Jinping will probably speak this week, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Monday, days after Trump accused Beijing of violating an agreement to roll back tariffs and trade restrictions. Despite the simmering uncertainties, a gauge of Nikkei volatility eased to 24.57%, moving into the middle of the narrow range of the past month, following a surge to as high as 62.46% in early April, when Trump unveiled his "Liberation Day" reciprocal tariffs. "With Nikkei 225 VIX returning to pre-spike levels, the market rally driven by fading uncertainty may be ending," Bank of America Securities strategists said in a note. "However, global earnings estimate revisions appear to be bottoming, suggesting the market is unlikely to undergo a sharp decline."
Indian Express
31 minutes ago
- Indian Express
A protracted battle between Trump and the US courts will only worsen trade uncertainty
If it weren't so damaging to the global economy, it would almost be tempting for observers outside the United States to grab their popcorn and watch the drama and chaos unfolding there, maybe with some schadenfreude. Alas, the outcome of the tussle between Donald Trump and the US judiciary has wide-ranging effects for the world. To recap, the US Court of International Trade ruled that President Trump does not have the authority to impose sweeping tariffs using 1970s emergency legislation. This was in response to two separate lawsuits by a coalition of US state governments and small businesses that relied on imported goods. Almost immediately, the Trump administration filed an emergency appeal at the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which issued a temporary stay on the trade court's decision, allowing the tariffs to stay in effect. For now. The next hearing is on June 5. The underlying issue which was taken up by the trade court warrants further deliberation, as it is a deeper question of the functioning of the US constitutional democracy. The court ruled against Trump's tariffs stating that it unlawfully invoked the 1977 International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) to declare a national emergency and impose tariffs on nearly all US trading partners. The three-judge panel concluded that this Act is meant for urgent national security issues and that long-standing trade issues do not qualify as one. To do it lawfully, these tariffs would have had to be passed after approval by the US Congress, which would be prone to long discussions and scrutiny, which Trump seeks to avoid. This skirmish and the ensuing long-drawn battle of political manoeuvrings is a scathing indictment of the political and judicial system in the US. That the judiciary is subject to political takeover and can be openly criticised and even threatened in public by the President surely does not bode well for the process of checks and balances and having independent, but equal, branches of government. The executive has steamrolled both the legislature and judiciary in this episode. The strategy of this administration seems to be to flood the system with brazen extra-constitutional and unconstitutional executive orders, which will take time to be legally challenged and withdrawn. Across the country, in separate cases on a broad range of issues, there have been at least 180 judicial rulings that the White House has exceeded its constitutional authority or violated Congressional statutes, which has drawn public criticism by the administration. Many more have passed through. Back to trade, Trump is determined to win this battle one way or another. The White House has stated that if these rulings don't go in its favour, they are prepared to take the matter to the Supreme Court. Even if the Supreme Court rules against the administration, they have many other options at their disposal to disrupt trade through tariffs. Peter Navarro, Trump's chief trade advisor has said, 'So you can assume that even if we lose, we will do it another way;' and has already lined up several legal alternatives. For starters, the current trade court ruling does not affect the tariffs on cars, auto parts, steel and aluminium, which were imposed using Section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act (1962), which allows for trade barriers based on national security concerns. That can be revoked again, as everything can be argued to be a national security concern. Further, they could invoke Section 301 of the US Trade Act of 1974 that allows for tariffs to protect against unfair trade practices by other countries, which was used to impose tariffs on China in the first term. A separate trade law from the 1930s allows the President to impose tariffs up to 50 per cent on imports from countries that 'discriminate' against the US. Thus, there's no shortage of options for Trump. The full range of tariffs on countries are now paused and due to resume sometime in July. While all of this domestic drama plays out, most countries, including India, might adopt a wait-and-watch approach before going out of the way to make concessions in a trade deal with the US. In cabinet meetings across countries, discussions will be raging on whether the US has less leverage now and if it would make sense to slow down on trade negotiations a bit. While the legal seesaw might not derail negotiations, it might shift positions on the negotiating table by a bit, given that the legitimacy of the tariffs is questioned by US courts. A protracted battle will only worsen uncertainty surrounding trade. Trade policy uncertainty, as captured by an index built by 'policy uncertainty' is at the highest level since the 1980s. To give you an idea of the extent, the uncertainty score under normal circumstances in 2017 was around 80, which rose to a peak of 1400 during Covid times. Under Trump's second term, it has reached 3300. All of this uncertainty severely dampens business sentiment. According to one study, trade policy uncertainty reduced investment in the US by about 1.5 per cent in 2018 (first trade war). Another study says that the uncertainty, by itself, is equivalent to a tariff rate of between 1.7 per cent and 8.7 per cent. The effect of uncertainty on other countries can be significant as well. India's trade and investment will take a beating due to this. Businesses relying on trade will be caught in a limbo, severely hampering decision making. Fresh investments will be stalled due to the uncertainty. Though Apple has decided to brave the storm and committed to an expansion of production in India, other companies might be waiting for greater clarity before investing, which might take years. The best way out of this for India remains for it to have a trade deal with its major trading partners. In this regard, the Australia FTA and the recently concluded FTA with the UK is excellent news. Though much more difficult now with a flaky regime, a trade deal with the US can overcome much of this uncertainty. Anupam Manur is a Professor of Economics at the Takshashila Institution, an independent think tank and school of public policy
New Indian Express
34 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Adani shares slide sharply amid reports of US probe; group denies wrongdoing
CHENNAI: Shares of Adani Group companies experienced a notable decline on Tuesday (June 3) amid reports that US prosecutors are investigating whether the conglomerate imported Iranian liquefied petroleum gas (LPG) into India through its Mundra port in Gujarat. The Wall Street Journal's report yesterday suggested that some LPG tankers associated with Adani entities may have employed tactics such as AIS spoofing to conceal their origins, potentially violating US sanctions. AIS spoofing involves the deliberate manipulation of automatic identification system (AIS) data to deceive maritime vessels, or monitoring systems. In response, the Adani Group issued a statement labeling the allegations as "baseless and mischievous," asserting that none of its ports process Iranian cargo and denying any knowledge of an ongoing US investigation. Despite the group's denials, investor sentiment was affected, leading to declines in the stock prices of several Adani Group companies. Adani Enterprises fell by 2.2 percent, while Adani Ports dropped 2.5 percent. Other entities, including Adani Total Gas, Adani Power, Adani Green, and Adani Energy Solutions, saw declines ranging from 1 percent to 2 percent. The benchmark Nifty 50 index also experienced a slight dip of 0.4 percent. This development adds to the challenges faced by the Adani Group, which has previously been under scrutiny following allegations of bribery and fraud related to solar energy contracts. The group's international securities have also been impacted, with dollar-denominated bonds experiencing sharp declines. As the investigation progresses, market participants will be closely monitoring any further developments that could influence the Adani Group's financial standing and reputation.
