Meet Sophie Chandauka, who's at the centre of Prince Harry's ‘charity meltdown': she accused others at Sentebale of ‘bullying', had an awkward encounter with Meghan Markle, and once worked for Meta
The Duke of Sussex, 40, launched the organisation with co-founder
Prince Seeiso of Lesotho two decades ago to help people in Africa living with HIV and Aids.
Prince Harry stands beside Dr Sophie Chandauka MBE (in red) at a Sentebale reception and panel discussion at The Saxon Hotel in Johannesburg, South Africa, last October.
Advertisement
Along with Harry, Prince Seeiso and the board of trustees are also leaving their post at the charity. 'Although we may no longer be patrons, we will always be its founders, and we will never forget what this charity is capable of achieving when it is in the right care,' they wrote in a joint statement, per CNN.
Sophie Chandauka has refused to step down from Prince Harry's charity Sentebale. Photo: Indigo/Getty Images
Sentebale's chair, Sophie Chandauka, is said to be at the centre of the debacle, after refusing to step down from her role, notes The Standard. She has since accused others at the charity of '
bullying , harassment, misogyny, misogynoir' (sexism against Black women) and was not afraid to show her apparent disdain towards King Charles' son. 'There are people in this world who behave as though they are above the law and mistreat people, and then play the victim card and use the very press they disdain to harm people who have the courage to challenge their conduct,' she said in a statement.
Here's what we know about Sophie Chandauka amid the news.
Dr Sophie Chandauka is from Zimbabwe
Corporate Finance Lawyer and entrepreneur Sophie Chandauka has an MBE. Photo: Dr Tinashe Chandauka/LinkedIn
Chandauka was born in Zimbabwe in 1978. Her parents were both teachers and she looks up to both of them, she told The New Statesman in 2023. 'To pay for my unbelievably expensive private-school education, they improvised,' she said. 'My father toiled with metalwork in his garage, creating children's playground equipment to sell to nursery schools, and my mother wrote children's books.'
She added that her 'adult hero' is her grandmother, Eileen Charumbira. 'She was a housemaid in colonial Rhodesia who worked hard to ensure that her daughters all received an excellent education,' she noted.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
HKFP
22-07-2025
- HKFP
Ex-employee sues HSBC in Hong Kong over alleged racial discrimination after annual bonus cut, early redundancy
A former analyst at HSBC in Hong Kong has sued the bank over alleged racial discrimination, saying his Black heritage was the reason for 'differential treatment,' including a reduced annual bonus and early redundancy. Robert Ngugi Tomkinson filed a claim under the Race Discrimination Ordinance at the District Court on Friday. The former HSBC Global Services (Hong Kong) senior business analyst alleged that he was subject to 'sustained and differential treatment' starting in April last year, when he was assigned a new manager. According to the claim, Tomkinson had good performance in the company since joining in 2019 and achieved a 'top performer' designation for one year. But under his new manager, he was excluded from meetings and had his annual bonus reduced by 35 per cent, 'allegedly due to an 'off-track' performance rating.' The former analyst made a formal internal complaint in September, accusing the manager of racism. The company's investigation, which ended in February, partially upheld the complaint, concluding that the manager had acted inappropriately. However, it did not make findings of racial discrimination. The company's chief technology officer disputed the annual bonus reduction based on the performance rating, but there was no 'post-investigation correction,' according to the writ, adding that the review process was 'tainted by bias.' Tomkinson – the only Black employee in his peer group – was then made redundant two days after the investigation's conclusion, a timing that suggests a 'retaliatory motive,' according to the claim. Meanwhile, his peers with the same title and rank were retained, and those made redundant consisted primarily of contractors. His last working day at HSBC was May 12, three months after he was made redundant. 'Prejudicial decision-making' The company told Tomkinson the redundancy was because he had transferred to the procurement team, an explanation that was 'factually incorrect.' His peers who were made redundant in a second wave of redundancies in June this year were offered redeployment to other projects, while Tomkinson was not. 'This inconsistent application of selection and redeployment opportunities further raises concerns of differential and prejudicial treatment,' the writ read. Despite requests for transparency, the company did not disclose any objective redundancy selection procedures or scoring criteria, Tomkinson alleged. 'The absence of such safeguards raises concern over arbitrary or prejudicial decision-making,' the writ read. It added that Tomkinson suffered reputational damage within his professional network, emotional distress, and financial harm due to the bonus reduction and income loss. The claimant is seeking a declaration from the court that HSBC Global Services (Hong Kong) engaged in conduct unlawful under the Race Discrimination Ordinance, as well as an unspecified amount of damages. The case's first hearing will take place on October 8, according to the Judiciary's court diary.
AllAfrica
21-07-2025
- AllAfrica
US Navy's next-gen destroyer looking like a money pit
The US Navy's next-gen DDG(X) destroyer is designed to outgun China's rising fleet, but soaring costs, shaky tech and shipyard bottlenecks threaten to derail the program before it leaves the drawing board. This month, the US Congressional Research Service (CRS) released a report stating that while the US Navy seeks to procure the first DDG(X) in the early 2030s and has requested US$133.5 million for research and development in FY2026, the US Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates each ship will cost $4.4 billion—33% more than the US Navy's $3.3 billion projection. The DDG(X) is intended to replace the Arleigh Burke-class destroyers and Ticonderoga-class cruisers with enhanced power systems, increased payload capacity and the ability to field directed-energy weapons. However, a June 2025 Government Accountability Office (GAO) report highlighted that critical technologies—including the Integrated Power System (IPS) and hull form—remain immature and may not be fully tested before the ship enters detailed design. That's raising red flags about cost and schedule—further compounded by August 2024 updates to operational requirements made to accommodate faster speeds and higher electrical loads, with no updated timelines or cost estimates provided. Lawmakers must weigh whether DDG(X)'s ambitious design justifies its cost and whether the US Navy is doing enough to manage risks as it transitions from existing destroyer programs. The DDG(X) program embodies the US Navy's effort to field a technologically advanced destroyer capable of countering China's growing surface fleet, but it faces significant technology maturity challenges and industrial constraints that threaten to delay deployment. In terms of tactical capability, Missile Threat notes that the AN/SPY-6 active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar slated to be installed on the new class is 30 times more powerful than the current AN/SPY-1 and can track over 30 times the targets, enabling simultaneous ballistic missile defense, air defense and surface warfare. Defense Daily reported in January 2022 that the DDG(X)'s baseline combat suite includes two 21-cell Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM) launchers and 32 MK 41 vertical launch system (VLS) cells, with potential upgrades including two 600-kilowatt lasers, a third 150-kilowatt laser, and 12 Large Missile Launcher cells for hypersonic weapons. James Black mentions in a January 2024 RAND article that such weapons aboard ships offer precision strike capabilities at the speed of light, reduced engagement costs and deep magazine capacity—traits invaluable for countering fast-moving aerial threats, drones and missiles. Black notes that a 10-second laser shot may cost only $13, massively undercutting missile interceptor prices. He adds that lasers reduce logistical strain, can quickly retarget and offer deep magazines, but suffer from weather limits, require stable platforms and strain power systems. Although the GAO notes that IPS technology is still in development, nuclear propulsion for cruisers and destroyers could be feasible, as the US Navy previously operated such ships during the Cold War. However, renewed great power competition with China and Russia might prompt the US to revisit that idea. Jordan Spector argues in a July 2025 Proceedings article that reviving nuclear propulsion for cruisers and destroyers offers clear advantages in power and endurance. He states that Generation IV reactors are more economical, require less maintenance and eliminate midlife refueling, supporting high-energy weapons like railguns and lasers for sustained combat operations without losing mobility. Spector notes that nuclear vessels are less vulnerable to logistics interdiction, especially as China's capacity to disrupt fuel supply chains grows. However, he highlights challenges such as port access restrictions, limited nuclear-certified shipyards, significant infrastructure costs and historical expense concerns. The operational need for a large surface combatant such as the DDG(X) may be driven in part by the massive growth of China's People's Liberation Army Navy (PLAN), especially in large surface combatants such as the Type 055 cruiser. According to the US Department of Defense's (DoD) 2024 China Military Power Report (CMPR), the PLAN has significantly expanded its fleet of large surface combatants, reflecting a strategic emphasis on blue-water capability. As of 2023, the report states China fielded over 370 ships, including at least eight Renhai-class (Type 055) cruisers, each displacing approximately 13,000 tons and equipped with 112 VLS cells. The report notes this underscores China's push to project power through a technologically sophisticated fleet. Eric Wertheim, writing in March 2023 for Proceedings, says the Type 055 embodies China's ambition to field high-end blue-water combatants with extensive multi-domain capabilities. The writer notes China's Type 055 displaces up to 13,000 tons and is armed with 112 universal VLS cells capable of deploying HHQ-9B long-range surface-to-air missiles, YJ-18 antiship cruise missiles, YJ-21 hypersonic missiles and potentially antisubmarine or land-attack weapons. He adds that the class integrates the Type 346B AESA radar, towed and hull-mounted sonar suites and variable-depth sonar for layered detection, with shipboard sensors enclosed in a stealth-enhancing integrated mast. Additionally, Wertheim states that the Type 055's other armaments include a 130-millimeter main gun, HHQ-10 point-defense launcher, close-in weapons systems (CIWS) and dual maritime helicopters, giving the platform comprehensive strike, defense and intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) reach. Given such developments, Brent Sadler mentions in an April 2023 article for The Heritage Foundation that as tensions with China intensify, the DDG(X) program stands as a strategic imperative for maintaining US naval dominance. Sadler underscores that China's shipbuilding surge, coupled with the US's aging fleet, risks capability gaps without timely DDG(X) deployment. He points out that with only two US shipyards producing large surface combatants, early and predictable investment is crucial. He notes that a funded signal today enables Huntington Ingalls and Bath Iron Works to commit to facility upgrades and workforce expansion, mitigating production delays. He adds that integrating a proven acquisition model like the Virginia-class Integrated Product Team (IPT) ensures yard constraints are addressed during design, improving fabrication efficiency. Sadler warns that delayed action risks ceding US naval initiative in a high-stakes theater such as the Pacific. Whether DDG(X) becomes the US Navy's trump card or a billion-dollar trap will hinge on decisions made before the first keel is even laid.
AllAfrica
15-05-2025
- AllAfrica
US uses ‘poison pills' to isolate China from supply chains
The United States has started pushing for a 'strategic decoupling' from China, mainly in the steel, pharmaceutical, and semiconductor sectors, after the two countries lowered tariffs for each other. A trade deal signed by the US and the United Kingdom on May 8 showed that Washington wants veto power in China's acquisitions of British steel and drug firms. Some Chinese commentators expected the US to include such 'poison pills' in its coming trade deals with other countries. Meanwhile, the US Commerce Department said in three guidelines that companies worldwide should not use Chinese advanced computing chips, allow the training of Chinese AI models with US artificial intelligence chips or re-export American high-end chips to China. In a joint declaration announced Monday, the US and China agreed to a 90-day pause for 'reciprocal' tariffs. The US reduced its tariffs on Chinese goods from 145% to 30%, in addition to an average 20% tariff imposed by the US during the Trump administration's first trade war against China in 2018. In return, China lowered its tariffs on US goods from 125% to 10%. US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Monday that the US does not want a generalized decoupling from China but a strategic decoupling. He said the US will build resilient supply chains for steel, critical medicines, and semiconductors. On March 12, US President Donald Trump imposed a 25% tariff on all imports of aluminium, steel, and derivative goods, hitting the UK's metal industry. The UK exports about £700 million (US$931 million) of steel and aluminium and £2.2 billion of machinery and gym equipment to the US annually. According to the newly signed US-UK 'economic prosperity deal' (EPD), the US will provide forcertain key UK imports modified reciprocal tariff treatment, based on the two countries' 'balanced' trading relationship and shared national security priorities. Any modifications will be consistent with those shared national security priorities, including those identified in future US Section 232 investigations. Here are the key points of the agreement: The US will create a quota of 100,000 vehicles for UK automotive imports at a 10% tariff rate. The US will construct a quota at most favored nation (MFN) rates for UK steel and aluminum and certain derivative steel and aluminum products. The US and the UK intend to negotiate significantly preferential treatment outcomes on pharmaceuticals and ingredients. The US and the UK will negotiate regarding other sectors subject to Section 232 investigations or other tariff measures with a view to a significantly preferential outcome. The UK agreed to work to meet US requirements on the security of the supply chains of steel and aluminum products and drugs intended for export to the US and on the nature of ownership of relevant production facilities. The Telegraph said that under the agreement, the current Labor government in the UK allows the US to veto Chinese investment in the UK's steel and drug sectors. In 2018, the US Commerce Department's Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS) initiated Section 232 investigations into the effects of steel and aluminum imports on US national security. It added the so-called 'poison pill' clause in the US-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA) to limit China's access to the steel and aluminum markets in North America and potentially influence its economic relationship with Canada and Mexico. In March and April 2025, the BIS launched new Section 232 investigations on imports of copper, timber and lumber, semiconductors and chip-making equipment, medicines and their ingredients, trucks, and processed critical minerals and derivative products. 'This type of 'poison pill' clause is actually worse than the tariffs,' Zhang Yansheng, a senior researcher at the China Academy of Macroeconomic Research, told the Financial Times. Zhang said the US-UK trade deal showed Washington's attempt to isolate China by forcing other countries to accept similar terms in trade negotiations. He said China should 'bluntly raise the issue in talks with the UK,' but at this point, it should hold off from immediate retaliation. 'China is seriously concerned about the media reports and has made representations to the UK, asking for clarification,' a spokesperson of the Chinese Embassy in the UK said in a statement on Wednesday. 'Cooperation between countries should not target or harm the interests of any third party. China is firmly opposed to any party seeking a deal at the expense of China's interests.' The Chinese Embassy said it will continue to follow the situation and respond as necessary. A Shandong-based columnist said the UK's getting a tariff-free export quota of 100,000 cars to the US annually is not worth sacrificing the opportunity to collaborate with China in the chip and pharmaceutical sectors. Rescinding the AI diffusion rule On January 15, the Biden administration announced the AI diffusion rule, a new regulatory framework to ensure the responsible diffusion of advanced AI technology. The framework requires US companies, mainly Nvidia and AMD, to apply for export licenses if they ship high-end AI chips to foreign countries other than 18 US allies. Its compliance requirements were set to take effect on May 15. However, the US Commerce Department said Tuesday that the BIS will not enforce the AI diffusion rule. 'These new requirements would have stifled American innovation and saddled companies with burdensome new regulatory requirements,' the department said. 'The AI diffusion rule also would have undermined US diplomatic relations with dozens of countries by downgrading them to second-tier status.' At the same time, the BIS announced three actions to strengthen export controls for overseas AI chips: Alerting the industry to the risks of using PRC advanced computing ICs, including specific Huawei Ascend chips; Warning the public about the potential consequences of allowing US AI chips to be used for training Chinese AI models; and Urging US companies to protect supply chains against diversion tactics (China's tactics to obtain AI chips via third countries). Also on Tuesday, Trump led a group of technology gurus, including Nvidia's Jensen Huang and AMD's Lisa Su, on a visit to the Middle East. Nvidia said it plans to ship 18,000 Blackwell chips to Saudi Arabia. 'Why did the US take action against Huawei's Ascend AI chip?,' a Shaanxi-based columnist asks. 'The Ascend 910C chip is comparable to some of Nvidia's chips. It won't be long before it can compete with Nvidia.' She says Washington's action to suppress the Ascend chip in the global market is meaningless, as the chip now targets mainly domestic customers. She says China will continue to ban the exports of its critical minerals to the US. Chinese media said the performance of the Ascend 910C is equivalent to that of Nvidia's H100 chip. Still, Huawei has a limited production capacity as its contract manufacturer, Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp (SMIC), does not have extreme ultraviolet (EUV) lithography to make high-end chips. Read: US eases trade war, pursues 'strategic decoupling' from China
